1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Scientific Study of Literature
  4. Volume 6, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Previous research suggests that literary reading may involve critical thinking. This involvement may facilitate critical literary understanding (CLU), i.e. understanding the literary text in a reconstructive, de-automatized manner. However, little is known about the cognitive processes this involvement entails. This study aims: (1) to conceptualize CLU, by relating dual process theory to concepts from the domain of literary studies (foregrounding, defamiliarization); (2) to test CLU in an educational context. An instrument to measure CLU was designed. A prospective cohort study was conducted ( = 271, grades 10–12, pre-university education, ages 14–19) at a Dutch secondary school. CLU, critical thinking skills (CTS) and dispositions (CTD) were measured one month after the start of the academic year, CLU was measured again four months later. Results show that students improve in CLU. This improvement is mediated by CTD and moderated by CTS. These results suggest that critical thinking can be engaged in the literature classroom.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.6.2.04koe
2017-03-20
2025-03-23

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ssol.6.2.04koe
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Andringa, E.
    (1995) Strategieën bij het lezen van literatuur. [Strategies in Reading Literary Fiction]. Spiegel. 13(3), 7–32. doi: 10.1075/ttwia.13.07and
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ttwia.13.07and [Google Scholar]
  2. Bean, T. W. & Moni, K.
    (2003) Developing Students’ Critical Literacy: Exploring Identify Construction in Young Adult Fiction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 46(8), 638–648. www.jstor.org/stable/40017169
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Cacioppo, J. T. , & Petty, R. E.
    (1982) The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131. doi: 10.1037//0022‑3514.42.1.116
     https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.42.1.116 [Google Scholar]
  4. Claassen, E.
    (2012) Author Representation in Literary Reading. [Doctoral dissertation]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lal.11
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.11 [Google Scholar]
  5. De Coninck, H.
    (1975) Nog Een Geluk Dat [Still Fortunate That]. In: De Coninck, H. (Aut), Zolang er Sneeuw Ligt [As Long as There is Snow]. Belgium, Brugge: Orion.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Dewey, J.
    (1910) How We Think. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath & Company. doi: 10.1037/10903‑000
     https://doi.org/10.1037/10903-000 [Google Scholar]
  7. Dixon, P. , Bortolussi, M. , Twilley, L. C. , & Leung, A.
    (1993) Literary Processing and Interpretation: Towards Empirical Foundations. Poetics, 22, 5–33. doi: 10.1016/0304‑422x(93)90018‑c
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(93)90018-c [Google Scholar]
  8. Djikic, M. , Oatley, K. & Moldoveanu, M.C.
    (2013) Opening the Closed Mind: The Effect of Exposure to Literature on the Need for Closure. Creativity Research Journal, 25(2). 149–154. doi: 10.1080/10400419.2013.783735
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.783735 [Google Scholar]
  9. Earthman, E.A.
    (1992) Creating the Virtual Work: Readers’ Processes in Understanding Literary Texts. Research in the Teaching of English, 26(4), 351–384.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Elder, L.
    (2015) Amendment Needed for Critical Thinking in Education: On the Importance of Federal Congressional Support for the Advancement of Critical Thinking Throughout United States Education – Elementary Through Secondary and Beyond. Retrieved from: www.criticalthinking.org/data/pages/22/b0d33a4bf74fb254bf4e7728b90e66cc559d7315c4dfa.pdf]
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Ennis, R. H.
    (1993) Critical Thinking Assessment. Theory into Practice, 32 (3), 179–186. doi: 10.1080/00405849309543594
     https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543594 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2011) The Nature of Critical Thinking: An Outline of Critical Thinking Dispositions and Abilities. Retrieved from: faculty.education.illinois.edu/rhennis/documents/TheNatureofCriticalThinking_51711_000.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Ennis, R. H. , Millman, J. , & Tomko, T. N.
    (2005) Cornell Critical Thinking Tests Level X & Level Z Manual: Fifth Edition. North Bend, OR: The Critical Thinking Co.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Evans, J. St. B. T. , Stanovich, K. E.
    (2013) Dual-Process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. doi: 10.1177/1745691612460685
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685 [Google Scholar]
  15. Eysenck, H. J.
    (1954) The Psychology of Politics. New York, NJ: Praeger. doi: 10.1017/s000305540023027x
     https://doi.org/10.1017/s000305540023027x [Google Scholar]
  16. Facione, P.A.
    (1990) Critical Thinking: A statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Milbrae (CA): The California Academic Press. Retrieved from: https://assessment.trinity.duke.edu/documents/Delphi_Report.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Facione, P. A.
