1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Target. International Journal of Translation Studies
  4. Online First Articles
  5. Online First Article
image of Mirror your words, but NOT your wordings
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Current research has demonstrated the potential of large language models, such as GPT, as powerful translation tools. However, gaps remain in understanding how human and machine translation differ across linguistic and structural levels. This study adopts a network-based approach, using syntactic dependency networks to investigate structural differences in translations produced by humans and machines (Google Translate and ChatGPT). The findings revealed that human translation networks exhibit higher clustering coefficients and shorter average path lengths compared to ChatGPT translations, along with lower density and degree centrality than Google Translate. Human translations also contain fewer function words among central nodes than machine translations. These findings suggest that while machine translation prioritizes producing grammatically well-formed sentences, human translation tends to be more concise and efficient in transmitting information, optimizing the balance between syntactic simplicity and communicative clarity. Machine translation mirrors human words but does not fully replicate the syntactic and structural patterns of human translation. Our study offers new insights for future studies on translation in the context of AI.

© John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/target.25041.hua
2026-07-30
2026-08-16

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/target.25041.hua
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albert, Réka, Hawoong Jeong, and Albert-László Barabási
    2000 “Error and Attack Tolerance of Complex Networks.” Nature (): –. 10.1038/35019019
     https://doi.org/10.1038/35019019 [Google Scholar]
  2. Barabási, Albert-László, and R. E. Crandall
    2002 “Linked: The New Science of Networks.” American Journal of Physics(): –. 10.1119/1.1538577
     https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1538577 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barabási, Albert-László, and Réka, Albert
    1999 “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks.” Science (): –. 10.1126/science.286.5439.509
     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509 [Google Scholar]
  4. Baronchelli, Andrea, Ramon Ferrer-i-Cancho, Romualdo Pastor-Satorras, Nick Chater, and Morten H. Christiansen
    2013 “Networks in Cognitive Science.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences (): –. 10.1016/j.tics.2013.04.010
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.04.010 [Google Scholar]
  5. Cancho, Ramon Ferrer I., and Richard V. Solé
    2001 “The Small World of Human Language.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences (): –. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1800
     https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1800 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cancho, Ramon Ferrer I., Ricard V. Solé, and Reinhard Köhler
    2004 “Patterns in Syntactic Dependency Networks.” Physical Review. E (): . 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.051915
     https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.051915 [Google Scholar]
  7. Čech, Radek, and Ján Mačutek
    2009 “Word Form and Lemma Syntactic Dependency Networks in Czech: A Comparative Study.” Glottometrics: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Čech, Radek, Ján Mačutek, and Haitao Liu
    2016 “Syntactic Complex Networks and Their Applications.” Understanding Complex Systems: –. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑47238‑5_8
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47238-5_8 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen, Heng, Xinying Chen, and Haitao Liu
    2018 “How Does Language Change as a Lexical Network? An Investigation Based on Written Chinese Word Co-occurrence Networks.” PloS One (): –. 10.1371/journal.pone.0192545
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192545 [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen, Xinying, and Haitao Liu
    2016 “Function Nodes in Chinese Syntactic Networks.” Understanding Complex Systems: –. 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑47238‑5_9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-47238-5_9 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chen, Xinying, Chunshan, Xu, and Wenwen, Li
    2011 “Extracting Valency Patterns of Word Classes from Syntactic Complex Networks.” InDepLing 2011 Proceedings: International Conference on Dependency Linguistics Depling 2011, Barcelona, September 5–7 2011, edited byKim Gerdes, Eva Hajičová, and Leo Wanner, –.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, Xinying, Haitao Liu, and Kim, Gerdes
    2015 “Classifying Syntactic Categories in the Chinese Dependency Network.” InProceedings of the Third International Conference on Dependency Linguistics Depling 2015, edited byJoakim Nivre and Eva Hajičová, –. Uppsala: Uppsala University.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng, Hu
    2021 “‘Functional Equivalence’ Cases in E–C Translation of Long Sentences in EST Text and Their Implications for Translation Teaching.” Communication Across Borders: Translation & Interpreting (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Choromański, Krzysztof, Michał Matuszak, and Jacek MiȩKisz
    2013 “Scale-Free Graph with Preferential Attachment and Evolving Internal Vertex Structure.” Journal of Statistical Physics (): –. 10.1007/s10955‑013‑0749‑1
