What’s in the brain that ink may character ….

References

1. Altmann, U. , Bohrn, I. C. , Lubrich, O. , Menninghaus, W. , & Jacobs, A. M.
   (2012) The power of emotional valence-from cognitive to affective processes in reading. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6(192). doi:  10.3389/fnhum.2012.00192
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00192 [Google Scholar]
2. Altmann, U. , Bohrn, I. C. , Lubrich, O. , Menninghaus, W. , & Jacobs, A. M.
   (2014) Fact vs fiction-how paratextual information shapes our reading processes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 22–29. doi:  10.1093/scan/nss098
   https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss098 [Google Scholar]
3. Anderson, T. , & Crossley, S.
   (2011) “Rue with a Difference: A Stylistic Analysis of the Rhetoric of Suicide in Hamlet ” (pp.192–214). In Jonathan Culpepper and Mireille Ravassat (Eds.), Stylistics and Shakespeare’s language: Transdisciplinary approaches. Bloomsbury.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Aryani, A. , Jacobs, A. M. , & Conrad, M.
   (2013) Extracting salient sublexical units from written texts: “Emophon,” a corpus-based approach to phonological iconicity. Frontiers in Psychology, 41:654. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00654
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00654 [Google Scholar]
5. Aryani, A. , Kraxenberger, M. , Ullrich, S. , Jacobs, A. M. , & Conrad, M.
   (2016) Measuring the ba- sic a ective tone of poems via phonological saliency and iconicity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 101, 191–204. doi:  10.1037/aca0000033
   https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000033 [Google Scholar]
6. Beaty, R. E. , Benedek, M. , Silvia, P. J. , & Schacter, D. L.
   (2016) Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 201, 87–95. doi:  10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004 [Google Scholar]
7. Berlyne, D. E.
   (1971) Aesthetics and Psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bestgen, Y.
   (1994) Can emotional valence in stories be determined from words?. Cognition & Emotion, 8(1), 21–36. doi:  10.1080/02699939408408926
   https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939408408926 [Google Scholar]
9. Bohrn, I. C. , Altmann, U. , & Jacobs, A. M.
   (2012a) Looking at the brains behind figurative language – A quantitative meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies on metaphor, idiom and irony processing. Neuropsychologia, 501, 2669–2683. doi:  10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.021
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.021 [Google Scholar]
10. Bohrn, I. C. , Altmann, U. , Lubrich, O. , Menninghaus, W. , & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2012b) Old proverbs in new skins – an FMRI study on defamiliarization. Frontiers in Psychology, 31:204. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00204
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00204 [Google Scholar]
11. Bohrn, I. C. , Altmann, U. , Lubrich, O. , Menninghaus, W. , & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2013) When we like what we know – A parametric fMRI analysis of beauty and familiarity. Brain and Language, 124(1), 1–8. doi:  10.1016/j.bandl.2012.10.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.10.003 [Google Scholar]
12. Boston, M. F. , Hale, J. , Kliegl, R. , Patil, U. , & Vasishth, S.
    (2008) Parsing costs as predictors of reading difficulty: An evaluation using the Potsdam Sentence Corpus. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2(1), 1–12. doi: 10.16910/jemr.2.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.16910/jemr.2.1.1 [Google Scholar]
13. Boyd, B.
    (2012) Why lyrics last: Evolution, Cognition, and Shakespeare’s Sonnets. Harvard University Press. doi:  10.4159/harvard.9780674064843
    https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674064843 [Google Scholar]
14. Bradley, M. M. , & Lang, P. J.
    (1999) Affective Norms for English Words (ANEW): Stimuli Instruction and Affective Ratings Technical Report C-1. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Briesemeister, B. B. , Kuchinke, L. , & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2011) Discrete emotion norms for nouns: Berlin affective word list (DENN – BAWL). Behavior Research Methods, 43(2), 441–448. doi:  10.3758/s13428‑011‑0059‑y
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0059-y [Google Scholar]
16. Briesemeister, B. B. , Kuchinke, L. , & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2014) Emotion word recognition: Discrete information effects first, continuous later?. Brain Research, 15641, 62–71. doi:  10.1016/j.brainres.2014.03.045
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.03.045 [Google Scholar]
17. Briesemeister, B. B. , Kuchinke, L. , Jacobs, A. M. , & Braun, M.
    (2015) Emotions in reading: Dissociation of happiness and positivity. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(2), 287–298. doi:  10.3758/s13415‑014‑0327‑2
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0327-2 [Google Scholar]
18. Brown, S. , Gao, X. , Tisdelle, L. , Eickhoff, S. B. , & Liotti, M.
    (2011) Naturalizing aesthetics: brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities. Neuroimage, 58(1), 250–258. doi:  10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012 [Google Scholar]
19. Brysbaert, M. , & New, B.
    (2009) Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. doi:  10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977 [Google Scholar]
20. Burke, M.
    (2011) Literary reading, cognition and emotion: An exploration of the oceanic mind. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Burke, M.
