1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. TASK
  4. Volume 5, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN 2666-1748
  • E-ISSN: 2666-1756
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Two conceptual models of Task Complexity, Cognition Hypothesis (Robinson, 2001, 2007) and Limited Attentional Capacity (Skehan, 1998, 2003, 2018) have been proposed and widely debated in the task-based language teaching (TBLT) literature. However, little empirical evidence exists to suggest either of the models is based on teacher input or being used by teachers for classroom use. Drawing on pre-service teacher analysis of task difficulty, the study aimed to develop an in-depth understanding of task features they consider when evaluating task difficulty. Participants, 127 pre-service teachers at the end of their one-year MA TESOL program in Ontario, Canada, evaluated two sets of sample tasks, ranking them according to their degree of difficulty and identifying the features that contributed to this difficulty. 727 pieces of raw data, extracted from the task difficulty analysis, were categorized. Five main categories of task difficulty were identified, namely (1) linguistic demand, (2) cognitive operational demand, (3) design features, (4) informational demand, and (5) communicative demand. Learner related factors, external to task design, were also suggested as issues related to difficulty. We propose a set of task difficulty features that can be used in replication and validation studies to help with the development of a teacher evidence-based model of task difficulty.

© 2025 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/task.23013.tav
2025-08-08
2026-05-15

