oa How are translation norms negotiated?

References

1. Anderson, R. Bruce W.
   (1976) 2002 “Perspectives on the Role of Interpreter.” InThe Interpreting Studies Reader, edited byFranz Pöchhacker and Miriam Shlesinger, 209–217. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bell, Allan
   1984 “Language Style as Audience Design.” Language in Society13 (2): 145–204. 10.1017/S004740450001037X
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740450001037X [Google Scholar]
3. Ben-Ari, Nitsa
   1992 “Didactic and Pedagogic Tendencies in the Norms Dictating the Translation of Children’s Literature: The Case of Postwar German-Hebrew Translations.” Poetics Today13 (1): 198–221. 10.2307/1772799
   https://doi.org/10.2307/1772799 [Google Scholar]
4. Bolden, B. Galina
   2000 “Toward Understanding Practices of Medical Interpreting: Interpreters’ Involvement in History Taking.” Discourse Studies2 (4): 387–419. 10.1177/1461445600002004001
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002004001 [Google Scholar]
5. Bourdieu, Pierre
   1977 Outline of a Theory of Practice. Translated byRichard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511812507
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507 [Google Scholar]
6. Brems, Elke, and Sara Ramos Pinto
   2013 “Reception and Translation.” InHandbook of Translation StudiesVol.4, edited byYves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 142–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hts.4.rec1
   https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.4.rec1 [Google Scholar]
7. Chesterman, Andrew
   1993 “From ‘Is’ to ‘Ought’: Laws, Norms and Strategies in Translation Studies.” Target5 (1): 1–20. 10.1075/target.5.1.02che
   https://doi.org/10.1075/target.5.1.02che [Google Scholar]
8. Chesterman, Andrew
   2016 Memes of Translation: The Spread of Ideas in Translation Theory (Benjamins Translation Library 123). Revised edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.123
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.123 [Google Scholar]
9. Chesterman, Andrew
   1999 “The Empirical Status of Prescriptivism.” Folia Translatologica6: 9–19.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Chesterman, Andrew
    2001 “Proposal for a Hieronymic Oath.” The Translator7 (2): 139–154. 10.1080/13556509.2001.10799097
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2001.10799097 [Google Scholar]
11. Chesterman, Andrew
    2002 “Semiotic Modalities in Translation Causality.” Across Languages and Cultures3 (2): 145–158. 10.1556/Acr.3.2002.2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.3.2002.2.1 [Google Scholar]
12. Chesterman, Andrew
    2006a “A Note on Norms and Evidence.” InTranslation and Interpreting – Training and Research, edited byJorma Tommola and Yves Gambier, 13–19. Turku: University of Turku.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chesterman, Andrew
    2006b “Questions in the Sociology of Translation.” InTranslation Studies at the Interface of Disciplines (Benjamins Translation Library 68), edited byJoão F. Duarte, Alexandra A. Rosa, and Teresa Seruya, 9–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.68.03che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.68.03che [Google Scholar]
14. Chesterman, Andrew
    2007a “On the Idea of a Theory.” Across Languages and Cultures8 (1): 1–16. 10.1556/Acr.8.2007.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.8.2007.1.1 [Google Scholar]
15. Chesterman, Andrew
    2007b “The Unbearable Lightness of English Words.” InText, Processes, and Corpora: Research Inspired by Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit, edited byRiitta Jääskeläinen, Tiina Puurtinen, and Hilkka Stotesbury, 231–241. Joensuu: Joensuun yliopistopaino.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Chesterman, Andrew
    2008 “On Explanation.” InPym, Shlesinger, and Simeoni 2008, 363–379.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Chesterman, Andrew
    2009 The Name and Nature of Translator Studies.” Hermes: Journal of Linguistics42: 13–22.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Chesterman, Andrew
    2018 “Translation Ethics.” InA History of Modern Translation Knowledge: Sources, Concepts, Effects (Benjamins Translation Library 142), edited byLieven D’hulst and Yves Gambier, 443–448. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.142.62che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.142.62che [Google Scholar]
19. Chesterman, Andrew, and Rosemary Arrojo
    2000 “Shared Ground in Translation Studies.” Target12 (1): 151–160. 10.1075/target.12.1.08che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.12.1.08che [Google Scholar]
20. Chesterman, Andrew, and Mona Baker
    2008 “Ethics of Renarration: An Interview with Mona Baker.” Cultus1 (1): 10–33.
