1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Scientific Study of Literature
  4. Volume 7, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 7, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2210-4372
  • E-ISSN: 2210-4380
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Literary narrative fiction may be particularly effective in enhancing Theory of Mind (ToM), as it requires readers to contemplate author and character intentions in filling the literary ‘gaps’ that have been suggested to characterise this fiction type. The current study investigates direct and cumulative effects of reading literature on ToM using confirmatory Bayesian analyses. Direct effects were assessed by comparing the ToM skills of participants who read texts that were manipulated to differ in the amount of gap filling they required. Cumulative effects were assessed by considering the relationship between lifetime literary fiction exposure and ToM. Results showed no evidence for direct effects of reading literature on ToM. However, lifetime literary fiction exposure was associated with higher ToM, particularly cognitive ToM. Although reading a specific piece of literary fiction may thus not have immediately measurable effects on ToM, lifetime exposure to this fiction type is associated with more advanced ToM.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
This work is currently available as a sample.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.7.1.06dem
2017-11-23
2024-10-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/ssol.7.1.06dem
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adrian, J. E. , Clemente, R. A. , Villanueva, L. , & Rieffe, C.
    (2005) Parent – child picture-book reading, mothers’ mental state language and children’s theory of mind. Journal of Child Language, 32(3), 673–686. doi:  10.1017/S0305000905006963
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000905006963 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aram, D. , & Aviram, S.
    (2009) Mothers’ storybook reading and kindergartners’ socioemotional and literacy development. Reading Psychology, 30(2), 175–194. doi:  10.1080/02702710802275348
     https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710802275348 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bal, P. M. , & Veltkamp, M.
    (2013) How does fiction reading influence empathy? An experimental investigation on the role of emotional transportation. PloS one, 8(1), e55341. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0055341
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055341 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barnes, J. L.
    (2012) Fiction, imagination, and social cognition: Insights from autism. Poetics, 40(4), 299–316. doi:  10.1016/j.poetic.2012.05.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2012.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baron‐Cohen, S. , Wheelwright, S. , Hill, J. , Raste, Y. , & Plumb, I.
    (2001) The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high‐functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42(2), 241–251. doi:  10.1111/1469‑7610.00715
     https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00715 [Google Scholar]
  6. Black, J. E. , & Barnes, J. L.
    (2015) The effects of reading material on social and non-social cognition. Poetics, 521, 32–43. doi:  10.1016/j.poetic.2015.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2015.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chekhov, A.
    (1884/1978) A chameleon. In R. E. Matlow (Ed.), Anton Chekhov’s short stories (pp.1–3). New York, NY: Norton.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. (1884/2014) De kameleon [The chameleon]. InVerzamelde werken 1 verhalen 1880–1885 (pp.285–288). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Van Oorschot.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Dijkstra, K. , Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L. , van Kuijk, I. , Yee Chow, S. , Bakker, A. & Zwaan, R. A.
    (2015) Leidt het lezen van literaire fictie tot meer empathie? Een replicatiestudie [Does reading literature result in higher empathy? A replication study]. De Psycholoog, 50(10), 10–21.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Djikic, M. , Oatley, K. , & Moldoveanu, M. C.
    (2013) Reading other minds: Effects of literature on empathy. Scientific Study of Literature, 3(1), 28–47. doi:  10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.3.1.06dji [Google Scholar]
  11. Eugenides, J.
    (1993) The virgin suicides. New York, NY: Picador.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fong, K. , Mullin, J. B. , & Mar, R. A.
    (2013) What you read matters: The role of fiction genre in predicting interpersonal sensitivity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(4), 370–376. doi:  10.1037/a0034084
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034084 [Google Scholar]
  13. Gamannossi, B. A. , & Pinto, G.
    (2014) Theory of mind and language of mind in narratives: Developmental trends from kindergarten to primary school. First Language, 34(3), 262–272. doi:  10.1177/0142723714535875
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723714535875 [Google Scholar]
  14. Gerrig, R. & Rapp, D.
    (2004) Psychological processes underlying literary impact. Poetics Today, 25(2), 265–281. doi:  10.1215/03335372‑25‑2‑265
     https://doi.org/10.1215/03335372-25-2-265 [Google Scholar]
  15. Hakemulder, J.
    (2000) The moral laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/upal.34
     https://doi.org/10.1075/upal.34 [Google Scholar]
  16. Harlow, L. L. , Mulaik, S. A. , & Steiger, J. H.
    (1997) What if there were no significance tests?Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoijtink, H.
    (2012) Informative hypotheses: Theory and practice for behavioral and social scientists. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Iser, W.
    (1975) Die Appellstruktur der Texte. In R. Warning (Ed.), Rezeptionsästhetik: Theorie und Praxis (pp.228–252). Munich, Germany: Fink.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. (1978) The act of reading: A theory of aesthetic response. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. (1988) The reading process: A phenomenological approach. In D. Lodge (Ed.), Modern criticism and thought: A reader (pp.279–299). London, United Kingdom: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Kalbe, E. , Schlegel, M. , Sack, A. T. , Nowak, D. A. , Dafotakis, M. , Bangard, C. , … & Kessler, J.