    (2015) The neuroaesthetics of prose fiction: Pitfalls, parameters and prospects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 91. doi:  10.3389/fnhum.2015.00442
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00442 [Google Scholar]
22. Chatterjee, A. , & Vartanian, O.
    (2014) Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(7), 370–375. doi:  10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.03.003 [Google Scholar]
23. Chen, Q. , Zhang, J. , Xu, X. , Scheepers, C. , Yang, Y. , & Tanenhaus, M. K.
    (2016) Prosodic expectations in silent reading: ERP evidence from rhyme scheme and semantic congruence in classic Chinese poems. Cognition, 1541, 11–21. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.007 [Google Scholar]
24. Citron, F. M.
    (2012) Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: a review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies. Brain and Language, 122(3), 211–226. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011 [Google Scholar]
25. Cook, A.
    (2010) Shakespearean neuroplay: Reinvigorating the study of dramatic texts and performance through cognitive science. NY: Palgrave Macmillan doi:  10.1057/9780230113053
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113053 [Google Scholar]
26. Crane, M. T.
    (2001) Shakespeare’s Brain: Reading with Cognitive Theory. Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Crossley, S. A. , Kyle, K. , & McNamara, D. S.
    (2016) The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion. Behavior Research Methods, 48(4), 1227–1237. doi:  10.3758/s13428‑015‑0651‑7
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7 [Google Scholar]
28. Crossley, S. A. , Kyle, K. , & McNamara, D. S.
    (2017) Sentiment Analysis and Social Cognition Engine (SEANCE): An automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social-order analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 803–821. doi:  10.3758/s13428‑016‑0743‑z
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0743-z [Google Scholar]
29. Crystal, D.
    (2012) Think on my Words: Exploring Shakespeare's Language (Canto Classics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139196994
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139196994 [Google Scholar]
30. Cupchik, G. C.
    (1986) A decade after Berlyne: New directions in experimental aesthetics. Poetics, 15(4–6), 345–369. doi:  10.1016/0304‑422X(86)90003‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(86)90003-3 [Google Scholar]
31. De Beaugrande, R. A.
    (1979) Toward a general theory of creativity. Poetics, 8(3), 269–306. doi:  10.1016/0304‑422X(79)90036‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(79)90036-6 [Google Scholar]
32. Delmonte, R.
    (2016) Exploring Shakespeare’s Sonnets with SPARSAR. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 4(1), 61–95. doi:  10.13189/lls.2016.040110
    https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2016.040110 [Google Scholar]
33. Dietterich, T. G.
    (2000) An experimental comparison of three methods for constructing ensembles of decision trees: Bagging, boosting, and randomization. Machine Learning, 40(2), 139–157. doi:  10.1023/A:1007607513941
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007607513941 [Google Scholar]
34. Dixon, P. , & Bortolussi, M.
    (2015) Measuring literary experience. Scientific Study of Literature, 5(2), 178–182. doi:  10.1075/ssol.5.2.03dix
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.5.2.03dix [Google Scholar]
35. Fellbaum, C.
    (Ed.) (1998) WordNet: An electronic lexical database. Cambridge: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/7287.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/7287.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
36. Forgács, B. , Bohrn, I. , Baudewig, J. , Hofmann, M. J. , Pléh, C. , & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2012) Neural correlates of combinatorial semantic processing of literal and figurative noun noun compound words. Neuroimage, 63(3), 1432–1442. doi:  10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.029
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.029 [Google Scholar]
37. Frank, S. L.
    (2013) Uncertainty reduction as a measure of cognitive load in sentence comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5(3), 475–494. doi:  10.1111/tops.12025
    https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12025 [Google Scholar]
38. Frank, S. L. , Otten, L. J. , Galli, G. , & Vigliocco, G.
    (2015) The ERP response to the amount of information conveyed by words in sentences. Brain and Language, 1401, 1–11. doi:  10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.006
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.006 [Google Scholar]