    [Google Scholar]
21. China Academy of Translation
    China Academy of Translation. n.d. “Database of the Standardized Translations of Chinese Key Foreign-Affairs Terms [中国重要政治词汇对外翻译标准化专题库zhong guo zhong yao zheng zhi ci hui dui wai fan yi biao zhun hua zhuan ti ku]”. AccessedJanuary 3, 2020. https://library.unimelb.edu.au/recite/chicago-b/webpages-and-social-media
22. Dam, Helle V., and Karen Korning Zethsen
    eds. 2009 Translation Studies: Focus on the Translator. Thematic section of Hermes: Journal of Language and Communication Studies42: 7–166.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Delabastita, Dirk, Christopher Taylor, David Katan, Peter Fawcett, Ian Mason, and Jorge Díaz Cintas
    2003 “Book Reviews.” The Translator9 (2): 333–366. 10.1080/13556509.2003.10799162
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2003.10799162 [Google Scholar]
24. Di Giovanni, Elena, and Yves Gambier
    eds. 2018 Reception Studies and Audiovisual Translation (Benjamins Translation Library 141). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.141
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.141 [Google Scholar]
25. Duflou, Veerle
    2016 Be(com)ing a Conference Interpreter: An Ethnography of EU Interpreters as a Professional Community (Benjamins Translation Library 124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.124
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.124 [Google Scholar]
26. Gile, Daniel
    1992 “Basic Theoretical Components in Interpreter and Translator Training.” InTeaching Translation and Interpreting: Training Talent and Experience. Papers from the First Language International Conference, Elsinore, Denmark, 1991, edited byCay Dollerup and Anne Loddegaard, 185–194. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.56.29gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.56.29gil [Google Scholar]
27. Gile, Daniel
    2009 Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training (Benjamins Translation Library 8). Revised edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.8 [Google Scholar]
28. Gouanvic, Jean-Marc
    1997 “Translation and the Shape of Things to Come.” The Translator3 (2): 125–152. 10.1080/13556509.1997.10798995
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1997.10798995 [Google Scholar]
29. Harris, Brian
    1990 “Norms in Interpretation.” Target2 (1): 115–119. 10.1075/target.2.1.08har
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.2.1.08har [Google Scholar]
30. Hermans, Theo
    1991 “Translational Norms and Correct Translations.” InTranslation Studies: The State of the Art, edited byTon Naaijkens and Kitty M. van Leuven-Zwart, 155–169. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Hermans, Theo
    1998 “Some Concluding Comments on the Debates and the Responses.” Current Issues in Language and Society5 (1–2): 135–142. 10.1080/13520529809615511
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13520529809615511 [Google Scholar]
32. Hermans, Theo
    1999 Translation in Systems: Descriptive and System-Oriented Approaches Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
33. House, Juliane
    1981 A Model for Translation Quality Assessment. Second edition. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Inghilleri, Moira
    2003 “Habitus, Field and Discourse: Interpreting as a Socially Situated Activity.” Target15 (2): 243–268. 10.1075/target.15.2.03ing
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.15.2.03ing [Google Scholar]
35. Karamitroglou, Fotios
    2000 Towards a Methodology for the Investigation of Norms in Audiovisual Translation: The Choice between Subtitling and Revoicing in Greece. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kolb, Waltraud, and Franz Pöchhacker
    2008 “Interpreting in Asylum Appeal Hearings: Roles and Norms Revisited.” InInterpreting in Legal Settings, edited byDebra Russell and Sandra Hale, 26–50. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Koskinen, Kaisa
    2000 “Institutional Illusions: Translating in the EU Commission.” The Translator6 (1): 49–65. 10.1080/13556509.2000.10799055
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2000.10799055 [Google Scholar]
38. Koskinen, Kaisa
    2008 Translating Institutions. An Ethnographic Study of EU Translation. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Kruger, Haidee
    2012 Postcolonial Polysystems: The Production and Reception of Translated Children’s Literature in South Africa (Benjamins Translation Library 105). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.105
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.105 [Google Scholar]
40. Laviosa, Sara
    2008 “Description in the Translation Classroom: Universals as a Case in Point.” InPym, Shlesinger, and Simeoni 2008, 119–132.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Lefevere, André
    ed. 1992a Translation, History, Culture: A Sourcebook. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Lefevere, André
    1992b Translation, Rewriting and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Mason, Ian
    2000 “Audience Design in Translating.” The Translator6 (1): 1–22. 10.1080/13556509.2000.10799053
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2000.10799053 [Google Scholar]
44. Mauranen, Anna, and Pekka Kujamäki
    eds. 2004 Translation Universals: Do They Exist? (Benjamins Translation Library 48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.48
