Re-opening the case

References

1. Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker
   2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software (): –. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
2. Beckner, Clay, Richard Blythe, Joan Bybee, Morten H. Christiansen, William Croft, Nick C. Ellis, John Holland, Jinyun Ke, Diane Larsen-Freeman, and Tom Schoenemann
   2009 “Language Is a Complex Adaptive System: Position Paper.” Language Learning (): –. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2009.00533.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00533.x [Google Scholar]
3. Burchardt, Aljoscha, Katrin Erk, Anette Frank, Andrea Kowalski, Sebastian Padó, and Manfred Pinkal
   2009 “8. Using FrameNet for the Semantic Analysis of German: Annotation, Representation, and Automation.” InMultilingual FrameNets in Computational Lexicography, edited byHans C. Boas, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110212976.3.209
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110212976.3.209 [Google Scholar]
4. Chater, Nick, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, and Alan Yuille
   2006 “Probabilistic Models of Cognition: Conceptual Foundations.” Probabilistic Models of Cognition, edited byNick Chater, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, and Alan Yuille, special issue ofTrends in Cognitive Sciences, (): –. 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.007
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.007 [Google Scholar]
5. De Sutter, Gert, and Marie-Aude Lefer
   2020 “On the Need for a New Research Agenda for Corpus-Based Translation Studies: A Multi-Methodological, Multifactorial and Interdisciplinary Approach.” Perspectives (): –. 10.1080/0907676X.2019.1611891
   https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2019.1611891 [Google Scholar]
6. De Swart, Peter
   2014 “Prepositional Inanimates in Dutch: A Paradigmatic Case of Differential Object Marking.” Linguistics: An Interdisciplinary Journal of the Language Sciences (): –. 10.1515/ling‑2013‑0069
   https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0069 [Google Scholar]
7. Doms, Steven, Bernard de Clerck, and Sonia Vandepitte
   2016 “Non-Human Agents as Subjects in English and Dutch: A Corpus-Based Translation Study.” InAtypical Predicate-Argument Relations, edited byThierry Ruchot and Pascale Van Praet, –. Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lis.33.04dom
   https://doi.org/10.1075/lis.33.04dom [Google Scholar]
8. Ellis, Nick C.
   2019 “Essentials of a Theory of Language Cognition.” The Modern Language Journal (): –. 10.1111/modl.12532
   https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12532 [Google Scholar]
9. Evert, Stefan, and Stella Neumann
   2017 “The Impact of Translation Direction on Characteristics of Translated Texts: A Multivariate Analysis for English and German.” InEmpirical Translation Studies: New Theoretical and Methodological Traditions, edited byGert de Sutter, Marie-Aude Lefer, and Isabelle Delaere, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110459586‑003
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110459586-003 [Google Scholar]
10. Fillmore, Charles J., Christopher R. Johnson, and Miriam R. L. Petruck
    2003 “Background to FrameNet.” International Journal of Lexicography (): –. 10.1093/ijl/16.3.235
    https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/16.3.235 [Google Scholar]
11. Freiwald, Jonas
    2016 “You Say Theme, I Say Thema: A Corpus-Based Approach to Theme in English and German from an SFL Perspective.” MA thesis. RWTH Aachen University.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Freiwald, Jonas
    2023 Theme in English and German: A Corpus-Based Contrastive Analysis of Clause Openings in Original and Translated Texts. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.112
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.112 [Google Scholar]
13. García García, Marco, Beatrice Primus, and Nikolaus P. Himmelmann
    2018 “Shifting from Animacy to Agentivity.” Theoretical Linguistics (): –. 10.1515/tl‑2018‑0002
    https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2018-0002 [Google Scholar]
14. Grafmiller, Jason, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi, Melanie Röthlisberger, and Benedikt Heller
    2018 “General Introduction: A Comparative Perspective on Probabilistic Variation in Grammar.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics (): .
