1887
image of How do trainee interpreters manage cognitive problem triggers in simultaneous interpreting with text?
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study investigates how trainee interpreters use scripts in simultaneous interpreting with text (SIMTXT) when encountering cognitive problem triggers such as numbers, fast speech rates, proper names, and deviations from the script. Fifteen trainees performed English-to-Chinese SIMTXT under one baseline and four ‘problem-triggering’ conditions, each involving one of the aforementioned triggers. Analysis of eye-tracking data and retrospective interviews revealed that: (1) Cognitive effort and visual attention allocation during SIMTXT were influenced by the cognitive demands associated with each type of problem trigger. Frequent numbers prompted the most intensive script use, with more fixations within the script and fewer fixation shifts between script and video than in the baseline. In contrast, deviations reduced script reliance, with less dwell time and more fixation shifts relative to the baseline. (2) Most participants reported being disrupted by deviations. Their perceptions of script utility varied, but the majority regarded scripts as a valuable visual aid, particularly for managing numbers and proper names.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/target.23179.ma
2026-08-25
2026-09-09
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Agrifoglio, Marjorie
    2004 “Sight Translation and Interpretation: A Comparative Analysis of Constraints and Failure.” Interpreting (): –. 10.1075/intp.6.1.05agr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.6.1.05agr [Google Scholar]
  2. Baddeley, Alan David, and Graham J. Hitch
    1974 “Working Memory.” InThe Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, edited byGordon H. Bower, –. New York: Academic Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barghout, Alma, Lucía Ruiz Rosendo, and Mónica Varela García
    2015 “The Influence of Speed on Omissions in Simultaneous Interpretation.” Interpreting (): –. 10.1075/babel.61.3.01bar
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.61.3.01bar [Google Scholar]
  4. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker Mächler
    2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software (): –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
  5. Braun, Virginia, and Victoria Clarke
    2006 “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology (): –. 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
    https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa [Google Scholar]
  6. Burgoyne, A. P., Cody A. Mashburn, Jason S. Tsukahara, and Randall W. Engle
    2022 “Attention Control and Process Overlap Theory: Searching for Cognitive Processes Underpinning the Positive Manifold.” Intelligence: . 10.1016/j.intell.2022.101629
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2022.101629 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cammoun, Rawdha, Catherine Davies, Konstantin Ivanov, and Naimushin Boris
    2009Simultaneous Interpretation with Text: Is the Text Friend or Foe? Laying Foundations for a Teaching Module. MA dissertation. University of Geneva.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Čeňková, Ivana
    2015 “Sight Translation/Interpreting.” InRoutledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, edited byFranz Pöchhacker, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Jing, Rongrui Yu, and Xiao Zhao
    2019 “Interpreting Training in China: Practice and Research.” InTranslation Studies in China: New Frontiers in Translation Studies, edited byZiman Han and Defeng Li, –. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑13‑7592‑7_6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7592-7_6 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cheung, Andrew Kay-fan
    2008 “Numbers in Simultaneous Interpreting: An Experimental Study.” Forum (): –. 10.1075/forum.7.2.03che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.7.2.03che [Google Scholar]
  11. Chmiel, Agnieszka, and Agnieszka Lijewska
    2019 “Syntactic Processing in Sight Translation by Professional and Trainee Interpreters: Professionals Are More Time-Efficient While Trainees View the Source Text Less.” Target (): –. 10.1075/target.18091.chm
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.18091.chm [Google Scholar]
  12. Chmiel, Agnieszka, Przemysław Janikowski, and Agnieszka Lijewska
    2020 “Multimodal Processing in Simultaneous Interpreting with Text: Interpreters Focus More on the Visual than the Auditory Modality.” Target (): –. 10.1075/target.18157.chm