39. Goldman, A. I.
    (2006) Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford University Press. doi:  10.1093/0195138929.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/0195138929.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
40. Graesser, A. C. , McNamara, D. S. , Louwerse, M. M. , & Cai, Z.
    (2004) Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language. Behavior Research Methods, 36(2), 193–202. doi:  10.3758/BF03195564
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195564 [Google Scholar]
41. Graesser, A. C. , & McNamara, D. S.
    (2010) Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 371–398. doi:  10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2010.01081.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01081.x [Google Scholar]
42. Graesser, A. C. , Dowell, N. , & Moldovan, C.
    (2011) A computer’s understanding of literature. Scientific Study of Literature, 1(1), 24–33. doi:  10.1075/ssol.1.1.03gra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.1.1.03gra [Google Scholar]
43. Green, M. C. , & Brock, T. C.
    (2000) The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721. doi:  10.1037/0022‑3514.79.5.701
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.701 [Google Scholar]
44. Grünbein, D.
    (1996) Katze und Mond. In D. Grünbein (Eds) Galilei Vermisst Dantes Hölle und Bleibt an den Maßen Hängen (pp.116–128). Frankfurt AM: Suhrkamp.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Habermas, T. , & de Silveira, C.
    (2008) The development of global coherence in life narratives across adolescence: Temporal, causal, and thematic aspects. Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 707–721. doi:  10.1037/0012‑1649.44.3.707
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.707 [Google Scholar]
46. Harker, W. J.
    (1997) Literary texts as models: Implications for the empirical study of literature. In S. Tötösy de Zepetnek & I. Sywenky (Eds.), The systemic and empirica lapproach to literature and culture as theory and application (pp.51–65). Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Hofmann, M. J. , & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2014) Interactive activation and competition models and semantic context: From behavioral to brain data. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 461, 85–104. doi:  10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.011 [Google Scholar]
48. Hope, J. , & Witmore, M.
    (2004) The very large textual object: a prosthetic reading of Shakespeare. Early Modern Literary Studies, 9(3), 1–36.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Hsu, C. T. , Conrad, M. , & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2014) Fiction feelings in Harry Potter: Haemodynamic response in the mid-cingulate cortex correlates with immersive reading experience. Neuroreport, 25(17), 1356–1361. doi: 10.1097/WNR.000000000000
    https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.000000000000 [Google Scholar]
50. Hsu, C. T. , Jacobs, A. M. , Citron, F. M. , & Conrad, M.
    (2015) The emotion potential of words and passages in reading Harry Potter – An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 1421, 96–114. doi:  10.1016/j.bandl.2015.01.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.01.011 [Google Scholar]
51. Hutcheon, L.
    (2012) A Theory of Adaptation. 2nd editionwith Siobhan O’Flynn. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203095010
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203095010 [Google Scholar]
52. Hutchins, R.
    (Ed.) (1952) Great books of the Western world (541vols.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Jacobs, A. M.
    (2011) Neurokognitive Poetik: Elemente eines Modells des literarischen Lesens [Neurocognitive poetics: Elements of a model of literary reading]. In R. Schrott and A. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren [Brain and poetry: How we construct our realities] (pp.492–520). Munich: Carl Hanser.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Jacobs, A. M.
    (2015a) Towards a neurocognitive poetics model of literary reading, in R. Willems (Ed.) Towards a Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use (pp.135–159). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781107323667.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323667.007 [Google Scholar]
55. Jacobs, A. M.
    (2015b) Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9:186. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.0018
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.0018 [Google Scholar]
56. Jacobs, A. M.
    (2015c) The scientific study of literary experience. Scientific Study of Literature, 5(2), 139–170. doi:  10.1075/ssol.5.2.01jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.5.2.01jac [Google Scholar]
57. Jacobs, A.
    (2016a) The scientific study of literary experience and neuro-behavioral responses to Literature: Reply to Commentaries. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(1), 164–174. doi:  10.1075/ssol.6.1.08jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.1.08jac [Google Scholar]
58. Jacobs, A. M. , and Kinder, A.
    (2015) Worte als Worte erfahren: wie erarbeitet das Gehirn Gedichte (Experience words as words: how the brain constructs poems), in A. Pompe (Ed.) Kind und Gedicht [Child and Poem] (pp.57–76). Berlin: Rombach.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Jacobs, A. M. , & Kinder, A.
