1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Scientific Study of Literature
  4. Volume 7, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 7 Number 1
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This article reports the results of a study that investigated different aspects of the aesthetic perception of literary style. Excerpts from novels belonging to two broadly defined literary style categories, namely modern and postmodern style, were judged by the participants. Semantic scales corresponding to perceptual qualities of modern and postmodern literature were used. The results indicate that these scales can measure perceptual differences between the selected novels, and that the two novels categorized as modern were experienced differently from those categorized as postmodern. Some of the scales also predicted aesthetic preference for novels. Rating differences on the two scales and predicted the ability to attribute novel excerpts. This finding seems to indicate that the ability to distinguish styles in regard to perceptual qualities helps readers to judge certain similarities of novels.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.7.1.03sie
2017-11-23
2023-06-10

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ssol.7.1.03sie
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Auer, P.
    (1989) Natürlichkeit und Stil. In V. Hinnenkamp & M. Selting (Eds.), Stil und Stilisierung: Arbeiten zur interpretativen Soziolinguistik (pp.27–59). Tübingen: Niemeyer. doi: 10.1515/9783111354637.27
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111354637.27 [Google Scholar]
  2. Behrend, T. S. , Sharek, D. J. , Meade, A. W. , & Wiebe, E. N.
    (2011) The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research. Behavior Research Methods43(3), 800–813. doi: 10.3758/s13428‑011‑0081‑0
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0081-0 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bubenhofer, N. , & Scharloth, J.
    (2012) Stil als Kategorie der soziopragmatischen Sprachgeschichte. In P. Maitz (Ed.), Historische Sprachwissenschaft: Erkenntnisinteressen, Grundlagenprobleme, Desiderate (pp.227–261). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110273304.227
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110273304.227 [Google Scholar]
  4. Buhrmester, M. , Kwang, T. , & Gosling, S. D.
    (2011) Amazon’s Mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data?Perspectives on Psychological Science6(1), 3–5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610393980 [Google Scholar]
  5. Coupland, D.
    (1995) Microserfs. New York: ReganBooks.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Croce, B.
    (1937) La poesia. Introduzione alla critica e storia della poesia e della letteratura. Bari: Laterza.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Cupchik, B. C. , Leonard, G. , Axelrad, E. , & Kalin, J. D.
    (1998) The landscape of emotion in literary encounters. Cognition and Emotion, 12(6), 825–847. doi: 10.1080/026999398379457
     https://doi.org/10.1080/026999398379457 [Google Scholar]
  8. Damiani, A. , Jeric, D. , Imberty, M. , & Belardinelli, M. O.
    (2004) Evaluation of the musical style using the semantic differential technique and a fuzzy graphic rating scale. In S. D. Libscomb , R. Ashley , R. O. Gjerdingen , & P. Webster (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Perception & Cognition (pp.410–412). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University School of Music.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Devoto, G.
    (1950) Studi di stilistica. Firenze: Le Monnier.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Dittmar, N.
    (2009) Stil und Sozialität (Gruppe, Alter, Geschlecht). In U. Fix , A. Gardt , & J. Knape (2008–2009), Rhetorik und Stylistik/Rhetoric and Stylistics: Ein internationales Handbuch historischer und systematischer Forschung, Vol.2 (pp.1245–1270), Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Doležel, L. , & Bailey, R. W.
    (Eds.) (1969) Statistics and style. New York: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Ellis, B. E.
    (1991) American Psycho. London: Picador.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fix, U. , Wellmann, H.
    (Eds.) (1997) Stile, Stilprägungen, Stilgeschichte: Über Epochen-, Gattungs- und Autorenstile, sprachliche Analysen und didaktische Aspekte. Heidelberg: Winter.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Fix, U. , Gardt, A. , & Knape, J.
