Theorizing a postmodern translator education

References

1. Aloni, Nimrod
   2011 “Humanistic Education.” InEducation and Humanism: Linking Autonomy and Humanity, edited byWiel Veugelers, 35–46. Rotterdam: Sense. 10.1007/978‑94‑6091‑577‑2_3
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-577-2_3 [Google Scholar]
2. Aronowitz, Stanley, and Henry A. Giroux
   1991 Postmodern Education: Politics, Culture and Social Criticism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Arrojo, Rosemary
   1996 “Postmodernism and the Teaching of Translation.” Teaching Translation and Interpreting 3. New Horizons: Papers from the Third Language International Conference, Elsinore, Denmark 9–11 June 1995, edited byCay Dollerup and Vibeke Appel, 97–104. Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.16.15arr
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.16.15arr [Google Scholar]
4. Arrojo, Rosemary
   1998 “The Revision of the Traditional Gap between Theory & Practice & the Empowerment of Translation in Postmodern Times.” The Translator4 (1): 25–48. 10.1080/13556509.1998.10799005
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1998.10799005 [Google Scholar]
5. Arrojo, Rosemary
   2012 “Deconstruction, Psychoanalysis, and the Teaching of Translation.” Translation and Interpreting Studies7 (1): 95–110. 10.1075/tis.7.1.06arr
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.7.1.06arr [Google Scholar]
6. Baker, Mona
   2011 In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation. 2nd ed.Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203832929
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203832929 [Google Scholar]
7. Bandia, Paul F.
   2006 “The Impact of Postmodern Discourse on the History of Translation.” InCharting the Future of Translation History, edited byGeorges L. Bastin and Paul F. Bandia, 45–58. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press. 10.2307/j.ctt1ckpfkh.6
   https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ckpfkh.6 [Google Scholar]
8. Bauman, Zygmunt
   1993 Postmodern Ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Berlina, Alexandra
   2014 Brodsky Translating Brodsky: Poetry in Self-Translation. New York: Bloomsbury.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Biesta, Gert J. J.
    2010 “Why ‘What Works’ Still Won’t Work: From Evidence-Based Education to Value-Based Education.” Studies in Philosophy and Education291: 491–503. 10.1007/s11217‑010‑9191‑x
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-010-9191-x [Google Scholar]
11. Burbules, Nicolas C.
    2009 “Postmodernism and Education.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Education, edited byHarvey Siegel, 524–533. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195312881.003.0029
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195312881.003.0029 [Google Scholar]
12. Burnard, Pamela, and Julie White
    2008 “Creativity and Performativity: Counterpoints in British and Australian Education.” InCreativity and Performativity in Teaching and Learning: Tensions, Dilemmas, Constraints, Accommodations and Synthesis, edited byAnna Craft and Bob Jeffrey, special issue ofBritish Educational Research Journal, 34 (5): 667–682. 10.1080/01411920802224238
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920802224238 [Google Scholar]