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.48 [Google Scholar]
45. Meylaerts, Reine
    2008 “Translators and (Their) Norms: Towards a Sociological Construction of the Individual.” InPym, Shlesinger, and Simeoni 2008, 91–102.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Newmark, Peter
    1988 A Textbook of Translation. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Pöchhacker, Franz
    1995 “Simultaneous Interpreting: A Functionalist Perspective.” Hermes: Journal of Linguistics14: 31–53.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2016 Introducing Interpreting Studies. Second edition. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315649573
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315649573 [Google Scholar]
49. Pöllabauer, Sonja
    2004 “Interpreting in Asylum Hearings: Issues of Role, Responsibility and Power.” Interpreting6 (2): 143–180. 10.1075/intp.6.2.03pol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.6.2.03pol [Google Scholar]
50. Pym, Anthony
    1998 “Okay, So How Are Translation Norms Negotiated? A Question for Gideon Toury and Theo Hermans.” Current Issues in Language and Society5 (1–2): 107–113. 10.1080/13520529809615507
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13520529809615507 [Google Scholar]
51. Pym, Anthony
    2008a “On Toury’s Laws of How Translators Translate.” InPym, Shlesinger, and Simeoni 2008, 311–328.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Pym, Anthony
    2008b “On Omission in Simultaneous Interpreting: Risk Analysis of a Hidden Effort.” InEfforts and Models in Interpreting and Translation Research: A Tribute to Daniel Gile (Benjamins Translation Library 80), edited byGyde Hansen, Andrew Chesterman, and Heidrun Gerzymisch-Arbogast, 83–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Pym, Anthony
    2015 “Translating as Risk Management.” Journal of Pragmatics85: 67–80. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.010
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.06.010 [Google Scholar]
54. Pym, Anthony, Miriam Shlesinger, and Daniel Simeoni
    eds. 2008 Beyond Descriptive Translation Studies: Investigations in Homage to Gideon Toury (Benjamins Translation Library 75). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.75
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.75 [Google Scholar]
55. QSR International Pty Ltd
    QSR International Pty Ltd (2018) NVivo (qualitative data analysis software) version 12. https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo/home
56. Schäffner, Christina
    1998 “The Concept of Norms in Translation Studies.” Current Issues in Language and Society5 (1–2): 2–9.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Schäffner, Christina
    2010 “Norms of Translation.” InHandbook of Translation StudiesVol.1, edited byYves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 235–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hts.1.nor1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.1.nor1 [Google Scholar]
58. Schäffner, Christina, Luciana Sabina Tcaciuc, and Wine Tesseur
    2014 “Translation Practices in Political Institutions: A Comparison of National, Supranational, and Non-governmental Organizations.” Perspectives22 (4): 493–510. 10.1080/0907676X.2014.948890
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2014.948890 [Google Scholar]
59. Sela-Sheffy, Rakefet
    2005 “How to Be a (Recognized) Translator: Rethinking Habitus, Norms, and the Field of Translation.” Target17 (1): 1–26. 10.1075/target.17.1.02sel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.17.1.02sel [Google Scholar]
60. Shlesinger, Miriam
    1989 “Extending the Theory of Translation to Interpretation: Norms as a Case in Point.” Target1 (1): 111–116. 10.1075/target.1.1.09shl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.1.1.09shl [Google Scholar]
61. Simeoni, Daniel
    1998 “The Pivotal Status of the Translator’s Habitus.” Target10 (1): 1–39. 10.1075/target.10.1.02sim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.10.1.02sim [Google Scholar]
62. TAC (Translators Association of China)
    TAC (Translators Association of China) 2018 2018 China’s Language Service Industry Development Report. Beijing: TAC.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Toury, Gideon
    1980 In Search of a Theory of Translation. Tel Aviv: Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Toury, Gideon
    1998 “A Handful of Paragraphs on ‘Translation’ and ‘Norms’.” Current Issues in Language and Society5 (1–2): 10–32. 10.1080/13520529809615501
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13520529809615501 [Google Scholar]
65. Toury, Gideon
    2012 Descriptive Translation Studies – and Beyond (Benjamins Translation Library 100). Revised edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.100
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.100 [Google Scholar]
66. Xu, Mingqiang
    2014 “Waixuan fanyi de fannao [The difficulties of translating Chinese political discourse].” Chinese Translators Journal3: 11–12.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Walker, Callum
    2018 “A Cognitive Perspective on Equivalent Effect: Using Eye Tracking to Measure Equivalence in Source Text and Target Text Cognitive Effects on Readers.” Perspectives27 (1): 124–143. 10.1080/0907676X.2018.1449870
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2018.1449870 [Google Scholar]