1887
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2666-1748
  • E-ISSN: 2666-1756
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

The relationship between task-based language teaching (TBLT) and instructed second language acquisition (ISLA) is a close one. Both are concerned primarily with facilitating the development of second language (L2) learners’ linguistic proficiency. This article begins by providing a brief description of both terms. TBLT has been described as an approach to language teaching, comprised primarily of a needs analysis, development of meaning-focused instructional materials, and assessment. The central construct is the task, which provides opportunities for learners to use their own linguistic resources as they engage in meaning-focused interaction. In contrast, ISLA is a research field encompassing multiple approaches to L2 teaching and learning, based on various theoretical perspectives. As such, ISLA includes TBLT, especially as both have a particular interest in the cognitive-interactionist approach to L2 instruction. Differences between the two terms include a focus on explicit instruction in ISLA that is not present in most versions of TBLT. In addition, ISLA does not constitute an all-encompassing curricular approach to L2 instruction. Finally, ISLA has been less focused on needs analyses and assessment in comparison to TBLT. This article ends with a consideration of areas of mutual concern, as well as perspectives from each that might benefit the other.

This work is currently available as a sample.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/task.00003.loe
2021-05-27
2021-06-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmadian, M. J., & Tavakoli, M.
    (2011) The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, complexity, and fluency in EFL learners’ oral production. Language Teaching Research, 15, 35–59. doi:  10.1177/1362168810383329
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810383329 [Google Scholar]
  2. Breen, M. P., & Candlin, C. N.
    (1980) The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 89–112. doi:  10.1093/applin/I.2.89
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.2.89 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bryfonski, L., & McKay, T. H.
    (2019) TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 23, 603–632. doi:  10.1177/1362168817744389
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817744389 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bygate, M.
    (2020) Some directions for the possible survival of TBLT as a real world project. Language Teaching, 53, 275–288. doi:  10.1017/S0261444820000014
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000014 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carless, D.
    (2012) TBLT in EFL settings: Looking back and moving forward. InA. Shehadeh & C. A. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation (pp.345–358). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.4.20car
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.4.20car [Google Scholar]
  6. Crookes, G.
    (1998) On the relationship between second and foreign language teachers and research. TESOL Journal, 7, 6–11.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DeKeyser, R.
    (2015) Skill acquisition theory. InB. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp.94–112). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Doughty, C., & Pica, T.
    (1986) ‘Information gap’ tasks: Do they facilitate second language acquisition?TESOL Quarterly, 20(2), 305–325. doi:  10.2307/3586546
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586546 [Google Scholar]
  9. Dubreil, S.
    (2020) Using games for language learning in the age of social distancing. Foreign Language Annals, 53, 250–259. doi:  10.1111/flan.12465
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12465 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellis, N.
    (2005) At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 305–352. doi:  10.1017/S027226310505014X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310505014X [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellis, R.
    (2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. (2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172. doi:  10.1017/S0272263105050096
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050096 [Google Scholar]
  13. (2009) The differential effects of three types of planning on fluency, complexity and accuracy in L2 oral production. Applied Linguistics, 30, 474–509. doi:  10.1093/applin/amp042
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp042 [Google Scholar]
  14. (2017) Task-based language teaching. InS. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp.108–145). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315676968‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-7 [Google Scholar]
  15. (2019) Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks. Language Teaching Research, 23, 454–475. doi:  10.1177/1362168818765315
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818765315 [Google Scholar]
  16. Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C.
    (2020) Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Erlam, R.
    (2016) ‘I’m still not sure what a task is’: Teachers designing language tasks. Language Teaching Research, 20, 279–299. doi:  10.1177/1362168814566087
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814566087 [Google Scholar]
  18. Gacs, A., Goertler, S., & Spasova, S.
    (2020) Planned online language education versus crisis-prompted online language teaching: Lessons for the future. Foreign Language Annals, 53, 380–392. doi:  10.1111/flan.12460
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12460 [Google Scholar]
  19. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A.
    (2015) Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. InB. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp.180–206). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. González-Lloret, M.
    (2020a) Collaborative tasks for online language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 53, 260–269. doi:  10.1111/flan.12466
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12466 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2020b) Using technology-mediated tasks in second language acquisition. InC. Lambert & R. Oliver (Eds.), Using tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts (pp.65–81). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Guillén, G., Sawin, T., & Avineri, N.
