Translatophilia

References

1. Designer Guilds Ltd. v. Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd
   Designer Guilds Ltd. v. Russell Williams (Textiles) Ltd [2000] 1 WLR 2416
2. Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades Forening (C-5/08
   Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades Forening (C-5/08 [2009] ECDR 16 [CJEU Fourth Chamber]
3. Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd
   Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 273
4. University of London Press v. University Tutorial Press
   University of London Press v. University Tutorial Press [1916] 2 Ch 601
5. Aplin, Tanya, and Jennifer Davis
   2017 Intellectual Property Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/he/9780198743545.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198743545.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
6. Barthes, Roland
   (1957) 2012 Mythologies [orig. Mythologies]. Translated byRichard Howard and Annette Lavers. New York: Hill and Wang.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bassnett, Susan
   2014a Translation. Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bassnett, Susan
   2014b “Translation Studies at a Cross-Roads.” InThe Known Unknowns of Translation Studies, edited byElke Brems, Reine Meylaerts, and Luc van Doorslaer, 17–27. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.69.02bas
   https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.69.02bas [Google Scholar]
9. Bassnett, Susan
   2017 “Foreword.” InTranslation and Rewriting in the Age of Post-Translation Studies, edited byEdwin Gentzler, viii–x. Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bassnett, Susan
    2018 “Questioning Authority and Authenticity: The Creative Translations of Josephine Balmer.” InThe Palgrave Handbook of Literary Translation, edited byJean Boase-Beier, Lina Fisher, and Hiroko Furukawa, 333–350. London: Palgrave. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑75753‑7_17
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75753-7_17 [Google Scholar]
11. Bassnett, Susan, and Peter Bush
    eds. 2007 The Translator as Writer. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bennett, Jane
    2010 Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Bently, Lionel, and Brad Sherman
    2014 Intellectual Property Law. 4th ed.Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/he/9780199645558.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/he/9780199645558.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
14. Brown, Bill
    2001 “Thing Theory.” Critical Inquiry28 (1): 1–22. 10.1086/449030
    https://doi.org/10.1086/449030 [Google Scholar]
15. Cabanellas, Guillermo
    2014 The Legal Environment of Translation. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Chesterman, Andrew
    2016 Memes of Translation: The Spread of Ideas in Translation Theory. Revised ed.Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.123
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.123 [Google Scholar]
17. Cintron, Ralph
    2020 Democracy as Fetish. University Park: Penn State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Coates, Jenefer
    2006 “Vladimir Nabokov.” InTranslation – Theory and Practice: A Historical Reader, edited byDaniel Weissbort and Astradur Eysteinsson, 376–392. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lee, Tong King
    2020a “Translation and Copyright: Toward a Distributed View on Originality and Authorship.” The Translator26 (3): 241–256. 10.1080/13556509.2020.1836770
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2020.1836770 [Google Scholar]
20. Lee, Tong King
    2020b “Ideology.” InThe Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, 3rd ed., edited byMona Baker and Gabriela Saldanha, 252–256. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lefevere, André
    2017 Translation, Rewriting, and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Litwin, Maciej
    2020 Review of Contra Instrumentalism: A Translation Polemic, byLawrence Venuti. The Translator26 (2): 209–216. 10.1080/13556509.2020.1681740
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2020.1681740 [Google Scholar]
23. Perteghella, Manuela, and Eugenia Loffredo
    eds. 2006 Translation and Creativity: Perspectives on Creative Writing and Translation Studies. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Pym, Anthony
    2009 “The Translator as Non-Author, and I Am Sorry about That.” InThe Translator as Author: Perspectives on Literary Translation, edited byClaudia Buffagni, Beatrice Garzelli, and Serenella Zanotti, 31–44. Berlin: Lit Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Reynolds, Matthew
    2019 “Introduction.” InPrismatic Translation, edited byMatthew Reynolds, 1–18. Cambridge: Legenda.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ricketson, Sam
    1987 The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works: 1886–1986. London: Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary College/Kluwer.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Tymoczko, Maria
    2014 Enlarging Translation, Empowering Translators. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315759494
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759494 [Google Scholar]
28. Vaver, David
    1994 “Translation and Copyright: A Canadian Focus.” European Intellectual Property Review16 (4): 159–166.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Venuti, Lawrence
    1995 “Translation, Authorship, Copyright.” The Translator1 (1): 1–24. 10.1080/13556509.1995.10798947
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1995.10798947 [Google Scholar]
30. Venuti, Lawrence
    1998 The Scandals of Translation: Towards an Ethics of Difference. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203269701
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203269701 [Google Scholar]
31. Venuti, Lawrence
    2008 The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. 2nd ed.Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Venuti, Lawrence
    2013 Translation Changes Everything: Theory and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Venuti, Lawrence
    2019 Contra Instrumentalism: A Translation Polemic. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. 10.2307/j.ctvgc62bf
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvgc62bf [Google Scholar]
34. Woods, Michelle
    2006 Translating Milan Kundera. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853598845
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598845 [Google Scholar]