oa A tale of two Skopos theories

References

1. Alekseev, Mikhail
   1931 Problema liternaturnogo perevoda [The problem of literary translation]. Irkutsk: Irkutsk University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Arduini, Stefano, and Siri Nergaard
   2011 “Translation: A New Paradigm.” Translation: An Interdisciplinary Journal: –.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Ayvazyan, Nune, and Anthony Pym
   2017 “West Enters East: A Strange Case of Unequal Equivalences in Soviet Translation Theory.” InGoing East: Discovering New and Alternative Traditions in Translation Studies, edited byLarisa Schippel and Cornelia Zwischenberger, –. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baer, Brian James
   2020 “On Origins: The Mythistory of Translation Studies and the Geopolitics of Knowledge.” The Translator (): –. 10.1080/13556509.2020.1843755
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2020.1843755 [Google Scholar]
5. Baer, Brian James
   2021 “How to Read Soviet Translation Theory.” InFedorov’s Introduction to Translation Theory (orig.Vvedenie v teoriiu perevoda), edited byBrian James Baer, translated byBrian James Baer and Ryan Green, –. Abingdon: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Baer, Brian James
   2025 “Birth of a Discipline? Soviet Translation Studies in the 1920s.” Stridon: Journal of Studies in Translation and Interpreting (): –. 10.4312/stridon.4.2.5‑28
   https://doi.org/10.4312/stridon.4.2.5-28 [Google Scholar]
7. Baker, Mona, and Gabriela Saldanha
   eds. 2001 Routledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Batiushkov, Fedor, Kornei Chukovskii, and Nikolai Gumilev
   1920 Printsipy khudozhestvennogo perevoda [Principles of literary translation]. Petrograd: World Literature.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Benjamin, Walter
   2000 “The Task of the Translator.” Translated byHarry Zohn. InThe Translation Studies Reader, edited byLawrence Venuti, –. New York: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Blumczynski, Piotr
    2016 Ubiquitous Translation. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315646480
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315646480 [Google Scholar]
11. Cauer, Paul
    1914 Die Kunst des Übersetzens [The art of translation]. Berlin: Weidmann.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Chesterman, Andrew
    ed. 1989 Readings in Translation Theory. Helsinki: Oy Finn Lectura Ab.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chukovskii, Kornei, and Nikolai Gumilev
    1919 Printsipy khudozhestvennogo perevoda [Principles of literary translation]. Petrograd: Vsemirnaia Literatura.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Clifford, James
    1997 Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Collombat, Isabelle
    2017 “Skopos Theory as an Extension of Rhetoric.” Poroi (): –. 10.13008/2151‑2957.1236
    https://doi.org/10.13008/2151-2957.1236 [Google Scholar]
16. Du, Xiaoyan
    2012 “A Brief Introduction of Skopos Theory.” Theory and Practice in Language Studies (): –. 10.4304/tpls.2.10.2189‑2193
    https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.10.2189-2193 [Google Scholar]
17. Even-Zohar, Itamar
    1971 Introduction to a Theory of Literary Translation. PhD diss. University of Tel Aviv.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Fedorov, Andrei
    1933 Teoriia i praktika perevoda nemetskoi nauchnoi i tekhnicheskoi literatury na russkii iazyk [Theory and practice of translating German scientific and technical literature into Russian]. Issue. Moscow: Inostrannye Iazyki.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fedorov, Andrei
    1936 Teoriia i praktika perevoda nemetskoi nauchnoi i tekhnicheskoi literatury na russkii iazyk [Theory and practice of translating German scientific and technical literature into Russian]. Issue. Moscow: Inostrannye Iazyki.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Fedorov, Andrei
    1952 “Osnovnye voprosy teorii perevoda [Basic issues in the theory of translation].” Voprosy iazykoznaniia (.): –.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Fedorov, Andrei
    1953 Vvedenie v teoriiu perevoda [Introduction to translation theory]. Moscow: Literatura na inostrannykh iazykakh.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Fedorov, Andrei
    1955 翻译理论概要 [Introduction to translation theory]. Shanghai: Zhonghua Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Finkel, Oleksandr
    1929 Teoriia i praktyka perekladu [Theory and practice of translation]. Kharkiv: Derzhavne Vydavnytstvo Ukrainy.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Foucault, Michel
    1977 “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History.” InLanguage, Counter-Memory, Practice, edited byDonald F. Bouchard, –. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Gentzler, Edwin
    ed. 1993 Contemporary Translation Theories. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Gentzler, Edwin
    2014 “Translation Studies: Pre-Discipline, Discipline, Interdiscipline, and Post-Discipline.” International Journal of Society, Culture and Language (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Holz-Mänttäri, Justa
    1984 Translatorisches Handeln: Theorie und Methode [Translatorial action: Theory and method]. Helsinki: Suomalainen Tiedeakatemia.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kade, Otto
    1968 Zufall und Gesetzmäßigkeit in der Übersetzung [Coincidence and regularity in translations]. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Kalnychenko, Oleksandr, and Natalia Kamovnikova