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.18157.chm [Google Scholar]
  13. Christoffels, Ingrid, and Annette M. B. de Groot
    2005 “Simultaneous Interpreting: A Cognitive Perspective.” InHandbook of Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Approaches, edited byJudith F. Kroll and Annette. M. B. de Groot, –. New York: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Clifton Jr, Charles, Fernanda Ferreira, John M. Henderson, Albrecht W. Inhoff, Simon P. Liversedge, Erik D. Reichle, and Elizabeth R. Schotter
    2016 “Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: Keith Rayner’s 40 Year Legacy.” Journal of Memory and Language: –. 10.1016/j.jml.2015.07.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  15. Colavita, Francis
    1974 “Human Sensory Dominance.” Perception & Psychophysics (): –. 10.3758/BF03203962
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203962 [Google Scholar]
  16. Conklin, Kathy, Sara Alotaibi, Ana Pellicer-Sánchez, and Laura Vilkaitė-Lozdienė
    2020 “What Eye-Tracking Tells Us about Reading-only and Reading-while-listening in a First and Second Language.” Second Language Research (): –. 10.1177/0267658320921496
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320921496 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cowan, Nelson
    2000 “Processing Limits of Selective Attention and Working Memory: Potential Implications for Interpreting.” Interpreting (): –. 10.1075/intp.5.2.05cow
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.5.2.05cow [Google Scholar]
  18. De Laet, Frans, and Raymond Vanden Plas
    2005 “La traduction à vue en interprétation simultanée: Quelle opérationnalité ambitionner? [Sight translation in simultaneous interpreting: What level of operational readiness should we aim for?].” Meta (). 10.7202/019835ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/019835ar [Google Scholar]
  19. Doherty, Stephen, and Jan-Louis Kruger
    2018 “The Development of Eye Tracking in Empirical Research on Subtitling and Captioning.” InSeeing into Screens: Eye Tracking and the Moving Image, edited byTessa Dwyer, Claire Perkins, Sean Redmond, and Jodi Sita, –. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781501329012.0009
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781501329012.0009 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dong, Yanping, and Ping Li
    2019 “Attentional Control in Interpreting: A Model of Language Control and Processing Control.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition (): –. 10.1017/S1366728919000786
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000786 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fox, John, and Sanford Weisberg
    2019An R Companion to Applied Regression. 3rd ed.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gieshoff, Anne Catherine
    2021 “Does It Help to See the Speaker’s Lip Movements? An Investigation of Cognitive Load and Mental Effort in Simultaneous Interpreting.” Translation, Cognition & Behavior (): –. 10.1075/tcb.00049.gie
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00049.gie [Google Scholar]
  23. Gile, Daniel, and Rafael Barranco-Droege
    2022 “Theory and Training in Conference Interpreting.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Conference Interpreting, edited byMichaela Albl-Mikasa and Elisabet Tiselius, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gile, Daniel
    2008 “Local Cognitive Load in Simultaneous Interpreting and Its Implications for Empirical Research.” Forum (): –. 10.1075/forum.6.2.04gil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.6.2.04gil [Google Scholar]
  25. 2009Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.8 [Google Scholar]
  26. Han, Chao, and Mehdi Riazi
    2017 “Investigating the Effects of Speech Rate and Accent on Simultaneous Interpretation: A Mixed-Methods Approach.” Across Languages and Cultures (): –. 10.1556/084.2017.18.2.4
    https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2017.18.2.4 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ho, Chen-En
    2022 “Sight Interpreting/Translation.” InEncyclopedia of Translation and Interpreting (ENTI), edited byJavier Franco Aixelà, Ricardo Muñoz Martín, and Carla Botella Tejera. Granada: Iberian Association of Translation and Interpreting Studies.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Holmqvist, Kenneth, Marcus Nyström, Richard Andersson, Richard Dewhurst, Halszka Jarodzka, and Joost van de Weijer
    2011Eye Tracking: A Comprehensive Guide to Methods and Measures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hvelplund, Kristian T.
