oa A methodology of translatological and sociological cooperation in data collection, analysis, and interpretation

References

1. Ben-Ari, Nitsa
   2014 “Political Dissidents as Translators, Editors, and Publishers.” InThe Sociological Turn in Translation and Interpreting Studies, edited byClaudia V. Angelelli, special issue ofTranslation and Interpreting Studies7 (2): 144–160. 10.1075/tis.7.2.03ben
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.7.2.03ben [Google Scholar]
2. Bertaux, Daniel, and Martin Kohli
   1984 “The Life Story Approach: A Continental View.” Annual Review of Sociology10: 215–237. 10.1146/annurev.so.10.080184.001243
   https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.10.080184.001243 [Google Scholar]
3. Bourdieu, Pierre
   1984 Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste [orig. La Distinction: Critique sociale du judgement]. Translated byRichard Nice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bourdieu, Pierre
   1990 The Logic of Practice [orig. Les sens pratique]. Translated byRichard Nice. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9781503621749
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503621749 [Google Scholar]
5. Bourdieu, Pierre
   1996 The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field [orig. Les Règles de l’art]. Translated bySusan Emanuel. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9781503615861
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503615861 [Google Scholar]
6. Bourdieu, Pierre, and Loïc J. D. Wacquant
   1992 An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Chakhachiro, Raymond
   2018 Translating Irony between English and Arabic. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Chesterman, Andrew
   2016 Memes of Translation: The Spread of Ideas in Translation Theory. Rev. ed.Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.123
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.123 [Google Scholar]
9. Fock, Holger, Martin de Haan, and Alena Lhotová
   2008 Comparative Income of Literary Translators in Europe. Brussels: CEATL (Conseil Européen des Associations de Traducteurs Littéraires).
   [Google Scholar]
10. Grisham, John
    1998 The Street Lawyer. New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Grisham, John
    2011 Advokát chudých [orig. The Street Lawyer]. Translated byJan Jirák. Prague: Euromedia Group/Knižní klub.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Hanna, Sameh F.
    2014 “Remapping Habitus: Norms, Habitus and the Theorisation of Agency in Translation Practice and Translation Scholarship.” InVorderobermeier (2014, 59–71).
    [Google Scholar]
13. Heilbron, Johan
    1999 “Towards a Sociology of Translation: Book Translations as a Cultural World-System.” European Journal of Social Theory2 (4): 429–444. 10.1177/136843199002004002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136843199002004002 [Google Scholar]
14. Heilbron, Johan
    2010 “Structure and Dynamics of the World System of Translation.” Paper presented at theInternational Symposium: Translation and Cultural Mediation, UNESCO, Paris, February 22–23.
15. Heilbron, Johan, and Gisèle Sapiro
    2007 “Outline for a Sociology of Translation: Current Issues and Future Prospects.” InConstructing a Sociology of Translation, edited byMichaela Wolf and Alexandra Fukari, 93–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.74.07hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.74.07hei [Google Scholar]
16. Hirsch, Galia
    2011 “Explicitations and Other Types of Shifts in the Translation of Irony and Humor.” Target23 (2): 178–205. 10.1075/target.23.2.03hir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.23.2.03hir [Google Scholar]
17. Kaufmann, Jean-Claude
    2010 Chápající rozhovor [Understanding interview]. Prague: Sociologické nakladatelství.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lambert, José, and Hendrik van Gorp
    2014 “On Describing Translations.” InThe Manipulation of Literature: Studies in Literary Translation, edited byTheo Hermans, 42–53. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315759029‑3
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759029-3 [Google Scholar]
