1887
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2666-1748
  • E-ISSN: 2666-1756

Abstract

Abstract

This interview with Marije Michel, Professor of Second Language Acquisition at the University of Groningen, explores key developments and challenges in Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT). Drawing on her extensive experience in both research and practice, Michel discusses the integration of psycholinguistic constructs in task design, drawing examples from priming effects in written and oral interaction. She also emphasizes the importance of researching task sequences and post-task reflection as key sites of language development and describes some challenges of implementing TBLT across diverse educational contexts. Michel’s insights highlight the evolving nature of TBLT as it adapts to technological innovations while maintaining its core principles of meaningful communication and learner empowerment. The interview also highlights contemporary issues in (task-based) language education, including the research-practice relationship, the potential role of artificial intelligence in language learning, and the need for more inclusive approaches to language teaching research. We conclude with perspectives on future directions for TBLT, particularly emphasizing the importance of longitudinal research and teacher development in advancing the field, as well as highlighting unique features of the in Groningen, NL (April 2–4, 2025).

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/task.00038.gor
2025-08-08
2026-03-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/task.00038.gor.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/task.00038.gor&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Alferink, I., & Marsden, E.
    (2023) OASIS: one resource to widen the reach of research in language studies. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 17(5), 946–952. 10.1080/17501229.2023.2204100
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2023.2204100 [Google Scholar]
  2. Al-Hoorie, A. H., Cinaglia, C., Hiver, P., Huensch, A., Isbell, D. R., Leung, C., & Sudina, E.
    (2024) Open science: Considerations and issues for TESOL research. TESOL Quarterly, 58(1), 537–556. 10.1002/tesq.3304
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3304 [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkinson, D., Michel, M. C., & Ribeiro, A. C.
    (2025) Synergies in Second Language Acquisition and Teaching (SLA/T). The Modern Language Journal, 109(S1) 10.1111/modl.12975
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12975 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bear, E., Chen, X., Souto, D. V., Ribeiro-Flucht, L., Rudzewitz, B., & Meurers, D.
    (2024) Designing a task-based conversational agent for EFL in German schools: Student needs, actions, and perceptions. System, 1261, 103460. 10.1016/j.system.2024.103460
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103460 [Google Scholar]
  5. De Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M.
    (2007) A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10(1), 7–21. 10.1017/S1366728906002732
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002732 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ellis, R.
    (2024) Conclusion: Some thoughts on investigating individual differences in task-based language teaching. InS. Li (Ed.), Individual differences and task-based language teaching (pp.346–346). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.16.12ell
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.16.12ell [Google Scholar]
  7. Gilabert, R., Comelles, E., Castellví, J., Malicka, A., Barón, J., Brennan, K., Trager, V., & Arnold, G.
    (2024) TaskGen. https://taskgen.eu/
  8. Godfroid, A., & Andringa, S.
    (2023) Uncovering sampling biases, advancing inclusivity, and rethinking theoretical accounts in second language acquisition: Introduction to the special issue SLA for All?Language Learning, 73(4), 981–1002. 10.1111/lang.12620
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12620 [Google Scholar]
  9. Gök, S., & Michel, M. C.
    (2021) Designing pedagogic tasks for refugees learning English to enter universities in the Netherlands. InM. Ahmadian & M. Long (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of task-based language teaching (pp.290–302). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108868327.017
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868327.017 [Google Scholar]
  10. Gök, S. Ö., & Michel, M. C.
    (2025) Task design for highly educated newcomers: improvement and implementation through Lesson Study. International Journal for Lesson & Learning Studies, 14(5), 1–16. 10.1108/IJLLS‑08‑2024‑0180
    https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-08-2024-0180 [Google Scholar]
  11. Hiver, P., Larsen-Freeman, D., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Lowie, W.
    (2023) Complex dynamic systems and language education: A sampling of current research–Editorial. International Journal of Complexity in Education, 4(1). 10.26262/IJCE.V4I1.9476
    https://doi.org/10.26262/IJCE.V4I1.9476 [Google Scholar]
  12. Hwang, H., Coss, M. D., Sato, M., Cárcamo, B., Nguyen, M. X. N. C., Dao, P., Iwashita, N., Marsden, E., Hawkes, R., Loewen, S., Scheffler, P., Baranowska, K., McKinley, J., & Ortega, L.