    (2020) Zooming out of the crisis: Language and human collaboration. Foreign Language Annals, 53, 320–328. doi:  10.1111/flan.12459
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12459 [Google Scholar]
  23. Gurzynski-Weiss, L. & Baralt, M.
    (2014) Exploring learner perception and use of task-based interactional feedback in FTF and CMC modes. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 1–28. doi:  10.1017/S0272263113000363
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000363 [Google Scholar]
  24. Han, Z., & Nassaji, H.
    (2019) Introduction: A snapshot of thirty-five years of instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 23, 393–402. doi:  10.1177/1362168818776992
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818776992 [Google Scholar]
  25. Harmer, J.
    (2015) The practice of English language teaching (5 ed.). Person Education.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Housen, A., & Pierrard, M.
    (2005) Investigations in instructed second language acquisition. Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110197372
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197372 [Google Scholar]
  27. Ji, Y., & Pham, T.
    (2020) Implementing task-based language teaching (TBLT) to teach grammar in English classes in China: Using design-based research to explore challenges and strategies. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14, 164–177. doi:  10.1080/17501229.2018.1545021
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1545021 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kang, E. Y., Sok, S., & Han, Z. H.
    (2019) Thirty-five years of ISLA on form-focused instruction: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 428–453. doi:  10.1177/1362168818776671
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818776671 [Google Scholar]
  29. Keck, C., Iberri-Shea, N., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S.
    (2006) Investigating the empirical link between task-based interaction and acquisition: A meta-analysis. InJ. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp.91–131). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.13.08kec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.13.08kec [Google Scholar]
  30. Kessler, M., Loewen, S., & Trego, D.
    (2020) Synchronous VCMC with TalkAbroad: Exploring noticing, transcription, and learner perceptions in Spanish foreign-language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, Early View. doi:  10.1177/1362168820954456
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820954456 [Google Scholar]
  31. Kobayashi Hillman, K., & Long, M. H.
    (2020) A task-based needs analysis for US foreign service officers: The challenge of the Japanese celebration speech. InC. Lambert & R. Oliver (Eds.), Using tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts (pp.123–145). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lambert, C., & Oliver, R.
    (2020) Introduction: Tasks in context. InC. Lambert & R. Oliver (Eds.), Using tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts (pp.1–10). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lambert, C.
    (2020) Frameworks in using tasks in second language instruction. InC. Lambert & R. Oliver (Eds.), Using tasks in second language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts (pp.13–32). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Lantolf, J. P., Thorne, S. L., & Poehner, M. E.
    (2015) Sociocultural theory and second language development. InB. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp.207–226). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Leow, R. P.
    (2019) ISLA: How implicit or how explicit should it be? Theoretical, empirical, and pedagogical/curricular issues. Language Teaching Research, 23, 476–493. doi:  10.1177/1362168818776674
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818776674 [Google Scholar]
  36. Lightbown, P. M.
    (1985) Great expectations: Second-language acquisition research and classroom teaching. Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 173–189. doi:  10.1093/applin/6.2.173
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/6.2.173 [Google Scholar]
  37. Loewen, S.
    (2005) Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 361–386. doi:  10.1017/S0272263105050163
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050163 [Google Scholar]
  38. (2020) Introduction to instructed second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315616797
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315616797 [Google Scholar]
  39. Loewen, S., & Sato, M.
    (2017) The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315676968
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2018) State-of-the-arts article: Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 51(3), 285–329. 10.1017/S0261444818000125
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125 [Google Scholar]
  41. Long, M. H.
    (1991) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. InK. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp.39–52). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.2.07lon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon [Google Scholar]
  42. (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. InW. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of research on language acquisition (Vol.2, pp.413–468). Academic Press. 10.1016/B978‑012589042‑7/50015‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012589042-7/50015-3 [Google Scholar]
  43. (2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. (2017) Instructed second language acquisition (ISLA): Geopolitics, methodological issues, and some major research questions. Instructed Second Language Acquisition1, 7–44. doi:  10.1558/isla.33314
    https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.33314 [Google Scholar]
  45. Marsden, E., & Kasprowicz, R.
    (2017) Foreign language educators’ exposure to research: Reported experiences, exposure via citations, and a proposal for action. The Modern Language Journal, 101(4), 613–642. doi:  10.1111/modl.12426
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12426 [Google Scholar]