    2017 “Eye-tracking in Translation Process Research.” InThe Handbook of Translation and Cognition, edited byJohn W. Schwieter and Aline Ferreira, –. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell. 10.1002/9781119241485.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241485.ch14 [Google Scholar]
  30. Ivanova, A.
    2000 “The Use of Retrospection in Research on Simultaneous Interpreting.” InTapping and Mapping the Process of Translation and Interpreting: Outlooks on Empirical Research, edited bySonja Tirkonnen-Condit and Riitta Jääskeläinen, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.37.05iva
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.37.05iva [Google Scholar]
  31. Jones, Roderick
    2014Conference Interpreting Explained. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315760322
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315760322 [Google Scholar]
  32. Kajzer-Wietrzny, Marta, Ilmari Ivaska, and Adriano Ferraresi
    2024 “Fluency in Rendering Numbers in Simultaneous Interpreting.” Interpreting (): –. 10.1075/intp.00092.kaj
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00092.kaj [Google Scholar]
  33. Kane, Michael J., and Randall W. Engle
    2002 “The Role of Prefrontal Cortex in Working-Memory Capacity, Executive Attention, and General Fluid Intelligence: An Individual Differences Perspective.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review: –. 10.3758/BF03196323
    https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196323 [Google Scholar]
  34. Kobeleva, Polina P.
    2012 “Second Language Listening and Unfamiliar Proper Names: Comprehension Barrier?” RELC Journal (): –. 10.1177/0033688212440637
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212440637 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kruger, Jan-Louis, Stephen Doherty, Wendy Fox, and Peter de Lissa
    2018 “Multimodal Measurement of Cognitive Load during Subtitle Processing: Same-Language Subtitles for Foreign Language Viewers.” InInnovation and Expansion in Translation Process Research, edited byIsabel Lacruz and Riitta Jääskeläinen, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ata.18.12kru
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.18.12kru [Google Scholar]
  36. Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Per B. Brockhoff, and Rune H. B. Christensen
    2017 “lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models.” Journal of Statistical Software: –. 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
    https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lamberger-Felber, Heike, and Julia Schneider
    2009 “Linguistic Interference in Simultaneous Interpreting with Text: A Case Study.” InEfforts and Models in Interpreting and Translation Research: A Tribute to Daniel Gile, edited byGyde Hansen, Andrew Chesterman, and Heidrun Gerzymisch-Arbogast, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.80.17lam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.80.17lam [Google Scholar]
  38. Lambert, Sylvie
    2004 “Shared Attention during Sight Translation, Sight Interpretation and Simultaneous Interpretation.” Meta (): –. 10.7202/009352ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/009352ar [Google Scholar]
  39. Li, Tianyun, and Bicheng Fan
    2020 “Attention-Sharing Initiative of Multimodal Processing in Simultaneous Interpreting.” International Journal of Translation, Interpretation, and Applied Linguistics (): –. 10.4018/IJTIAL.20200701.oa4
    https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTIAL.20200701.oa4 [Google Scholar]
  40. Li, Xiangdong
    2014 “Sight Translation as a Topic in Interpreting Research: Progress, Problems, and Prospects.” Across Languages and Cultures (): –. 10.1556/Acr.15.2014.1.4
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.15.2014.1.4 [Google Scholar]
  41. Liao, Sixin, Lili Yu, Erik D. Reichle, and Jan-Louis Kruger
    2020 “Using Eye Movements to Study the Reading of Subtitles in Video.” Scientific Studies of Reading (): –. 10.1080/10888438.2020.1823986
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2020.1823986 [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu, Chen-Yu
    2021 “Examining the Implementation of Academic Vocabulary, Lexical Density, and Speech Rate Features on OpenCourseWare and MOOC Lectures.” Interactive Learning Environments (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Liu, Minhua, and Yu-Hsien Chiu
    2009 “Assessing Source Material Difficulty for Consecutive Interpreting: Quantifiable Measures and Holistic Judgment.” Interpreting (): –. 10.1075/intp.11.2.07liu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.11.2.07liu [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu, Minhua