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-013-0749-1 [Google Scholar]
  15. Cong, Jin, and Haitao Liu
    2014 “Approaching Human Language with Complex Networks.” Physics of Life Reviews (): –. 10.1016/j.plrev.2014.04.004
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2014.04.004 [Google Scholar]
  16. Corpas Pastor, Gloria, and Laura Noriega-Santiáñez
    2024 “Human versus Neural Machine Translation Creativity: A Study on Manipulated MWEs in Literature.” Information (): . 10.3390/info15090530
     https://doi.org/10.3390/info15090530 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cui, Xinru, Jinxu Qi, Hao Tan, and Feng Chen
    2017 “Comparison of Ancient and Modern Chinese Based on Complex Weighted Networks.” PloS One (): –. 10.1371/journal.pone.0187854
     https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187854 [Google Scholar]
  18. De Marneffe, Marie-Catherine, Bill MacCartney, and Christopher D. Manning
    2006 “Generating Typed Dependency Parses from Phrase Structure Parses.” Language Resources and Evaluation: –.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. De Saussure, Ferdinand, Charles Bally, Albert Sechehaye, Albert Reidlinger, and Wade Baskin
    1960 “Course in General Linguistics.” The Journal of American Folklore (): . 10.2307/538001
     https://doi.org/10.2307/538001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Deng, Hancheng, and Deyi Xiong
    2022 “A Survey on Machine Translation Quality Estimation.” Journal of Chinese Information Processing (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Devlin, Jacob, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova
    2019 “BERT: Pre-Training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding.” arXiv, May 24, 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.04805
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Dragsted, Barbara
    2005 “Segmentation in Translation: Differences Across Levels of Expertise and Difficulty.” Target (): –. 10.1075/target.17.1.04dra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/target.17.1.04dra [Google Scholar]
  23. Estrada, Ernesto
    2011 The Structure of Complex Networks: Theory and Applications. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591756.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591756.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fan, Lu, and Yue Jiang
    2021 “A Syntactic Dependency Network Approach to the Study of Translational Language.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (): –. 10.1093/llc/fqaa030
     https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqaa030 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2023 “Probability Distribution of Dependency Distance and Dependency Type in Translational Language.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications: –. 10.1057/s41599‑023‑02427‑x
     https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02427-x [Google Scholar]
  26. Frankenberg-García, Ana
    2021 “Can a Corpus-Driven Lexical Analysis of Human and Machine Translation Unveil Discourse Features That Set Them Apart?” Target (): –. 10.1075/target.20065.fra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/target.20065.fra [Google Scholar]
  27. Freeborn, Lani, Sible Andringa, Gabriela Lunansky, and Judith Rispens
    2023 “Network Analysis for Modeling Complex Systems in SLA Research.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition (): –. 10.1017/S0272263122000407
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263122000407 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gao, Yuan, Ruili Wang, and Feng Hou
    2023 “How to Design Translation Prompts for ChatGPT: An Empirical Study.” arXiv, April 21, 2023. arxiv.org/abs/2304.02182
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Guerberof-Arenas, Ana, and Antonio Toral
    2024 “To Be or Not to Be: A Translation Reception Study of a Literary text Translated into Dutch and Catalan Using Machine Translation.” Target (): –. 10.1075/target.22134.gue
     https://doi.org/10.1075/target.22134.gue [Google Scholar]
  30. Halverson, Sandra L.
    2010 “Cognitive Translation Studies: Developments in Theory and Method.” InTranslation and Cognition, edited byGregory M. Shreve and Erik Angelone, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ata.xv.18hal
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.18hal [Google Scholar]
  31. Hao, Yuxin, Xuelin Wang, Meng Wu, and Haitao Liu
    2021 “Syntactic Networks of Interlanguage Across L2 Modalities and Proficiency Levels.” Frontiers in Psychology: 643120. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643120
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643120 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hendy, Amr, Mohamed Abdelrehim, Amr Sharaf, Vikas Raunak, Mohamed Gabr, Hitokazu Matsushita, Young Jin Kim, Mohamed Afify, and Hany Hassan Awadalla
    2023 “How Good are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluation.” arXiv, June 22, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.09210
     [Google Scholar]
  33. House, Juliane
    2014 Translation: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9781137025487
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137025487 [Google Scholar]
  34. Hudson, Richard
    2007 Language Networks: The New Word Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Ikram, Muh, Muhammad Nur Akbar Rasyid, and Muh Syukri