13. Butin, Dan W.
    2005 Service-Learning in Higher Education: Critical Issues and Directions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781403981042
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403981042 [Google Scholar]
14. Calzada Perez, María
    2003 “Constructing Identity via Translation: A Descriptive-Explanatory Study of Transitivity Shifts in the Translation of European Parliament Speeches.” InSpeaking in Tongues: Language Across Contexts and Users, edited byLuis Pérez González, 67–90. València: Universitat de València.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Carrington, Suzanne
    2011 “Service-Learning Within Higher Education: Rhizomatic Interconnections between University and The Real World.” The Australian Journal of Teacher Education36 (6): Article 1. 10.14221/ajte.2011v36n6.3
    https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n6.3 [Google Scholar]
16. Chen, Liming
    2019 “Nietzsche as Precursor of Postmodern Translation Studies.” Meta64 (3): 794–816. 10.7202/1070540ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1070540ar [Google Scholar]
17. Chesterman, Andrew
    1997 Memes of Translation: The Spread of Ideas in Translation Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.22
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.22 [Google Scholar]
18. Cilliers, Paul
    1998 Complexity and Postmodernism: Understanding Complex Systems. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Cook-Sather, Alison
    2006 Education is Translation: A Metaphor for Change in Learning and Teaching. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Cook-Sather, Alison, Catherine Bovill, and Peter Felten
    2014 Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cormier, Dave
    2008 “Rhizomatic Knowledge Communities -> Edtechtalk, Webcast Academy.” Dave’s Educational Blog, February 29, 2008. davecormier.com/edblog/2008/02/29/rhizomatic-knowledge-communities-edtechtalk-webcast-academy/
    [Google Scholar]
22. Coyne, Richard
    1996 “Deconstructing the Curriculum: Radical Hermeneutics and Professional Education.” Edinburgh Architectural Research EAR 23. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a40c/7d32460262a4e1327c775054c00f7a02c7c0.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
23. Cronin, Michael
    2017 Eco-Translation: Translation and Ecology in the Age of the Anthropocene. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315689357
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315689357 [Google Scholar]
24. Csikszentmihalyi, Mihaly
    1990 Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Davis, Brent, and Dennis J. Sumara
    1997 “Cognition, Complexity, and Teacher Education.” Harvard Educational Review67 (1): 105–125. 10.17763/haer.67.1.160w00j113t78042
    https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.67.1.160w00j113t78042 [Google Scholar]
26. Davis, Kathleen
    2001 Deconstruction and Translation. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Deleuze, Gilles and Félix Guattari
    1987 A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia [orig. Mille plateaux: Capitalisme et schizophrénie]. Translated byBrian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Derrida, Jacques
    1985 The Ear of the Other: Otobiography, Transference, Translation. Texts and Discussions with Jacques Derrida [orig. L’oreille de l’autre]. Translated byPeggy Kamuf. New York: Schocken Books.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Derrida, Jacques
    2001 “What Is a ‘Relevant’ Translation?” [orig. “Qu’est-ce qu’une traduction ‘relevante’?”]. Translated byLawrence Venuti. Critical Inquiry27 (2): 174–209. 10.1086/449005
    https://doi.org/10.1086/449005 [Google Scholar]
30. Doll Jr., William E.
    1993 A Post-Modern Perspective on Curriculum. New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Usher, Robin, and Richard Edwards
    1994 Postmodernism and Education: Different Voices, Different Worlds. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Edwards, Richard, and Robin Usher
    2000 “Lifelong Learning: The Postmodern Condition of Education?” InAERC 2000: An International Conference. Proceedings of the Annual Adult Education Research Conference (41st, Vancouver, Canada, June 2–4, 2000), edited byThomas J. Sork, Valerie-Lee Chapman, and Ralf St. Clair, 96–100. Vancouver: University of British Columbia, Department of Education Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Freire, Paolo
    2018 Pedagogy of the Oppressed: 50th Anniversary Edition [orig.Pedagogia do Oprimido]. Translated byMyra Bergman Ramos. New York: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Gillies, Donald
    . n.d. “rhizomatic learning.” A Brief Critical Dictionary of Education. AccessedOctober 11, 2021. www.dictionaryofeducation.co.uk/r/r/rhizomatic-learning
    [Google Scholar]
35. Giroux, Henry A.
    2005 Border Crossings: Cultural Workers and the Politics of Education. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
36. González-Davies, Maria
    2004 Multiple Voices in the Translation Classroom: Activities, Tasks, and Projects. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.54
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.54 [Google Scholar]