19. McAdams, Dan P.
    1993 The Stories We Live by: Personal Myths and the Making of the Self. New York: Guilford Publications.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Meylaerts, Reine
    2008 “Translators and (Their) Norms: Towards a Sociological Construction of the Individual.” InBeyond Descriptive Translation Studies: Investigation in Homage to Gideon Toury, edited byAnthony Pym, Miriam Shlesinger, and Daniel Simeoni, 91–102. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.75.08mey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.75.08mey [Google Scholar]
21. Munday, Jeremy
    2016 Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. 4th ed.New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315691862
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315691862 [Google Scholar]
22. Pasmatzi, Kalliopi
    2014 “Translatorial Hexis and Cultural Honour: Translating Captain Corelli’s Mandolin into Greek.” InVorderobermeier (2014, 73–92). 10.1163/9789401210867_007
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401210867_007 [Google Scholar]
23. Prudký, Libor
    2009 Inventura hodnot: Výsledky sociologických výzkumů hodnot ve společnosti České republiky [A stocktaking of values: The results of sociological research on values in the Czech Republic’s society]. Prague: Academia.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Sela-Sheffy, Rakefet
    2005 “How to Be a (Recognized) Translator: Rethinking Habitus, Norms, and The Field of Translation.” Target17 (1): 1–26. 10.1075/target.17.1.02sel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.17.1.02sel [Google Scholar]
25. Sela-Sheffy, Rakefet
    2014 “Translators’ Identity Work: Introducing Micro-Sociological Theory of Identity to the Discussion of Translators’ Habitus.” InVorderobermeier (2014, 43–58). 10.1163/9789401210867_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401210867_005 [Google Scholar]
26. Simeoni, Daniel
    1998 “The Pivotal Status of the Translator’s Habitus.” Target10 (1): 1–39. 10.1075/target.10.1.02sim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.10.1.02sim [Google Scholar]
27. Šimeček, Zdeněk, and Jiří Trávníček
    2015 Knihy kupovati … Dějiny knižního trhu v českých zemích [To buy books … A history of the book market in the Czech lands]. Prague: Academia.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Tárnyiková, Jarmila
    2007 Sentence Complexes in Text: Processing Strategies in English and in Czech. Olomouc: Palacký University Olomouc.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Toury, Gideon
    1995 Descriptive Translation Studies – and Beyond. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.4
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.4 [Google Scholar]
30. Toury, Gideon
    1999 “A Handful of Paragraphs on ‘Translation’ and ‘Norms’.” InTranslation and Norms, edited byChristina Schäffner, 9–31. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Toury, Gideon
    2012 “The Nature and Role of Norms in Literary Translation.” InThe Translation Studies Reader, 3rd ed., edited byLawrence Venuti, 168–181. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Union Catalogue of the Czech Republic (CASLIN)
    Union Catalogue of the Czech Republic (CASLIN). AccessedJuly 1, 2020. https://aleph.nkp.cz/F/7YEI5EI4BDEKAE221DK3CJM6XECSAK6PKF5V2L64DL8JXU8K1C-15874?func=file&file_name=base-list&CON_LNG=ENG
33. Vorderobermeier, Gisella M.
    ed. 2014 Remapping Habitus in Translation Studies. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401210867
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401210867 [Google Scholar]
34. Wolf, Michaela
    2010 “Sociology of Translation.” InHandbook of Translation Studies, vol.1, edited byYves Gambier and Luc van Doorslaer, 337–343. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hts.1.soc1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.1.soc1 [Google Scholar]
35. Wolf, Michaela
    2012 “The Sociology of Translation and Its ‘Activist Turn’.” InThe Sociological Turn in Translation and Interpreting Studies, edited byClaudia V. Angelelli, special issue ofTranslation and Interpreting Studies7 (2): 7–21. 10.1075/tis.7.2.02wol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.7.2.02wol [Google Scholar]
36. Xu, Minhui, and Chi Yu Chu
    2015 “Translators’ Professional Habitus and the Adjacent Discipline: The Case of Edgar Snow.” Target27 (2): 173–191. 10.1075/target.27.2.01xu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.27.2.01xu [Google Scholar]
37. Zehnalová, Jitka, and Helena Kubátová
    2019 “From a Target Population to Representative Samples of Translations and Translators.” The Translator25 (2): 87–100. 10.1080/13556509.2019.1642713
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2019.1642713 [Google Scholar]