    (2017) The brain is the prisoner of thought: A machine-learning assisted quantitative narrative analysis of literary metaphors for use in Neurocognitive Poetics. Metaphor & Symbol, in press. doi:  10.1080/10926488.2017.1338015
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2017.1338015 [Google Scholar]
60. Jacobs, A. M. , and Schrott, R.
    (2015) Gefesselt im Kopfkino: Von Kippschaltern, Madeleine Effekten und Don Quichote Syndromen bei der Immersion in Textwelten (Captivated in the mind’s cinema: Of trigger-switches, Don Quichote syndroms and immersion in text worlds). Available online at: FIKTION.CC
    [Google Scholar]
61. Jacobs, A. M. , Võ, M. L. H. , Briesemeister, B. B. , Conrad, M. , Hofmann, M. J. , Kuchinke, L. , Lüdtke, J. & Braun, M.
    (2015) 10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?. Frontiers in Psychology, 61:714. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00714
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00714 [Google Scholar]
62. Jacobs, A. M. , Lüdtke, J. , Aryani, A. , Meyer-Sickendieck, B. , & Conrad, M.
    (2016a) Mood-empathic and aesthetic responses in poetry reception. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(1), 87–130. doi:  10.1075/ssol.6.1.06jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.1.06jac [Google Scholar]
63. Jacobs, A. , Hofmann, M. J. , & Kinder, A.
    (2016b) On elementary affective decisions: To like or not to like, that is the question. Frontiers in Psychology, 71:1836. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01836
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01836 [Google Scholar]
64. Jacobsen, T.
    (2006) Bridging the arts and sciences: A framework for the psychology of aesthetics. Leonardo, 391, 155–162. doi:  10.1162/leon.2006.39.2.155
    https://doi.org/10.1162/leon.2006.39.2.155 [Google Scholar]
65. Jakobson, R. , & Jones, L. G.
    (1970) Shakespeare’s Verbal Art in Th’Expence of Spirit (No.35). Walter de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110889673
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110889673 [Google Scholar]
66. Jakobson, R. , & Lévi-Strauss, C.
    (1962) “Les chats” de Charles Baudelaire. L’homme, 21, 5–21. doi:  10.3406/hom.1962.366446
    https://doi.org/10.3406/hom.1962.366446 [Google Scholar]
67. Kintsch, W.
    (2000) Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7(2), 257–266. doi:  10.3758/BF03212981
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212981 [Google Scholar]
68. Kintsch, W.
    (2012) Musings about beauty. Cognitive Science, 36(4), 635–654. doi:  10.1111/j.1551‑6709.2011.01229.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01229.x [Google Scholar]
69. Kintsch, W. , & Mangalath, P.
    (2011) The construction of meaning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(2), 346–370. doi:  10.1111/j.1756‑8765.2010.01107.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01107.x [Google Scholar]
70. Kiss, G. R. , Armstrong, C. , Milroy, R. and Piper, J.
    (1973) An associative thesaurus of English and its computer analysis. In Aitken, A. J. , Bailey, R. W. and Hamiltonsmith, N. (Eds), The Computer and Literary Studies. Edinburgh: University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Kivy, P.
    (1991) Music alone: Philosophical reflections on the purely musical experience. Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Koelsch, S. , Jacobs, A. M. , Menninghaus, W. , Liebal, K. , Klann-Delius, G. , von Scheve, C. , & Gebauer, G.
    (2015) The quartet theory of human emotions: An integrative and neurofunctional model. Physics of Life Reviews, 131, 1–27. doi:  10.1016/j.plrev.2015.03.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2015.03.001 [Google Scholar]
73. Krumhansl, C. L.
    (1997) An Exploratory Study of Musical Emotions and Psychophysiology. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51(4), 336. doi:  10.1037/1196‑1961.51.4.336
    https://doi.org/10.1037/1196-1961.51.4.336 [Google Scholar]
74. Kuchinke, L. , Fritzemeier, S. , Hofmann, M. J. , & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2013) Neural correlates of episodic memory: Associative memory and confidence drive hippocampus activations. Behavioural Brain Research, 2541, 92–101. doi:  10.1016/j.bbr.2013.04.035
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2013.04.035 [Google Scholar]
75. Kuhlmann, M. , Hofmann, M. J. , Briesemeister, B. B. , & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2016) Mixing positive and negative valence: Affective-semantic integration of bivalent words. Scientific Reports, 6:30718. doi:  10.1038/srep30718
    https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30718 [Google Scholar]
76. Kuzmičová, A.
    (2014) Literary narrative and mental imagery: A view from embodied cognition. Style, 48(3), 275–293.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Landauer, T. K. , & Dumais, S. T.
