The multimodal translation workshop as a method of creative inquiry

References

1. Alves, Fabio, and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen
   eds. 2021 The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Andean, James
   2016 “Narrative Modes in Acousmatic Music.” InSound and Narrative, edited byJames Andean, special issue ofOrganised Sound21 (3): 192–203. 10.1017/S1355771816000157
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771816000157 [Google Scholar]
3. Andrews, Molly, Corinne Squire, and Maria Tamboukou
   eds. 2013 Doing Narrative Research. 2nd ed.London: SAGE. 10.4135/9781526402271
   https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526402271 [Google Scholar]
4. Aryani, Arash, Erin S. Isbilen, and Morten H. Christiansen
   2020 “Affective Arousal Links Sound to Meaning.” Psychological Science31 (8): 978–986. 10.1177/0956797620927967
   https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620927967 [Google Scholar]
5. Atkinson, Dwight
   2019 “Beyond the Brain: Intercorporeality and Co-Operative Action for SLA Studies.” The Modern Language Journal103 (4): 724–738. 10.1111/modl.12595
   https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12595 [Google Scholar]
6. Bailenson, Jeremy N.
   2021 “Nonverbal Overload: A Theoretical Argument for the Causes of Zoom Fatigue.” Technology, Mind, and Behavior2 (1). 10.1037/tmb0000030
   https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000030 [Google Scholar]
7. Berger, Christopher C., and H. Henrik Ehrsson
   2017 “The Content of Imagined Sounds Changes Visual Motion Perception in the Cross-Bounce Illusion.” Scientific Reports7 (1): 40123. 10.1038/srep40123
   https://doi.org/10.1038/srep40123 [Google Scholar]
8. Böhme, Gernot
   2000 “Acoustic Atmospheres.” Soundscape: The Journal of Acoustic Ecology1 (1): 14–18.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bower, Matthew, and Shaun Gallagher
   2016 “Bodily Affects as Prenoetic Elements in Enactive Perception.” Phenomenology and Mind (4): 108–131.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Campbell, Madeleine
    2017 “Entre l’audible et l’inaudible: Intersemiotic Translation of Mohammed Dib’s Poetry.” InLanguage – Literature – the Arts: A Cognitive-Semiotic Interface, edited byElżbieta Chrzanowska-Kluczewska and Olga Voroboya, 167–182. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Campbell, Madeleine, Birthe Jørgensen, and Bethan. R. Parkes
    eds. 2013 Haجar and the Anجel: A Response to John Runciman’s Painting ‘Hagar and the Angel’ (c1766). Collaborative Installation at The Hunterian, Glasgow, UK. https://www.gla.ac.uk/hunterian/learning/hunterianassociates/hagarinstallation/
    [Google Scholar]
12. Campbell, Madeleine, and Ricarda Vidal
    eds. 2019 Translating across Sensory and Linguistic Borders: Intersemiotic Journeys between Media. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑97244‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97244-2 [Google Scholar]
13. Creswell, John W., and J. David Creswell
    2018 Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative & Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Damasio, Antonio. R.
    1994 Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Avon.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Damasio, Antonio. R.
    1999 The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness. New York: Harcourt Brace.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Dib, Mohammed
    (1996) 2007 “L’Aube Ismaël (louange) [Dawn Ismaël (Hymn of praise)].” InOeuvres Complètes: I Poésies [Complete works: I Poems], edited byHabib Tengour. Paris: Éditions de la Différence.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Elleström, Lars
    2010 “The Modalities of Media: A Model for Understanding Intermedial Relations.” InMedia Borders, Multimodality and Intermediality, edited byLars Elleström, 11–48. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230275201_2
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230275201_2 [Google Scholar]
18. Elleström, Lars
    2016 “Visual Iconicity in Poetry: Replacing the Notion of ‘Visual Poetry’.” Orbis Litterarum71 (6): 437–472. 10.1111/oli.12112
    https://doi.org/10.1111/oli.12112 [Google Scholar]
19. Englund, Axel
    2010 “Intermedial Topography and Metaphorical Interaction.” InMedia Borders, Intermediality and Multimodality, edited byLars Elleström, 69–80. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230275201_4
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230275201_4 [Google Scholar]
20. Erickson, Frederick
    2011 “Reflections on Practice, Teaching/Learning, Video, and Theorizing.” InTheories of Learning and Studies of Instructional Practice, edited byTimothy Koschmann, 385–402. New York: Routledge. 10.1007/978‑1‑4419‑7582‑9_23
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-7582-9_23 [Google Scholar]
21. ffrench, Patrick
    2015 “Barthes and the Voice: The Acousmatic and Beyond.” L’Esprit créateur55 (4): 56–69. 10.1353/esp.2015.0058
    https://doi.org/10.1353/esp.2015.0058 [Google Scholar]
