Task complexity and task type

References

1. Azkarai, A.
   (2015) Males and females in EFL task-based interaction: Does gender have an impact on LREs?VIAL, 121, 9–35.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. P.
   (2014) Task-modality and L1 use in EFL oral interaction. Language Teaching Research, 19(5), 550–571. 10.1177/1362168814541717
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814541717 [Google Scholar]
3. Azkarai, A., & García Mayo, M. P.
   (2016) Task repetition effects on L1 use in EFL child task-based interaction. Language Teaching Research, 21(4), 480–495. 10.1177/1362168816654169
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816654169 [Google Scholar]
4. Canagarajah, S.
   (2011) Codemeshing in academic writing: Identifying teachable strategies of translanguaging. The Modern Language Journal, 95(3), 401–417. www.jstor.org/stable/41262375. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2011.01207.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01207.x [Google Scholar]
5. Carless, D.
   (2008) Students’ use of the mother tongue in the task-based classroom. ELT Journal, 621, 331–38. 10.1093/elt/ccm090
   https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm090 [Google Scholar]
6. Choe, S. K.
   (2000) The effect of modelling a jigsaw task on communicative strategies of ESL learners (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Iowa State University.
   [Google Scholar]
7. de la Colina, A. A., & García Mayo, M. P.
   (2009) Oral interaction in task based EFL learning: the use of the L1 as a cognitive tool. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(3), 325–345. 10.1515/iral.2009.014
   https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.014 [Google Scholar]
8. Cook, V.
   (2001) Using the first language in the classroom. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 402–423. 10.3138/cmlr.57.3.402
   https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.3.402 [Google Scholar]
9. de la Fuente, M. J., & Goldenberg, C.
   (2020) Understanding the role of the first language (L1) in instructed second language acquisition (ISLA): Effects of using a principled approach to L1 in the beginner foreign language classroom. Language Teaching Research. 10.1177%2F1362168820921882
   https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168820921882 [Google Scholar]
10. DiCamilla, F. J., & Antón, M.
    (2012) Functions of L1 in the collaborative interaction of beginning and advanced second language learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(2). 160–188. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2011.00302.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2011.00302.x [Google Scholar]
11. Ellis, R.
    (2003) Task-based language learning and teaching. Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Foster, P. M., Tonkyn, A., & Wigglesworth, G.
    (2000) Measuring spoken discourse: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics, 211, 333–353. 10.1093/applin/21.3.354
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.3.354 [Google Scholar]
13. García Mayo, M. P., & Hidalgo, M.d.l.Á.
    (2017) L1 use among young EFL mainstream and CLIL learners in task-supported interaction. System, 671, 132–145. 10.1016/j.system.2017.05.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.05.004 [Google Scholar]
14. García Mayo, M. P., & Lázaro Ibarrola, A.
    (2015) Do children negotiate for meaning in task-based interaction? Evidence from CLIL and EFL settings. System, 541, 40–54. 10.1016/j.system.2014.12.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.12.001 [Google Scholar]
15. Gass, S., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L.
    (2005) Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55(4), 575–611. 10.1111/j.0023‑8333.2005.00318.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00318.x [Google Scholar]
16. Gilabert, R.
    (2007) The simultaneous manipulation of task complexity along the planning time and +/- here-and-now dimensions: Effects on L2 oral production. InM. P. García-Mayo (Ed.), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 44–68). Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Hall, G., & Cook, G.
    (2012) Own-language use in language teaching and learning. Language teaching, 45(3), 271–308. 10.1017/S0261444812000067
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000067 [Google Scholar]
18. Hunt, K.
    (1966) Recent measures in syntactic development. Elementary English, 431, 732–739.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jacobs, G., & Small, J.
    (2003) Combining dictogloss and cooperative learning to promote language learning. The Reading Matrix, 3(1), 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Jordens, K.
    (2016) “Turkish is not for learning, Miss”. Valorizing linguistic diversity in primary education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). KU Leuven.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kamwangamalu, N.
