Indirect interpreting: Stumbling block or stepping stone?

References

1. AIIC
   AIIC 2022 Professional Standards. AccessedMay 10, 2022. https://aiic.org/document/10235/NormesProf-ProfStandards_2022_E&F_final.pdf
   [Google Scholar]
2. Andrades Moreno, Arsenio
   2011 “La interpretación en la Unión Europea: Prácticas y salidas profesionales [Interpreting in the European Union: Internships and professional opportunities].” Entreculturas3: 205–222. 10.24310/Entreculturasertci.vi3.11677
   https://doi.org/10.24310/Entreculturasertci.vi3.11677 [Google Scholar]
3. Assis Rosa, Alexandra, Hanna Pięta, and Rita Bueno Maia
   2017 “Theoretical, Methodological and Terminological Issues Regarding Indirect Translation: An Overview.” InIndirect Translation: Theoretical, Methodological and Terminological Issues, edited byAlexandra Assis Rosa, Hanna Pięta, and Rita Bueno Maia, special issue ofTranslation Studies10 (2): 113–132.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena
   2004 “Simultaneous Interpreting A–B vs. B–A from the Interpreters’ Standpoint.” InClaims, Changes and Challenges in Translation Studies: Selected Contributions from the EST Congress, Copenhagen 2001, edited byGyde Hansen, Kirsten Malmkjær, and Daniel Gile, 239–249. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.50.20bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.50.20bar [Google Scholar]
5. Čeňková, Ivana
   2008 “Retour et relais – un défi et une réalité quotidienne pour les interprètes de conférence au sein des institutions européennes [Retour and relay: A challenge and a reality for conference interpreters at the European institutions].” FORUM6 (2): 1–21. 10.1075/forum.6.2.01cen
   https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.6.2.01cen [Google Scholar]
6. Čeňková, Ivana
   2015 “Relay Interpreting.” InRoutledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, edited byFranz Pöchhacker, 339–341. Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chernov, Gelij V.
   1992 “Conference Interpreting in the USSR: History, Theory, New Frontiers.” Meta37 (1): 149–162. 10.7202/002227ar
   https://doi.org/10.7202/002227ar [Google Scholar]
8. Chesterman, Andrew
   2017 Reflections on Translation Theory: Selected Papers 1993–2014. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.132
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.132 [Google Scholar]
9. DG Interpretation
   DG Interpretation 2018 Annual Activity Report 2018. AccessedMay 27, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/annual-activity-report-2018-interpretation_es
   [Google Scholar]
10. DG Interpretation
    DG Interpretation 2019 Annual Activity Report 2019. AccessedMay 27, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/publications/annual-activity-report-2019-interpretation_es
    [Google Scholar]
11. European Commission
    European Commission 2021 European Commission 2021: HR Key Figures Staff Members. AccessedMay 27, 2021. https://ec.europa.eu/info/about-european-commission/organisational-structure/commission-staff_en
    [Google Scholar]
12. European Parliament
    European Parliament 2021 The Interpreter. AccessedMay 27, 2021. https://europarl.europa.eu/interpretation/en/the-interpreter.html
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gambier, Yves
    2003 “Working with Relay: An Old Story and a New Challenge.” InSpeaking in Tongues: Language across Contexts and Users, edited byLuis Pérez González, 47–66. Valencia: Universitat de València.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gile, Daniel
    1995 Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.8(1st)
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.8(1st) [Google Scholar]
15. Gile, Daniel
    2004 “Translation Research versus Interpreting Research: Kinship, Differences and Prospects for Partnership.” InTranslation Research and Interpreting Research: Traditions, Gaps and Synergies, edited byChristina Schäffner, 10–34. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853597350‑003
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853597350-003 [Google Scholar]