    (2024) (Re) Examining the research–practice interface: International perspectives, multiple methods, persistent challenges, and novel directions. Language Teaching, 1–7. 10.1017/S0261444824000181
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444824000181 [Google Scholar]
  13. Kim, Y., & Michel, M. C.
    (2023) Linguistic alignment in second language acquisition: A methodological review. System, 1151, 103007. 10.1016/j.system.2023.103007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103007 [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim, Y., & Namkung, Y.
    (2024) Methodological characteristics in technology-mediated task-based language teaching research: Current practices and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1–23. 10.1017/S0267190524000096
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190524000096 [Google Scholar]
  15. Long, Michael H.
    (2015) Second language acquisition and task-based language teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Marsden, E., & Morgan-Short, K.
    (2023) (Why) are open research practices the future for the study of language learning?. Language Learning, 73(S2), 344–387. 10.1111/lang.12568
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12568 [Google Scholar]
  17. McDonough, K., & Trofimovich, P.
    (2011) Using priming methods in second language research. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203880944
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203880944 [Google Scholar]
  18. Michel, M. C.
    (2011) Effects of task complexity and interaction on L2 performance. InP. Robinson (Ed.) Second language task complexity: Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp.141–173). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.2.12ch6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2.12ch6 [Google Scholar]
  19. (2013) The use of conjunctions in cognitively simple versus complex oral L2 tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 178–195. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2013.01431.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.01431.x [Google Scholar]
  20. (2018) Practising online with your peers: The role of text-chat for second language development. InC. Jones (Ed.), Practice in second language learning (pp.164–196). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781316443118.009
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316443118.009 [Google Scholar]
  21. (2022, August29–31). Tasks for everyone. Everyone a task. [Plenary presentation]. Task-Based Language Teaching Conference, Innsbruck, Austria.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. (2023) Key concepts in applied linguistics: Task-based Language Teaching. Estudios de Linguistica Inglesa Aplicada (ELIA), 231, 317–328.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Michel, M. C., Appel, C., & Cipitria, S.
    (2022) Lexical and syntactic alignment during English-Spanish teletandem meetings. System, 1111, 102930. 10.1016/j.system.2022.102930
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102930 [Google Scholar]
  24. Michel, M. C., Atkinson, D., Custodio Ribeiro, A., Alexopoulou, T., Cappellini, M., Eskildsen, S., Gao, X., Hellermann, J., Kayi-Aydar, H., Lowie, W., Mejía-Laguna, J., Ortega, L., Doehler, S., Sasaki, M., Sato, M., Thorne, S., & Zheng, Y.
    (2025a) Forging common ground in second language acquisition and teaching: A combined synergy statement. The Modern Language Journal, 109(S1), 90–103. 10.1111/modl.12983
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12983 [Google Scholar]
  25. Michel, M. C., Bazhutkina, I., Abel, N., & Strobl, C.
    (2025b) Collaborative writing based on generative AI models: Revision and deliberation processes in German as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 671, 101185. 10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101185
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101185 [Google Scholar]
  26. Michel, M. C., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
    (2007) Effects of task complexity and task condition on Dutch L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 45(3), 241–259. 10.1515/iral.2007.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
  27. Michel, M. C., Murakami, A., Alexopoulou, T., & Meurers, D.
    (2019) Effects of task type on morpho-syntactic complexity across proficiency: Evidence from a large learner corpus of A1 to C2 writings. Journal of Instructed Second Language Acquisition, 3(2): 124–152. 10.1558/isla.38248
    https://doi.org/10.1558/isla.38248 [Google Scholar]