    2020 “Teaching Translation: Academic Courses in ‘Translation Theory and Practice’ of the early 1930s.” Visnyk Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universitetu imeni V.N. Karazina [The journal of V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University], Foreign Philology: –.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Keller, Julius
    1892 Die Grenzen der Übersetzungskunst [Limitations of the art of translation]. Karlsruhe: Braun.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Koller, Werner
    1972 Grundprobleme der Übersetzungstheorie [Basic problems of translation theory]. Bern: Francke.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kolomiets, Lada
    2020 “A Psycholinguistic Analysis of the First Ukrainian Syllabi on General and Special Methodology of Translation by Mykhailo Kalynovych and Mykola Zerov.” East European Journal of Psycholinguistics (): –. 10.29038/eejpl.2020.7.2.kol
    https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2020.7.2.kol [Google Scholar]
33. Levý, Jiří
    1969 Die literarische Übersetzung [Literary translation]. Translated byWalter Schamschula. Frankfurt am Main: Athenäum-Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Levý, Jiří
    1974 Iskusstvo perevoda [Art of translation]. Translated byVladimir Rossel. Moscow: Progress.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Levý, Jiří
    2011 The Art of Translation. Translated byPatrick Corness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.97
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.97 [Google Scholar]
36. Li, Liu, Cheng Deng, Shangqian Li, Huapeng Zhang, Ming Gao, Benyi Sun, Yun Zhou, Shu Wang, Zhaogeng Meng, and Zhenxin Xu
    1955 “Translators’ Preface.” In翻译理论概要 [Introduction to translation theory], byAndrei Fedorov, . Shanghai: Zhonghua Book Company.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Malmberg, Bertil
    ed. 1973 La traduzione: Saggi e studi [Translation: Essays and studies]. Trieste: Edizioni Lint.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Mommsen, Tycho
    1886 Die Kunst des Übersetzens fremdsprachlicher Dichtung ins Deutsche [The art of translating foreign poetry into German]. Frankfurt am Main: M. Jügel.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Morozov, Mikhail
    1932–1938 Tekhnika perevoda nauchnoi i tekhnicheskoi literatury s angliiskogo iazyka na russkii [Techniques for translating scientific and technical writing from English into Russian]. Issues. Moscow: Inostrannye Iazyki.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Mounin, Georges
    1963 Problèmes théoretiques de la traduction [Theoretical problems of translation]. Paris: Gallimard.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Munday, Jeremy
    2001 Introducing Translation Studies: Theories and Applications. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Munday, Jeremy
    2022 “Translation Theories.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Translation, edited byKirsten Malmkjaer, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108616119.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108616119.002 [Google Scholar]
43. Nida, Eugene Albert
    1964 Toward a Science of Translating. Leiden: Brill. 10.1163/9789004495746
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004495746 [Google Scholar]
44. Niranjana, Tejaswini
    1992 Siting Translation: History, Post-Structuralism, and the Colonial Context. Berkeley: University of California Press. 10.1525/9780520911369
    https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520911369 [Google Scholar]
45. Nord, Christiane
    1997 Translating as a Purposeful Activity: Functionalist Approaches Explained. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Pokorn, Nike K.
    2012 Post-Socialist Translation Practices: Ideological Struggle in Children’s Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.103
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.103 [Google Scholar]
47. Pym, Anthony, and Nune Ayvazyan
    2015 “The Case of the Missing Russian Translation Theories.” Translation Studies (): –. 10.1080/14781700.2014.964300
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2014.964300 [Google Scholar]
48. Pym, Anthony
    2016 Translation Solutions for Many Languages: Histories of a Flawed Dream. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Rancière, Jacques
    2007 The Future of the Image [orig. Le Destin des images]. Translated byG. Elliott. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Reiss, Katharina, and Hans J. Vermeer
    1984 Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Translationstheorie [Foundation of a general theory of translation]. Tübingen: Niemeyer. 10.1515/9783111351919
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111351919 [Google Scholar]
51. Reiss, Katharina, and Hans J. Vermeer
    1996 Fundamentos para una teoría funcional de la traducción [Foundations for a functional theory of translation]. Madrid: Ediciones Akal.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Reiss, Katharina, and Hans J. Vermeer
    2013 Towards a General Theory of Translational Action: Skopos Theory Explained [orig.Grundlegung einer allgemeinen Translationstheorie]. Translated byChristiane Nord. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Retsker, Iakov
    1934 Metodika tekhnicheskogo perevoda [Methods of technical translation]. Moscow: NKTP.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Schäffner, Christina
    2001 “Skopos Theory.” InRoutledge Encyclopedia of Translation Studies, edited byMona Baker and Gabriela Saldanha, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Schleiermacher, Friedrich
    1838 “Über die verschiedenen Methoden des Übersetzens [On different methods of translating].” InFriedrich Schleiermacher, Sämtliche Werke, Abt. III: Zur Philosophie, Bd., –. Berlin: Reimer.
