1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Legal translation and legal survivals
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

This study explores the relevance of the concept of legal survivals, proposed by the legal scholar Rafał Mańko, for legal translation purposes. The concept of legal survivals, in parallel to the well-known notion of legal transplants, problematises a specific aspect of legal continuity, namely the continued existence of certain units of legal culture despite transformations of a given jurisdiction’s legal system. Translating texts relating to such institutions raises difficult questions for legal translators, who need to consider the legal and/or terminological changes to establish acceptable equivalents. This article uses the translational comparative legal analysis framework to investigate the usefulness of Mańko’s theory for legal translation through three case studies of the Polish–English translation of property law terms. The research shows that the legal survivals theory may be useful in helping translators better comprehend the not-always-parallel paths of legal terminology and legal institutions and encouraging a kind of ‘legal genealogy’.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/target.24106.kus
2026-08-21
2026-09-09

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/target.24106.kus
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bevans, Neal R.
    2016 Real Estate and Property Law for Paralegals. New York: Wolters Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Biel, Łucja, and Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski
    2015 “Legal Translation.” InWays to Translation, edited byŁukasz Bogucki, Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski, and Piotr Stalmaszczyk, –. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Biel, Łucja
    2024 “Linguistic Approaches.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Comparative Law, edited byMathias Siems and Po Jen Yap, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108914741.008
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108914741.008 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bridge, Michael
    2015 Personal Property Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Brzozowski, Adam
    2021 “Ogólne wiadomości o prawie rzeczowym [General information about property law].” InPrawo rzeczowe. Zarys wykładu [Property law: An outline of the lecture], edited byAdam Brzozowski, Wojciech J. Kocot, and Wiesław Opalski, –. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Cairns, John W.
    2013 “Watson, Walton, and the History of Legal Transplants.” Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Cao, Deborah
    2007 Translating Law. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781853599552
     https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853599552 [Google Scholar]
  8. Chromá, Marta
    2014 “The New Czech Civil Code: Lessons from Legal Translation — A Case-Study Analysis.” InThe Ashgate Handbook of Legal Translation, edited byLe Cheng, King Kui Sin, and Anne Wagner, –. Farnham: Ashgate.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Clarke, Alison, and Paul Kohler
    2005 Property Law: Commentary and Materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139051941
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051941 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cohn, Margit
    2010 “Legal Transplant Chronicles: The Evolution of Unreasonableness and Proportionality Review of the Administration in the United Kingdom.” American Journal of Comparative Law (): –. 10.5131/ajcl.2009.0048
     https://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2009.0048 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cooperative Housing International
    Cooperative Housing International. n.d. “About United Kingdom.” AccessedApril 26, 2024. https://www.housinginternational.coop/co-ops/united-kingdom/
  12. Dajczak, Wojciech
    2011 “Historical Development of Private Law in Poland.” InHandbook of Polish Law, edited byWojciech Dajczak, Andrzej J. Szwarc, and Paweł Wiliński, –. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Szkolne PWN.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. De Cruz, Peter
    1999 Comparative Law in a Changing World. London: Cavendish.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. De Groot, Gérard-René
    1987 “The Point of View of a Comparative Lawyer.” Les Cahiers de Droit [The law journal] (): –. 10.7202/042842ar
     https://doi.org/10.7202/042842ar [Google Scholar]
  15. Dixon, Martin
    2018 Modern Land Law. Oxon: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351237345
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351237345 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dullion, Valérie
    2015 “Droit comparé pour traducteurs: De la théorie à la didactique de la traduction juridique [Comparative law for translators: From theory to the didactics of legal translation].” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law — Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique (): –. 10.1007/s11196‑014‑9360‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-014-9360-2 [Google Scholar]
  17. Engberg, Jan
    2020 “Comparative Law for Legal Translation: Through Multiple Perspectives to Multidimensional Knowledge.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law — Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique (): –. 10.1007/s11196‑020‑09706‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09706-9 [Google Scholar]
