Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2666-1748
  • E-ISSN: 2666-1756
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



This commentary synthesizes the five articles in Kuiken and Vedder’s special issue on functional adequacy in linguistic performance. The commentary considers the different scales that were used to measure functional adequacy, as well as the relationship between functional adequacy and other measures of linguistic performance such as complexity, accuracy, and fluency. The commentary also considers how functional adequacy might be usefully incorporated more frequently into studies from a task-based language teaching or instructed second language acquisition perspective, both as pedagogical instruction and as a means of measuring linguistic development.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Council of Europe
    Council of Europe (2001) Commonm European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Council of Europe.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I.
    (2017) Functional adequacy in L2 writing. Towards a new rating scale. Language Testing, 34(3), 321–336. 10.1177/0265532216663991
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216663991 [Google Scholar]
  3. (2018) Assessing functional adequacy of L2 performance in a task-based approach. InN. Taguchi & Y-J. Kim (Eds.), Task-based approaches to assessing pragmatics (pp. 265–286). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.10.11kui
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.10.11kui [Google Scholar]
  4. Kuiken, F., Vedder, I., & Gilabert, R.
    (2010) Communicative adequacy and linguistic complexity in L2 writing. InI. Bartning, M. Martin & I. Vedder (Eds.) Communicative proficiency and linguistic development: Intersections between SLA and language testing research (pp. 81–100). Eurosla Monographs Series 1. Roma: Eurosla.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Loewen, S.
    (2020) Introduction to instructed second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315616797
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315616797 [Google Scholar]
  6. Loewen, S. & Sato, M.
    (2021) Exploring the relationship between TBLT and ISLA. TASK: Journal on Task-based Language Learning and Teaching. Early View. 10.1075/task.00003.loe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/task.00003.loe [Google Scholar]
  7. Loewen, S., & Wolff, D.
    (2016) Peer interaction in F2F and CMC contexts. InM. Sato & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 163–184). John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.45.07loe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.07loe [Google Scholar]
  8. Marsden, E., Morgan-Short, K., Thompson, S., & Abugaber, D.
    (2018) Replication in second language research: Narrative and systematic reviews and recommendations for the field: replication in second language research. Language Learning, 68(2), 321–391. 10.1111/lang.12286
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12286 [Google Scholar]
  9. Michel, M.
    (2017) Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in L2 production. InS. Loewen & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 50–68). Routledge. 10.4324/9781315676968‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315676968-4 [Google Scholar]
  10. Révész, A., Ekiert, M., & Torgersen, E.
    (2016) The effects of complexity, accuracy and fluency on communicative adequacy in oral task performance. Applied Linguistics, 37(6), 828–848. 10.1093/applin/amu069
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu069 [Google Scholar]
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error