    2024 “The Evaluation of Machine Translation and Human Translation on YouTube: A Comparative Study.” Journal of Islamic Culture and Literature (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Jiang, Jingyang, Wuzhe Yu, and Haitao Liu
    2019 “Does Scale-Free Syntactic Network Emerge in Second Language Learning?” Frontiers in Psychology: . 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00925
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00925 [Google Scholar]
  37. Jiao, Wenxiang, Wenxuan Wang, Jen tse Huang, Xing Wang, Shuming Shi, and Zhaopeng Tu
    2023 “Is ChatGPT a Good Translator? Yes with GPT-4 as the Engine.” arXiv, November 2, 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.08745
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Jin, Huiyuan, and Haitao Liu
    2016 “Chinese Writing of Deaf or Hard-of-Hearing Students and Normal-Hearing Peers from Complex Network Approach.” Frontiers in Psychology: . 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01777
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01777 [Google Scholar]
  39. Jin, Huiyuan, Kecheng Yang, and Haitao Liu
    2023 “An Investigation on Ellipsis From Network Science Approach.” Digital Scholarship in the Humanities (): –. 10.1093/llc/fqac087
     https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqac087 [Google Scholar]
  40. Klammer, Thomas P., Muriel Schulz, and Angela Della Volpe
    1999 Analyzing English Grammar. New York: Longman.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Kolb, Waltraud, Wolfgang U. Dressler, and Elisa Mattiello
    2023 “Human and Machine Translation of Occasionalisms in Literary Texts.” Target (): –. 10.1075/target.21147.kol
     https://doi.org/10.1075/target.21147.kol [Google Scholar]
  42. Kübler, Sandra, Ryan McDonald, and Joakim Nivre
    2009 Dependency Parsing. Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑02131‑2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02131-2 [Google Scholar]
  43. Läubli, Samuel, Patrick Simianer, Joern Wuebker, Geza Kovacs, Rico Sennrich, and Spence Green
    2021 “The Impact of Text Presentation on Translator Performance.” Target (): –. 10.1075/target.20006.lau
     https://doi.org/10.1075/target.20006.lau [Google Scholar]
  44. Li, Juan, Hongquan Jiang, Aihua Shang, and Jingli Chen
    2021 “Research on Associative Learning Mechanisms of L2 Learners Based on Complex Network Theory.” Computer Assisted Language Learning: An International Journal (): –. 10.1080/09588221.2019.1633356
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1633356 [Google Scholar]
  45. Li, Yafu, Yongjing Yin, Jing Li, and Yue Zhang
    2022 “Prompt-Driven Neural Machine Translation.” InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, edited bySmaranda Muresan, Preslav Nakov, and Aline Villavicencio, –. Dublin: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/2022.findings‑acl.203
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.203 [Google Scholar]
  46. Lin, Yumeng, Duo Xu, and Junying Liang
    2021 “Differentiating Interpreting Types: Connecting Complex Networks to Cognitive Complexity.” Frontiers in Psychology: . 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.590399
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.590399 [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu, Haitao, and Chunshan Xu
    2011 “Can Syntactic Networks Indicate Morphological Complexity of a Language?” Europhysics Letters (): . 10.1209/0295‑5075/93/28005
     https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/93/28005 [Google Scholar]
  48. Liu, Haitao
    2008 “The Complexity of Chinese Syntactic Dependency Networks.” Physica A: Statistical Machines and its Applications (): –. 10.1016/j.physa.2008.01.069
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2008.01.069 [Google Scholar]
  49. Liu, Jianpeng, Xinzhuo Shen, Haitao Liu, and Huifang Du
    2023 “Dependency Network Approach to the Oral Production of English- and Chinese-speaking Healthy Older Adults.” Speech, Language and Hearing (): –. 10.1080/2050571X.2023.2241759
     https://doi.org/10.1080/2050571X.2023.2241759 [Google Scholar]
  50. Liu, Yiguang, and Junying Liang
    2024 “Multidimensional Comparison of Chinese–English Interpreting Outputs From Human and Machine: Implications for Interpreting Education in the Machine-translation Age.” Linguistics and Education: –. 10.1016/j.linged.2024.101273
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2024.101273 [Google Scholar]
  51. Luo, Jiaming, Colin Cherry, and George Foster
    2024 “To Diverge or Not to Diverge: A Morphosyntactic Perspective on Machine Translation vs Human Translation.” Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics: –. 10.1162/tacl_a_00645
     https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00645 [Google Scholar]
  52. Luo, Jinru, and Dechao Li
    2022 “Universals in Machine Translation?” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics (): –. 10.1075/ijcl.19127.luo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19127.luo [Google Scholar]
  53. Marshall, Catherine
    2024 A Comparative Analysis of Human and Machine Translation Quality. MA thesis. Brigham Young University. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/10526
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Mel’čuk, Igor’ Aleksandrovic
    1988 Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. Albany: New York Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Moneus, Ahmed Mohammed, and Yousef Sahari
    2024 “Artificial Intelligence and Human Translation: A Contrastive Study Based on Legal Texts.” Heliyon (): . 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28106
