Shorter than a text, longer than a sentence

References

1. Alves, Fabio
   2003 Triangulating Translation: Perspectives in Process Oriented Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.45
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.45 [Google Scholar]
2. Alves, Fabio, and Daniel Couto Vale
   2009 “Probing the Unit of Translation in Time: Aspects of the Design and Development of a Web Application for Storing, Annotating, and Querying Translation Process Data.” Across Languages and Cultures10 (2): 251–273. 10.1556/Acr.10.2009.2.5
   https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.10.2009.2.5 [Google Scholar]
3. Alves, Fabio, and Daniel Couto Vale
   2011 “On Drafting and Revision in Translation: A Corpus Linguistics Oriented Analysis of Translation Process Data.” Translation: Computation, Corpora, Cognition1: 105–122.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Alves, Fabio, Adriana Pagano, and Igor da Silva
   2014 “Effortful Text Production in Translation: A Study of Grammatical (De)metaphorization Drawing on Product and Process Data.” Translation and Interpreting Studies9 (1): 25–51. 10.1075/tis.9.1.02alv
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.9.1.02alv [Google Scholar]
5. Alves, Fabio, Adriana Pagano, Stella Neumann, Erich Steiner, and Silvia Hansen-Schirra
   2010 “Translation Units and Grammatical Shifts: Towards an Integration of Product- and Process-based Translation Research.” InTranslation and Cognition, edited byGregory Shreve and Erik Angelone, 109–142. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/ata.xv.07alv
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.07alv [Google Scholar]
6. Bates, Douglas, Martin Maechler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker
   2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software67 (1): 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
7. Benjamini, Yoav, and Yosef Hochberg
   1995 “Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society57 (1): 289–300.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bursac, Zoran, C. Heath Gauss, David Keith Williams, and David W. Hosmer
   2008 “Purposeful Selection of Variables in Logistic Regression.” Source Code for Biology and Medicine3 (17). www.scfbm.org/content/3/1/17. 10.1186/1751‑0473‑3‑17
   https://doi.org/10.1186/1751-0473-3-17 [Google Scholar]
9. Camblin, C. C., Peter C. Gordon, and Tamara Y. Swaab
   2007 “The Interplay of Discourse Congruence and Lexical Association during Sentence Processing: Evidence from ERPs and Eye Tracking.” Journal of Memory and Language56: 103–128. 10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.07.005 [Google Scholar]
10. Carl, Michael
    2012 “Translog – II: A Program for Recording User Activity Data for Empirical Reading and Writing Research.” InProceedings of the Eight International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 4108–4112.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Carl, Michael, Srinivas Bangalore, and Moritz Schaeffer
    eds. 2016 New Directions in Empirical Translation Process Research: Exploring the CRITT TPR-DB. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑20358‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20358-4 [Google Scholar]
12. Carl, Michael, Barbara Dragsted, and Arnt L. Jakobsen
    2011 “A Taxonomy of Human Translation Styles.” Translation Journal16 (2). translationjournal.net/journal/56taxonomy.htm
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chesterman, Andrew
    2011 “Reflections on the Literal Translation Hypothesis.” InMethods and Strategies of Process Research: Integrative Approaches in Translation Studies, edited byCecilia Alvstad, Adelina Hild and Elisabet Tiselius, 23–35. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.94.05che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.94.05che [Google Scholar]
14. Couto Vale, Daniel
    2017 “What Does a Translator Do When Not Writing?” InEmpirical Modelling of Translation and Interpreting, edited bySilvia Hansen-Schirra, Oliver Czulo, and Sascha Hoffmann, 177–208. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. da Silva, Igor
    2012 (Des)compactação de significados e esforço cognitivo no processo tradutório: Um estudo da metáfora grammatical na construção do texto traduzido. PhD thesisFederal University of Minas Gerais.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Davies, Mark
    2004- BYU-BNC. (Based on the British National Corpus from Oxford University Press). corpus.byu.edu/bnc/
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dragsted, Barbara
    2005 “Segmentation in Translation: Differences across Levels of Expertise and Difficulty.” Target17 (1): 49–70. 10.1075/target.17.1.04dra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.17.1.04dra [Google Scholar]
18. Dragsted, Barbara, and Inge G. Hansen
    2008 “Comprehension and Production in Translation: A Pilot Study on Segmentation and the Coordination of Reading and Writing Processes.” InLooking at Eyes: Eye-Tracking Studies of Reading and Translation Processing, edited bySusanne Göpferich, Arnt L. Jakobsen, and Inger M. Mees, 9–29. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Efron, Bradley
    2010 “Correlated z-Values and the Accuracy of Large-Scale Statistical Estimates.” Journal of the American Statistical Association105 (491): 1042–1055. 10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09129
    https://doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2010.tm09129 [Google Scholar]
20. Englund Dimitrova, Birgitta
    2005 Expertise and Explicitation in the Translation Process. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.64
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.64 [Google Scholar]
21. Halliday, Michael A. K., and Ruqaiya Hasan
    1976 Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Halliday, Michael A. K.