  18. Filipiak, Teresa A.
    2012 “Art. 228.” InKodeks cywilny. Komentarz. Tom II. Własność i inne prawa rzeczowe [The Civil Code: Commentary. Volume II. Ownership and other property rights], edited byAndrzej Kidyba, –. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Gillman, Eric
    2009 “Legal Transplants in Trade and Investment Agreements: Understanding the Exportation of U.S. Law to Latin America.” Georgetown Journal of International Law: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Gniewek, Edward
    2022 Prawo rzeczowe [Property law]. Warsaw: C. H. Beck.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Goldberg, John C. P., and Benjamin C. Zipursky
    2010 The Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law: Torts. New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Gondek, Michał
    2006 “Poland.” InElgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, edited byJan M. Smits, –. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781847200204.00055
     https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847200204.00055 [Google Scholar]
  23. Graziadei, Michele
    2019 “Comparative Law, Transplants, and Receptions.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, edited byMathias Reimann and Reinhard Zimmermann, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Greaves, Valerian E.
    1934 “The Social-Economic Purpose of Private Rights.” New York University Law Quarterly Review (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Harvey, Malcolm
    2002 “What’s So Special about Legal Translation?” Meta (): –. 10.7202/008007ar
     https://doi.org/10.7202/008007ar [Google Scholar]
  26. Hayes, Adam
    2021 “Government-Owned Property: Definition, Example and Property Types.” Investopedia. Last modifiedSeptember 29, 2021. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/government-owned-property.asp
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Helewitz, Jeffrey A.
    2015 Basic Real Estate and Property Law for Paralegals. New York: Wolters Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Hinkel, Daniel F.
    2007 Practical Real Estate Law. New York: Delmar Learning.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Huber, Bruce R.
    2014 “The Durability of Private Claims to Public Property.” The Georgetown Law Journal: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Husa, Jaakko
    2015 A New Introduction to Comparative Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing. 10.5040/9781849469531
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849469531 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2022 Interdisciplinary Comparative Law: Rubbing Shoulders with the Neighbours or Standing Alone in a Crowd. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781802209785
     https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802209785 [Google Scholar]
  32. Ignatowicz, Jerzy, and Krzysztof Stefaniuk
    2009 Prawo rzeczowe [Property law]. Warsaw: LexisNexis.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Jansen, Nils
    2019 “Comparative Law and Comparative Knowledge.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, edited byMathias Reimann and Reinhard Zimmermann, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Kancelaria ‘Kuczek-Maruta’, Tomasz Bil, Aleksandra Broniek, Aleksandra Cincio, Marcin Kiełbasa, Gerhard Dannemann, Susanna Frederick Fischer, and Fryderyk Zoll
    2023 “Civil Code.” AccessedMay 4, 2024. https://sip.lex.pl
  35. Kielar, Barbara
    1977 Language of the Law in the Aspect of Translation. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Kischel, Uwe
    2019 Comparative Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Kocot, Wojciech J.
    2021 “Treść i wykonywanie własności [The content and exercise of ownership].” InPrawo rzeczowe. Zarys wykładu [Property law: An outline of the lecture], edited byAdam Brzozowski, Wojciech J. Kocot, and Wiesław Opalski, –. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Kozińska, Joanna
    2018 “Art. 228.” InKodeks Cywilny. Komentarz. Tom II. Własność i inne prawa rzeczowe [The Civil Code: Commentary. Volume II. Ownership and other property rights], edited byMariusz Fras and Magdalena Habdas, –. Warsaw: Wolters Kluwer.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Król, Małgorzata
    2010 “Legal Culture and Legal Transplants.” InRapports Polonais: XVIIIe Congrès International de droit comparé, XVIIIth Congress of Comparative Law Washington, 25.VII–1.VIII.2010, edited byBiruta Lewaszkiewicz-Petrykowska, –. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Królikowska, Katarzyna
    2024 “Art. 228.” InKodeks Cywilny. Komentarz [The Civil Code: Commentary], edited byWitold Borysiak. Warsaw: C. H. Beck. AccessedApril 25, 2024. https://sip.legalis.pl/
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Kusik, Przemysław
    2022 “English Translation Equivalents of Selected Polish Partnership Types Revisited from the Perspective of Comparative Law.” Lingua Legis: –. 10.32612/uw.25434357.2022.30.pp.7‑21
     https://doi.org/10.32612/uw.25434357.2022.30.pp.7-21 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2023a “The Right to the Environment? Article 4(1) of the Polish Environmental Protection Law Act from a Combined Comparative Law and Polish–English Legal Translation Perspective.” Comparative Legilinguistics: –. 10.14746/cl.56.2023.3
     https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.56.2023.3 [Google Scholar]
  43. 2023b Zastosowanie metod prawnoporównawczych w procesie tłumaczenia na przykładzie polsko-angielskiego przekładu terminologii z zakresu prawa rzeczowego [The application of comparative law methods in the translation process as exemplified by the Polish-English translation of property law terminology]. PhD diss. University of Warsaw.
