An intermodal approach to cohesion in constrained and unconstrained language

References

1. Baker, Mona
   1996 “Corpus-Based Translation Studies: The Challenges that Lie Ahead.” InTerminology, LSP and Translation: Studies in Language Engineering in Honour of Juan C. Sager, edited by Harold Somers , 175–186. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.18.17bak
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.18.17bak [Google Scholar]
2. Barton, Kamil
   2019 MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. Version 1.43.6. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=MuMIn
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bates, Douglas , Martin Mächler , Ben Bolker , and Steve Walker
   2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software67(1): 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
4. Bentz, Christian , and Bodo Winter
   2014 “Languages with More Second Language Learners Tend to Lose Nominal Case.” InQuantifying Language Dynamics: On the Cutting Edge of Areal and Phylogenetic Linguistics, edited by Søren Wichmann and Jeff Good , 96–124. Leiden: Brill.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bernardini, Silvia , Adriano Ferraresi , and Maja Miličević
   2016 “From EPIC to EPTIC – Exploring Simplification in Interpreting and Translation from an Intermodal Perspective.” Target28 (1): 61–86. 10.1075/target.28.1.03ber
   https://doi.org/10.1075/target.28.1.03ber [Google Scholar]
6. Blum-Kulka, Shoshana
   1986 “Shifts of Cohesion and Coherence in Translation.” InInterlingual and Intercultural Communication: Discourse and Cognition in Translation and Second Language Acquisition Studies, edited by Juliane House and Shoshana Blum-Kulka , 17–35. Tübingen: Narr.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bolker, Benjamin
   2019 GLMM FAQ. AccessedSeptember 30, 2020. https://bbolker.github.io/mixedmodels-misc/glmmFAQ.html#overdispersion
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bolker, Benjamin , Mollie Brooks , Connie Clark , Shane Geange , John Poulsen , M. Henry Stevens , and Jada-Simone White
   2009 “Generalized Linear Mixed Models: A Practical Guide for Ecology and Evolution.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution24 (3): 127–135. 10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 [Google Scholar]
9. Cao, Yan , and Richard Xiao
   2013 “A Multi-Dimensional Contrastive Study of English Abstracts by Native and Non-Native Writers.” Corpora8 (2): 209–234. 10.3366/cor.2013.0041
   https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0041 [Google Scholar]
10. Chesterman, Andrew
    2004 “Beyond the particular.” InTranslation Universals: Do They Exist?edited by Anna Mauranen and Pekka Kujamäki , 33–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.48.04che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.48.04che [Google Scholar]
11. Chesterman, Andrew
    2014 “Translation Studies Forum: Universalism in Translation Studies.” Translation Studies7 (1): 82–90. 10.1080/14781700.2013.828904
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2013.828904 [Google Scholar]
12. De Sutter, Gert , and Marie-Aude Lefer
    2020 “On the Need for a New Research Agenda for Corpus-Based Translation Studies: A Multi-Methodological, Multifactorial and Interdisciplinary Approach.” Perspectives28 (1): 1–23. 10.1080/0907676X.2019.1611891
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2019.1611891 [Google Scholar]
13. Defrancq, Bart , Koen Plevoets , and Cédric Magnifico
    2015 “Connective Items in Interpreting and Translation: Where Do They Come From?” InYearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2015: Current Approaches to Discourse and Translation Studies, edited by Jesús Romero-Trillo , 195–222. Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑17948‑3_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17948-3_9 [Google Scholar]
14. EP (European Parliament)
    EP (European Parliament). n.d.European Parliament Plenary Debates: Note to the Reader. AccessedMay 18, 2020. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/cre/info_en.htm
    [Google Scholar]
15. Ferraresi, Adriano , and Silvia Bernardini
    2019 “A Many-Sided, Multi-Purpose Corpus of EU Parliament Proceedings.” InParallel Corpora for Contrastive and Translation Studies: New Resources and Applications, edited by Irene Doval and M. Teresa Sánchez Nieto , 123–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.90.08fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.90.08fer [Google Scholar]
16. Granger, Sylviane , and Stephanie Tyson
    1996 “Connector Usage in the English Essay Writing of Native and Non-Native EFL Speakers of English.” World Englishes15 (1): 17–27. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1996.tb00089.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1996.tb00089.x [Google Scholar]
17. Gumul, Ewa
    2006 “Explicitation in Simultaneous Interpreting: A Strategy or a By-Product of Language Mediation?” Across Languages and Cultures7 (2): 171–190. 10.1556/Acr.7.2006.2.2
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.7.2006.2.2 [Google Scholar]
18. Gumul, Ewa