    (2015) Critical Thinking: What it is and Why it Counts. Retrieved from: go.roguecc.edu/sites/go.roguecc.edu/files/dept/nursing/PDF/Nursing/Critical%20Thinking-What%20it%20is%20and%20Why%20it%20Counts--to%20be%20linked%20to%20HSRT%20info.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Faust, M.
    (2000) Reconstructing Familiar Metaphors: John Dewey and Louise Rosenblatt on Literary Art as Experience. Research in the Teaching of English, 35(1), 9–34.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Fialho, O.
    (2007) Foregrounding and Refamiliarization: Understanding Readers’ Response to Literary Texts. Language and Literature, 16(2), 105–123. doi: 10.1177/0963947007075979
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007075979 [Google Scholar]
  20. Fialho, O. , Miall, D. , & Zyngier, S.
    (2011) Interpretation and Experience: Two Pedagogical Interventions Observed. English in Education, 45(3), 236–253. doi: 10.1111/j.1754‑8845.2011.01103.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-8845.2011.01103.x [Google Scholar]
  21. Frederick, S.
    (2005) Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. doi: 10.1257/089533005775196732
     https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732 [Google Scholar]
  22. Frost, R.
    (1920) The Road Not Taken. In: R. Frost (Aut), Mountain Interval. New York, NJ: Henry Holt and Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Haft, S. , Junger Witt, P. , Thomas, T. (producers ), & Weir, P. (director
    ) (1989) Dead Poets Society [Motion Picture]. USA: Touchstone Pictures.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Hakemulder, F.
    (2000) The Moral Laboratory: Experiments Examining the Effects of Reading Literature on Social Perception and Moral Self-knowledge. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/upal.34
     https://doi.org/10.1075/upal.34 [Google Scholar]
  25. (2004) Foregrounding and Its Effect on Readers’ Perception. Discourse Processes, 38 (2), 193–2018. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp3802_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3802_3 [Google Scholar]
  26. Hakemulder, F. & Van Peer, W.
    (2015) Empirical Stylistics. In Sotirova, V. The Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics. London: Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. doi: 10.5040/9781472593603.0016
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472593603.0016 [Google Scholar]
  27. Halpern, D. F.
    (1997) Critical Thinking Across the Curriculum: A Brief Edition of Thought and Knowledge. Mahwah, NK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. doi: 10.4324/9781315805719
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315805719 [Google Scholar]
  28. Hayes, A. F.
    (2013) Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York, NJ: Guilford Press. doi: 10.1111/jedm.12050
     https://doi.org/10.1111/jedm.12050 [Google Scholar]
  29. Heijltjes, A.
    (2013) Cultivating Critical Thinking: The Effects of Instructions on Economics Students’ Reasoning. [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from: repub.eur.nl/pub/50418/
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Hoorn, J.F.
    (1997) Metaphor and the Brain: Behavioral and Psychophysiological Research into Literary Metaphor Processing. [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from: dspace.ubvu.vu.nl/bitstream/handle/1871/13048/7392.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Hoorntje, R. & Doesborgh, D.
    (2012, February14). Het Nut van een Gebroken Hart [The Benefit of a Broken Heart]. NRC. Retrieved from: www.nrc.nl/next/2012/02/14/het-nut-van-een-gebroken-hart-12165689
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Iser, W.
    (1978) The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. doi: 10.3366/olr.1980.010
     https://doi.org/10.3366/olr.1980.010 [Google Scholar]
  33. Jacobs, A. M.
    (2015) Neurocognitive Poetics: Methods and Models for Investigating the Neuronal and Cognitive-Affective Bases of Literature Reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9(186). doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186 [Google Scholar]
  34. Janssen, T.
    (1998) Literatuuronderwijs bij Benadering: Een Empirisch Onderzoek naar de Vormgeving en Opbrengsten van het Literatuuronderwijs Nederlands in de Bovenbouw van het Havo en Vwo. [Approaches to Literature Education: An Empirical Research into the Design and Outputs of Dutch Literary Education in Upper Higher General and Pre-University Education]. [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved from: hdl.handle.net/11245/1.143656
     [Google Scholar]
  35. (2000) “Iets van Herkenning en Opluchting”. Een Onderzoek naar Leereffecten van Literatuuronderwijs. [“Some Kind of Recognition and Relief”. A Study into the Learning Outcomes of Literature Education.] In S. Stawski , et. al. (Eds.), Docentengids Voortgezet Onderwijs [Teacher Guide Higher Education]. Houten: Bohn, Stafleu, Van Loghum.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Janssen, T. , Braaksma, M. , Rijlaarsdam, G. & Van den Bergh, H.