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28106 [Google Scholar]
  56. Mrvar, Andrej, and Vladimir Batagelj
    2016 “Analysis and Visualization of Large Networks with Program Package Pajek.” Complex Adaptive Systems Modeling: . 10.1186/s40294‑016‑0017‑8
     https://doi.org/10.1186/s40294-016-0017-8 [Google Scholar]
  57. Newman, Mark
    2010 Networks: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199206650.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  58. Niu, Jiang, Yue Jiang, and Yadong Zhou
    2020 “Approaching Textual Coherence of Machine Translation With Complex Network.” International Journal of Modern Physics C(): . 10.1142/S0129183120501752
     https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183120501752 [Google Scholar]
  59. Nivre, Joakim
    2006 Inductive Dependency Parsing. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/1‑4020‑4889‑0
     https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4889-0 [Google Scholar]
  60. Peng, Keqin, Liang Ding, Qihuang Zhong, Li Shen, Xuebo Liu, Min Zhang, Yuanxin Ouyang, and Dacheng Tao
    2023 “Towards Making the Most of ChatGPT for Machine Translation.” InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, edited byHouda Bouamor, Juan Pino, and Kalika Bali, –. Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/2023.findings‑emnlp.373
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.373 [Google Scholar]
  61. Pym, Anthony
    2014 Exploring Translation Theories. 2nd ed.Abingdon: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Radford, Alec, Karthik Narasimhan, Tim Salimans, and Ilya Sutskever
    2018 Improving Language Understanding by Generative Pre-Training. Technical report. OpenAI. https://cdn.openai.com/research-covers/language-unsupervised/language_understanding_paper.pdf
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Solé, Ricard V., Bernat Corominas-Murtra, Sergi Valverde, and Luc Steels
    2010 “Language Networks: Their Structure, Function, and Evolution.” Complexity (): –. 10.1002/cplx.20305
     https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.20305 [Google Scholar]
  64. Tesnière, Lucien
    1959 Éléments De Syntaxe Structurale [Elements of structural syntax]. Paris: Klincksieck.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Toury, Gideon
    2012 Descriptive Translation Studies — and Beyond. Rev. ed.Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.100
     https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.100 [Google Scholar]
  66. Vaswani, Ashish, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin
    2017 “Attention Is All You Need.” InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30, edited byIsabelle Guyon, Ulrike von Luxburg, Samy Bengio, Hanna M. Wallach, Rob Fergus, S. V. N. Vishwanathan, and Roman Garnett, –. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Venuti, Lawrence
    1995 The Translator’s Invisibility: A History of Translation. London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Wang, Longyue, Chenyang Lyu, Tianbo Ji, Zhirui Zhang, Dian Yu, Shuming Shi, and Zhaopeng Tu
    2023 “Document-Level Machine Translation With Large Language Models.” InProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, edited byHouda Bouamor, Juan Pino, and Kalika Bali, –. Singapore: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp‑main.1036
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.1036 [Google Scholar]
  69. Watts, Duncan J., and Steven H. Strogatz
    1998 “Collective Dynamics of ‘Small-world’ Networks.” Nature (): –. 10.1038/30918
     https://doi.org/10.1038/30918 [Google Scholar]
  70. White, Jules, Quchen Fu, Sam Hays, Michael Sandborn, Carlos Olea, Henry Gilbert, Ashraf Elnashar, Jesse Spencer-Smith, and Douglas C. Schmidt
    2023 “A Prompt Pattern Catalog to Enhance Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT.” arXiv, July 4, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.11382
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Wu, Minghao, Thuy-Trang Vu, Lizhen Qu, George Foster, and Gholamreza Haffari
    2024 “Adapting Large Language Models for Document-Level Machine Translation.” arXiv, November 11, 2024. 10.48550/arXiv.2401.06468
     https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.06468 [Google Scholar]
  72. Yan, Jianhao, Pingchuan Yan, Yulong Chen, Judy Li, Xianchao Zhu, and Yue Zhang
    2024 “GPT-4 vs. Human Translators: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Translation Quality Across Languages, Domains, and Expertise Levels.” arXiv, July 4, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.03658v1
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Yu, Shuiyuan, Jin Cong, Junying Liang, and Haitao Liu
    2016 “The Distribution of Information Content in English Sentences.” Dblp Computer Science Bibliography. AccessedFebruary 3, 2025. https://dblp.org/rec/journals/corr/YuCLL16.html
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhou, Fan
    2024 “The Comparison of Translationese in Machine Translation and Human Translation in Terms of Translation Relations.” arXiv, March 27, 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.08661v1
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/target.25041.hua
Loading
Mirror your words, but NOT your wordings
John Benjamins ; https://doi.org/10.1075/target.25041.hua
/content/journals/10.1075/target.25041.hua
/content/journals/10.1075/target.25041.hua
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: human translation ; machine translation ; complex network ; large language models ; syntactic dependency

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error