1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. TASK
  4. Volume 4, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 4, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2666-1748
  • E-ISSN: 2666-1756
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

This study compares the effectiveness of two instructional interventions on the uptake and transfer of relative clauses (RCs) during picture-based oral narrative tasks: (1) Focus on Form (FonF), which involves incidental focus on language problems as they arise naturally in learners’ language during meaning-focused task-based communication, and (2) Focus on Forms (FonFs), which involves explicit attention to specific forms felt by the teacher or materials planner to be natural, useful or essential to the performance of a task (Long, 2015). A third treatment, focus on meaning (FonM), which involved no form-focused instruction at all, provided a baseline to compare the relative effects of these two instructional interventions. Thirty-six Chinese ESL learners participated in the study. The study employed a pre-test, post-test, and delayed post-test design. Results revealed that FonM did not promote uptake or transfer of RCs, and that FonFs and FonF had comparable effects on the uptake, stability, and transfer of RCs to novel versions of oral narrative tasks. The study demonstrates that: (1) form-focused instruction was essential in promoting uptake and transfer of challenging task-relevant language; and (2) FonF was at least as effective as FonFs for promoting Chinese ESL learners’ use and acquisition of task-relevant structures. The results of the study provide support for the use of FonF in instruction as consistent with the principles of task-based language teaching.

© 2024 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/task.00028.che
2024-09-12
2024-10-06