    (1997) A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211. doi:  10.1037/0033‑295X.104.2.211
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211 [Google Scholar]
78. Lasswell, H. D. , & Namenwirth, J. Z.
    (1969) The Lasswell value dictionary. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Leder, H. , Belke, B. , Oeberst, A. , & Augustin, D.
    (2004) A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95(4), 489–508. doi:  10.1348/0007126042369811
    https://doi.org/10.1348/0007126042369811 [Google Scholar]
80. Leder, H. , & Nadal, M.
    (2014) Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments: The aesthetic episode – developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. British Journal of Psychology, 105(4), 443–464. doi:  10.1111/bjop.12084
    https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12084 [Google Scholar]
81. Leder, H. , Markey, P. S. , & Pelowski, M.
    (2015) Aesthetic emotions to art-What they are and what makes them special: Comment on “The quartet theory of human emotions: An integrative and neurofunctional model” by S. Koelsch et al.Physics of Life Reviews, 131, 67–70. doi:  10.1016/j.plrev.2015.04.037
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2015.04.037 [Google Scholar]
82. Lehne, M. , Engel, P. , Rohrmeier, M. , Menninghaus, W. , Jacobs, A. M. , & Koelsch, S.
    (2015) Reading a suspenseful literary text activates brain areas related to social cognition and predictive inference. PLoS One, 10(5), e0124550. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0124550
    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124550 [Google Scholar]
83. Levinson, J.
    (1997) Music and negative emotion. In J. Robinson (Ed.), Music and Meaning (pp.215–41). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Lindquist, K. A. , MacCormack, J. K. , & Shablack, H.
    (2015) The role of language in emotion: Predictions from psychological constructionism. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:444. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00444
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00444 [Google Scholar]
85. Liu, S. , Erkkinen, M. G. , Healey, M. L. , Xu, Y. , Swett, K. E. , Chow, H. M. , & Braun, A. R.
    (2015) Brain activity and connectivity during poetry composition: Toward a multidimensional model of the creative process. Human Brain Mapping, 36(9), 3351–3372. doi:  10.1002/hbm.22849
    https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22849 [Google Scholar]
86. Loh, W. Y.
    (2011) Classification and regression trees. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1(1), 14–23. doi:  10.1002/widm.8
    https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.8 [Google Scholar]
87. Lüdtke, J. , & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2015) The emotion potential of simple sentences: Additive or interactive effects of nouns and adjectives?. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:1137. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01137
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01137 [Google Scholar]
88. Lüdtke, J. , Meyer-Sickendieck, B. , & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2014) Immersing in the stillness of an early morning: Testing the mood empathy hypothesis of poetry reception. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 363. doi:  10.1037/a0036826
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036826 [Google Scholar]
89. Marin, M. M.
    (2015) Crossing boundaries: Toward a general model of neuroaesthetics. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 91:443. doi:  10.3389/fnhum.2015.00443
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2015.00443 [Google Scholar]
90. Marin, M. M. , Lampatz, A. , Wandl, M. , & Leder, H.
    (2016) Berlyne revisited: Evidence for the multifaceted nature of hedonic tone in the appreciation of paintings and music. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10:536. doi:  10.3389/fnhum.2016.00536
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00536 [Google Scholar]
91. Martindale, C.
    (1975) The romantic progression: The psychology of literary history. Halsted Press.
    [Google Scholar]
92. McNamara, D. S. , Louwerse, M. M. , McCarthy, P. M. , & Graesser, A. C.
    (2010) Coh-Metrix: Capturing linguistic features of cohesion. Discourse Processes, 47(4), 292–330. doi:  10.1080/01638530902959943
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902959943 [Google Scholar]
93. McNamara, D. S. , Graesser, A. C. , McCarthy, P. M. , & Cai, Z.
    (2014) Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix. Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9780511894664
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894664 [Google Scholar]
94. McQuarrie, E. F. , & Mick, D. G.
    (1996) Figures of rhetoric in advertising language. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(4), 424–438. doi:  10.1086/209459
    https://doi.org/10.1086/209459 [Google Scholar]
95. Mcquire, M. , Mccollum, L. , & Chatterjee, A.
    (2017) Aptness and beauty in metaphor. Language and Cognition, 9(2), 316–331. doi:  10.1017/langcog.2016.13
    https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2016.13 [Google Scholar]
96. Meireles, R. C.
    (2005) The hermeneutics of symbolical imagery in Shakespeare’s sonnets. Unpublished Dissertation, University. Porto Alegre, Bresil.