    (2012) Flexibility in Reading Literature: Differences Between Good and Poor Adolescent Readers. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(1), 83–107. doi: 10.1075/ssol.2.1.05jan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.2.1.05jan [Google Scholar]
  37. Kahneman, D.
    (2011) Thinking Fast, and Slow. New York, NJ: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. doi: 10.1086/674372
     https://doi.org/10.1086/674372 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kahneman, D. & Frederick, S.
    (2002) Representativeness revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment. In: Gilovich, T. , Griffin, D. & Kahneman, D. (Eds). Heuristics of Intuitive Judgment: Extensions and Applications. New York, NJ: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004
     https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kidd, D.C. , & Castano, E.
    (2013) Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind. Science (New York, N.Y.), 342, 377–380. doi: 10.1126/science.1239918
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918 [Google Scholar]
  40. Koek, M.
    (2010) De Literaire Mindmap als Alternatief voor het Leesdossier. [The Literary Mindmap as an Alternative Literature Portfolio]. In: Vanhooren & Mottart (Red.), 24e Conferentie Het Schoolvak Nederlands [24th Conference on the School Subject Dutch] (pp.60–64). Den Haag: Nederlandse Taalunie. Retrieved from: taalunieversum.org/onderwijs/conferentie_het_schoolvak_nederlands/bundels/24/60/
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Koopman, E.M. , & Hakemulder, F.
    (2015) Effects of Literature on Empathy and Self-Reflection: A Theoretical-Empirical Framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(1), 79–111. doi: 10.1515/jlt‑2015‑0005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2015-0005 [Google Scholar]
  42. Lai, E.R.
    (2011) Critical Thinking: A Literature Report. [Pearson’s Research Report]. Retrieved from Pearson Assessments Website: images.pearsonassessments.com/images/tmrs/CriticalThinkingReviewFINAL.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Lucebert
    (1959/2002) Herfst. [Autumn]. In: Lucebert (Aut), Verzamelde Gedichten [Collected Poems] (pp315). Amsterdam: De Bezige Bij.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Martin, G. R. R.
    (1996) A Game of Thrones. New York, NJ: Bantam Spectra.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. McCarthy, K. S.
    (2015) Reading Beyond the Lines: A Critical Review of Cognitive Approaches to Literary Interpretation and Comprehension. Scientific Study of Literature, 5(1), 99–128. doi: 10.1075/ssol.5.1.05mcc
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.5.1.05mcc [Google Scholar]
  46. Miall, D. S. & Kuiken, D.
    (1994) Foregrounding, Defamiliarization, and Affect Response to Literary Stories. Poetics, 22 (5), 389–407. doi: 10.1016/0304‑422x(94)00011‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422x(94)00011-5 [Google Scholar]
  47. Miall, D.S. & Kuiken, D.
    (1995) Aspects of Literary Response: A New Questionnaire. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 37–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. (2002) A Feeling for Fiction: Becoming What We Behold. Poetics, 30 (4), 221–241. doi: 10.1016/s0304‑422x(02)00011‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-422x(02)00011-6 [Google Scholar]
  49. Mol, S.E. , & Bus, A.G.
    (2011) Een Vroeg Begin is het Halve Werk. De Rol van Vrijetijdslezen in de Taal- en Leesontwikkeling van Kinderen en Jongeren. [An Early Start has Benefits. The Role of Leisure Reading in the Language and Reading Development of Children and Adolescents.] In D. Schram (Ed.), Waarom Zou je (nu) Lezen? [Why Would you Read (Now)?] (pp.91–111). Delft: Eburon.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Murakovsky, J.
    (1932/1964) Standard Language and Poetic Language. In: P.L. Garvin (Ed.), A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure and Style, 17–30. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Orr, D.
    (2015) The Road Not Taken: Finding America in the Poem Everyone Loves and Almost Everyone Gets Wrong. New York, NJ: Penguin Random House LLC.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Purves, A.C. , Beach, R.
    (1972) Literature and the Reader: Research in Response to Literature, Reading Interests, and the Teaching of Literature. Urbana, ILL: National Council of Teachers of English
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Rosenblatt, L. M.
    (1938/1995) Literature as Exploration. New York, NJ: The Modern Language Association of America.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Salinger, J. D.
    (1954) Uncle Wiggly in Connecticut. In: Salinger, J. D. (Aut), Nine Stories. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Schraw, G. & Bruning, R.
    (1996) Readers’ Implicit Models of Reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 290–305. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.31.3.4
     https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.31.3.4 [Google Scholar]
  56. Schrijvers, M. , Janssen, T. , Fialho, O. & Rijlaarsdam, G.
    (2016) The Impact of Literature Education on Students’ Perceptions of Self and Others: Exploring Personal and Social Learning Experiences in Relation to Teacher Approach. L1 – Educational Studies in Language and Literature (accepted for publication).
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Shklovsky, V.