    (Eds.) (2008–2009) Rhetorik und Stylistik/Rhetoric and Stylistics: Ein internationales Handbuch historischer und systematischer Forschung (Vols.1–2). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110211405
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110211405 [Google Scholar]
  15. Green, K.
    (2006) Literary theory and stylistics. In E. K. Brown , R. E. Asher , & J. M. Y. Simpson , Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.), Vol.7 (pp.261–267). New York: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00521‑6
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00521-6 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hebdige, D.
    (1979) Subculture: The meaning of style. London: Methuen.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Habscheid, S.
    (Ed.) (2003) Gruppenstile: Zur sprachlichen Inszenierung sozialer Zugehörigkeit. Bern: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Hemingway, E.
    (1994) A farewell to arms. London: Arrow. (Original work published 1929)
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Hoover, D. L.
    (2002) Frequent word sequences and statistical stylistics. Literary & Linguistic Computing, 17(2), 157–180. doi: 10.1093/llc/17.2.157
     https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/17.2.157 [Google Scholar]
  20. Huxley, A.
    (1955) After many a summer. Harmondsworth: Penguin. (Original work published 1939)
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jeffries, L. & McIntyre, D.
    (2010) Stylistics. Cambridge GB: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑137‑04516‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04516-4 [Google Scholar]
  22. Jürgens, C.
    (1999, August5). Das Monster ist ein Moralist. Zeit online. www.zeit.de/1999/32/199932.b.e.ellis_.xml?page=2
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Kaiser, H.
    (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36. doi: 10.1007/BF02291575
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575 [Google Scholar]
  24. Knoop, C. A. , Wagner, V. , Jacobsen, T. , & Menninghaus, W.
    (2016) Mapping the aesthetic space of literature “from below”. Poetics. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2016.02.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2016.02.001 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kraus, J.
    (1987) On the sociolinguistic aspects of the notion of functional style . In J. Chloupek & J. Nekvapil (Eds.), Reader in Czech Sociolinguistics (pp.83–93). Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/llsee.23.05kra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/llsee.23.05kra [Google Scholar]
  26. Lowe, D. , & Matthews, R.
    (1995) A stylometric analysis by radial basis functions. Computers and the Humanities, 29, 449–461. doi: 10.1007/BF01829876
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01829876 [Google Scholar]
  27. Mayr, S. , & Buchner, A.
    (2007) Negative priming as a memory phenomenon: A review of 20 years of negative priming research. Journal of Psychology, 215(1), 35–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Michel, G.
    (2001) Stilistische Textanalyse. Eine Einführung. Frankfurt a.M.: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Müller, W. G.
    (2009) Epochenstil/Zeitstil. In U. Fix , A. Gardt , & J. Knape (2008–2009), Rhetorik und Stylistik/Rhetoric and Stylistics: Ein internationales Handbuch historischer und systematischer Forschung, Vol.2 (pp.1271–1285), Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Neme, A. , Pulido, J. R. G. , Muñoz, A. , Hernández, S. , & Dey, T.
    (2015) Stylistics analysis and authorship attribution algorithms based on self-organizing maps. Neurocomputing, 147, 147–159. doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2014.03.064
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2014.03.064 [Google Scholar]
  31. Nöth, W.
    (2009) Stil als Zeichen. In U. Fix , A. Gardt , & J. Knape (2008–2009), Rhetorik und Stylistik/Rhetoric and Stylistics: Ein internationales Handbuch historischer und systematischer Forschung, Vol.2 (pp.1178–1196), Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Osgood, C. E. , Suci, G. J. , & Tannenbaum, P. H.
    (1957), The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Paolacci, G. , Chandler, J. , & Ipeirotis, P. G.
    (2010) Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Reich-Ranicki, M.
    (2008, December8). Was denken Sie von Hemingway?FAZ online. www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/buecher/fragen-sie-reich-ranicki/fragen-sie-reich-ranicki-was-denken-sie-von-hemingway-1745938.html
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Riffaterre, M.