    [Google Scholar]
97. Menninghaus, W. , Bohrn, I. C. , Altmann, U. , Lubrich, O. , & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2014) Sounds funny? Humor effects of phonological and prosodic figures of speech. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 71–76. doi:  10.1037/a0035309
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035309 [Google Scholar]
98. Menninghaus, W. , Bohrn, I. C. , Knoop, C. A. , Kotz, S. A. , Schlotz, W. , & Jacobs, A. M.
    (2015) Rhetorical features facilitate prosodic processing while handicapping ease of semantic comprehension. Cognition, 1431, 48–60. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.026
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.026 [Google Scholar]
99. Meyer-Sickendiek, B.
    (2011) Lyrisches Gespür: Vom Geheimen Sensorium Moderner Poesie [The lyrical sense of feeling. About the secret sensorium of modern poetry]. Paderborn, Germany: Fink.
    [Google Scholar]
100. Miall, D. S.
     (1989) Beyond the schema given: Affective comprehension of literary narratives. Cognition & Emotion, 3(1), 55–78. doi:  10.1080/02699938908415236
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938908415236 [Google Scholar]
101. Miall, D. S. , & Kuiken, D.
     (1994) Foregrounding, defamiliarization, and affect: Response to literary stories. Poetics, 22(5), 389–407. doi:  10.1016/0304‑422X(94)00011‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)00011-5 [Google Scholar]
102. Miall, D. S. , & Dissanayake, E.
     (2003) The poetics of babytalk. Human Nature, 14(4), 337–364. doi:  10.1007/s12110‑003‑1010‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-003-1010-4 [Google Scholar]
103. Miller, G. A.
     (1993) “Images and models, similes and metaphors”. In A. Ortony (ed), Metaphor and thought, 2nd edition (pp.357–400). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781139173865.019
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.019 [Google Scholar]
104. Miller, G. A.
     (1993) Wörter: Streifzüge durch die Psycholinguistik. Frankfurt: Zweitausendeins.
     [Google Scholar]
105. Millis, K. , & Larson, M.
     (2008) Applying the construction-integration framework to aesthetic responses to representational artworks. Discourse Processes, 45(3), 263–287. doi:  10.1080/01638530802070015
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530802070015 [Google Scholar]
106. Nicklas, P. , & Jacobs, A. M.
     (2017) Rhetorics, neurocognitive poetics and the aesthetics of adaptation. Poetics Today, 381, 393–412. doi:  10.1215/03335372‑3869311.
     https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-3869311 [Google Scholar]
107. Oatley, K.
     (1994) A taxonomy of the emotions of literary response and a theory of identification in fictional narrative. Poetics, 23(1–2), 53–74. doi:  10.1016/0304‑422X(94)P4296‑S
     https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(94)P4296-S [Google Scholar]
108. Oatley, K.
     (2016) Fiction: Simulation of social worlds. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 618–628. doi:  10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.06.002 [Google Scholar]
109. O’Sullivan, N. , Davis, P. , Billington, J. , Gonzalez-Diaz, V. , & Corcoran, R.
     (2015) “Shall I compare thee”: The neural basis of literary awareness, and its benefits to cognition. Cortex, 731, 144–157. doi:  10.1016/j.cortex.2015.08.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.08.014 [Google Scholar]
110. Panksepp, J.
     (2008) The power of the word may reside in the power of affect. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 42(1), 47–55. doi:  10.1007/s12124‑007‑9036‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-007-9036-5 [Google Scholar]
111. Pelowski, M. , Markey, P. S. , Lauring, J. O. , & Leder, H.
     (2016) Visualizing the impact of art: An update and comparison of current psychological models of art experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10:160. doi:  10.3389/fnhum.2016.00160
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00160 [Google Scholar]
112. Pléh, C.
     (2003) Narrativity in text construction and self construction. Neohelicon, 30(1), 187–205. doi:  10.1023/A:1024178827479
     https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024178827479 [Google Scholar]
113. Pragglejaz Group
     Pragglejaz Group (2007) MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. doi:  10.1080/10926480709336752
     https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752 [Google Scholar]