37. Graham, John T.
    2001 The Social Thought of Ortega y Gasset: A Systematic Synthesis in Postmodernism and Interdisciplinarity. Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Greenall, Annjo Klungervik
    2006 “Translation as Dialogue.” InTranslation Studies at the Interface of Disciplines, edited byJoão Ferreira Duarte, Alexandra Assis Rosa, and Teresa Seruya, 67–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.68.07klu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.68.07klu [Google Scholar]
39. Guterman, Jeffrey T., and James Rudes
    2008 “Social Constructionism and Ethics: Implications for Counseling.” Counseling and Values, 52 (2): 136–144. 10.1002/j.2161‑007X.2008.tb00097.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-007X.2008.tb00097.x [Google Scholar]
40. Harvey, David
    1992 The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Haro-Soler, María del Mar, and Don Kiraly
    2019 “Exploring Self-Efficacy Beliefs in Symbiotic Collaboration with Students: An Action Research Project.” InTraining the Trainers, edited byGary Massey, Don Kiraly, and Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, special issue ofThe Interpreter and Translator Trainer13 (3): 255–270. 10.1080/1750399X.2019.1656405
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2019.1656405 [Google Scholar]
42. Hatim, Basil, and Ian Mason
    1997 The Translator as Communicator. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
43. hooks, bell
    1994 Teaching to Transgress: Education as the Practice of Freedom. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Hubscher-Davidson, Séverine
    2018 “Do Translation Professionals Need to Tolerate Ambiguity to be Successful? A Study of the Links between Tolerance of Ambiguity, Emotional Intelligence and Job Satisfaction.” InInnovation and Expansion in Translation Process Research, edited byIsabel Lacruz and Riitta Jääskeläinen, 77–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ata.18.05hub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.18.05hub [Google Scholar]
45. Iser, Wolfgang
    1974 The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 10.56021/9780801815690
    https://doi.org/10.56021/9780801815690 [Google Scholar]
46. Johnson, Barbara
    2014 “Teaching Deconstructively.” InThe Barbara Johnson Reader: The Surprise of Otherness, edited byMelissa Feuerstein, Bill Johnson González, Lili Porten, and Keja L. Valens, 347–356. Durham: Duke University Press. 10.1215/9780822399070‑023
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822399070-023 [Google Scholar]
47. Kadiu, Silvia
    2019 Reflexive Translation Studies: Translation as Critical Reflection. London: UCL Press. 10.2307/j.ctv6q5315
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv6q5315 [Google Scholar]
48. Kaindl, Klaus
    2005 “The Plurisemiotics of Pop Song Translation: Words, Music, Voice and Image.” InSong and Significance: Virtues and Vices of Vocal Translation, edited byDinda L. Gorlée, 235–262. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401201544_009
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401201544_009 [Google Scholar]
49. Kearns, John
    2012 “Curriculum Ideologies in Translator and Interpreter Training.” InGlobal Trends in Translator and Interpreter Training: Mediation and Culture, edited bySéverine Hubscher-Davidson and Michal Borodo, 11–29. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Kergel, David
    2018 “The Postmodern Dialogue and the Ethics of Digital Based Learning.” InThe Digital Turn in Higher Education: International Perspectives on Learning and Teaching in a Changing World, edited byDavid Kergel, Birte Heidkamp, Patrik Kjaersdam Telléus, Tadeusz Rachwal, and Samuel Nowakowski, 47–57. Wiesbaden: Springer VS. 10.1007/978‑3‑658‑19925‑8_5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19925-8_5 [Google Scholar]
51. Kilgore, Deborah
    2004 “Toward a Postmodern Pedagogy.” InPromoting Critical Practice in Adult Education, edited byJennifer A. Sandlin and Ralf St. Clair, special issue ofNew Directions for Adult and Continuing Education1021: 45–53. 10.1002/ace.137
    https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.137 [Google Scholar]
52. Kincheloe, Joe L.
    1993 Toward a Critical Politics of Teacher Thinking: Mapping the Postmodern. Westport: Bergin & Garvey.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Kiraly, Don
    2015 “Occasioning Translator Competence: Moving Beyond Social Constructivism toward a Postmodern Alternative to Instructionism.” InT&I Pedagogy in Dialogue with Other Disciplines, edited bySonia Colina and Claudia V. Angelelli, special issue ofTranslation and Interpreting Studies10 (1): 8–32. 10.1075/tis.10.1.02kir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.10.1.02kir [Google Scholar]
54. Kohn, Sheldon S.
    2008 “Teaching Beyond Modernism and Postmodernism.” The English Journal97 (6): 70–74.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Koskinen, Kaisa
    2000 Beyond Ambivalence: Postmodernity and the Ethics of Translation. Academic Diss. University of Tampere.
56. Koskinen, Kaisa
    2018 “Deconstruction.” A History of Modern Translation Knowledge: Sources, Concepts, Effects, edited byLieven D’hulst and Yves Gambier, 317–322. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.142.43kos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.142.43kos [Google Scholar]
57. Lefevere, André
    1984 “On the Refraction of Texts.” Mimesis in Contemporary Theory: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Volume 1: The Literary and Philosophical Debate, edited byMihai Spariosu, 217–237. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cl.1.1.12lef
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cl.1.1.12lef [Google Scholar]