    2016 “Putting the Horse Before the Cart: Righting the Experimental Approach in Interpreting Studies.” InAddressing Methodological Challenges in Interpreting Studies Research, edited byClaudio Bendazzoli and Claudia Monacelli, –. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Lumivero
    Lumivero 2018 NVivo (Version 12) [Computer software]. Lumivero NVivo Product Page.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Ma, Xingcheng, and Andrew K. F. Cheung
    2020 “Language Interference in English–Chinese Simultaneous Interpreting with and without Text.” Babel (): –. 10.1075/babel.00168.che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00168.che [Google Scholar]
  47. Ma, Xingcheng, Dechao Li, and Yu-Yin Hsu
    2021 “Exploring the Impact of Word Order Asymmetry on Cognitive Load during Chinese–English Sight Translation: Evidence from Eye-movement Data.” Target (): –. 10.1075/target.19052.ma
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.19052.ma [Google Scholar]
  48. Mazza, Cristina
    2001 “Numbers in Simultaneous Interpretation.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Mead, Peter
    2015 “Input Variables.” InRoutledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, edited byFranz Pöchhacker, –. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Mellinger, Christopher D., and Thomas A. Hanson
    2016Quantitative Research Methods in Translation and Interpreting Studies. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315647845
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315647845 [Google Scholar]
  51. Meuleman, Chris, and Fred van Besien
    2009 “Coping with Extreme Speech Conditions in Simultaneous Interpreting.” Interpreting (): –. 10.1075/intp.11.1.03meu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.11.1.03meu [Google Scholar]
  52. Monacelli, Claudia
    2009Self-preservation in Simultaneous Interpreting: Surviving the Role. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.84
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.84 [Google Scholar]
  53. Perego, Elisa, Fabio del Missier, Marco Porta, and Mauro Mosconi
    2010 “The Cognitive Effectiveness of Subtitle Processing.” Media Psychology (): –. 10.1080/15213269.2010.502873
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2010.502873 [Google Scholar]
  54. Pinochi, Diletta
    2009 “Simultaneous Interpretation of Numbers: Comparing German and English to Italian — An Experimental Study.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Plevoets, Koen, and Bart Defrancq
    2016 “The Effect of Informational Load on Disfluencies in Interpreting: A Corpus-Based Regression Analysis.” Translation and Interpreting Studies (): –. 10.1075/tis.11.2.04ple
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.11.2.04ple [Google Scholar]
  56. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2016Introducing Interpreting Studies. 2nd ed.Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.4324/9781315649573
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315649573 [Google Scholar]
  57. Rajendran, Dhevi, Andrew T. Duchowski, Pilar Orero, Juan Martínez, and Pablo Romero Fresco
    2013 “Effects of Text Chunking on Subtitling: A Quantitative and Qualitative Examination.” Perspectives (): –. 10.1080/0907676X.2012.722651
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2012.722651 [Google Scholar]
  58. Rayner, Keith
    1998 “Eye Movements in Reading and Information Processing: 20 Years of Research.” Psychological Bulletin (): –. 10.1037/0033‑2909.124.3.372
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 [Google Scholar]
  59. Ruiz Rosendo, Lucía, Varela García, Mónica, and Alma Barghout
    2020 “Interpreting at the United Nations: The Effects of Delivery Rate on Quality in Simultaneous Interpreting.” InInstitutional Translation and Interpreting: Assessing Practices and Managing for Quality, edited byFernando Prieto Ramos, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429264894‑13
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429264894-13 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ruiz Rosendo, Lucía, and Marie Diur
    2022 “Conference Interpreting at the United Nations.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Conference Interpreting, edited byMichaela Albl-Mikasa and Elisabet Tiselius, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Schotter, Elizabeth R., and Keith Rayner
    2012 “Eye Movements in Reading: Implications for Reading Subtitles.” InEye-tracking in Audio Visual Translation, edited byElisa Perego, –. Rome: Aracne.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Seeber, Kilian G.