    2017 “Explicitation and Directionality in Simultaneous Interpreting.” Linguistica Silesiana38: 311–329.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Halverson, Sandra
    2003 “The cognitive basis of translation universals.” Target15 (2): 197–241. 10.1075/target.15.2.02hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.15.2.02hal [Google Scholar]
20. Hayward, Kathy , and Hardy. C. Wilcoxon
    1994 “Connectives in Context.” English Teaching Forum32: 20–23.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Hartig, Florian
    2019 DHARMa: Residual Diagnostics for Hierarchical (Multi-Level / Mixed) Regression Models. Version 0.2.4. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hinkel, Eli
    2001 “Matters of Cohesion in L2 Academic Texts.” Applied Language Learning12 (2): 111–132.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Ivaska, Ilmari , Adriano Ferraresi , and Silvia Bernardini
    . Forthcoming. “Syntactic Properties of Constrained English: A Corpus-Driven Approach.” InExtending the Scope of Corpus-Based Translation Studies edited by Sylviane Granger and Marie-Aude Lefer . London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781350143289.0013
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350143289.0013 [Google Scholar]
24. Kajzer-Wietrzny, Marta
    2018a “Interpretese vs. Non-Native Language Use: The Case of Optional That .” InMaking Way in Corpus-Based Interpreting Studies, edited by Mariachiara Russo , Claudio Bendazzoli , and Bart Defrancq , 97–113. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑10‑6199‑8_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6199-8_6 [Google Scholar]
25. Kajzer-Wietrzny, Marta
    2018b “Translationese, Interpretese and Foreignese – What Do They Have in Common?” Paper delivered atUsing Corpora in Contrastive and Translation Studies Conference, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 12–14 September 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kajzer-Wietrzny, Marta , and Ilmari Ivaska
    2020 “A Multivariate Approach to Lexical Diversity in Constrained Language.” Across Languages and Cultures21 (2): 169–194. 10.1556/084.2020.00011
    https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2020.00011 [Google Scholar]
27. Kassambara, Alboukadel , and Fabian Mundt
    2017 Factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. Version 1.0.5. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=factoextra
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kotze, Haidee
    2020 “Translation, Contact Linguistics and Cognition.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition, edited by Fabio Alves and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen , 113–132. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315178127‑9
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178127-9 [Google Scholar]
29. Kotze, Haidee , Minna Korhonen , Adam Smith , and Bertus van Rooy
    . Forthcoming. “Salient Differences Between Oral Parliamentary Discourse and its Official Written Records: A Comparison of ‘Close’ and ‘Distant’ Analysis Methods.” InParliamentary Discourse Across Time and Space: Using Big Data to Study Language and Society edited by Minna Korhonen , Haidee Kotze , and Jukka Tyrkkö . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kruger, Haidee , and Bertus van Rooy
    2012 “Register and the Features of Translated Language.” Across Languages and Cultures13 (1): 33–65. 10.1556/Acr.13.2012.1.3
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.13.2012.1.3 [Google Scholar]
31. Kruger, Haidee , and Bertus van Rooy
    2016a “Syntactic and Pragmatic Transfer Effects in Reported-Speech Constructions in Three Contact Varieties of English Influenced by Afrikaans.” Language Sciences56: 118–131. 10.1016/j.langsci.2016.04.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2016.04.003 [Google Scholar]
32. Kruger, Haidee , and Bertus van Rooy
    2016b “Constrained Language: A Multidimensional Analysis of Translated English and a Non-Native Indigenised Variety of English.” English World-Wide37 (1): 26–57. 10.1075/eww.37.1.02kru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.37.1.02kru [Google Scholar]
33. Kruger, Haidee , and Gert de Sutter
    2018 “Alternations in Contact and Non-Contact Varieties: Reconceptualising That-Omission in Translated and Non-Translated English Using the MuPDAR Approach.” Translation, Cognition & Behavior1 (2): 251–290. 10.1075/tcb.00011.kru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00011.kru [Google Scholar]
34. Lanstyák, István , and Pál Heltai
    2012 “Universals in Language Contact and Translation.” Across Languages and Cultures13 (1): 99–121. 10.1556/Acr.13.2012.1.6
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.13.2012.1.6 [Google Scholar]
35. Laviosa, Sara
    1998 “Core Patterns of Lexical Use in a Comparable Corpus of English Narrative Prose.” Meta43 (4): 557–570. 10.7202/003425ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/003425ar [Google Scholar]
36. Leech, Geoffrey , and Jan Svartvik
    2013 A Communicative Grammar of English. 3rd ed.Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315836041
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315836041 [Google Scholar]
37. Louwerse, Max M. , Philip M. McCarthy , Danielle S. McNamara , and Arthur C. Graesser