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/task.00028.che
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdolmanafi, S.
    (2012) Effects of form-focused instruction on the learning of relative clauses. The Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 8(1), 192–210. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jlls/issue/9935/122952
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Cai, J.
    (2020) Research on the main conflicts in College English Education in the new era. China University Teaching, (1), 51–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Carless, D.
    (2009) Revisiting the TBLT versus P-P-P Debate: Voices from Hong Kong. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 191, 49–66.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen, J.
    (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. DeKeyser, R.
    (1998) Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition, 281, 42–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. (2020) Skill acquisition theory. InB. VanPatten, G. D. Keating & S. Wulff (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (3rd ed., pp. 83–104). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429503986‑5
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503986-5 [Google Scholar]
  7. Deng, C., & Carless, D.
    (2009) The communicativeness of activities in a task-based innovation in Guangdong, China. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 191, 113–134.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Diessel, H., & Tomasello, M.
    (2005) A new look at the acquisition of relative clauses. Language, 811, 882–906. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4490021
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Ellis, R.
    (2005) Planning and task-based research: Theory and research. InR. Ellis (Ed.), Planning and task-performance in an L2 (pp. 3–34). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.11.03ell
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.11.03ell [Google Scholar]
  10. (2016) Focus on form: A critical review. Language Teaching Research, 20(3), 405–428. 10.1177/1362168816628627
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816628627 [Google Scholar]
  11. Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C.
    (2020) Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Givon, T.
    (1985) Function, structure and language acquisition. InD. Slobin (Ed.) The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, Vol. 2: Theoretical issues (pp. 1005–1027). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Harris, J., & Leeming, P.
    (2022) The impact of teaching approach on growth in L2 proficiency and self-efficacy: A longitudinal classroom-based study of TBLT and PPP. Journal of Second Language Studies, 5(1), 114–143. 10.1075/jsls.20014.har
     https://doi.org/10.1075/jsls.20014.har [Google Scholar]
  14. Hoey, M.
    (1983) On the surface of discourse. George, Allen and Unwin.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Lambert, C.
    (2019) Task-induced second language development: A micro-genetic study. InE. Wen & M. Ahmadian, M. (Eds). Researching L2 task performance and pedagogy (pp. 279–302). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.13.13lam
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.13.13lam [Google Scholar]
  16. (2023) Practice in Task-Based Language Teaching. InSuzuki, Y. (Ed.). Practice and automatization in second language research: Theory, methods, and pedagogical implications (pp. 144–159). Routledge. 10.4324/9781003414643‑8
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003414643-8 [Google Scholar]
  17. Lambert, C., Aubrey, S., & Leeming, P.
    (2021) Pre-task preparation and second language speech processing. TESOL Quarterly55(2): 331–365. 10.1002/tesq.598
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.598 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lambert, C., & Engler, S.
    (2007) Information distribution and goal orientation in second language task design. InP. del García Mayo (Ed.) Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 27–43). Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D.
    (2017) Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 167–196. 10.1017/S0272263116000085
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000085 [Google Scholar]
  20. Lambert, C., & Minn, D.
    (2007) Personal investment in L2 task design and learning: A case study of two Japanese learners of English. ELIA: Estudios de Lingüística Inglesa Aplicada, 71, 127–148.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Lambert, C., & Robinson, P.
    (2014) Learning to perform narrative task: A semester long study of task sequencing effects. InM. Maralt, R. Gilabert, & P. Robinson (Eds.), Task sequencing and instructed second language learning (pp. 207–230). Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Li, S., Ellis, R., & Shu, D.
    (2016) The differential effects of immediate and delayed feedback on learners of different proficiency levels. Foreign Languages and Foreign Language Research, 2861, 1–15. 10.13458/j.cnki.flatt.004214
     https://doi.org/10.13458/j.cnki.flatt.004214 [Google Scholar]
  23. Li, S., Ellis, R., & Zhu, Y.
    (2019) The associations between cognitive ability and L2 development under five different instructional conditions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(3), 693–722. 10.1017/S0142716418000796
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716418000796 [Google Scholar]
  24. Long, M.
    (2015) Task-based language teaching and second language acquisition. Wiley & Sons.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Long, M., & Robinson, P.
    (1998) Focus on form theory, research and practice. InC. Doughty & J. William (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15–41). Cambridge University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Loschky, L., & Bley-Vroman, R.
    (1993) Grammar and task-based methodology. InS. Gass. & G. Crookes (Eds.) Tasks and language learning (pp. 123–167). Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (MOE)
    Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (MOE) (2022) Yiwu Jiaoyu Yingyu Kechen Biaozhun [Curriculum Standards for teaching English in Compulsory Education]. Beijing Normal University Publishing Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Nippold, M., Hesketh, L., Duthie, J., & Mansfield, T.
    (2005a) Conversational versus expository discourse: A study of syntactic development in children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 481, 1048–1064. 10.1044/1092‑4388(2005/073)
     https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2005/073) [Google Scholar]
  29. Nippold, M., Ward-Lonergan, J., & Fanning, J.
    (2005b) Persuasive writing in children, adolescents, and adults: A study of syntactic, semantic and pragmatic development. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 361, 125–138. 10.1044/0161‑1461(2005/012)
     https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2005/012) [Google Scholar]
  30. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L.
    (2000) Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language learning, 50(3), 417–528. 10.1111/0023‑8333.00136
     https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136 [Google Scholar]
  31. Pang, F., & Skehan, P.
    (2014) Self-reported planning behaviour and L2 performance in narrative retelling. InP. Skehan, (Ed.), Processing perspectives on task performance (pp. 95–128). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.5.04pan
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.5.04pan [Google Scholar]
  32. Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L.
    (2014) How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language learning, 64(4), 878–912. 10.1111/lang.12079
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079 [Google Scholar]
  33. Samuda, V., & Bygate, M.
    (2008) Tasks in second language learning. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230596429
     https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596429 [Google Scholar]
  34. Sheen, R.
    (2006) Focus on forms as a means of improving accurate oral production. InA. Housen, & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition. (pp. 271–309). Mouton de Gruyter.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Shintani, N.
    (2015) The incidental grammar acquisition in focus on form and focus on forms instruction for young beginner learners. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 115–140. 10.1002/tesq.166
     https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.166 [Google Scholar]
  36. Soongpankhao, W., Aubrey, S. & Lambert, C.
    (2023)  Impact of goal-tracking on engagement in language use in an online TBLT module for Thai university students. System (early view) 10.1016/j.system.2023.103184
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103184 [Google Scholar]
  37. Suzuki, Y.
    (2021) Optimizing fluency training for speaking skills transfer: Comparing the effects of blocked and interleaved task repetition. Language Learning, 71(2), 285–325. 10.1111/lang.12433
     https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12433 [Google Scholar]
  38. Trondheim, L.
    (2007) Mr. I. Nantler, Beall and Minoustchine.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Wang, Z.
    (1999) The trends of EIT in China. Foreign Language, 124(6), 36–41.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. White, R., & Robinson, P.
    (1995) Current approaches to syllabus design: A discussion with Ron White. RELC Guidelines, 17(1), 93–101.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Xu, J.
    (2020) Corpora and Chinese learners’ spoken English. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Yu, L.
    (2001) Communicative language teaching in China: Progress and resistance. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 194–198. 10.2307/3587868
     https://doi.org/10.2307/3587868 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/task.00028.che
Loading
Focus on form in the uptake, stability and transfer of relative clause use across tasks
task 4, 111 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1075/task.00028.che
/content/journals/10.1075/task.00028.che
/content/journals/10.1075/task.00028.che
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Chinese learners of English as a second language; corrective feedback; Focus on Form (FonF); relative clauses; Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT)

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error