  28. Michel, M. C., Ofner, D., & Thoma, D.
    (2014) Early childhood educators’ competences for supporting children’s academic language skills in Germany. Language Awareness, 23(1–2), 138–156. 10.1080/09658416.2013.863896
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863896 [Google Scholar]
  29. Michel, M. C., & O’Rourke, B.
    (2019) What drives alignment during text chat with a peer vs. a tutor? Insights from cued interviews and eye-tracking. System, 831, 50–63. 10.1016/j.system.2019.02.009
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.02.009 [Google Scholar]
  30. Michel, M. C., & Smith, B.
    (2018) Measuring lexical alignment during L2 peer interaction via written synchronous computer-mediated communication — An eye tracking study. InS. Gass, P. Spinner, & J. Beheny (Eds.), Salience and SLA (pp.244–268). Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Plonsky, L.
    (2024) Study quality as an intellectual and ethical imperative: A proposed framework. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1–15. 10.1017/S0267190524000059
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190524000059 [Google Scholar]
  32. (2023) Sampling and generalizability in Lx research: A second-order synthesis. Languages, 8(1), 75. 10.3390/languages8010075
    https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010075 [Google Scholar]
  33. Poole, F. J., & Polio, C.
    (2023) From sci-fi to the classroom: Implications of AI in task-based writing. TASK, 3(2), 243–272. 10.1075/task.00022.poo
    https://doi.org/10.1075/task.00022.poo [Google Scholar]
  34. Samuda, V., & Bygate, M.
    (2008) Tasks in second language learning. Palgrave Macmillan. 10.1057/9780230596429
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596429 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sato, M.
    (2023) Navigating the research–practice relationship: Professional goals and constraints. Language Teaching, 1–16. 10.1017/S0261444823000423
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000423 [Google Scholar]
  36. Sato, M., Chong, S. W., Aktar, T., Cowell, J., Kong, M. S., & Shaahdadi, M.
    (2024) Creating and sustaining a platform for researchers and teachers to communicate: an example of TESOLgraphics. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1–11. 10.1080/17501229.2024.2404613
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2404613 [Google Scholar]
  37. Sato, M., Thorne, S. L., Michel, M., Alexopoulou, T., & Hellermann, H.
    (2025) Language, people, classrooms, world: Blending disparate theories for united language education practices. The Modern Language Journal, 109(S1), 15–38. 10.1111/modl.12976
    https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12976 [Google Scholar]
  38. Strobl, C., Menke-Bazhutkina, I., Abel, N., & Michel, M. C.
    (2024) Adopting ChatGPT as a writing buddy in the advanced L2 writing class. Technology in Language Teaching & Learning, 6(1), 1–19. 10.29140/tltl.v6n1.1168
    https://doi.org/10.29140/tltl.v6n1.1168 [Google Scholar]
  39. Van den Branden, K.
    (2016) The role of teachers in task-based language education. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 164–181. 10.1017/S0267190515000070
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000070 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2022) How to teach an additional language: To task or not to task?. John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.15
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.15 [Google Scholar]
  41. Van Gorp, K.
    (2021) Blue-sky thinking about TBLT: An interview with Martin Bygate. TASK, 1(1), 127 — 137. 10.1075/task.00006.gor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/task.00006.gor [Google Scholar]
  42. Van Gorp, K., Branden, K. V. D., Newton, J., & Coss, M. D.
    (2024) Talking it through with teachers: Jonathan Newton’s reflections on coursebooks, challenges, and opportunities for TBLT. TASK, 4(2), 152–162. 10.1075/task.00031.gor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/task.00031.gor [Google Scholar]
  43. Verspoor, M. H., Lowie, W., & Bot, K.
    (2011) A dynamic approach to second language development. John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.29
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.29 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/task.00038.gor
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/task.00038.gor
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error