    2004 “Variation in Language and Cohesion Across Written and Spoken Registers.” Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society26: 843–848.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Mauranen, Anna
    2000 “Strange Strings in Translated Language: A Study on Corpora.” InIntercultural Faultlines: Research Models in Translation Studies I. Textual and Cognitive Aspects, edited by Maeve Olohan , 119–141. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Marzocchi, Carlo
    2007 “Translation – Transcript – Interpretation: Notes on the European Parliament Verbatim Report of Proceedings.” Across Languages and Cultures8 (2): 249–254. 10.1556/Acr.8.2007.2.6
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.8.2007.2.6 [Google Scholar]
40. Merilaine, Elina
    2015 The Frequency and Variability of Conjunctive Adjuncts in the Estonian–English Interlanguage Corpus. MA diss.University of Tartu.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Mollin, Sandra
    2007 “The Hansard Hazard: Gauging the Accuracy of British Parliamentary Transcripts.” Corpora2 (2): 187–210. 10.3366/cor.2007.2.2.187
    https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2007.2.2.187 [Google Scholar]
42. Nenadic, Oleg , and Michael Greenacre
    2007 “Correspondence Analysis in R, with Two- and Three-Dimensional Graphics: The ca Package.” Journal of Statistical Software20 (3): 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Nencioni, Giovanni
    1976 “Parlato-parlato, parlato-scritto, parlato-recitato.” Strumenti critici29: 1–56. Torino: Einaudi.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Olohan, Maeve , and Mona Baker
    2000 “Reporting That in Translated English: Evidence for Subconscious Processes of Explicitation?” Across Languages and Cultures1 (2): 141–158. 10.1556/Acr.1.2000.2.1
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.1.2000.2.1 [Google Scholar]
45. Ordan, Noam , and Miriam Shlesinger
    2012 “More Spoken or More Translated? Exploring a Known Unknown of Simultaneous Interpreting.” Target24 (1): 43–60. 10.1075/target.24.1.04shl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.24.1.04shl [Google Scholar]
46. Øverås, Lynn
    1998 “In Search of the Third Code: An Investigation of Norms in Literary Translation.” Meta43 (4): 557–570. 10.7202/003775ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/003775ar [Google Scholar]
47. Pym, Anthony
    2007 “On Shlesinger’s proposed equalizing universal for interpreting.” InInterpreting Studies and Beyond: A Tribute to Miriam Shlesinger, edited by Franz Pöchhacker , Arnt Lykke Jakobsen , and Inger M. Mees , 175–190, Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur Press.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Puurtinen, Tiina
    2004 “Explicitation of Clausal Relations: A Corpus-Based Analysis of Clause Connectives in Translated and Non-Translated Finnish Children’s Literature.” InTranslation Universals: Do They Exist?, edited by Anna Mauranen and Pekka Kujamäki , 165–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.48.13puu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.48.13puu [Google Scholar]
49. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2013 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. www.R-project.org/
    [Google Scholar]
50. Rabinovitch, Ella , Sergiu Nisioi , Noam Ordan , and Shuly Wintner
    2016 “On the Similarities between Native, Non-Native and Translated Texts.” InProceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vol.1, edited by Katrin Erk and Noah A. Smith , 1870–1881. Berlin: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/P16‑1176
    https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P16-1176 [Google Scholar]
51. Séguinot, Candace
    1988 “Pragmatics and the Explicitation Hypothesis.” TTR: Traduction, Terminologie, Rédaction1 (2): 106–113. 10.7202/037024ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/037024ar [Google Scholar]
52. Sandrelli, Annalisa , and Claudio Bendazzoli
    2005 “Lexical Patterns in Simultaneous Interpreting: A Preliminary Investigation of EPIC (European Parliament Interpreting Corpus).” InProceedings from the Corpus Linguistics Conference Series1 (1), Birmingham: University of Birmingham. https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/research/activity/corpus/publications/conference-archives/2005-conf-e-journal.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
53. Shlesinger, Miriam
    1989 Simultaneous Interpretation as a Factor in Effecting Shifts in the Position of Texts on the Oral–Literate Continuum. MA diss.Tel Aviv University.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Shlesinger, Miriam
    1995 “Shifts in Cohesion in Simultaneous Interpreting.” The Translator1 (2): 193–214. 10.1080/13556509.1995.10798957
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1995.10798957 [Google Scholar]
55. Van Rooy, Bertus , Lize Terblanche , Christoph Haase , and Joseph Schmied
    2010 “Register Differentiation in East African English: A Multidimensional Study.” English World-Wide31 (3): 311–349. 10.1075/eww.31.3.04van
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.31.3.04van [Google Scholar]