    (2010) Dissociating cognitive from affective theory of mind: A TMS study. Cortex, 46(6), 769–780. doi:  10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.010 [Google Scholar]
  22. Keen, S.
    (2007) Empathy and the novel. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195175769.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195175769.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  23. Kidd, D. C. , & Castano, E.
    (2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science, 342(6156), 377–380. doi:  10.1126/science.1239918
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1239918 [Google Scholar]
  24. Kidd, D. , & Castano, E.
    (2016) Different stories: How levels of familiarity with literary and genre fiction relate to mentalizing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, Advance online publication. doi:  10.1037/aca0000069
     https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000069 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kidd, D. C. , & Castano, E.
    (2017) Panero et al. (2016): Failure to replicate methods caused the failure to replicate results. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), e1–e4. doi:  10.1037/pspa0000072
     https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000072 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kidd, D. , Ongis, M. , & Castano, E.
    (2016) On literary fiction and its effects on theory of mind. Scientific Study of Literature, 6(1), 42–58. doi:  10.1075/ssol.6.1.04kid
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.6.1.04kid [Google Scholar]
  27. Koopman, E. M. E.
    (2015a) Empathic reactions after reading: The role of genre, personal factors and affective responses. Poetics, 501, 62–79. doi:  10.1016/j.poetic.2015.02.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2015.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2015b) How texts about suffering trigger reflection: Genre, personal factors and affective responses. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9(4), 430–441. doi:  10.1037/aca0000006
     https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000006 [Google Scholar]
  29. (2016a) Reading suffering. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: ERMeCC, Erasmus Research Center for Media, Communication and Culture
     [Google Scholar]
  30. (2016b) Effects of “literariness” on emotions and on empathy and reflection after reading. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10(1), 82–98. doi:  10.1037/aca0000041
     https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000041 [Google Scholar]
  31. Koopman, E. M. E. , & Hakemulder, F.
    (2015) Effects of literature on empathy and self-reflection: A theoretical-empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(1), 79–111. doi:  10.1515/jlt‑2015‑0005
     https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2015-0005 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kluytmans, A. , van de Schoot, R. , Mulder, J. , & Hoijtink, H.
    (2012) Illustrating Bayesian evaluation of informative hypotheses for regression models. Frontiers in Psychology, 3(2), 1–11. doi:  10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00002
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00002 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mar, R. A. , & Oatley, K.
    (2008) The function of fiction is the abstraction and simulation of social experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. doi:  10.1111/j.1745‑6924.2008.00073.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00073.x [Google Scholar]
  34. Mar, R. A. , Oatley, K. , Hirsh, J. , dela Paz, J. , & Peterson, J. B.
    (2006) Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 694–712. doi:  10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.002 [Google Scholar]
  35. Mar, R. A. , Oatley, K. , & Peterson, J. B.
    (2009) Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes. Communications, 34(4), 407–428. doi:  10.1515/COMM.2009.025
     https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.025 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mol, S. E. , & Bus, A. G.
    (2011) To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137(2), 267–296. doi:  10.1037/a0021890
     https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021890 [Google Scholar]
  37. Moore, M. , & Gordon, P. C.
    (2015) Reading ability and print exposure: Item response theory analysis of the author recognition test. Behavior Research Methods, 47(4), 1095–1109. doi:  10.3758/s13428‑014‑0534‑3
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0534-3 [Google Scholar]
  38. Mulder, J. , Hoijtink, H. & Klugkist, I.
    (2009) Equality and inequality constrained multivariate linear models: Model selection using constrained posterior priors. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 140(4), 887–906. doi:  10.1016/j.jspi.2009.09.022
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2009.09.022 [Google Scholar]
  39. Mulder, J. , Hoijtink, H. , & de Leeuw, C.
    (2012) BIEMS: A Fortran 90 program for calculating Bayes factors for inequality and equality constrained models. Journal of Statistical Software, 46(2), 1–39. doi:  10.18637/jss.v046.i02
     https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v046.i02 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mulder, J. , Klugkist, I. G. , Schoot, A. G. J. van de , Meeus, W. H. J. , Selfhout, M. H. W. & Hoijtink, H. J. A.
    (2009) Informative hypotheses for repeated measurements: A Bayesian approach. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 53(6), 530–546. doi:  10.1016/j.jmp.2009.09.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2009.09.003 [Google Scholar]
  41. Mumper, M. L. & Gerrig, R. J.
    (2016) Leisure reading and social cognition: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11(1), 109–120. doi:  10.1037/aca0000089
     https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000089 [Google Scholar]
  42. Oatley, K.
    (1999a) Why fiction may be twice as true as fact: Fiction as cognitive and emotional simulation. Review of General Psychology, 3(2), 101. doi:  10.1037/1089‑2680.3.2.101
     https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.3.2.101 [Google Scholar]
  43. (1999b) Meetings of minds: Dialogue, sympathy, and identification, in reading fiction. Poetics, 26(5–6), 439–454. doi:  10.1016/S0304‑422X(99)00011‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00011-X [Google Scholar]
