An item-based, Rasch-calibrated approach to assessing translation quality

References

1. Angelelli, Claudia V.
   2009 “Using a Rubric to Assess Translation Ability: Defining the Construct.” In Testing and Assessment in Translation and Interpreting Studies: A Call for Dialogue between Research and Practice, edited byClaudia V. Angelelli and Holly E. Jacobson, 13–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ata.xiv.03ang
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xiv.03ang [Google Scholar]
2. Bachman, Lyle F.
   2004 Statistical Analyses for Language Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667350
   https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667350 [Google Scholar]
3. Bond, Trevor G., and Christine M. Fox
   2015 Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences. 3rd ed.New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315814698
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814698 [Google Scholar]
4. Campbell, Stuart J.
   1991 “Towards a Model of Translation Competence.” Meta36 (2–3): 329–343. 10.7202/002190ar
   https://doi.org/10.7202/002190ar [Google Scholar]
5. Colina, Sonia
   2008 “Translation Quality Evaluation: Some Empirical Evidence for a Functionalist Approach.” The Translator14 (1): 97–134. 10.1080/13556509.2008.10799251
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2008.10799251 [Google Scholar]
6. Colina, Sonia
   2009 “Further Evidence for a Functionalist Approach to Translation Quality Evaluation.” Target21 (2): 235–264. 10.1075/target.21.2.02col
   https://doi.org/10.1075/target.21.2.02col [Google Scholar]
7. Eckes, Thomas
   2015 Introduction to Many-Facet Rasch Measurement: Analyzing and Evaluating Rater-Mediated Assessments. 2nd ed.Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Eyckmans, June, and Philippe Anckaert
   2017 “Item-based Assessment of Translation Competence: Chimera of Objectivity Versus Prospect of Reliable Measurement.” In Translator Quality – Translation Quality: Empirical Approaches to Assessment and Evaluation, edited byGeoffrey S. Koby and Isabel Lacruz, special issue ofLinguistica Antverpiensia161: 40–56.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Eyckmans, June, Philippe Anckaert, and Winibert Segers
   2009 “The Perks of Norm Referenced Translation Evaluation.” In Testing and Assessment in Translation and Interpreting Studies: A Call for Dialogue between Research and Practice, edited byClaudia V. Angelelli and Holly E. Jacobson, 73–93. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ata.xiv.06eyc
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xiv.06eyc [Google Scholar]
10. Eyckmans, June, Winibert Segers, and Philippe Anckaert
    2012 “Translation Assessment Methodology and the Prospects of European Collaboration.” In Collaboration in Language Testing and Assessment, edited byDina Tsagari and Ildikó Csépes, 171–184. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Green, Rita
    2013 Statistical Analyses for Language Testers. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137018298
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137018298 [Google Scholar]
12. Han, Chao
    2015 “Investigating Rater Severity/Leniency in Interpreter Performance Testing: A Multifaceted Rasch Measurement Approach.” Interpreting17 (2): 255–283. 10.1075/intp.17.2.05han
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.17.2.05han [Google Scholar]
13. Han, Chao
    2016 “Investigating Score Dependability in English/Chinese Interpreter Certification Performance Testing: A Generalizability Theory Approach.” Language Assessment Quarterly13 (3): 186–201. 10.1080/15434303.2016.1211132
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1211132 [Google Scholar]
14. Han, Chao
    2017 “Using Analytic Rating Scales to Assess English/Chinese Bi-directional Interpretation: A Longitudinal Rasch Analysis of Scale Utility and Rater Behavior.” In Translator Quality – Translation Quality: Empirical Approaches to Assessment and Evaluation, edited byGeoffrey S. Koby and Isabel Lacruz, special issue ofLinguistica Antverpiensia161: 196–215.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Han, Chao
    2019 “A Generalizability Theory Study of Optimal Measurement Design for a Summative Assessment of English/Chinese Consecutive Interpreting.” Language Testing36 (3): 419–438. 10.1177/0265532218809396
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218809396 [Google Scholar]
16. Han, Chao
    2020 “Translation Quality Assessment: A Critical Methodological Review.” The Translator26 (3): 257–273. 10.1080/13556509.2020.1834751