    [Google Scholar]
56. Sobolev, Lev
    1950 “O mere tochnosti v perevode [On the measure of accuracy in translation].” InVoprosy teorii i metodiki uchebnogo perevoda [Issues in the theory and method of educational translation], edited byK. Ganshina and I. Karpov, –. Moscow: Nauka.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Störig, Hans Joachim
    1963 Das Problem des Übersetzens [The problem of translation]. Stuttgart: Goverts.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Usov, Dmitrii
    1933 Syllabus for the course Teorii i praktike perevoda. Manuscript. Central State Archives of Literature and Art of Saint Petersburg. F.158 op.2 d.398.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Usov, Dmitrii
    1934a “Iz nabliudenii nad tekhnikoi perevoda [From observations on the technique of translation].” InSbornik tekstov dlia perevoda s nemetskogo iazyka [Collection of texts for translation from the German language], edited byDmitrii Usov, Zigmund Til’ts, and Al’fred Tuntser, –. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe uchebno-pedagogicheskoe izdatel’stvo.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Usov, Dmitrii
    1934b Osnovny printsipy perevodcheskoi raboty [Basic principles of translatorial work]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe uchebno-pedagogicheskoe izdatel’stvo.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Vasserman, Elizaveta
    2021 Andrei Fedorov’s Theory of Translation and its Place in the History of Translation Studies. PhD diss. University of Leeds.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Venuti, Lawrence
    ed. 2000 The Translation Studies Reader. 1st ed.New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203446621
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203446621 [Google Scholar]
63. Venuti, Lawrence
    ed. 2004 The Translation Studies Reader. 2nd ed.New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Venuti, Lawrence
    ed. 2012 The Translation Studies Reader. 3rd ed.New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Venuti, Lawrence
    ed. 2021 The Translation Studies Reader. 4th ed.New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429280641
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429280641 [Google Scholar]
66. Vermeer, Hans J.
    1976 “Review: ‘La traduzione: Saggi e studi. Trieste: Edizione Lint 1973’.” Göttingische Gelehrte Anzeigen [Göttingen scholarly adverts] : –.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Vermeer, Hans J.
    1978 “Ein Rahmen für eine allgemeine Translationstheorie [A framework for a general theory of translation].” Lebende Sprachen [Living languages] : –. 10.1515/les.1978.23.3.99
    https://doi.org/10.1515/les.1978.23.3.99 [Google Scholar]
68. Vermeer, Hans J.
    1979 “Vom ‘richtigen’ Übersetzen [The ‘right’ way to translate].” Mitteilungsblatt für Dolmetscher und Übersetzer [Newsletter for interpreters and translators] (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Vermeer, Hans J.
    1983a Aufsätze zur Translationstheorie [Essays on translation theory]. Heidelberg: Selbstverlag.
    [Google Scholar]
70. Vermeer, Hans J.
    1983b “Translation Theory and Linguistics.” InNäkökohtia kääntämisen tutkumuksesta [Perspectives on the study of translation], edited byPauli Roinila, Ritva Orfanos, and Sonja Tirkkonen-Condit, –. Joensuu: Korkeakoulu.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Vermeer, Hans J.
    1986a Esboço de uma teoría da tradução [Outline of a theory of translation]. Porto: Edições Asa.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Vermeer, Hans J.
    1986b Voraussetzungen für eine Translationstheorie — einige Kapitel Kultur-und Sprachtheorie [Requirements for a theory of translation — some chapters on culture and language theory]. Heidelberg: Infinity.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Vermeer, Hans J.
    1987 “What Does It Mean to Translate?” Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics: –.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Vermeer, Hans J.
    1989a “Skopos and Commission in Translational Action.” InReadings in Translation, edited byAndrew Chesterman, –. Helsinki: Oy Finn Lectura Ab.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Vermeer, Hans J.
    1989b Skopos und Translationsauftrag [Skopos and translation brief]. Heidelberg: Abt. Allg. Übersetzungs- u. Dolmetschwiss. d. Inst. für Übersetzen u. Dolmetschen d. Univ.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Vermeer, Hans J.
    1996 A Skopos Theory of Translation (Some Arguments For and Against). Heidelberg: TEXTconTEXT.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Vermeer, Hans J.
    2000 “Skopos and Commission in Translational Action.” InThe Translation Studies Reader, edited byLawrence Venuti, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Vermeer, Hans J.
    2006 Versuch einer Intertheorie der Translation [Attempting an intertheory of translation]. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
    [Google Scholar]
79. Vermeer, Hans J.
    2007 “La théorie du skopos et ses possibles développements” [The theory of skopos and its possible developments]. InTraduction spécialisée: pratiques, théories, formations [Specialised translation: Practice, theory and training], edited byElisabeth Lavault-Olléon, –. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]