58. Leitch, Vincent B.
    1996 Postmodernism: Local Effects, Global Flows. Albany: State University of New York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Littau, Karin
    2010 “Translation in the Age of Postmodern Production: From Text to Intertext to Hypertext.” Critical Readings in Translation Studies, edited byMona Baker, 435–448. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Lubeck, Sally
    1998 “Is Developmentally Appropriate Practice for Everyone?” InContinuing Tensions in Education, edited byDavid Sexton, Michael Kelley, and Jerry Aldridge, special issue ofChildhood Education74 (5): 283–292. 10.1080/00094056.1998.10521952
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1998.10521952 [Google Scholar]
61. Marais, Kobus
    2019 A (Bio)Semiotic Theory of Translation: The Emergence of Socio-Cultural Reality. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Marais, Kobus and Reine Meylaerts
    eds. 2018 Complexity Thinking in Translation Studies: Methodological Considerations. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203702017
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203702017 [Google Scholar]
63. Martusewicz, Rebecca A.
    2001 Seeking Passage: Post-Structuralism, Pedagogy, Ethics. New York: Teachers College Press.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Massey, Gary, Don Kiraly, and Sascha Hofmann
    2018 “Beyond Teaching: Toward Co-Emergent Praxis in Translator Education.” Translation-Didactik-Kompetenz: Translationswissenschaftliches Kolloquium V. Beiträge zur Übersetzungs- und Dolmetschwissenschaft [Translation didactics competence: Translation Studies Colloquium V. Contributions to Translation and Interpreting Studies], edited byBarbara Ahrens, Silvia Hansen-Schirra, Monika Krein-Kühle, Michael Schreiber, and Ursula Wienen, 11–64. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Mezirow, Jack
    1991 Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    [Google Scholar]
66. Nietzsche, Friedrich
    (1901) 1968 The Will to Power [orig.Der Wille zur Macht]. Translated byW. Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale. New York: Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Nylund, David, and Julie Tilsen
    2006 “Pedagogy and Praxis: Postmodern Spirit in the Classroom.” Journal of Systemic Therapies25 (4): 21–31. 10.1521/jsyt.2006.25.4.21
    https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2006.25.4.21 [Google Scholar]
68. Parker, Stuart
    1997 Reflective Teaching in the Postmodern World: A Manifesto for Education in Postmodernity. Buckingham: Open University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Pennycook, Alastair
    2018 Posthumanist Applied Linguistics. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Peters, Michael A., Marek Tesar, and Liz Jackson
    2018 “After Postmodernism in Educational Theory? A Collective Writing Experiment and Thought Survey.” InWhat Comes After Postmodernism, edited byMichael A. Peters, Marek Tesar, and Liz Jackson, special issue ofEducational Philosophy and Theory50 (14): 1299–1307. 10.1080/00131857.2018.1457868
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1457868 [Google Scholar]
71. Porter, James E.
    1993 “Developing a Postmodern Ethics of Rhetoric and Composition.” Defining the New Rhetorics, edited byTheresa Enos and Stuart C. Brown, 207–226. Newbury Park: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Prawat, Richard S.