16. Greenbaum, Thomas L.
    2000 Moderating Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Group Facilitation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. 10.4135/9781483328522
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483328522 [Google Scholar]
17. Heynold, Christian
    1994 “Interpreting at the European Commission.” InTeaching Translation and Interpreting 2: Insights, Aims, Visions. Papers from the Second Language International Conference Elsinore, 1993, edited byCay Dollerup and Annette Lindegaard, 11–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.5.04hey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.5.04hey [Google Scholar]
18. Klonowicz, Tatiana
    1994 “Putting One’s Heart into Simultaneous Interpretation.” InBridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation, edited bySylvie Lambert and Barbara Moser-Mercer, 213–224. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.3.16klo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.3.16klo [Google Scholar]
19. Lim, Hyang-Ok
    2005 “Working into the B Language: The Condoned Taboo?” Meta50 (4). 10.7202/019870ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/019870ar [Google Scholar]
20. Maricou, Jozefien
    2018 L’Interpretation en relais: Étude comparative de la qualité d’interprétations directes et indirectes sur la base d’un corpus [Relay interpreting: Corpus-based quality study comparing direct and indirect interpretations]. MA thesis. Ghent University. https://lib.ugent.be/nl/catalog/rug01:002478864?faculty=LW-GE&i=0&lang=und&q=maricou&sticky=type-faculty-lang&type=master
    [Google Scholar]
21. Mikkelson, Holly
    1999 “Relay Interpreting: A Solution for Languages of Limited Diffusion?” The Translator5 (2): 361–380. 10.1080/13556509.1999.10799051
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1999.10799051 [Google Scholar]
22. Nida, Eugene A.
    2001 Contexts in Translating. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Pięta, Hanna
    2019 “Indirect Translation: Main Trends in Practice and Research.” Slovo.ru: Baltic accent10 (1): 21–36. 10.5922/2225‑5346‑2019‑1‑2
    https://doi.org/10.5922/2225-5346-2019-1-2 [Google Scholar]
24. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2004 Introducing Interpreting Studies. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203504802
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203504802 [Google Scholar]
25. Pym, Anthony
    2008 “On Omission in Simultaneous Interpreting: Risk Analysis of a Hidden Effort.” InEfforts and Models in Interpreting and Translation Research: A Tribute to Daniel Gile, edited byGyde Hansen, Andrew Chesterman, and Heidrun Gerzymisch-Arbogast, 83–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Rodríguez Melchor, Maia Dolores, and Lucía Sánchez del Villar Boceta
    2000 “Interpretación de conferencias en las instituciones europeas: El intérprete como elemento integrador frente a la diversidad lingüística y cultural [Conference interpreting at the European Institutions: The interpreter as integrating element before linguistic diversity].” ICADE49: 235–248.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Schlesinger, Miriam
    1994 “Intonation in the Production and Perception of Simultaneous Interpretation.” InBridging the Gap: Empirical Research in Simultaneous Interpretation, edited bySylvie Lambert and Barbara Moser-Mercer, 225–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.3.17shl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.3.17shl [Google Scholar]
28. Seleskovitch, Danica
    1999 “The Teaching of Conference Interpretation in the Course of the Last 50 Years.” Interpreting4 (1): 55–66. 10.1075/intp.4.1.07sel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.4.1.07sel [Google Scholar]
29. Seleskovitch, Danica, and Marianne Lederer
    1989 Pédagogie raisonnée de l’interprétation [A systematic approach to teaching interpretation]. Brussels: Didier Érudition.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Setton, Robin
    1994 “Experiments in the Application of Discourse Studies to Interpreter Training.” InTeaching Translation and Interpreting 2: Insights, Aims, Visions. Papers from the Second Language International Conference Elsinore, 1993, edited byCay Dollerup and Annette Lindegaard, 183–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.5.27set
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.5.27set [Google Scholar]
31. Setton, Robin, and Andrew Dawrant
    2016a Conference Interpreting: A Complete Course. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.120
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.120 [Google Scholar]
32. Setton, Robin, and Andrew Dawrant
    2016b Conference Interpreting: A Trainer’s Guide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Toury, Gideon
    1995 Descriptive Translation Studies – and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.4 [Google Scholar]
34. Van Hoof-Haferkamp, Renée
    1989 Préface. InPédagogie raisonnée de l’interprétation [A systematic approach to teaching interpretation], edited byDanica Seleskovitch and Marianne Lederer, 3–4. Brussels: Didier Érudition.
    [Google Scholar]