114. Richards, I. A.
     (1929) Practical criticism: A study of literary judgment. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
     [Google Scholar]
115. Rosenblatt, L. M.
     (1978) The reader, the text, the poem: The transactionaltheoryof the literarywork. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
116. Ryan, M. L.
     (2001) Narrative as virtual reality: Immersion and interactivity in literature and electronic media. Johns Hopkins University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
117. Schmidtke, D. S. , Schröder, T. , Jacobs, A. M. , & Conrad, M.
     (2014) ANGST: Affective norms for German sentiment terms, derived from the affective norms for English words. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 1108–1118. doi:  10.3758/s13428‑013‑0426‑y
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0426-y [Google Scholar]
118. Schrott, R. , & Jacobs, A. M.
     (2011) Gehirn und Gedicht: Wie wir unsere Wirklichkeiten konstruieren (Brain and Poetry: How We Construct Our Realities). München: Hanser.
     [Google Scholar]
119. Shakespeare online
     Shakespeare online. n.d.Retrieved fromwww.shakespeare-online.com/sonnets/sonnetintroduction.html)
120. Shimron, J.
     (1980) Psychological processes behind the comprehension of a poetic text. Instructional Science, 9(1), 43–66. doi:  10.1007/BF00118968
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118968 [Google Scholar]
121. Simonto, D. K.
     (1989) Shakespeare’s Sonnets: A Case of and for Single – Case Historiometry. Journal of Personality, 57(3), 695–721. doi:  10.1111/j.1467‑6494.1989.tb00568.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00568.x [Google Scholar]
122. Simonton, D. K.
     (1990) Lexical choices and aesthetic success: A computer content analysis of 154 Shakespeare sonnets. Computers and the Humanities, 24(4), 251–264. doi: 10.1007/BF00123412
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123412 [Google Scholar]
123. Smith, N. J. , & Levy, R.
     (2013) The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition, 128(3), 302–319. doi:  10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013 [Google Scholar]
124. Steen, G.
     (1999) Analyzing metaphor in literature: With examples from William Wordsworth’s “I wandered lonely as a cloud”. Poetics Today, 20(3), 499–522.
     [Google Scholar]
125. Steen, G.
     (2002) Metaphor in Bob Dylan’s ’Hurricane’: Genre, Language, and Style. In E. Semino , & J. Culpepper (eds): Cognitive Stylistics: Language and Cognition in Text Analysis (pp.183–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:  10.1075/lal.1.10ste
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.1.10ste [Google Scholar]
126. Steen, G.
     (2004) Can discourse properties of metaphor affect metaphor recognition?. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(7), 1295–1313. doi:  10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.014
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2003.10.014 [Google Scholar]
127. Stockwell, P.
     (2009) The cognitive poetics of literary resonance. Language and Cognition, 1(1), 25–44. doi:  10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.002 [Google Scholar]
128. Stone, P. J. , Bales, R. F. , Namenwirth, J. Z. , & Ogilvie, D. M.
     (1962) The general inquirer: A computer system for content analysis and retrieval based on the sentence as a unit of information. Behavioral Science, 7(4), 484–498. doi:  10.1002/bs.3830070412
     https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830070412 [Google Scholar]
129. Sylvester, T. , Braun, M. , Schmidtke, D. , & Jacobs, A. M.
     (2016) The Berlin affective word list for children (kidBAWL): Exploring processing of affective lexical semantics in the visual and auditory modalities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7:969. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00969
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00969 [Google Scholar]
130. Taruffi, L.
     (2016) Why We Listen to Sad Music: Effects on Emotion and Cognition. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Freie Universität Berlin.
     [Google Scholar]
131. The Complete Works of William Shakespeare
     The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. n.d.Retrieved from: shakespeare.mit.edu/.
132. Tsur, R.
     (1998) Poetic Rhythm: Structure and Performance – An Empirical Study in Cognitive Poetics. Bern: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
133. Tsur, R.
     (2006) Delivery style and listener response in the rhythmical performance of Shakespeare’s sonnets. College Literature, 33(1), 170–196. doi:  10.1353/lit.2006.0014
     https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2006.0014 [Google Scholar]
134. Tsur, R.
     (2008) Deixis in literature: What isn’t cognitive poetics?. Pragmatics & Cognition, 16(1), 119–150. doi:  10.1075/pc.16.1.08tsu
     https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.16.1.08tsu [Google Scholar]
135. Turner, F. , & Pöppel, E.
     (1983) The neural lyre: Poetic meter, the brain, and time. Poetry, 277–309.