22. Gibson, James J.
    1979 The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Greener, Ian
    2011 Designing Social Research: A Guide for the Bewildered. London: SAGE. 10.4135/9781446287934
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446287934 [Google Scholar]
24. Hajar, Anas
    2021 “Theoretical Foundations of Phenomenography: A Critical Review.” Higher Education Research and Development40 (7): 1421–1436. 10.1080/07294360.2020.1833844
    https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1833844 [Google Scholar]
25. Halliday, M. A. K.
    1978 Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Hodder Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hokkanen, Sari, and Kaisa Koskinen
    2016 “Affect as a Hinge: The Translator’s Experiencing Self as a Sociocognitive Interface.” Translation Spaces5 (1): 78–96.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Hutchins, Edwin
    1995 Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Katschthaler, Karl
    2022 Zwischen Atmosphäre und Narration: Zum Verhältnis von Musik, Sprache und Literatur im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert [Between atmosphere and narration: The relationship of music, language and literature in the 20th and 21st century]. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kellough, B. R.
    2013 “Sound Installation.” InHaجar and the Anجel: A Response to John Runciman’s Painting ‘Hagar and the Angel’ (c1766), edited byMadeleine Campbell, Birthe Jørgensen, and Bethan. R. Parkes. Collaborative Installation at The Hunterian, Glasgow, UK. https://www.gla.ac.uk/hunterian/learning/hunterianassociates/hagarinstallation/
    [Google Scholar]
30. Kohler Riessman, Catherine
    2008 Narrative Methods for the Human Sciences. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Koskinen, Kaisa
    2012 “Domestication, Foreignization and the Modulation of Affect.” InDomestication and Foreignization in Translation Studies, edited byHannu Kemppainen, Marja Jänis, and Alexandra Belikova, 13–32. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Koskinen, Kaisa
    2015 “Training Translators for a Superdiverse World: Translators’ Intercultural Competence and Translation as Affective Work.” Russian Journal of Linguistics19 (4): 175–184.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Koskinen, Kaisa
    2020 Translation and Affect: Essays on Sticky Affects and Translational Affective Labour. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.152
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.152 [Google Scholar]
34. Kress, Gunther R.
    2003 Literacy in the New Media Age. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Kress, Gunther R.
    2010 Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Kress, Gunther R., and Theo van Leeuwen
    1996 Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Kress, Gunther R., and Theo Van Leeuwen
    2021 Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 3rd ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Leavy, Patricia
    2017 Research Design: Quantitative, Qualitative, Mixed Methods, Arts-Based, and Community-Based Participatory Research Approaches. New York: The Guilford Press
    [Google Scholar]
39. Lebrecht, Sophie, Moshe Bar, Lisa Feldman Barrett, and Michael J. Tarr
    2012 “Micro-Valences: Perceiving Affective Valence in Everyday Objects.” Frontiers in Psychology31: 107. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00107
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00107 [Google Scholar]
40. Lehr, Caroline
    2021 “Translation, Emotion and Cognition.” InAlves and Jakobsen (2021, 294–309). 10.4324/9781315178127‑20
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178127-20 [Google Scholar]
41. Leibowitz, Brenda
    2009 “The Professional Development of Academics as Teachers.” InResearching Higher Education: International Perspectives on Theory, Policy and Practice, edited byJennifer M. Case and Jeroen Huisman, 153–170. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Marton, Ference
    1986 “Phenomenography: A Research Approach to Investigating Different Understandings of Reality.” Journal of Thought21 (3): 28–49.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Marton, Ference, and Shirley Booth
