Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN 2666-1748
  • E-ISSN: 2666-1756
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



In this piece, I trace Task-Based Language Teaching from Mike Long’s original conceptualization in 1985, through his development of methodological principles that are based on SLA theory and empirical evidence he gathered for three and half decades, to two recent (2010, 2015) practical examples of TBLT. Since there is still some important work to be done on remaining tricky issues, I highlight a few of these (unresolved in instructed SLA), such as sequencing according to complexity and the resilience of implicit processing mechanisms in adult language learning. In resolving these and other issues that will no doubt arise, I urge us all to follow Mike’s scrupulous lead in holding ourselves accountable to the empirical evidence.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Ahmadian, M. J., & Long, M. H.
    (eds.) (2021) The Cambridge Handbook of Task-Based Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108868327
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868327 [Google Scholar]
  2. Bryfonski, L., & McKay, T. H.
    (2017) TBLT implementation and evaluation: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 23, 603–632. 10.1177/1362168817744389
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817744389 [Google Scholar]
  3. Ellis, N.
    (2017) Salience in usage-based SLA. InS. Gass, P. Spinner, & J. Behney. (Eds.), Salience in second language acquisition (pp.21–40). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315399027‑2
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315399027-2 [Google Scholar]
  4. Jordan, G., & Long, M. H.
    (to appear). English Language Teaching for Adults. The way it is now, and the way it could be. Cambridge Scholars.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Long, M. H.
    (1981) Input, interaction and second language acquisition. InH. Winitz. (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259–78. 10.1111/j.1749‑6632.1981.tb42014.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1981.tb42014.x [Google Scholar]
  6. (1983) Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 177–93. 10.1017/S0272263100004848
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004848 [Google Scholar]
  7. (1985) A role for instruction in second language acquisition: Task-based language teaching. InK. Hyltenstam & M. Pienemann. (Eds.), Modeling and assessing second language development (pp.77–99). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. (1990) Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition12, 3, 251–85. 10.1017/S0272263100009165
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100009165 [Google Scholar]
  9. (1991a) Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. InK. de Bot, R. B. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp.39–52). John Benjamins. 10.1075/sibil.2.07lon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sibil.2.07lon [Google Scholar]
  10. (1991b) The design and psycholinguistic motivation of research on foreign language learning. InB. Freed. (Ed.), Foreign language acquisition research and the classroom (pp.309–320). D. C. Heath.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. (ed.) (2005) Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667299
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667299 [Google Scholar]
  12. (2007) Problems in SLA. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. (2013a) Maturational constraints on child and adult SLA. InG. Granena & M. H. Long. (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp.3–41). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.35.01lon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.35.01lon [Google Scholar]
  14. (2013b) Some implications of research findings on sensitive periods in language learning for educational policy and practice. InG. Granena & M. H. Long. (Eds.), Sensitive periods, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment (pp.259–271). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.35.10lon
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.35.10lon [Google Scholar]
  15. (2015) Second language acquisition and Task-Based Language Teaching. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. (2020) Enhanced incidental and implicit L2 acquisition for international students. InS. Rastelli & C. Bagna. (Eds.), Manifesto per l’insegnamiento della lengua italiana agli student internazionali. Otto commenti (pp.23–41). Ospedaletto-Pisa.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. (2021). The L in TBLT. InM. J. Ahmadian & M. H. Long Eds. The handbook of task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108868327.010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868327.010 [Google Scholar]
  18. Long, M. H., & Crookes, G.
    (1993) Units of analysis in syllabus design: The case for task. InG. Crookes & S. M. Gass. (Eds.), Tasks in pedagogical context. Integrating theory and practice (pp.9–54). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Long, M. H., & Porter, P.
    (1985) Group work, interlanguage talk, and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 207–27. 10.2307/3586827
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3586827 [Google Scholar]
  20. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P.
    (1998) Focus on form: Theory, research and practice. InC. J. Doughty & J. Williams. (Eds.), Focus on form in second language acquisition (pp.15–41). Cambridge University Press. Reprinted inOrtega, L. (Ed.) (2011) Second language acquisition: Critical concepts in linguistics. Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Long, M. H., & Ross, S.
    (2009) Input elaboration: a viable alternative to “authentic” and simplified texts. InNamai, K., & Fukada, Y. (eds.), Toward the fusion of language, culture and education: From the persepectives of international and interdisciplinary research. A feschrift for Yasukata Yano. (pp.307–25). Tokyo: Kaitakusha.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Robinson, P.
    (2011) Second language task complexity, the cognition hypothesis, language learning, and performance. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity. Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp.3–37). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.2.05ch1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2.05ch1 [Google Scholar]
  23. Yano, Y., Long, M. H., & Ross, S.
    (1994) The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning44, 2, 189–219. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1994.tb01100.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1994.tb01100.x [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error