    2017a “Interpreting at the European Institutions: Faster, Higher, Stronger.” CLINA: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Translation, Interpreting and Intercultural Communication (): –. 10.14201/clina2017327390
    https://doi.org/10.14201/clina2017327390 [Google Scholar]
  63. 2017b “Multimodal Processing in Simultaneous Interpreting.” InThe Handbook of Translation and Cognition, edited byJohn W. Schwieter and Aline Ferreira, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1002/9781119241485.ch25
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241485.ch25 [Google Scholar]
  64. Seeber, Kilian G., and Carmen Delgado Luchner
    2020 “Simulating Simultaneous Interpreting with Text: From Training Model to Training Module.” InThe Role of Technology in Conference Interpreter Training, edited byMaría Dolores Rodríguez Melchor, Ildikó Horváth, and Kate Ferguson, –. Oxford: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Seeber, Kilian G., Laura Keller, and Alexis Hervais-Adelman
    2020 “When the Ear Leads the Eye: The Use of Text during Simultaneous Interpretation.” Language, Cognition and Neuroscience (): –. 10.1080/23273798.2020.1799045
    https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1799045 [Google Scholar]
  66. Setton, Robin, and Andrew Dawrant
    2016Conference Interpreting: A Trainer’s Guide. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.121
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.121 [Google Scholar]
  67. Setton, Robin
    2015 “Simultaneous Interpreting with Text.” InRoutledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, edited byFranz Pöchhacker, –. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Shamy, Marwa, and Raquel de Pedro Ricoy
    2017 “Retrospective Protocols: Tapping into the Minds of Interpreting Trainees.” Translation and Interpreting (): –. 10.12807/ti.109201.2017.a05
    https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.109201.2017.a05 [Google Scholar]
  69. Shlesinger, Miriam
    2003 “Effects of Presentation Rate on Working Memory in Simultaneous Interpreting.” The Interpreters’ Newsletter: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Silva, Breno B., David Orrego-Carmona, and Agnieszka Szarkowska
    2022 “Using Linear Mixed Models to Analyze Data from Eye-Tracking Research on Subtitling.” Translation Spaces (): –. 10.1075/ts.21013.sil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.21013.sil [Google Scholar]
  71. SR Research Ltd
    SR Research Ltd 2023a “Experiment Builder (Version 2.4.7)” [Computer software]. SR Research Ltd. https://www.sr-research.com/experiment-builder/
  72. SR Research Ltd
    SR Research Ltd 2023b “Data Viewer (Version 4.3.2)” [Computer software]. SR Research Ltd. https://www.sr-research.com/data-viewer/
  73. Stachowiak-Szymczak, Katarzyna, and Paweł Korpal
    2019 “Interpreting Accuracy and Visual Processing of Numbers in Professional and Student Interpreters: An Eye-Tracking Study.” Across Languages and Cultures (): –. 10.1556/084.2019.20.2.5
    https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2019.20.2.5 [Google Scholar]
  74. Timarová, Šárka, Ivana Čeňková, Reine Meylaerts, Erik Hertog, Arnaud Szmalec, and Wouter Duyck
    2014 “Simultaneous Interpreting and Working Memory Executive Control.” Interpreting (): –. 10.1075/intp.16.2.01tim
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.16.2.01tim [Google Scholar]
  75. Togato, Giulia, and Pedro Macizo
    2023 “Cognitive Flexibility and Interpreting.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Translation, Interpreting, and Bilingualism, edited byAline Ferreira and John. W. Schwieter, –. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003109020‑23
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003109020-23 [Google Scholar]
  76. Winter, Bodo
    2020Statistics for Linguists: An Introduction Using R. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Yagi, Sane M.
    2000 “Studying Style in Simultaneous Interpretation.” Meta (): –. 10.7202/004626ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/004626ar [Google Scholar]
  78. Yang, Shanshan, Defeng Li, and Victoria Lai Cheng Lei
    2020 “The Impact of Source Text Presence on Simultaneous Interpreting Performance in Fast Speeches: Will it Help Trainees or Not?” Babel (): –. 10.1075/babel.00189.yan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.00189.yan [Google Scholar]
  79. Yuan, Lu, and Binhua Wang
    2023 “Cognitive Processing of the Extra Visual Layer of Live Captioning in Simultaneous Interpreting: Triangulation of Eye-tracking and Performance Data.” Ampersand. 10.1016/j.amper.2023.100131
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2023.100131 [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhong, Weihe
    2006A Course Book of Interpreting. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Zou, Longhui, Michael Carl, and Jia Feng
    2022 “Patterns of Attention and Quality in English–Chinese Simultaneous Interpreting with Text.” International Journal of Chinese and English Translation & Interpreting (): –. 10.56395/ijceti.v2i2.50
    https://doi.org/10.56395/ijceti.v2i2.50 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/target.23179.ma
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/target.23179.ma
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error