  44. 2024a “Comparative Law in the Eyes of Translation Scholars. Is Legal Translation Really an Exercise of Comparative Law?” HERMES — Journal of Language and Communication in Business: –. 10.7146/hjlcb.vi64.147304
     https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.vi64.147304 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2024b “Teoria przeszczepów prawnych jako paradygmat prawa porównawczego. Próba podsumowania w 50. rocznicę ukazania się monografii pt. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law Alana Watsona [The legal transplant theory as a paradigm of comparative law: An attempt at a summary on the 50th anniversary of the publication of Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law by Alan Watson].” Forum Prawnicze [The legal forum] : –. 10.32082/fp.3.2024.1265
     https://doi.org/10.32082/fp.3.2024.1265 [Google Scholar]
  46. 2025 “Legal Transplants and Legal Translation: A Case Study of the Borrowing of the U.S. Limited Liability Partnership into the Polish Legal System.” Perspectives (): –. 10.1080/0907676X.2024.2331189
     https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2024.2331189 [Google Scholar]
  47. Law Commission
    Law Commission 2011 Making Land Work: Easements, Covenants and Profits à Prendre. London: The Stationery Office.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Legal Information Institute
    Legal Information Institute n.d. s.v. “Public Property.” Cornell Law School. AccessedMay 4, 2024. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/public_property
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Legalis
    Legalis 2023 “The Civil Code.” AccessedMay 4, 2024. https://sip.legalis.pl/
  50. Legrand, Pierre
    1995 “Comparative Legal Studies and Commitment to Theory.” The Modern Law Review: –. 10.1111/j.1468‑2230.1995.tb02009.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1995.tb02009.x [Google Scholar]
  51. Mańko, Rafał
    2013a “Legal Transfers and Legal Survivals: Theoretical Implications of the Continuity of the Socialist Legal Tradition in Poland.” AccessedApril 21, 2024. https://www.qmul.ac.uk/law/media/law/research/centres/clsgc/ivr/members/docs/MANKO.pdf
  52. 2013b “Weeds in the Gardens of Justice? The Survival of Hyperpositivism in Polish Legal Culture as a Symptom/Sinthome.” Pólemos (): –. 10.1515/pol‑2013‑0011
     https://doi.org/10.1515/pol-2013-0011 [Google Scholar]
  53. 2015a “Demons of the Past? Legal Survivals of the Socialist Legal Tradition in Contemporary Polish Private Law.” InLaw and Critique in Central Europe: Questioning the Past, Resisting the Present, edited byRafał Mańko, Cosmin Sebastian Cercel, and Adam Sulikowski, –. Oxford: Counterpress.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 2015b “Legal Survivals: A Conceptual Tool for Analysing Post-Transformation Continuity of Legal Culture.” InTiesību efektivitāte postmodernā sabiedrībā [The effectiveness of law in post-modern society], edited byJānis Rozenfelds, –. Riga: Latvijas Universitāte.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. 2015c “Relikty w kulturze prawnej. Uwagi metodologiczne na tle pozostałości epoki socjalizmu realnego w polskim prawie prywatnym [Survivals in legal culture: Methodological remarks in the light of the remnants of real socialism in Polish private law].” Przegląd Prawa i Administracji [Law and administration review] : –.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 2015d “The Cooperative Member’s Proprietary Right to an Apartment: A Legal Survival of the Period of Actually Existing Socialism in Polish Private Law.” Zeszyty Prawnicze [The legal journal] (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 2016a “Towards a Typology of Dimensions of the Continuity and Discontinuity of Law: The Perspective of Polish Private Law after the 1989 Transformation.” Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics (): –. 10.1515/wrlae‑2018‑0007
     https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2018-0007 [Google Scholar]
  58. 2016b “Transformacja ustrojowa a ciągłość instytucji prawnych — uwagi teoretyczne [Systemic transformation and the continuity of legal institutions: Theoretical remarks].” Zeszyty Prawnicze [The legal journal] (): –. 10.21697/zp.2016.16.2.01