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2020.1834751 [Google Scholar]
17. Han, Chao, Rui Xiao, and Wei Su
    2021 “Assessing the Fidelity of Consecutive Interpreting: The Effects of Using Source Versus Target Text as the Reference Material.” Interpreting23 (2): 245–268. 10.1075/intp.00058.han
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00058.han [Google Scholar]
18. House, Juliane
    2015 Translation Quality Assessment: Past and Present. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. IBM Corp
    IBM Corp 2012 IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. V. 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kockaert, Hendrik J., and Winibert Segers
    2012 “L’assurance qualité des traductions: items sélectionnés et évaluation assistée par ordinateur [Quality assurance of translations: Selected items and computer-assisted evaluation].” Meta57 (1): 159–176. 10.7202/1012747ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1012747ar [Google Scholar]
21. Kockaert, Hendrik J., and Winibert Segers
    2017 “Evaluation of Legal Translations: PIE Method (Preselected Items Evaluation).” JoSTrans271: 148–163.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Lauscher, Susanne
    2000 “Translation Quality Assessment: Where Can Theory and Practice Meet?” The Translator6 (2): 149–168. 10.1080/13556509.2000.10799063
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2000.10799063 [Google Scholar]
23. Linacre, John M.
    1989 Many-Facet Rasch Measurement. Chicago: MESA Press.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Linacre, John M.
    1999 “Investigating Rating Scale Category Utility.” Journal of Outcome Measurement3 (2): 103–122.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Linacre, John M.
    2002 “What Do Infit and Outfit, Mean-Square and Standardized Mean?” Rasch Measurement Transactions16 (2): 878.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Linacre, John M.
    2017 FACETS: Computer Program for Many Faceted Rasch Measurement. V. 3.80.0. Beaverton, OR: Winsteps.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Martínez Mateo, Robert
    2014 “A Deeper Look into Metrics for Translation Quality Assessment (TQA): A Case Study.” Miscelanea491: 73–93.
    [Google Scholar]
28. McAlester, Gerard
    2000 “The Evaluation of Translation into a Foreign Language.” In Developing Translation Competence, edited byChristina Schäffner and Beverly Adab, 229–241. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.38.21mca
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.38.21mca [Google Scholar]
29. Myford, Carol M., and Edward W. Wolfe
    2003 “Detecting and Measuring Rater Effects Using Many-Facet Rasch Measurement: Part I.” Journal of Applied Measurement4 (4): 386–422.
    [Google Scholar]
30. O’Brien, Sharon
    2012 “Towards a Dynamic Quality Evaluation Model for Translation.” JoSTrans171: 55–77.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Pym, Anthony
    1992 “Translation Error Analysis and the Interface with Language Teaching.” In Teaching Translation and Interpreting: Training, Talent and Experience. Papers from the First Language International Conference, Elsinore, Denmark, 1991, edited byCay Dollerup and Anne Loddegaard, 279–288. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.56.42pym
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.56.42pym [Google Scholar]
32. Rasch, Georg
    1980 Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago: MESA Press.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Teague, Ben
    1987 “ATA Accreditation and Excellence in Practice.” In Translation Excellence: Assessment, Achievement, Maintenance, edited byMarilyn Gaddis Rose, 21–26. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Turner, Barry, Miranda Lai, and Neng Huang
    2010 “Error Deduction and Descriptors – A Comparison of Two Methods of Translation Test Assessment.” Translation & Interpreting2 (1): 11–23.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Waddington, Christopher
    2001 “Should Translations Be Assessed Holistically or Through Error Analysis?” Hermes261: 15–38.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Williams, Malcolm
    1989 “The Assessment of Professional Translation Quality: Creating Credibility out of Chaos.” TTR2 (2): 13–33. 10.7202/037044ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/037044ar [Google Scholar]
37. Wind, Stefanie A., and Meghan E. Peterson
    2018 “A Systematic Review of Methods for Evaluating Rating Quality in Language Assessment.” Language Testing35 (2): 161–192. 10.1177/0265532216686999
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216686999 [Google Scholar]