1887
Volume 6, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
GBP
Buy:£15.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Previous work ( Whalen, Zunshine, & Holquist, 2012 ) has shown that perspective embedding ("she thought I left" embedding her perspective on "I left") affects reading times for short vignettes. With increasing levels of embedment 1–5, reading times rose almost linearly. Level 0 was as slow as 3–4. Embedment level was determined by the authors, but validation by others is desirable. In Experiment 1, we trained 12 literature students to make embedment judgments. Their judgments correlated highly with ours (.94 on average) and agreed exactly in the majority of cases (74.5%); almost all were within one (94.2%). In Experiment 2, judgments of the first three paragraphs of "To Kill a Mockingbird" ( Lee, 1960 ) yielded a lower level of agreement; literature uses subtle means for introducing perspective embedment, and individuals differ about including them. Assessment of perspective embedding, and exploration of sources of disagreements, provide new tools for analyzing literature.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.6.2.05wha
2017-03-20
2018-09-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. M.
    (1981) The dialogic imagination ( C. Emerson & M. Holquist , Trans. M. Holquist Ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bowes, A. , & Katz, A.
    (2015) Metaphor creates intimacy and temporarily enhances theory of mind. Memory and Cognition, 43, 953–963. doi: 10.3758/s13421‑015‑0508‑4
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0508-4 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brooks, P.
    (1992) Reading for the plot: Design and intention in narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen, J.
    (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychosocial Measurement, 20, 37–46. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104
    https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000104 [Google Scholar]
  5. Dunbar, R. I.
    (1996) Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Fleiss, J. L. , & Chilton, N. W.
    (1983) The measurement of interexaminer agreement on periodontal disease. Journal of Periodontal Research, 18, 601–606. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‑0765.1983.tb00397.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0765.1983.tb00397.x [Google Scholar]
  7. Hakemulder, F.
    (2000) The moral laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. doi: 10.1075/upal.34
    https://doi.org/10.1075/upal.34 [Google Scholar]
  8. Hakemulder, F. , & Van Peer, W.
    (2015) Empirical stylisticsThe Bloomsbury Companion to Stylistics. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hirschfeld, L. A.
    (2013) The myth of mentalizing and the primacy of folk sociology. In M. Banaji & S. Gelman (Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp.101–106). New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199890712.003.0019
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199890712.003.0019 [Google Scholar]
  10. Hogan, P. C.
    (2003) The mind and its stories: Narrative universals and human emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511499951
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499951 [Google Scholar]
  11. Just, M. A. , Carpenter, P. A. , & Woolley, J. D.
    (1982) Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228–238. doi: 10.1037/0096‑3445.111.2.228
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.111.2.228 [Google Scholar]
  12. Kidd, D. C. , & Castano, E.
    (2013) Reading literary fiction improves Theory of Mind. Science, 342, 377–380. doi: 10.1126/science.1239918
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918 [Google Scholar]
  13. Landis, J. R. , & Koch, G. G.
    (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310
    https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310 [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee, H.
    (1960) To kill a mockingbird. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott and Co.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Miall, D. S.
    (2006) Literary reading: Empirical and theoretical studies. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Miall, D. S. , & Kuiken, D.
    (2001) Shifting perspectives: Readers’ feelings and literary response. In W. van Peer & S. Chatman (Eds.), New perspectives on narrative perspective (pp.289–301). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Oatley, K.
    (2012) The passionate muse: Exploring emotion in stories. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Palmer, A.
    (2010) Social minds in the novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rabinowitz, P. J.
    (1987) Before reading: Narrative conventions and the politics of interpretation. The theory and interpretation of narrative series. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rabinowitz, P. J. , & Bancroft, C.
    (2014) Euclid at the core: Recentering literary education. Style, 48(1), 1–34.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Schneider, R.
    (2001) Toward a cognitive theory of literary character: The dynamics of mental-model construction. Style, 35, 607–639.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2013) The cognitive theory of character reception: An updated proposal. Anglistik, 24(2), 117–134.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Scholes, R. , Phelan, J. , & Kellogg, R.
    (2006) The nature of narrative (Revised and expanded, 40th anniversary edition ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sperber, D. , & Wilson, D.
    (2002) Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. Mind and Language, 17, 3–23. doi: 10.1111/1468‑0017.00186
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00186 [Google Scholar]
  25. van Duijn, M. J. , Sluiter, I. , & Verhagen, A.
    (2015) When narrative takes over: The representation of embedded mindstates in Shakespeare’s Othello. Language and Literature, 24(2), 148–166. doi: 10.1177/0963947015572274
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947015572274 [Google Scholar]
  26. van Peer, W. , Hakemulder, F. , & Zyngier, S.
    (2007) Lines on feeling: foregrounding, aesthetics and meaning. Language and Literature, 16(2), 197–213. doi: 10.1177/0963947007075985
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963947007075985 [Google Scholar]
  27. Whalen, D. H. , Zunshine, L. , & Holquist, M.
    (2012) Theory of Mind and embedding of perspective: A psychological test of a literary “sweet spot”. Scientific Study of Literature, 2(2), 301–315. doi: 10.1075/ssol.2.2.06wha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.2.2.06wha [Google Scholar]
  28. (2015) Perspective embedding affects reading time: Implications for the reading of literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(1778), 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Zunshine, L.
    (2006) Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. (2011) Style brings in mental states. Style, 45, 349–356.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. (2014) Theory of Mind as a pedagogical tool. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies, 16, 89–109. doi: 10.5325/intelitestud.16.1.0089
    https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.16.1.0089 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2015a) From the social to the literary: Approaching Cao Xueqin’s The Story of the Stone (紅樓夢) from a cognitive perspective. In L. Zunshine (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive literary studies (pp.176–196). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. (2015b) The secret life of fiction. PMLA, 130, 724–731. doi: 10.1632/pmla.2015.130.3.724
    https://doi.org/10.1632/pmla.2015.130.3.724 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.6.2.05wha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.6.2.05wha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error