Relay interpreting

References

1. Altman, Janet
   1990 “What Helps Effective Communication? Some Interpreters’ Views.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter3, 23–32.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Anderson, R. Bruce W.
   1976 “Perspectives On the Role of Interpreter.” InTranslation: Applications and Research, edited byRichard W. Brislin, 208–228. New York: Gardner Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Assis Rosa, Alexandra, Hanna Pięta, and Rita Bueno Maia
   2017 “Theoretical, Methodological and Terminological Issues Regarding Indirect Translation: An Overview.” InIndirect Translation: Theoretical, Methodological and Terminological Issues, edited byAlexandra Assis Rosa, Hanna Pięta, and Rita Bueno Maia, special issue ofTranslation Studies10 (2), 113–132.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Biscaye, Elizabeth
   1993 “Problems in Interpretation.” Meta38 (1), 101–103. 10.7202/002085ar
   https://doi.org/10.7202/002085ar [Google Scholar]
5. Bowen, David, and Margareta Bowen
   eds. 1990 Interpreting – Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow. Binghamton, NY: State University of New York at Binghamton. 10.1075/ata.iv
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.iv [Google Scholar]
6. Braun, Sabine
   2015 “Remote Interpreting.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Interpreting, edited byHolly Mikkelson and Renée Jourdenais, 352–367. Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Čeňková, Ivana
   2015 “Relay Interpreting.” InRoutledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, edited byFranz Pöchhacker, 339–341. Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Čeňková, Ivana
   2019 “Los intérpretes checos en las instituciones europeas a los quince años de la adhesión a la UE [Czech interpreters in the European Instiutions fifteen years after joining the EU].” InSmaller Languages: The Slavic Languages, edited byMiroslava Aurová, Jana Pešková, and José Agustín Torijano Pérez, special issue ofCLINA5 (2), 63–76.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cerney, Brian E.
   2004 Relayed Interpretation from English to American Sign Language via a Hearing and a Deaf Interpreter. PhD diss.Union Institute & University Graduate College.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Denissenko, Jurij
    1989 “Communicative and Interpretative Linguistics.” InThe Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Teaching Conference Interpretation: First International Symposium on Conference Interpreting at the University of Trieste, edited byLaura Gran and John Dodds, 155–158. Udine: Campanotto.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Díaz del Castillo, Bernal
    (1568) 1976 Historia Verdadera de la Conquista de la Nueva España [The true history of the conquest of New Spain]. México: Porrúa.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Dollerup, Cay
    2000 “‘Relay’ and ‘Support’ Translations.” InTranslation in Context: Selected Contributions from the EST Congress, Granada 1998, edited byAndrew Chesterman, Natividad Gallardo San Salvador, and Yves Gambier, 17–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.39.04dol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.39.04dol [Google Scholar]
13. Dollerup, Cay
    2014 “Relay in Translation.” InCross-Linguistic Interaction: Translation, Contrastive and Cognitive Studies, edited byDiana Yankova, 21–32. Sofia: St. Kliment Ohridski University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Gambier, Yves
    2003 “Working with Relay: An Old Story and a New Challenge.” InSpeaking in Tongues: Language across Contexts and Users, edited byLuis Pérez González, 47–66. València: Universitat de València.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Giambagli, Anna
    1993 “L’interprétation en relais: une perte d’information? Un essai expérimental [Relay interpreting: A loss of information? An experimental study].” The Interpreters’ Newsletter5, 81–93.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Hung, Eva
    2014 “Translation in China – An Analytical Survey: First Century B.C.E. to Early Twentieth Century.” InAsian Translation Traditions, edited byEva Hung and Judy Wakabayashi, 67–108. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315759876‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759876-7 [Google Scholar]
17. Kade, Otto
    1968 Zufall und Gesetzmäßigkeit in der Übersetzung [Coincidence and regularity in translation]. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kurz, Ingrid, and Liese Katschinka
    1988 “Live Subtitling – A First Experiment on Austrian TV.” InTranslation, Our Future: Proceedings of the XIth World Congress of FIT, edited byPaul Nekeman, 479–483. Maastricht: Euroterm.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lim, Hyang-Ok
    2002 “Relay Interpretation: A Necessary Evil?” Interpretation and Translation4 (2), 149–171.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Mackintosh, Jennifer