     https://doi.org/10.21697/zp.2016.16.2.01 [Google Scholar]
  59. 2017a “Form and Substance of Legal Continuity.” Zeszyty Prawnicze [The legal journal] (): –. 10.21697/zp.2017.17.2.10
     https://doi.org/10.21697/zp.2017.17.2.10 [Google Scholar]
  60. 2017b “Prawo użytkowania wieczystego jako pozostałość po epoce socjalizmu realnego — ujęcie socjologicznoprawne [The right of perpetual usufruct as a survival of the period of actually existing socialism: A socio-legal perspective].” Zeszyty Prawnicze [The legal journal] (): –. 10.21697/zp.2017.17.1.02
     https://doi.org/10.21697/zp.2017.17.1.02 [Google Scholar]
  61. 2017c “Wybrane relikty prawne epoki realnego socjalizmu w polskim prawie cywilnym — analiza zmiany funkcji społecznej instytucji prawnych w następstwie transformacji ustrojowej [Selected legal survivals of the period of actually existing socialism in Polish civil law: An analysis of the change of social function of legal institutions as a consequence of systemic transformation].” Studia Iuridica [Legal studies] : –.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 2024 “Legal Transplants, Legal Survivals, and Legal Revivals: Towards a Reconceptualisation of the Circulation of Legal Forms in Time and Space.” Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Iuridica [The journals of the University of Łódź: Law] : –. 10.18778/0208‑6069.109.06
     https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6069.109.06 [Google Scholar]
  63. 2025 “Legal Survivals and the Resilience of Juridical Form.” Law and Critique: –. 10.1007/s10978‑023‑09357‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-023-09357-2 [Google Scholar]
  64. Mańko, Rafał, Martin Škop, and Markéta Štěpáníková
    2016 “Carving Out Central Europe as a Space of Legal Culture: A Way Out of Peripherality?” Wroclaw Review of Law, Administration & Economics (): –. 10.1515/wrlae‑2018‑0002
     https://doi.org/10.1515/wrlae-2018-0002 [Google Scholar]
  65. Mattila, Heikki
    2006 Comparative Legal Linguistics. Aldershot: Ashgate.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Matulewska, Aleksandra, and Paula Trzaskawka
    2020 “A Tentative Analysis of Legal Terminology Diachronic Changes and the Problem of Communication Effectiveness in Legal Setting.” Semiotica, : –. 10.1515/sem‑2020‑0033
     https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2020-0033 [Google Scholar]
  67. Matulewska, Aleksandra
    2017 “Socially Induced Changes in Legal Terminology.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric (): –. 10.1515/slgr‑2017‑0010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/slgr-2017-0010 [Google Scholar]
  68. 2018 “Legal Languages — A Diachronic Perspective.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric (): –. 10.2478/slgr‑2018‑0011
     https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0011 [Google Scholar]
  69. Merrill, Thomas W., and Henry E. Smith
    2010 The Oxford Introductions to U.S. Law: Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Merryman, John Henry, and Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo
    2007 The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press. 10.1515/9780804768337
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804768337 [Google Scholar]
  71. Michaels, Ralf
    2006 “American Law (United States).” InElgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, edited byJan M. Smits, –. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781847200204.00011
     https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847200204.00011 [Google Scholar]
  72. Miller, Jonathan
    2003 “A Typology of Legal Transplants: Using Sociology, Legal History and Argentine Examples to Explain the Transplant Process.” The American Journal of Comparative Law (): –. 10.2307/3649131
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3649131 [Google Scholar]
  73. Morawski, Lech
    2014 Wstęp do prawoznawstwa [Introduction to jurisprudence]. Toruń: Dom Organizatora.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Nelken, David
    2006 “Legal Culture.” InElgar Encyclopaedia of Comparative Law, edited byJan M. Smits, –. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 10.4337/9781847200204.00040