    (2010) Multilingualism and code-switching in education. InN. Hornberger & S. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 116–142). Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781847692849‑007
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847692849-007 [Google Scholar]
22. Kobayashi, E., & Kobayashi, M.
    (2004) Rethinking L2 negotiation: An EFL classroom perspective. The Economic Journal of Takasaki City University of Economics, 47(2), 99–105.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Krashen, S.
    (1992) Fundamentals of language education. Laredo Publishing Co.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Lázaro, A., & Azpilicueta, R.
    (2015) Investigating negotiation of meaning in EFL children with very low levels of proficiency. International Journal of English Studies, 15(1), 1–21. 10.6018/ijes/2015/1/203751
    https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2015/1/203751 [Google Scholar]
25. Newton, J., & Nguyen, B. T. T.
    (2019) Task repetition and the public performance of speaking tasks in EFL classes at a Vietnamese high school. Language Teaching for Young Learners, 1(1), 34–56. 10.1075/ltyl.00004.new
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.00004.new [Google Scholar]
26. Pinter, A.
    (2007) Some benefits of peer–peer interaction: 10-year-old children practising with a communication task. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 189–207. 10.1177/1362168807074604
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807074604 [Google Scholar]
27. Qi, D. S.
    (1998) An inquiry into language-switching in second language composing processes. The Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue Canadienne des Langues Vivantes, 541, 413–435. 10.3138/cmlr.54.3.413
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.54.3.413 [Google Scholar]
28. Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S.
    (2001) Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667305
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667305 [Google Scholar]
29. Robinson, P.
    (2001a) Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 287–318). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139524780.012
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.012 [Google Scholar]
30. Robinson, P.
    (2001b) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework, Applied Linguistics, 221, 27–57. 10.1093/applin/22.1.27
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27 [Google Scholar]
31. Robinson, P.
    (2003b) The Cognition Hypothesis of adult, task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 211, 45–107.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Robinson, P.
    (2005) Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: A review of studies in a Componential Framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43(1), 1–33. 10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2005.43.1.1 [Google Scholar]
33. Robinson, P.
    (2011a) Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.2
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2 [Google Scholar]
34. Robinson, P.
    (2011b) Second language task complexity, the Cognition Hypothesis, language learning, and performance. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp. 3–38). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.2.05ch1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2.05ch1 [Google Scholar]
35. Scott, V. M., & de la Fuente, M. J.
    (2008) What’s the problem? L2 learners’ use of the L1 during consciousness-raising form-focused tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 100–113. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2008.00689.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00689.x [Google Scholar]
36. Seals, C. A., Newton, J., Ash, M., & Nguyen, T. B. T.
    (2020) Translanguaging and TBLT: Cross-overs and challenges. InZ. Tian, L. Aghai, P. Sayer, & J. Schissel (Eds.), Envisioning TESOL through a translanguaging Lens – Global perspectives. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑47031‑9_13
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47031-9_13 [Google Scholar]
37. Shintani, N.
    (2012) Repeating Input-based Tasks with Young Beginner Learners. RELC Journal, 43(1), 39–51. 10.1177/0033688212439322
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212439322 [Google Scholar]
38. Storch, N., & Aldosari, A.
    (2010) Learners’ use of first language (Arabic) in pair work in an EFL class. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 355–375. 10.1177/1362168810375362
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810375362 [Google Scholar]
39. Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, J.
    (2003) Is there a role for the use of the L1 in an L2 setting?TESOL Quarterly, 41, 760–770. 10.2307/3588224
    https://doi.org/10.2307/3588224 [Google Scholar]
40. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
    (2000) Task-based second language learning: The uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 41, 251–74. 10.1177/136216880000400304
    https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400304 [Google Scholar]
41. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S.
    (2001) Focus on form through collaborative dialogue: Exploring task effects. InM. Bygate, P. Skehan, & M. Swain (Eds.), Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and assessment (pp. 99–118). Pearson Education.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Tognini, R., & Oliver, R.
    (2012) L1 use in primary and secondary foreign language classrooms and its contribution to learning. InE. Alcón Soler & M. P. Safont Jordá (Eds.), Discourse and learning across L2 instructional contexts (pp. 53–78). Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789401208598_005
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401208598_005 [Google Scholar]