    2001 “Literacy and Linguistics: Relationships between Spoken and Written Language.” InAnalysing English in a Global Context, edited byAnne Burns and Caroline Coffin, 181–193. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Halverson, Sandra
    2015 “Cognitive Translation Studies and the Merging of Empirical Paradigms: The Case of ‘Literal Translation’.” Translation Spaces4 (2): 310–340. 10.1075/ts.4.2.07hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.4.2.07hal [Google Scholar]
24. Hansen-Schirra, Silvia, Jean Nitzke, and Katharina Oster
    2017 “Predicting Cognate Translation.” InEmpirical Modelling of Translation and Interpreting, edited bySilvia Hansen-Schirra, Oliver Czulo, and Sascha Hoffmann, 3–22. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Holmqvist, Kenneth, Marcus Nyström, Richard Andersson, Richard Dewhurst, Halszka Jarodzka, and Joost Van de Weijer
    2011 Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jakobsen, Arnt L.
    1999 “Logging Target Text Production with Translog.” InProbing the Process in Translation Methods and Results, edited byGyde Hansen, 9–20. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jakobsen, Arnt L.
    2002 “Orientation, Segmentation, and Revision in Translation.” InEmpirical Translation Studies: Process and Product, edited byGyde Hansen, 191–204. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kruger, Haidee, and Bertus van Rooy
    2016 “Syntactic and Pragmatic Transfer Effects in Reported-Speech Constructions in Three Contact Varieties of English Influenced by Afrikaans.” Language Sciences56: 118–131. 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.04.003 [Google Scholar]
29. Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff, and Rune H. B. Christensen
    2016 lmerTest: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models: R package. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=lmerTest
    [Google Scholar]
30. Mauranen, Anna
    2004 “Corpora, Universals and Interference.” InTranslation Universals: Do They Exist?edited byAnna Mauranen and Pekka Kujamäki, 65–82. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.48.07mau
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.48.07mau [Google Scholar]
31. McNamee, Roseanne
    2005 ”Regression Modelling and Other Methods to Control Confounding.” Occupational and Environmental Medicine62 (7): 500–506. 10.1136/oem.2002.001115
    https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2002.001115 [Google Scholar]
32. Mougeon, Raymond, Terry Nadasdi, and Katherine Rehner
    2005 “Contact-Induced Linguistic Innovations on the Continuum of Language Use: The Case of French in Ontario.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition8 (2): 99–115. 10.1017/S1366728905002142
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728905002142 [Google Scholar]
33. Neumann, Stella, Adriana Pagano, Fabio Alves, Pirita Pyykkönen, and Igor da Silva
    2010 “Targeting (De-)metaphorization: Process-Based Insights.” The 22nd ESFCW, Koper, Slovenija, July 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
34. O’Brien, Sharon
    2009 “Eye Tracking in Translation Process Research: Methodological Challenges and Solutions.” InMethodology, Technology and Innovation in Translation Process Research: A Tribute to Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, edited byInger M. Mees, Fabio Alves, and Susanne Göpferich, 251–266. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
35. O’Donnell, Michael
    2003 RSTTool: An RST Markup Tool. www.wagsoft.com/RSTTool
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pyykkönen, Pirita, and Juhani Järvikivi
    2010 “Activation and Persistence of Implicit Causality Information in Spoken Language Comprehension.” Experimental Psychology57 (1): 5–16. 10.1027/1618‑3169/a000002
    https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000002 [Google Scholar]
37. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2017 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
38. Radach, Ralph, Lynn Huestegge, and Ronan Reilly
    2008 “The Role of Global Top-Down Factors in Local Eye-Movement Control in Reading.” Psychological Research72 (6): 675–688. 10.1007/s00426‑008‑0173‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-008-0173-3 [Google Scholar]
39. Rautenberg, Rosa
    2011 (De-)Metaphorization in English-German Translation: A Quantitative Analysis of a Keystroke-Logging Experiment. State examination thesis RWTH Aachen University.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Schaeffer, Moritz, and Michael Carl
    2014 “Measuring the Cognitive Effort of Literal Translation Processes.” InWorkshop on Humans and Computer-Assisted Translation, 29–37.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Stamenov, Maxim I., Alexander Gerganov, and Ivo D. Popivanov
    2010 “Prompting Cognates in the Bilingual Lexicon: Optimizing Access during Translation.” InTranslation and Cognition, edited byGregory Shreve and Erik Angelone, 323–347. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/ata.xv.17sta
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.17sta [Google Scholar]
42. Teich, Elke
    2003 Cross-linguistic Variation in System and Text: A Methodology for the Investigation of Translations and Comparable Texts. Berlin: de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110896541
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110896541 [Google Scholar]
43. Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja
    2005 “The Monitor Model Revisited: Evidence from Process Research.” Meta50 (2): 405–414. 10.7202/010990ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/010990ar [Google Scholar]
44. Tobii Technology
    Tobii Technology 2012 User Manual Tobii Studio: Version 3.2. www.tobii.com/Global/Analysis/Downloads/User_Manuals_and_Guides/Tobii_UserManual_TobiiStudio3.2_301112_ENG_WEB.pdf
45. Toury, Gideon
    2012 Descriptive Translation Studies – and Beyond. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.100
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.100 [Google Scholar]