oa To be or not to be

References

1. Busselle, Rick, and Helena Bilandzic
   2009 “Measuring Narrative Engagement.” Media Psychology12 (4): 321–347. 10.1080/15213260903287259
   https://doi.org/10.1080/15213260903287259 [Google Scholar]
2. Colman, Toon, Margot Fonteyne, Joke Daems, Nicolas Dirix, and Lieve Macken
   2022 “GECO-MT: The Ghent Eye-tracking Corpus of Machine Translation.” In13th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2022), edited byNicoletta Calzolari , 29–38. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
   [Google Scholar]
3. Dixon, Peter, Marisa Bortolussi, Leslie C. Twilley, and Alice Leung
   1993 “Literary Processing and Interpretation: Towards Empirical Foundations.” Poetics22 (1–2): 5–33. 10.1016/0304‑422X(93)90018‑C
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-422X(93)90018-C [Google Scholar]
4. D’Ydewalle, Géry
   1984 “Processing TV Information and Eye Movements Research: Interfaces in the Field.” InReadings on Cognitive Ergonomics – Mind and Computers: Proceedings of the Second European Conference, Gmunden, Austria, September 10–14, 1984, edited byGerrit C. van der Veer, Michael J. Tauber, Thomas R. G. Green, and Peter Gorny, 200–204. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/3‑540‑13394‑1_17
   https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-13394-1_17 [Google Scholar]
5. D’Ydewalle, Géry, Johan van Rensbergen, and Joris Pollet
   1987 “Reading a Message When the Same Message Is Available Auditorily in Another Language: The Case of Subtitling.” InEye Movements from Physiology to Cognition: Selected/Edited Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Eye Movements, Dourdan, France, September 1985, edited byJ. K. O’Regan and A. Levy-Schoen, 313–321. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 10.1016/B978‑0‑444‑70113‑8.50047‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-70113-8.50047-3 [Google Scholar]
6. D’Ydewalle, Géry, and Johan van Rensbergen
   1989 “13 Developmental Studies of Text-Picture Interactions in the Perception of Animated Cartoons with Text.” InKnowledge Acquisition from Text and Pictures, edited byHeinz Mandl and Joel R. Levin, special issue ofAdvances in Psychology581: 233–248. 10.1016/S0166‑4115(08)62157‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62157-3 [Google Scholar]
7. Guerberof-Arenas, Ana, and Antonio Toral
   2022 “Creativity in Translation: Machine Translation as a Constraint for Literary Texts.” Translation Spaces11 (2): 184–212. 10.1075/ts.21025.gue
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.21025.gue [Google Scholar]
8. Guerberof-Arenas, Ana, and Antonio Toral
   2020 “The Impact of Post-Editing and Machine Translation on Creativity and Reading Experience.” Translation Spaces9 (2): 255–282. 10.1075/ts.20035.gue
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.20035.gue [Google Scholar]
9. Hakemulder, Jemeljan F.
   2004 “Foregrounding and Its Effect on Readers’ Perception.” Discourse Processes38 (2): 193–218. 10.1207/s15326950dp3802_3
   https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3802_3 [Google Scholar]
10. Hu, Ke, Sharon O’Brien, and Dorothy Kenny
    2021 “A Reception Study of Machine Translated Subtitles for MOOCs.” InMapping Contemporary Audiovisual Translation in East Asia, edited byDingkun Wang, Xiaochun Zhang, and Arista Szu-Yu Kuo, special issue ofPerspectives28 (4): 521–538.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Kotze, Haidee, Berit Janssen, Corina Koolen, Luka van der Plas, and Gys-Walt van Egdom
    2021 “Norms, Affect and Evaluation in the Reception of Literary Translations in Multilingual Online Reading Communities: Deriving Cognitive-Evaluative Templates from Big Data.” Translation, Cognition & Behavior4 (2): 147–186. 10.1075/tcb.00060.kot
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00060.kot [Google Scholar]
12. Kruger, Haidee
    2013 “Child and Adult Readers’ Processing of Foreign Elements in Translated South African Picturebooks.” Target: International Journal of Translation Studies25 (2): 180–227. 10.1075/target.25.2.03kru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.25.2.03kru [Google Scholar]
13. Kruger, Jan-Louis
    2018 “Eye Tracking in Audiovisual Translation Research.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Audiovisual Translation, edited byLuis Pérez-González, 350–366. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315717166‑22
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717166-22 [Google Scholar]
14. Kuijpers, Moniek M., Frank Hakemulder, Ed S. Tan, and Miruna M. Doicaru
    2014 “Exploring Absorbing Reading Experiences: Developing and Validating a Self-Report Scale to Measure Story World Absorption.” Scientific Study of Literature4 (1): 89–122. 10.1075/ssol.4.1.05kui
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.1.05kui [Google Scholar]
15. Mangen, Anne, and Don Kuiken
    2014 “Lost in an iPad: Narrative Engagement on Paper and Tablet.” Scientific Study of Literature4 (2): 150–177. 10.1075/ssol.4.2.02man
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ssol.4.2.02man [Google Scholar]
16. NOS
    NOS 2022 “Jongeren lezen graag boeken, maar dan wel in het Engels [Young people like to read books, but then in English].” NOS, April16. https://nos.nl/nieuwsuur/artikel/2425380-jongeren-lezen-graag-boeken-maar-dan-wel-in-het-engels
17. Nuland, Sherwin B.
    1995 How We Die: Reflections of Life’s Final Chapter, New Edition. New York: Vintage.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Orrego-Carmona, David
    2018 “Audiovisual Translation and Audience Reception.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Audiovisual Translation, edited byLuis Pérez-González, 367–382. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315717166‑23
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717166-23 [Google Scholar]
19. Ortiz Boix, Carla
    2016 Implementing Machine Translation and Post-Editing to the Translation of Wildlife Documentaries Through Voice-over and Off-Screen Dubbing. PhD diss. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/400020
    [Google Scholar]
20. Stasimioti, Maria, and Vilelmini Sosoni
    2022 “Creative Texts Translation vs Post-Editing: A Qualitative Study of the Product Quality, the Translators’ Perception and Audience’s Reception.” Presentation at theWorkshop on Creativity and Technology: Proceedings of the 1st NETTT Conference. Rhodes: NETT.
21. Vonnegut, Kurt
    1999 Bagombo Snuff Box. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Walker, Callum
    2020 An Eye-Tracking Study of Equivalent Effect in Translation: The Reader Experience of Literary Style. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Walker, Callum
    2021 “Investigating How We Read Translations: A Call to Action for Experimental Studies of Translation Reception.” Cognitive Linguistic Studies8 (2): 482–512. 10.1075/cogls.00087.wal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.00087.wal [Google Scholar]
24. Whyatt, Bogusława, Olga Witczak, Ewa Tomczak-Łukaszewska, and Olha Lehka-Paul
    2023 “The Proof of the Translation Process Is in the Reading of the Target Text: An Eyetracking Reception Study.” Ampersand111, 100149. 10.1016/j.amper.2023.100149
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2023.100149 [Google Scholar]