     [Google Scholar]
136. Ullrich, S. , Aryani, A. , Kraxenberger, M. , Jacobs, A. M. , & Conrad, M.
     (2016) Textual features as basis of the general affective meaning: Exploring the interplay of lexical affective features, dynamic inter-lexical shifts, and the basic affective tone in poetry. In revision.
     [Google Scholar]
137. Van Peer, W.
     (1986) Stylistics and psychology: Investigations of foregrounding. London, UK: Croom Helm.
     [Google Scholar]
138. van den Hoven, E. , Hartung, F. , Burke, M. , & Willems, R.
     (2016) Individual differences in sensitivity to style during literary reading: Insights from eye-tracking. Collabra: Psychology, 2(1), 1–16. doi:  10.1525/collabra.39
     https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.39 [Google Scholar]
139. Vaughan-Evans, A. , Trefor, R. , Jones, L. , Lynch, P. , Jones, M. W. , & Thierry, G.
     (2016) Implicit detection of poetic harmony by the naïve brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 7:1859. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01859
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01859 [Google Scholar]
140. Vendler, H.
     (1997) The art of Shakespeare’s sonnets. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
141. Võ, M. L. , Conrad, M. , Kuchinke, L. , Urton, K. , Hofmann, M. J. , & Jacobs, A. M.
     (2009) The Berlin affective word list reloaded (BAWL-R). Behavior Research Methods, 41(2), 534–538. doi: 10.3758/B.R.M.41.2.534
     https://doi.org/10.3758/B.R.M.41.2.534 [Google Scholar]
142. Võ, M. L. , Jacobs, A. M. , & Conrad, M.
     (2006) Cross-validating the Berlin affective word list. Behavior Research Methods, 38(4), 606–609. doi:  10.3758/BF03193892
     https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193892 [Google Scholar]
143. Wainwright, J.
     (2015) Poetry: The basics. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315742137
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315742137 [Google Scholar]
144. Wallace, W. T. , & Rubin, D. C.
     (1991) Characteristics and constraints in ballads and their effect on memory. Discourse Processes, 141, 181–202. doi:  10.1080/01638539109544781
     https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539109544781 [Google Scholar]
145. Wallentin, M. , Nielsen, A. H. , Vuust, P. , Dohn, A. , Roepstorff, A. , & Lund, T. E.
     (2011) Amygdala and heart rate variability responses from listening to emotionally intense parts of a story. Neuroimage, 58(3), 963–973. doi:  10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.077
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.077 [Google Scholar]
146. Warriner, A. B. , Kuperman, V. , & Brysbaert, M.
     (2013) Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. doi:  10.3758/s13428‑012‑0314‑x
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x [Google Scholar]
147. Westbury, C. , Keith, J. , Briesemeister, B. B. , Hofmann, M. J. , & Jacobs, A. M.
     (2014) Avoid violence, rioting, and outrage; approach celebration, delight, and strength: Using large text corpora to compute valence, arousal, and the basic emotions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(8), 1599–1622. doi:  10.1080/17470218.2014.970204
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.970204 [Google Scholar]
148. Willems, R. M.
     (Ed.) (2015) Cognitive Neuroscience of Natural Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:  10.1017/CBO9781107323667
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107323667 [Google Scholar]
149. Willems, R. M. , Frank, S. L. , Nijhof, A. D. , Hagoort, P. , & Van den Bosch, A.
     (2015) Prediction during natural language comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 26(6), 2506–2516. doi:  10.1093/cercor/bhv075
     https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv075 [Google Scholar]
150. Willems, R. M. , & Jacobs, A. M.
     (2016) Caring about Dostoyevsky: The untapped potential of studying literature. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(4), 243–245. doi:  10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.009 [Google Scholar]
151. Yaron, I.
     (2002) Processing of obscure poetic texts: Mechanisms of selection. Journal of Literary Semantics, 31(2), 133–170. doi:  10.1515/jlse.2002.013
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.2002.013 [Google Scholar]
152. Yaron, I.
     (2008) What is a “difficult poem”? Towards a definition. Journal of Literary Semantics, 37(2), 129–150. doi:  10.1515/jlse.2008.008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.2008.008 [Google Scholar]
153. Zeman, A. , Milton, F. , Smith, A. , & Rylance, R.
     (2013) By heart an fMRI study of brain activation by poetry and prose. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20(9–10), 132–158.
     [Google Scholar]