    1997 Learning and Awareness. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Martin, J. R., and White, R.
    2005 The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230511910
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511910 [Google Scholar]
45. Massey, Doreen
    2005 For Space. London: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Meschonnic, Henri
    2007 Éthique et politique du traduire [The ethics and politics of translation]. Paris: Verdier.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Meyer, Christian, Jürgen Streeck, and J. Scott Jordan
    eds. 2017 Intercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190210465.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
48. Muñoz Martín, Ricardo
    2016 “Processes of What Models? On the Cognitive Indivisibility of Translation Acts and Events.” InCognitive Space: Exploring the Situational Interface, edited byBirgitta Englund Dimitrova and Maureen Ehrensberger-Dow, special issue ofTranslation Spaces5 (1): 145–161.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Muñoz Martín, Ricardo, and Celia Martín de León
    2021 “Translation and Cognition.” InAlves and Jakobsen (2021, 52–68). 10.4324/9781315178127‑5
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178127-5 [Google Scholar]
50. Noë, Alva
    2004 Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. O’Regan, J. Kevin, and Alve Noë
    2001a “A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences24 (5): 939–973. 10.1017/S0140525X01000115
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01000115 [Google Scholar]
52. O’Regan, J. Kevin, and Alve Noë
    2001b “What Is It Like to See: A Sensorimotor Theory of Perceptual Experience.” Synthese129 (1): 79–103. 10.1023/A:1012699224677
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012699224677 [Google Scholar]
53. Painter, Clare, J. R. Martin, and Len Unsworth
    2013 Reading Visual Narratives: Image Analysis of Children’s Picture Books. Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Petrides, K. V.
    2009 Technical Manual for the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaires (TEIQue). London: London Psychometric Laboratory.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Pherali, Tejendra J.
    2011 Phenomenography as a Research Strategy: Researching Environmental Conceptions. Saarbrücken: Lambert Academic Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Raguet, Christine
    2016 “Alienability and Creativity: The Role of Sounds and Sensations in Translation.” InTranslation and Creativity – La traduction comme création, edited byMartine Hennard Dutheil de la Rochère and Irene Weber-Henking, 135–160. Lausanne: Cahiers du CTL.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Risku, Hanna, and Regina Rogl
    2021 “Translation and Situated, Embodied, Distributed and Extended Cognition.” InAlves and Jakobsen (2021, 478–499). 10.4324/9781315178127‑32
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178127-32 [Google Scholar]
58. Rowell, Lonnie L., Margaret M. Riel, and Elena Yu. Polush
    2017 “Defining Action Research: On Dialogic Spaces for Constructing Shared Meanings.” InThe Palgrave International Handbook of Action Research, edited byLonnie L. Rowell, Catherine D. Bruce, Joseph M. Shosh, and Margaret M. Riel, 85–101. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/978‑1‑137‑40523‑4_6
    https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-40523-4_6 [Google Scholar]
59. Rudenko, Svetlana, and Maria José de Córdoba Serrano
    2017 “Musical-Space Synaesthesia: Visualisation of Musical Texture.” Multisensory Research30 (3–5) : 279–285. 10.1163/22134808‑00002562
    https://doi.org/10.1163/22134808-00002562 [Google Scholar]
60. Schaeffer, Pierre
    1966 Traité des objets musicaux [A treatise on musical objects]. Paris: Le Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Scott, Clive
    2010 “Intermediality and Synesthesia: Literary Translation as Centrifugal Practice.” Art in Translation2 (2): 153–169. 10.2752/175613110X12706508989415
    https://doi.org/10.2752/175613110X12706508989415 [Google Scholar]
62. Sheets-Johnstone, Maxine
    2011 “Embodied Minds or Mindful Bodies? A Question of Fundamental, Inherently Inter-related Aspects of Animation.” Subjectivity4 (4): 451–466. 10.1057/sub.2011.21
    https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2011.21 [Google Scholar]
63. Silverstein, Michael
    2015 “How Language Communities Intersect: Is ‘Superdiversity’ an Incremental or Transformative Condition?” Language and Communication441: 7–18. 10.1016/j.langcom.2014.10.015
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2014.10.015 [Google Scholar]
64. Stuart, Susan A. J.
    2017 “Feeling Our Way: Enkinesthetic Enquiry and Immanent Intercorporeality.” InIntercorporeality: Emerging Socialities in Interaction, edited byChristian Meyer, Jürgen Streeck, and J. Scott Jordan, 51–72. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Van Lier, Leo
    2008 “Ecological-Semiotic Perspectives on Educational Linguistics.” InThe Handbook of Educational Linguistics, edited byBernard Spolsky and Francis M. Hult, 596–605. Malden, MA: Blackwell. 10.1002/9780470694138.ch42
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694138.ch42 [Google Scholar]
66. Vatakis, Argiro, and Charles Spence
    2007 “Crossmodal Binding: Evaluating the ‘Unity Assumption’ Using Audiovisual Speech Stimuli.” Perception & Psychophysics69 (5): 744–756. 10.3758/BF03193776
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193776 [Google Scholar]
67. Venuti, Lawrence
    1995 The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Ward, Jamie
    2008 The Frog Who Croaked Blue: Synesthesia and the Mixing of the Senses. Hove: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Williams, Ralph Vaughan
    1925 “The Lark Ascending: Romance for Violin and Orchestra.” Score. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]