    1996 “Constructivisms, Modern and Postmodern.” InFour Perspectives on Learning and Their Implications for Understanding Classroom Learning, edited byJeffrey A. Greene & Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia, special issue ofEducational Psychologist31 (3–4): 215–225.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Preda, Roxana
    2001 Ezra Pound’s (Post)Modern Poetics and Politics: Logocentrism, Language and Truth. New York: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Pym, Anthony
    2014 Exploring Translation Theories. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Risku, Hanna
    2002 “Situatedness in Translation Studies.” InSituated and Embodied Cognition, edited byTim Ziemke, special issue ofCognitive Systems Research3 (3): 523–533. 10.1016/S1389‑0417(02)00055‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-0417(02)00055-4 [Google Scholar]
76. Risku, Hanna
    2010 “A Cognitive Scientific View on Technical Communication and Translation: Do Embodiment and Situatedness Really Make a Difference?” Target22 (1): 94–111. 10.1075/target.22.1.06ris
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.22.1.06ris [Google Scholar]
77. Rose, Marilyn Gaddis
    1997 Translation and Literary Criticism: Translation as Analysis. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Rosenau, Pauline Marie
    1992 Postmodernism and the Social Sciences: Insights, Inroads, and Intrusions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Ryan, Sharon, and Susan Grieshaber
    2005 “Shifting from Developmental to Postmodern Practices in Early Childhood Teacher Education.” Journal of Teacher Education56 (1): 34–45. 10.1177/0022487104272057
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487104272057 [Google Scholar]
80. Schutz, Aaron
    2000 “Teaching Freedom? Postmodern Perspectives.” Review of Educational Research70 (2): 215–251. 10.3102/00346543070002215
    https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543070002215 [Google Scholar]
81. Serres, Michel
    1997 The Troubadour of Knowledge [orig. Le Tiers-Instruit]. Translated bySheila Faria Glaser with William Paulson. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Slattery, Patrick
    1995 “A Postmodern Vision of Time and Learning: A Response to the National Education Commission Report Prisoners of Time.” Harvard Educational Review65 (4): 612–634. 10.17763/haer.65.4.0908t56382151541
    https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.65.4.0908t56382151541 [Google Scholar]
83. Solway, David
    1997 Lying about the Wolf: Essays in Culture and Education. Montréal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. 10.1515/9780773566422
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773566422 [Google Scholar]
84. Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja
    2000 “Uncertainty in Translation Processes.” InTapping and Mapping the Processes of Translation and Interpreting: Outlooks on Empirical Research, edited bySonja Tirkkonen-Condit and Riitta Jääskeläinen, 123–142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.37.13tir
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.37.13tir [Google Scholar]
85. Tong, Vincent C. H., Alex Standen, and Mina Sotiriou
    eds. 2018 Shaping Higher Education with Students: Ways to Connect Research and Teaching. London: UCL Press. 10.2307/j.ctt21c4tcm
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt21c4tcm [Google Scholar]
86. Torres del Rey, Jesús
    2002 “Encuentros y desencuentros posmodernos con la didáctica de la traducción: lenguaje, cultura, poder y pedagogía [Postmodern meetings and mix-ups with translation teaching: Language, culture, power and pedagogy].” InCartografías de la traducción: Del post-estructuralismo al multiculturalismo [Cartographies of translation: From poststructuralism to multiculturalism], edited byRomán Alvarez, 233–278. Salamanca: Almar.
    [Google Scholar]
87. Vallance, Elizabeth
    1973 “Hiding the Hidden Curriculum: An Interpretation of the Language of Justification in Nineteenth-Century Educational Reform.” Curriculum Theory Network4 (1): 5–21. 10.2307/1179123
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1179123 [Google Scholar]
88. Various AuthorsJulie Boéri and Carol Maier
    Various Authors 2010 “Granada Declaration.” InCompromiso social y traducción /interpretación. Translation/Interpreting and Social Activism, edited byJulie Boéri and Carol Maier, 156–157. Granada: ECOS.
    [Google Scholar]
89. Varney, Jennifer
    2008 “Deconstruction and Translation: Positions, Pertinence and the Empowerment of the Translator.” Journal of Language & Translation9 (1): 113–131. 10.22425/jul.2008.9.1.113
    https://doi.org/10.22425/jul.2008.9.1.113 [Google Scholar]
90. Venuti, Lawrence
    (1995) 2008 The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. 2nd ed.London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
91. Vieira, Elsa Ribeiro Pires
    1994 “A Postmodern Translational Aesthetics in Brazil.” InTranslation Studies: An Interdiscipline: Selected Papers from the Translation Studies Congress, Vienna, 1992, edited byMary Snell-Hornby, Franz Pöchhacker, and Klaus Kaindl, 65–72. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.2.09rib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.2.09rib [Google Scholar]
92. Wu, Jinting, Paul William Eaton, David W. Robinson-Morris, Maria F. G. Wallace, and Shaofei Han
    2018 “Perturbing Possibilities in the Postqualitative Turn: Lessons from Taoism (道) and Ubuntu.” International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education31 (6): 504–519. 10.1080/09518398.2017.1422289
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1422289 [Google Scholar]