Volume 29, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0924-1884
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9986
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes


Translation studies and social theories of translation tend not to deal adequately with questions regarding the role of technology in translation and have neglected the ways in which technologies, as non-human entities, embody and materialize hegemonic and power relations. This paper seeks to address this shortcoming by looking to science and technology studies (STS) for conceptual frameworks to help us to understand and articulate (a) how popular, deterministic perceptions of translation technology are perpetuated through the discourses of hegemonic actors, (b) how decisions regarding design and use of translation technologies may be studied with reference to their construction and interpretation by relevant social groups, and (c) how a critical theory of technology and an analytical focus on practices can help to focus our attention on the exercise of hegemonic control in the translation sector.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adler, Paul S
    2007 “The Future of Critical Management Studies: A Paleo-Marxist Critique of Labour Process Theory.” Organization Studies28 (9): 1313–1345. doi: 10.1177/0170840607080743
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607080743 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baumgarten, Stefan
    2016 “The Crooked Timber of Self-reflexivity: Translation and Ideology in the End Times.” Perspectives24 (1): 115–129. doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2015.1069863
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2015.1069863 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bijker, Wiebe E
    1995Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Towards a Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2010 “How Is Technology Made? That Is the Question!” Cambridge Journal of Economics34 (1): 63–76. doi: 10.1093/cje/bep068
    https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bep068 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bijker, Wiebe E. , Thomas P. Hughes , and Trevor Pinch
    eds. 1987The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. eds. 2012The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bijker, Wiebe E. , and Trevor Pinch
    2012 “Preface to the Anniversary Edition.” In Bijker, Hughes and Pinch 2012, xi–xxxiv.
  8. Bräuchler, Birgit , and John Postill
    eds. 2010Theorising Media and Practice. New York: Berghahn Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chandler, Jennifer A
    2012 “‘Obligatory Technologies’ Explaining Why People Feel Compelled to Use Certain Technologies.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society32 (4): 255–264. doi: 10.1177/0270467612459924
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467612459924 [Google Scholar]
  10. Contu, Alessia
    2014 “On Boundaries and Difference: Communities of Practice and Power Relations in Creative Work.” Management Learning45 (3): 289–316. doi: 10.1177/1350507612471926
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507612471926 [Google Scholar]
  11. Contu, Alessia , and Hugh Willmott
    2006 “Studying Practice: Situating Talking About Machines.” Organization Studies27 (12): 1769–1782. doi: 10.1177/0170840606071895
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606071895 [Google Scholar]
  12. Cronin, Michael
    2003Translation and Globalization. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. 2013Translation in the Digital Age. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dafoe, Allan
    2015 “On Technological Determinism: A Typology, Scope Conditions, and a Mechanism.” Science, Technology & Human Values40 (6): 1047–1076. doi: 10.1177/0162243915579283
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915579283 [Google Scholar]
  15. Dobbins, Michael
    2009Urban Design and People. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Donoghue, Patrick
    2013 “Common Sense Advisory Lists Lionbridge as the #1 Language Service Provider.” AccessedJune 7, 2016. blog.lionbridge.com/translation/2013/06/07/common-sense-advisory-says-lionbridge-is-1-language-service-provider/
  17. Dorrier, Jason
    2016 “Will the End of Moore’s Law Halt Computing’s Exponential Rise?” Singularity HUB . AccessedMarch 8, 2016. singularityhub.com/2016/03/08/will-the-end-of-moores-law-halt-computings-exponential-rise/
  18. Feenberg, Andrew
    1992 “Subversive Rationalization: Technology, Power, and Democracy.” Inquiry35 (3–4): 301–322. doi: 10.1080/00201749208602296
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00201749208602296 [Google Scholar]
  19. 1999Questioning Technology. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2005 “Critical Theory of Technology: An Overview.” Tailoring Biotechnologies1 (1): 47–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fisher, Eran
    2010 “Contemporary Technology Discourse and the Legitimation of Capitalism.” European Journal of Social Theory13 (2): 229–252. doi: 10.1177/1368431010362289
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431010362289 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gramsci, Antonio
    1971Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci. Edited and translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith . London: Lawrence and Wishart.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hackett, Edward J. , Olga Amsterdamska , Michael Lynch , and Judy Wajcman
    eds. 2008The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Haraway, Donna
    1991Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Harding, Sandra
    1998Is Science Multicultural? Postcolonialisms, Feminisms, and Epistemologies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ed. 2011The Postcolonial Science and Technology Studies Reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. doi: 10.1215/9780822393849
    https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822393849 [Google Scholar]
  27. Harvey, David
    2015 “Consolidating Power.” ROAR Magazine. AccessedSeptember 3, 2016. https://roarmag.org/magazine/david-harvey-consolidating-power/.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Herman, Andrew
    1982 “Conceptualizing Control: Domination and Hegemony in the Capitalist Labor Process.” The Insurgent Sociologist11 (3): 7–22.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hommels, Anique
    2005 “Studying Obduracy in the City: Toward a Productive Fusion between Technology Studies and Urban Studies.” Science, Technology & Human Values30 (3): 323–351. doi: 10.1177/0162243904271759
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271759 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hornborg, Alf
    2014 “Technology as Fetish: Marx, Latour, and the Cultural Foundations of Capitalism.” Theory, Culture & Society31 (4): 119–140. doi: 10.1177/0263276413488960
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413488960 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hughes, Thomas P
    1983Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hutchins, W. John