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/task.23013.tav
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baralt, M., Gilabert, R., & Robinson, P.
    (2014a) Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781472593665
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472593665 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baralt, M., Harmath-de Lemmos, S., & Werfelli, S.
    (2014b) Teachers’ application of Cognition Hypothesis when lesson planning: A case study. InM. Baralt, R. Gilabert & P. Robinson (Eds.) Task sequencing and instructed second language learning. Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781472593665
     https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472593665 [Google Scholar]
  3. Borg, S.
    (2006) Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London, England: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Candlin, C. N.
    (1987) Towards task-based language learning. InC. N. Candlin & D. F. Murphy (Eds.), Language learning tasks (pp.5–22). Prentice-Hall.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Chan, H. Y.
    (2012) Values and the advance care planning framework in New Zealand. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 2(2), 203–203. 10.1136/bmjspcare‑2012‑000250.120
     https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2012-000250.120 [Google Scholar]
  6. Dalton-Puffer, C.
    (2011) Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles?Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 311, 182–204. 10.1017/S0267190511000092
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092 [Google Scholar]
  7. East, M.
    (2021) Foundational principles of task-based language teaching. Routledge. 10.4324/9781003039709
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003039709 [Google Scholar]
  8. Ellis, R.
    (2003) Task-based language teaching and learning. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108643689
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108643689 [Google Scholar]
  9. (2019) Towards a modular language curriculum for using tasks. Language Teaching Research, 23(4), 454–475. 10.1177/1362168818765315
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818765315 [Google Scholar]
  10. Ellis, R., Skehan, P., Li, S., Shintani, N., & Lambert, C.
    (2019) Task-based language teaching: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108643689
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108643689 [Google Scholar]
  11. Erlam, R.
    (2016) “I’m still not sure what a task is”: Teachers designing language tasks. Language Teaching Research. 20(3), 279–299. 10.1177/1362168814566087
     https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168814566087 [Google Scholar]
  12. Erlam, R., & Tolosa, C.
    (2022) Pedagogical realities of implementing task-based language teaching. John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.14
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.14 [Google Scholar]
  13. Faez, F., & Tavakoli, P.
    (2019) Task-based language teaching. TESOL Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Foster, P., & Skehan, P.
    (1996) The influence of planning and task ype on Second Language Performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299–323. 10.1017/S0272263100015047
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015047 [Google Scholar]
  15. Gilabert, R.
    (2007) Effects of manipulating task complexity on self-repairs during L2 oral production. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, IRAL, 45(3), 215–240. 10.1515/iral.2007.010
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2007.010 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gilabert, R., & Castellví, J.
    (2019) Task and syllabus design for morphologically complex languages. InJ. Schwieter & A. Benati (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of language learning (pp.527–549). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108333603.023
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108333603.023 [Google Scholar]
  17. Gilabert, R., & Malicka, A.
    (2021) From needs analysis to task selection, design, and sequencing. InM. J. Ahmadian & M. H. Long (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of task-based language teaching (pp.226–249). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108868327.014
     https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108868327.014 [Google Scholar]
  18. Lambert, C., & Oliver, R.
    (2020) Using tasks in language teaching: Practice in diverse contexts. Multilingual Matters.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Levelt, W.
    (1989) Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  20. Little, D.
    (2006) The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Content, purpose, origin, reception and impact. Language Teaching, 39(3), 167–190. 10.1017/S0261444806003557
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003557 [Google Scholar]
  21. Maijala, M., Heikkola, L. M., Kuusalu, S.-R., Laine, P., Mutta, M., & Mäntylä, K.
    (2023) Pre-service language teachers’ perceptions of sustainability and its implementation in language teaching. Language Teaching Research. 10.1177/13621688231170682
     https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688231170682 [Google Scholar]
  22. Michel, M. C.
    (2011) Effects of task complexity and interaction on L2 performance. InP. Robinson (Ed.), Second language task complexity: Researching the Cognition Hypothesis of language learning and performance (pp.141–173). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.2.12ch6
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2.12ch6 [Google Scholar]
  23. Prabhu, N. S.
    (1987) Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Révész, A.
    (2009) Task complexity, focus on form, and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(3), 437–470. 10.1017/S0272263109090366
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109090366 [Google Scholar]
  25. Révész, A., & Gurzynski-Weiss, L.
    (2016) Teachers’ perspectives on second language task difficulty: Insights from think-alouds and eye tracking. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 361, 182–204. 10.1017/S0267190515000124
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000124 [Google Scholar]
  26. Robinson, P.
    (2001) Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57. 10.1093/applin/22.1.27
     https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27 [Google Scholar]
  27. (2007) Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, IRAL, 45(3), 193–213. 10.1515/iral.2007.009
     https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2007.009 [Google Scholar]
  28. (2010) Situating and distributing cognition across task demands: The SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. InM. Pütz & L. Sicola (Eds.), Cognitive processing in second language acquisition: Inside the learner’s mind (pp.243–268). John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.13.17rob
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.13.17rob [Google Scholar]
  29. (2011) Second language task complexity : Researching the cognition hypothesis of language learning and performance. John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.2
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.2 [Google Scholar]
  30. (2015) The Cognition Hypothesis, second language task demands, and the SSARC model of pedagogic task sequencing. InM. Bygate (Ed.), Domains and directions in the development of TBLT: A decade of plenaries from the international conference (pp.87–121). John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.8.04rob
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.8.04rob [Google Scholar]
  31. Scarino, A.
    (2014) Learning as reciprocal, interpretive meaning-making: A view from collaborative research into the professional learning of teachers of languages. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 386–401. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2014.12068.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12068.x [Google Scholar]
  32. Shintani, N.
    (2016) Input-based tasks in foreign language instruction for young learners. John Benjamins. 10.1075/tblt.9
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tblt.9 [Google Scholar]
  33. Skehan, P.
    (1998) A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. (2003) Task-based instruction. Language Teaching, 36(1), 1–14. 10.1017/S026144480200188X
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480200188X [Google Scholar]
  35. (2018) Second language task-based performance: Theory, research, assessment. Routledge. 10.4324/9781315629766
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315629766 [Google Scholar]
  36. Tavakoli, P.
    (2009a) Assessing L2 task performance: Understanding effects of task design. System, 37(3), 482–495. 10.1016/j.system.2009.02.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.02.013 [Google Scholar]
  37. (2009b) Investigating task difficulty: Learners’ and teachers’ perceptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(1), 1–25. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2009.00216.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00216.x [Google Scholar]
  38. Tavakoli, P., & Jones, R.
    (2018) An overview of approaches to second language acquisition and instructional practices. Report. Welsh Government (Research & Statistics), Cardiff.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Van den Branden, K.
    (2006) Training teachers: Task-based as well?InK. Van den Branden (Ed.), Task-based language education: From theory to practice (pp.217–248). Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511667282.011
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667282.011 [Google Scholar]
  40. (2009) Mediating between predetermined order and chaos: The role of the teacher in task-based language education. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 264–285. 10.1111/j.1473‑4192.2009.00241.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00241.x [Google Scholar]
  41. Van den Branden, K., & Van Gorp, K.
    (2021) Implementing task-based language education in primary education: Lessons learnt from the Flemish experience. Language Teaching for Young learners3(1), 3–27. 10.1075/ltyl.20013.bra
     https://doi.org/10.1075/ltyl.20013.bra [Google Scholar]
  42. Willis, D., & Willis, J.
    (2007) Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/task.23013.tav
Loading
What makes a task difficult?
task 5, 88 (2025); https://doi.org/10.1075/task.23013.tav
/content/journals/10.1075/task.23013.tav
/content/journals/10.1075/task.23013.tav
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): pre-service teacher; task difficulty; task features; task-based language teaching

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error