    [Google Scholar]
15. Granger, Sylviane, and Marie-Aude Lefer
    2020 “The Multilingual Student Translation Corpus: A Resource for Translation Teaching and Research.” Language Resources and Evaluation: –. 10.1007/s10579‑020‑09485‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-020-09485-6 [Google Scholar]
16. Gries, Stefan Th., and Stefanie Wulff
    2021 “Examining Individual Variation in Learner Production Data: A Few Programmatic Pointers for Corpus-Based Analyses Using the Example of Adverbial Clause Ordering.” Applied Psycholinguistics (): –. 10.1017/S014271642000048X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271642000048X [Google Scholar]
17. Halliday, M. A. K.
    2005 “Corpus Studies and Probabilistic Grammar (1991).” InComputational and Quantitative Studies, vol. Collected Works of M.A.K. Halliday, edited byJonathan J. Webster, –. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Halliday, M. A. K., and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2014 Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed.London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203783771
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203783771 [Google Scholar]
19. Halverson, Sandra L., and Haidee Kotze
    2022 “Sociocognitive Constructs in Translation and Interpreting Studies (TIS): Do We Really Need Concepts Like Norms and Risk When We Have a Comprehensive Usage-Based Theory of Language?” InContesting Epistemologies in Cognitive Translation and Interpreting Studies, edited bySandra L. Halverson and Álvaro Marín García, –. Abingdon: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Hansen-Schirra, Silvia, Stella Neumann, and Erich Steiner
    2012 Cross-Linguistic Corpora for the Study of Translations: Insights from the Language Pair English–German. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110260328
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110260328 [Google Scholar]
21. Hansen-Schirra, Silvia, and Erich Steiner
    2012 “Towards a Typology of Translation Properties.” InCross-Linguistic Corpora for the Study of Translations, bySilvia Hansen-Schirra, Stella Neumann, and Erich Steiner, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110260328.255
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110260328.255 [Google Scholar]
22. Hawkins, John A.
    1986 A Comparative Typology of English and German: Unifying the Contrasts. London: Croom Helm.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Heilmann, Arndt, Tatiana Serbina, Jonas Freiwald, and Stella Neumann
    2021 “Animacy and Agentivity of Subject Themes in English–German Translation.” InDynamicity and Contrast in Systemic Functional Linguistics, edited byIzaskun Elorza, Jorge Arús-Hita, and Tom Bartlett, special issue ofLingua (): . 10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102813
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102813 [Google Scholar]
24. Hothorn, Torsten, Kurt Hornik, and Achim Zeileis
    2006 “Unbiased Recursive Partitioning: A Conditional Inference Framework.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics (): –. 10.1198/106186006X133933
    https://doi.org/10.1198/106186006X133933 [Google Scholar]
25. Kast, Marlene
    2012 “Variation within the Grammatical Function ‘Subject’ in English–German and German–English Translations.” InCross-Linguistic Corpora for the Study of Translations: Insights from the Language Pair English–German, bySilvia Hansen-Schirra, Stella Neumann, and Erich Steiner, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110260328.147
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110260328.147 [Google Scholar]
26. König, Ekkehard, and Volker Gast
    2018 Understanding English–German Contrasts. 4th ed. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Königs, Karin
    2011 Übersetzen Englisch–Deutsch: Lernen Mit System [Translation English–German: Learning systematically]. 3rd ed.München: Oldenbourg.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kotze, Haidee
    2022 “Translation as Constrained Communication: Principles, Concepts and Methods.” InExtending the Scope of Corpus-Based Translation Studies, edited bySylviane Granger and Marie-Aude Lefer, –. London: Bloomsbury Academic. 10.5040/9781350143289.0010
    https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350143289.0010 [Google Scholar]
29. Levshina, Natalia
    2015 How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.195
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
30. Levshina, Natalia