    (1917/1998) Art as technique. In: Rivkin, J. & Ryan, M. (Ed.). Literary Theory: An Anthology. Malden (MA): Blackwell Publishing Ltd. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑349‑25934‑2_1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25934-2_1 [Google Scholar]
  58. Sopcak, P.
    (2011) A Numerically Aided Phenomenological Study of Existential Reading. In: F. Hakemulder (Ed.), De Stralende Lezer: Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Naar de Invloed van het Lezen [The Radiant Reader: Scientific Research into Effects of Reading]. Stichting Lezen Reeks17, pp.123–152.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Stanovich, K. E.
    (2011) On the Distinction Between Rationality and Intelligence: Implications for Understanding Individual Differences in Reasoning. In: K. Holyoak & R. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp.343–365). New York, NJ: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0022
     https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0022 [Google Scholar]
  60. Stanovich, K. E. & Toplak, M. E.
    (2012) Defining Features Versus Incidental Correlates of Type 1 and Type 2 Processing. Mind & Society, 11(1), 3–13. doi: 10.1007/sl1299‑011‑0093‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1007/sl1299-011-0093-6 [Google Scholar]
  61. Trauzettel-Klosinski, S. & Dietz, K.
    (2012) Standardized Assessment of Reading Performance: the New International Reading Speed Texts IReST. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 53(9), 5452–5461. doi: 10.1167/iovs.11‑8284
     https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.11-8284 [Google Scholar]
  62. Van den Broek, P. , Lorch, R. F. jr. , Linderholm, T. , & Gustafson, M.
    (2001) The Effects of Readers’ Goals on Inference Generation and Memory for Texts. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1081–1087. doi: 10.3758/BF03206376
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206376 [Google Scholar]
  63. Van Gelder, T.
    (2005) Teaching Critical Thinking: Some Lessons from Cognitive Science. College Teaching, 53(1), 41–48. doi: 10.3200/ctch.53.1.41‑48
     https://doi.org/10.3200/ctch.53.1.41-48 [Google Scholar]
  64. Van Peer, W. , Hakemulder, J. & Zyngier, S.
    (2007) Lines on Feeling: Foregrounding, Aesthetics and Meaning. Language and Literature, 16 (2), 197–213. doi: 10.1177/0963947007075985
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007075985 [Google Scholar]
  65. Verboord, M.
    (2005) Long-term Effects of Literary Education on Book-reading Frequency: An Analysis of Dutch Student Cohorts 1975–1998. Poetics. 33(5–6), 320–342. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2005.09.007.
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2005.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  66. Vipond, D. & Hunt, R. A.
    (1984) Point-Driven Understanding: Pragmatic and Cognitive Dimensions of Literary Reading. Poetics, 13(3), 261–277. doi: 10.1016/0304‑422X(84)90005‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(84)90005-6 [Google Scholar]
  67. Webster, D. M. , & Kruglanski, A. W.
    (1994) Individual Differences in Need for Cognitive Closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062. doi: 10.1037//0022‑3514.67.6.1049
     https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1049 [Google Scholar]
  68. West, R. F. , Meserve, R. J. , Stanovich, K. E.
    (2012) Cognitive Sophistication does not Attenuate the Bias Blind Spot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3), 506–519. doi: 10.1037/a0028857
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028857 [Google Scholar]
  69. West, R. F. , Toplak, M. E & Stanovich, K. E.
    (2008) Heuristics and Biases as Measures of Critical Thinking: Associations with Cognitive Ability and Thinking Dispositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 930–941. doi: 10.1037/a0012842.
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012842 [Google Scholar]
  70. Whitman, W.
    (1900) When I Heard the Learn’d Astronomer. In: Whitman, W. (Aut), Leaves of Grass. Philadelphia: David McKay. Retrieved from: www.bartleby.com/142/180.html
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Witte, T.
    (2008) Het Oog van de Meester. Een Onderzoek naar de Literaire Ontwikkeling van Havo- en Vwo-leerlingen in de Tweede Fase van het Voortgezet Onderwijs. [The Eye of the Master. A Study of Literary Development of Upper Higher General Education and Pre-University Students.] [Doctoral Dissertation]. Delft: Eburon.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Wolkers, J.
    (1969) Turks Fruit [Turkish Delight]. Amsterdam: Meulenhoff.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Zwaan, R. A.
    (1994) Effect of Genre Expectations on Text Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 920–933. doi: 10.1037/0278‑7393.20.4.920.
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.920 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.6.2.04koe
Loading
Literary reading and critical thinking
Scientific Study of Literature 6, 243 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.2.04koe
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.6.2.04koe
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.6.2.04koe
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): critical thinking dispositions; critical thinking skills; dual process theory; literary reading; literary understanding; Literature education

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error