     https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847200204.00040 [Google Scholar]
  75. Örücü, Esin
    2002 “Law as Transposition.” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly (): –. 10.1093/iclq/51.2.205
     https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/51.2.205 [Google Scholar]
  76. Perrins, Bryn
    2000 Understanding Land Law. London: Cavendish Publishing. 10.4324/9781843140320
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843140320 [Google Scholar]
  77. Pommer, Sieglinde
    2006 Rechtsübersetzung und Rechtsvergleichung: Translatologische Fragen zur Interdisziplinarität [Legal translation and comparative law: Aspects of interdisciplinarity from a translational perspective]. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Pozzo, Barbara
    2012 “Comparative Law and Language.” InThe Cambridge Companion to Comparative Law, edited byMatteo Bussani and Ugo Mattei, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139017206.007
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139017206.007 [Google Scholar]
  79. Prieto Ramos, Fernando
    2014 “Legal Translation Studies as Interdiscipline: Scope and Evolution.” Meta (): –. 10.7202/1027475ar
     https://doi.org/10.7202/1027475ar [Google Scholar]
  80. Rhodes, Chris, Lorna Booth, Jenny Brown, Louise Butcher, Daniel Harari, Mathew Keep, Federico Mor, and Edward Potton
    2018 Public Ownership of Industries and Services. London: House of Commons Library.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Richards, Paul
    2014 Land Law. Harlow: Pearson.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Samuel, Geoffrey
    2013 A Short Introduction to the Common Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 2014 An Introduction to Comparative Law Theory and Method. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Šarčević, Susan
    1997 New Approach to Legal Translation. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Seidler, Grzegorz L.
    1967 “W poszukiwaniu systemu wszechstronnej analizy prawa [In search of a system of universal analysis of law].” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio G [The annals of the Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Section G] (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Smith, Roger J.
    2014 Property Law. Harlow: Pearson.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Soriano-Barabino, Guadalupe
    2016 Comparative Law for Legal Translators. Oxford: Peter Lang. 10.3726/978‑1‑78707‑040‑0
     https://doi.org/10.3726/978-1-78707-040-0 [Google Scholar]
  88. Sprankling, John G.
    2017 Understanding Property Law. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Van Hoecke, Mark
    2015 “Methodology of Comparative Legal Research.” Law and Method, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Warner-Reed, Emma
    2013 Land Law. Harlow: Pearson.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Watson, Alan
    1974 Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Władek, Zbigniew
    2016 “Klauzula generalna społeczno-gospodarczego przeznaczenia prawa w wykładni przepisów regulujących prawo własności [The general clause of the socio-economic purpose of a right in the interpretation of legal provisions governing ownership].” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio G [The annals of the Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, Section G] (): –. 10.17951/g.2016.63.2.117
     https://doi.org/10.17951/g.2016.63.2.117 [Google Scholar]
  93. Yiannopoulos, Athanassios N.
    1962 “Movables and Immovables in Louisiana and Comparative Law.” Louisiana Law Review (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/target.24106.kus
Loading
Legal translation and legal survivals
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/target.24106.kus
/content/journals/10.1075/target.24106.kus
/content/journals/10.1075/target.24106.kus
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: comparative law ; legal terminology ; translational comparative legal analysis ; legal survivals ; legal translation ; post-communist transformation ; legal transplants ; Polish property law

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error