    2020 “Conditional Inference Trees and Random Forests.” InA Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, edited byMagali Paquot and Stefan Th. Gries, –. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑46216‑1_25
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-46216-1_25 [Google Scholar]
31. Lødrup, Helge
    1993 “Subjects and Thematic Roles in English and Norwegian.” Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Macken, Lieve, Orphée de Clercq, and Hans Paulussen
    2011 “Dutch Parallel Corpus: A Balanced Copyright-Cleared Parallel Corpus.” Meta: Journal des traducteurs (): –. 10.7202/1006182ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/1006182ar [Google Scholar]
33. Neumann, Stella
    2014 Contrastive Register Variation: A Quantitative Approach to the Comparison of English and German. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Neumann, Stella, Gert de Sutter, and Stefan Evert
    2017 “Register-Specific Interference in Translation.” InConference Booklet of the 39th Annual Conference of the German Linguistic Society. Saarbrücken, Germany.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Neumann, Stella, and Stefan Evert
    2021 “A Register Variation Perspective on Varieties of English.” InCorpus-Based Approaches to Register Variation, edited byElena Seoane and Douglas Biber, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/scl.103.06neu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.103.06neu [Google Scholar]
36. Neumann, Stella, and Silvia Hansen-Schirra
    2012 “Corpus Methodology and Design.” InCross-Linguistic Corpora for the Study of Translations: Insights from the Language Pair English–German, bySilvia Hansen-Schirra, Stella Neumann, and Erich Steiner, –. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110260328.21
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110260328.21 [Google Scholar]
37. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2018 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org
    [Google Scholar]
38. Reynaert, Ryan, Lieve Macken, Arda Tezcan, and Gert de Sutter
    2021 “Building a New-Generation Corpus for Empirical Translation Studies: The Dutch Parallel Corpus 2.0.” InNew Perspectives on Corpus Translation Studies, edited byVincent X. Wang, Lily Lim, and Defeng Li, –. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑16‑4918‑9_4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4918-9_4 [Google Scholar]
39. Serbina, Tatiana
    2015 A Construction Grammar Approach to the Analysis of Translation Shifts: A Corpus-Based Study. PhD thesis. RWTH Aachen University.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Szmrecsanyi, Benedikt, Jason Grafmiller, Benedikt Heller, and Melanie Röthlisberger
    2016 “Around the World in Three Alternations: Modeling Syntactic Variation in Varieties of English.” English World-Wide (): –. 10.1075/eww.37.2.01szm
    https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.37.2.01szm [Google Scholar]
41. Tagliamonte, Sali A., and R. Harald Baayen
    2012 “Models, Forests, and Trees of York English: Was/Were Variation as a Case Study for Statistical Practice.” Language Variation and Change (): –. 10.1017/S0954394512000129
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394512000129 [Google Scholar]
42. Teich, Elke, Peter Fankhauser, Stefania Degaetano-Ortlieb, and Yuri Bizzoni
    2021 “Less Is More/More Diverse: On The Communicative Utility of Linguistic Conventionalization.” Frontiers in Communication. 10.3389/fcomm.2020.620275
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2020.620275 [Google Scholar]
43. Toury, Gideon
    2004 “Probabilistic Explanations in Translation Studies: Welcome as They Are, Would They Qualify as Universals?” InTranslation Universals: Do They Exist?, edited byAnna Mauranen and Pekka Kujamäki, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.48.03tou
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.48.03tou [Google Scholar]
44. Volansky, Vered, Noam Ordan, and Shuly Wintner
    2015 “On the Features of Translationese.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (): –. 10.1093/llc/fqt031
    https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqt031 [Google Scholar]
45. Zaenen, Annie, Jean Carletta, Gregory Garretson, Joan Bresnan, Andrew Koontz-Garboden, Tatiana Nikitina, M. Catherine O’Connor, and Tom Wasow
    2004 “Animacy Encoding in English: Why and How.” InProceedings of the Workshop on Discourse Annotation, –. Barcelona: Association for Computational Linguistics. https://aclanthology.org/W04-0216. 10.3115/1608938.1608954
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1608938.1608954 [Google Scholar]