    (1973) Strukturale Stilistik. München: List.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Salimpoor, V. N.
    (2003) The effect of odor-manipulated context on hedonic evaluations and experience of literature. Journal of Young Investigators1. legacy.jyi.org/volumes/volume7/issue1/articles/salimpoor.html
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Sandig, B.
    (2006) Textstilistik des Deutschen (2nd ed.). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Scharloth, J. & Bubenhofer, N.
    (2012) Datengeleitete Korpuspragmatik: Korpusvergleich als Methode der Stilanalyse. In E. Felder , M. Müller , & F. Vogel (Eds.), Korpuspragmatik. Thematische Korpora als Basis diskurslinguistischer Analysen (pp.195–230). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Sedelow, S. Y. , & Sedelow, W. A.
    (1972) Models, computing, and stylistics. In B. B. Kachru & H. F. Stahlke (Eds.), Current trends in stylistics (pp.275–286). Edmonton: Linguistic Research.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Semino, E. , & Culpeper, J.
    (Eds.) (2002) Cognitive stylistics: Language and cognition in text analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/lal.1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.1 [Google Scholar]
  41. Siefkes, M.
    (2011) Style: A new semiotic view on an old problem. Kodikas/Code. Ars Semeiotica34, 1/2, 15–25.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. (2012) Stil als Zeichenprozess: Wie Variation bei Verhalten, Artefakten und Texten Information erzeugt. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. (2013) The experimental aesthetics of style. Research report, IUAV Venice. siefkes.de/dokumente/Siefkes_Experimental_Aesthetics_of_Style.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Siefkes, M. , & Arielli, E.
    (2015) An experimental approach to multimodality: How musical and architectural styles interact in aesthetic perception. In J. Wildfeuer (Ed.), Building bridges for multimodal research. International perspectives on theories and practices of multimodal analysis (pp.247–265). Bern & New York: Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Simpson, P.
    (2014) Stylistics: A resource book for students (2nd ed.). London & New York: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Snider, J. G. , & Osgood, C. E.
    (1969) Semantic differential technique. A sourcebook. Chicago: Aldine.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Spillner, B.
    (1995) Stilsemiotik. In G. Stickel (Ed.), Stilfragen (pp.62–93). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Spitzer, L.
    (1948) Linguistics and literary history: Essays in stylistics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Stewart, L. L.
    (2006) Computational stylistics. In E. K. Brown , R. E. Asher , & J. M. Y. Simpson , Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.), Vol.2 (pp.769–775). doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00966‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00966-4 [Google Scholar]
  50. Sutherland, F.
    (1972) The style of innocence. A study of Hemingway and Callaghan. Toronto: Clarke & Irwin.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Thomaneck, J.
    (1969) Ernest Hemingway. Adverb und Adjektiv als Stil- und Deutungsmittel. PhD thesis, University of Kiel.
  52. Tuldava, J.
    (2005) Stylistics, author identification. In R. Köhler , G. Altmann , & R. G. Piotrowski (Eds.), Quantitative Linguistik: Ein internationales Handbuch (pp.368–387). Berlin & New York: de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Tulving, E. , Schacter, D. L. , & Stark, H. A.
    (1982) Priming effects in word fragment completion are independent of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition8(4), 336–342.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Verdonk, P.
    (2002) Stylistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. (2006) Style. In E. K. Brown , R. E. Asher , & J. M. Y. Simpson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd ed.), Vol.12 (pp.196–210). doi: 10.1016/B0‑08‑044854‑2/00547‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00547-2 [Google Scholar]
  56. Wales, K.
    (1991) A dictionary of stylistics. London & New York: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.7.1.03sie
Loading
Perceptual qualities of literary style
Scientific Study of Literature 7, 52 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.7.1.03sie
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.7.1.03sie
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.7.1.03sie
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): aesthetic preference; attribution; modern literature; novel; perceptual qualities; postmodern literature; style; style categorization

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error