    1983 Relay Interpretation: An Exploratory Study. MA thesis. University of London.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Maricou, Jozefien
    2018 L’interprétation en relais: Étude comparative de la qualité d’interprétations directes et indirectes sur la base d’un corpus [Relay interpreting: A corpus-based comparative study on the quality of direct and indirect interpretations]. MA thesis. Ghent University.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Merriam-Webster
    Merriam-Webster 2020 “Relay.” AccessedAugust 15, 2020. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/relay
23. Mikkelson, Holly
    1999 “Relay Interpreting: A Solution for Languages of Limited Diffusion?” The Translator5 (2), 361–380. 10.1080/13556509.1999.10799051
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1999.10799051 [Google Scholar]
24. Millner, Julia
    2016 Inkonsistenter visueller Input beim Relaisdolmetschen [Inconsistent visual input in relay interpreting]. MA thesis. University of Vienna.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Moravcová, Helena
    2012 Relaisdolmetschen von PowerPoint-Präsentationen: Eine Fallstudie [Relay interpreting of PowerPoint presentations: A case study]. MA thesis. University of Vienna.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Pięta, Hanna
    2019 “Indirect Translation: Main Trends in Practice and Research.” Slovo.ru: Baltic Accent10 (1), 21–36. 10.5922/2225‑5346‑2019‑1‑2
    https://doi.org/10.5922/2225-5346-2019-1-2 [Google Scholar]
27. Pihkala, Tuula
    1998 “Die Kompetenz des Dolmetschers auf die Probe gestellt: Relaisdolmetschen ohne Dolmetschanlage im Rahmen eines internationalen Bauprojekts [Interpreting competence put to the test: Relay interpreting without interpreting facilities as part of an international construction project].” textcontext12 (2), 129–147.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2022 Introducing Interpreting Studies. 3rd ed.Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003186472
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003186472 [Google Scholar]
29. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2019 “Moving Boundaries in Interpreting.” InMoving Boundaries in Translation Studies, edited byHelle V. Dam, Matilde Nisbeth Brøgger, and Karen Korning Zethsen, 45–63. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2020 “‘Going Video’: Mediality and Multimodality in Interpreting.” InLinking Up with Video: Perspectives on Interpreting Practice and Research, edited byHeidi Salaets and Geert Brône, 13–45. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.149.02poc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.149.02poc [Google Scholar]
31. Pym, Anthony
    2011 “Translation Research Terms: A Tentative Glossary for Moments of Perplexity and Dispute.” InTranslation Research Projects 3, edited byAnthony Pym, 75–100. Tarragona: Intercultural Studies Group.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Romero-Fresco, Pablo
    2011 Subtitling through Speech Recognition: Respeaking. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Romero-Fresco, Pablo, and Franz Pöchhacker
    2017 “Quality Assessment in Interlingual Live Subtitling: The NTR Model.” InTranslator Quality – Translation Quality: Empirical Approaches to Assessment and Evaluation, edited byGeoffrey S. Kolby and Isabel Lacruz, special issue ofLinguistica Antverpiensia, New Series: Themes in Translation Studies16, 149–167.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sakalidis, Theodoros
    2021 Interlinguale Live-Untertitel: Direkt vs. relaisgestützt [Interlingual live subtitles: Direct vs. relay-based]. MA thesis. University of Vienna.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Seleskovitch, Danica, and Marianne Lederer
    1989 Pédagogie raisonnée de l’interprétation [A systematic approach to teaching interpretation]. Paris: Didier Érudition & Bruxelles: OPOCE.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Shlesinger, Miriam
    2010 “Relay Interpreting.” InHandbook of Translation Studies, vol.1, edited byYves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 276–278. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hts.1.rel1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.1.rel1 [Google Scholar]
37. Song, Shuxian, and Andrew K. F. Cheung
    2019 “Disfluency in Relay and Non-Relay Simultaneous Interpretation: An Initial Exploration.” Forum17 (1), 1–19. 10.1075/forum.18016.che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.18016.che [Google Scholar]
38. St. André, James
    2020 Relay. InRoutledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, 3rd ed., edited byMona Baker and Gabriela Saldanha, 470–473. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Wadensjö, Cecilia
    1998 Interpreting as Interaction. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]