  44. Oatley, K. , & Mar, R. A.
    (2005) Evolutionary pre-adaptation and the idea of character in fiction. Journal of Cultural and Evolutionary Psychology, 3(2), 179–194. doi:  10.1556/JCEP.3.2005.2.5
     https://doi.org/10.1556/JCEP.3.2005.2.5 [Google Scholar]
  45. Panero, M. E. , Weisberg, D. S. , Black, J. , Goldstein, T. R. , Barnes, J. L. , Brownell, H. , & Winner, E.
    (2016) Does reading a single passage of literary fiction really improve theory of mind? An attempt at replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(5), e46–e54. doi:  10.1037/pspa0000064
     https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000064 [Google Scholar]
  46. Peskin, J. , & Astington, J. W.
    (2004) The effects of adding metacognitive language to story texts. Cognitive Development, 19(2), 253–273. doi:  10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.01.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.01.003 [Google Scholar]
  47. Pino, M. C. , & Mazza, M.
    (2016) The use of “literary fiction” to promote mentalizing ability. PloS one, 11(8), e0160254. doi:  10.1371/journal.pone.0160254
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160254 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ratner, N. K. , & Olver, R. R.
    (1998) Reading a tale of deception, learning a theory of mind?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(2), 219–239. doi:  10.1016/S0885‑2006(99)80036‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80036-2 [Google Scholar]
  49. Rosnow, R. L. , & Rosenthal, R.
    (1989) Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44(10), 1276–1284. doi:  10.1037/0003‑066X.44.10.1276
     https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.10.1276 [Google Scholar]
  50. Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. , & Aharon-Peretz, J.
    (2007) Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: A lesion study. Neuropsychologia, 45(13), 3054–3067. doi:  10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.021
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.021 [Google Scholar]
  51. Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. , Shur, S. , Barcai-Goodman, L. , Medlovich, S. , Harari, H. , & Levkovitz, Y.
    (2007) Dissociation of cognitive from affective components of theory of mind in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 149(1), 11–23. doi:  10.1016/j.psychres.2005.10.018
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2005.10.018 [Google Scholar]
  52. Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. , Tibi-Elhanany, Y. , & Aharon-Peretz, J.
    (2007) The green-eyed monster and malicious joy: The neuroanatomical bases of envy and gloating (schadenfreude). Brain, 130(6), 1663–1678. doi:  10.1093/brain/awm093
     https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm093 [Google Scholar]
  53. Stanovich, K. E. , & West, R. F.
    (1989) Exposure to print and orthographic processing. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(4), 402–433. doi:  10.2307/747605
     https://doi.org/10.2307/747605 [Google Scholar]
  54. Stansfield, J. & Bunce, L.
    (2014) The relationship between empathy and reading fiction: Separate roles for cognitive and affective components. Journal of European Psychology Students, 5(3), 9–18. doi:  10.5334/jeps.ca
     https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.ca [Google Scholar]
  55. Sugiyama, M. S.
    (2001) Food, foragers, and folklore: The role of narrative in human subsistence. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(4), 221–240. doi:  10.1016/S1090‑5138(01)00063‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(01)00063-0 [Google Scholar]
  56. van Beem, J.
    (2015) Kleur bekennen [Follow suit]. National Geographic, 91, 118–130.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. van de Schoot, R. , Kaplan, D. , Denissen, J. , Asendorpf, J. B. , Neyer, F. J. , & Aken, M. A.
    (2014) A gentle introduction to Bayesian analysis: Applications to developmental research. Child Development, 85(3), 842–860. doi:  10.1111/cdev.12169
     https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12169 [Google Scholar]
  58. van de Schoot, R. , Mulder, J. , Hoijtink, H. , Van Aken, M. A. , Semon Dubas, J. , Orobio de Castro, B. , … & Romeijn, J. W.
    (2011) An introduction to Bayesian model selection for evaluating informative hypotheses. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8(6), 713–729. doi:  10.1080/17405629.2011.621799
     https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2011.621799 [Google Scholar]
  59. Van Peer, W.
    (1986) Pulp and purpose. Stylistic analysis as an aid to a theory of texts. In T. D’Haen (Ed.), Linguistics and the study of literature (pp.268–286). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rodopi.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. (1989) Quantitative studies of literature. A critique and an outlook. Computers and the Humanities, 23(4), 301–307. doi:  10.1007/BF02176635
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02176635 [Google Scholar]
  61. West, R. F. , Stanovich, K. E. , & Mitchell, H. R.
    (1993) Reading in the real world and its correlates. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(1), 34–50. doi:  10.2307/747815
     https://doi.org/10.2307/747815 [Google Scholar]
  62. Zunshine, L.
    (2006) Why we read fiction: Theory of mind and the novel. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.7.1.06dem
Loading
Effects of exposure to literary narrative fiction
Scientific Study of Literature 7, 129 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.7.1.06dem
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.7.1.06dem
/content/journals/10.1075/ssol.7.1.06dem
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): author recognition test; Bayesian analyses; literariness; literary gaps; literary narrative fiction; Theory of Mind

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error