  46. Michel, M.
    (2017) Complexity, accuarcy, and fluency in L2 production. InS. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp.50–68). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315676968‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-4 [Google Scholar]
  47. Norris, J., & Ortega, L.
    (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50(3), 417–528. doi:  10.1111/0023‑8333.00136
    https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 [Google Scholar]
  48. Nunan, D.
    (1989) Hidden agendas: The role of the learner in programme implementation. InR. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp.176–186). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524520.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524520.013 [Google Scholar]
  49. Paran, A.
    (2017) ‘Only connect’: researchers and teachers in dialogue. ELT Journal, 71(4), 499–508. doi:  10.1093/elt/ccx033
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx033 [Google Scholar]
  50. Prabhu, N. S.
    (1987) Second language pedagogy (Vol.20). Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Reinders, H., & Stockwell, G.
    (2017) Computer-assisted SLA. InS. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp.361–376). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315676968‑20
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-20 [Google Scholar]
  52. Révész, A.
    (2012) Task complexity, focus on L2 constructions, and individual differences: A classroom-based study. Modern Language Journal, 95, 437–470. doi:  10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01241.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01241.x [Google Scholar]
  53. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S.
    (2014) Approaches and methods in language teaching (3 ed.). Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Robinson, P.
    (2015) The cognition hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. InBygate, M. (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT (pp.87–122). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.8.04rob
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.04rob [Google Scholar]
  55. Sato, M., & Loewen, S.
    (2019) Do teachers care about research? The research-pedagogy dialogue. ELT Journal, 73(1), 1–10. doi:  10.1093/elt/ccy048
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccy048 [Google Scholar]
  56. Scheffler, P., & Cincała, M.
    (2011) Explicit grammar rules and L2 acquisition. ELT Journal, 65(1), 13–23. doi:  10.1093/elt/ccq019
    https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq019 [Google Scholar]
  57. Shehadeh, A.
    (2012) Broadening the perspective of task-based language teaching scholarship: The contribution of research in foreign language contexts. InA. Shehadeh & C. A. Coombe (Eds.), Task-based language teaching in foreign language contexts: Research and implementation (pp.1–20). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.4.03she
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.4.03she [Google Scholar]
  58. Skehan, P.
    (1996) Second language acquisition research and task-based instruction. InE. Willis & D. Willis (Eds.), Challenge and change in language teaching (pp.17–30). Heinemann.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. (2014) Processing perspectives on task performance. John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.5
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5 [Google Scholar]
  60. (2016) Tasks versus conditions: Two perspectives on task research and their implications for pedagogy. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 34–49. doi:  10.1017/S0267190515000100
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000100 [Google Scholar]
  61. (2018) Second language task-based performance: Theory, research, and assessment. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315629766
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315629766 [Google Scholar]
  62. Skehan, P., & Luo, S.
    (2020) Developing a task-based approach to assessment in an Asian context. System, 90. doi:  10.1016/j.system.2020.102223
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102223 [Google Scholar]
  63. Spada, N.
    (1997) Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: A review of classroom and laboratory research. Language Teaching, 30(2), 73–87. doi:  10.1017/S0261444800012799
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012799 [Google Scholar]
  64. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P.
    (2008) Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated?TESOL Quarterly, 42, 181–207. doi:  10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00115.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00115.x [Google Scholar]
  65. Swan, M.
    (2005) Legislation by hypothesis: The case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 376–401. doi:  10.1093/applin/ami013
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami013 [Google Scholar]
  66. Van den Branden, K., Bygate, M., & Norris, J.
    (Eds.) (2009) Task-based language teaching: A reader. John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.1 [Google Scholar]
  67. VanPatten, B.
    (2017) Situating instructed language acquisition: Facts about second language acquisition. Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 1(1), 45–60. 10.1558/isla.33315
    https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.33315 [Google Scholar]
  68. VanPatten, B., & Williams, J.
    (2015) Introduction: The nature of theories. InB. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp.1–16). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Vygotsky, L.
    (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Havard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Ziegler, N.
    (2016) Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 38(3), 553–586. doi:  10.1017/S027226311500025X
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311500025X [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/task.00003.loe
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cognitive-interactionist approach; focus on form; L2 pedagogy; SLA theory; task
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error