    1995 “Machine Translation: A Brief History.” InConcise History of the Language Sciences: From the Sumerians to the Cognitivists, ed. by E. F. K. Koerner , and R. E. Asher , 431–445. Kidlington: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978‑0‑08‑042580‑1.50066‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-042580-1.50066-0 [Google Scholar]
  33. Kenny, Dorothy
    2011 “The Ethics of Machine Translation.” InProceedings of the 20th NZSTI National Conference. Reflections on Language and Technology, ed. by Sybille Ferner , 121–131. Auckland: New Zealand Society of Translators and Interpreters.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kenny, Dorothy , and Stephen Doherty
    2014 “Statistical Machine Translation in the Translation Curriculum: Overcoming Obstacles and Empowering Translators.” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer8 (2): 276–294. doi: 10.1080/1750399X.2014.936112
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2014.936112 [Google Scholar]
  35. Klein, Hans K. , and Daniel Lee Kleinman
    2002 “The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations.” Science, Technology & Human Values27 (1): 28–52. doi: 10.1177/016224390202700102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390202700102 [Google Scholar]
  36. Laclau, Ernesto , and Chantal Mouffe
    1985Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Leonardi, Paul M. , and Stephen R. Barley
    2010 “What’s Under Construction Here? Social Action, Materiality, and Power in Constructivist Studies of Technology and Organizing.” The Academy of Management Annals4 (1): 1–51. doi: 10.1080/19416521003654160
    https://doi.org/10.1080/19416521003654160 [Google Scholar]
  38. Littau, Karin
    2016 “Translation and the Materialities of Communication.” Translation Studies9 (1): 82–96. doi: 10.1080/14781700.2015.1063449
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2015.1063449 [Google Scholar]
  39. Longino, Helen
    1990Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Lukes, Steven
    2005Power: A Radical View. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. doi: 10.1007/978‑0‑230‑80257‑5_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lynch, Michael
    2008 “Ideas and Perspectives.” In Hackett et al. 2008, The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies,9–11.
  42. Moore, Gordon E
    1975 “Progress in Digital Integrated Electronics.” IEDM Technical Digest1975: 11–13.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Morozov, Evgeny
    2013To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Nicolini, Davide
    2009 “Zooming In and Out: Studying Practices by Switching Theoretical Lenses and Trailing Connections.” Organization Studies30 (12): 1391–1418. doi: 10.1177/0170840609349875
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609349875 [Google Scholar]
  45. 2012Practice Theory, Work, and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. O’Brien, Sharon
    2012 “Translation as Human-Computer Interaction.” Translation Spaces1 (1): 101–122. doi: 10.1075/ts.1.05obr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.1.05obr [Google Scholar]
  47. O’Hagan, Minako
    2016 “Massively Open Translation: Unpacking the Relationship between Technology and Translation in the 21st Century.” International Journal of Communication10: 929–946.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Olohan, Maeve
    2011 “Translators and Translation Technology: The Dance of Agency.” Translation Studies4 (3): 342–357. doi: 10.1080/14781700.2011.589656
    https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2011.589656 [Google Scholar]
  49. . Forthcoming 2017. “Knowledge and Knowing in Translation Practice.” Translation Spaces.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Orr, Julian Edgerton
    1996Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Pinch, Trevor J. , and Wiebe E. Bijker
    1984 “The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other.” Social Studies of Science14 (3): 399–441. doi: 10.1177/030631284014003004
    https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004 [Google Scholar]
  52. Reckwitz, Andreas
    2002 “Toward a Theory of Social Practices: A Development in Culturalist Theorizing.” European Journal of Social Theory5 (2): 243–263. doi: 10.1177/13684310222225432
    https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432 [Google Scholar]
  53. Robinson, William I
    2012 “Global Capitalism Theory and the Emergence of Transnational Elites.” Critical Sociology38 (3): 349–363. doi: 10.1177/0896920511411592
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920511411592 [Google Scholar]
  54. 2004A Theory of Global Capitalism: Production, Class, and State in a Transnational World. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Schatzki, Theodore R
    1996Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511527470
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527470 [Google Scholar]
  56. 2001 “Introduction: Practice Theory.” InThe Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. by Theodore, R. Schatzki , Karin Knorr-Cetina , and Eike von Savigny , 1–14. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Shove, Elizabeth , Mika Pantzar , and Matt Watson
    2012The Dynamics of Social Practice. London: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781446250655.n1
    https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250655.n1 [Google Scholar]
  58. Sismondo, Sergio
    2010An Introduction to Science and Technology Studies. 2nd ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Thorpe, Charles
    2008 “Political Theory in Science and Technology Studies.” In Hackett et al. 2008, The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies,63–82.
  60. van der Meer, Jaap
    2016 “The Future Does Not Need Translators.” TAUS Blog. AccessedFebruary 24, 2016. https://taus.net/blog/the-future-does-not-need-translators
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Waldrop, Mitchell
    2016 “The Chips Are Down for Moore’s Law.” Nature NewsFebruary 9, 2016. Archive530 (7589). www.nature.com/news/the-chips-are-down-for-moore-s-law-1.19338 doi: 10.1038/530144a
    https://doi.org/10.1038/530144a [Google Scholar]
  62. Warde, Alan
    2016The Practice of Eating. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Winner, Langdon
    1983 “Technologies as Forms of Life.” InEpistemology, Methodology and the Social Sciences, ed. by Robert S. Cohen , and Marx W. Wartofsky , 249–263. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Also in Winner 1986, Chapter 1. doi: 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑1458‑7_10
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1458-7_10 [Google Scholar]
  64. 1986The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. 2001 “Where Technological Determinism Went.” InVisions of STS: Counterpoints in Science, Technology, and Society Studies, ed. by Stephen H. Cutcliffe , and Carl Mitcham , 11–18. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Wyatt, Sally
    2008 “Technological Determinism is Dead: Long Live Technological Determinism.” In Hackett et al. 2008, The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies,165–180.
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error