Order effects in the translation process

References

1. Alves, Fabio
   2005 “Ritmo cognitivo, meta-função e experiencia: parámetros de análise processual no desempenho de tradutores novatos e experientes.” InCompetência em tradução: cognição e discurso. Edited by F. Alves , C. Magalhães , and A. Pagano , 109–169. Belo Horizonte: Editorial UFMG.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alves, Fabio , and Daniel Vale
   2009 “Probing the Unit of Translation in Time: Aspects of the Design and Development of a Web Application for Storing, Annotating, and Querying Translation Process Data.” Across Languages and Cultures10 (2): 251–273. doi:10.1556/Acr.10.2009.2.5.
   https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.10.2009.2.5 [Google Scholar]
3. Anderson, Norman H. , and Stephen Hubert
   1963 “Effects of Concomitant Verbal Recall on Order Effects in Personality Impression Formation.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior2 (5–6): 379–391. doi:10.1016/S0022‑5371(63)80039‑0
   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(63)80039-0 [Google Scholar]
4. Angelone, Erik
   2012 “The Place of Screen Recording in Process-oriented Translator Training.” Rivista Internazionale di Tecnica della Traduzione (RITT)14: 41–55.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Angelone, Erik
   2013 “Watching and Learning from ‘Virtual Professionals’: Utilizing Screen Recording in Process-oriented Translator Training.” InNew Prospects and Perspectives for Educating Language Mediators. Edited by D. Kiraly , S. Hansen-Schirra , and K. Maksymski , 139–155. Tübingen: Günther Narr.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bansback, Nick , Linda C. Li , Larry Lynd , and Stirling Bryan
   2014 “Exploiting Order Effects to Improve the Quality of Decisions.” Patient Education and Counseling96 (2): 197–203. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.021.
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.05.021 [Google Scholar]
7. Bates, Douglas , Martin Maechler , Ben Bolker , and Steve Walker
   2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-effects Models Using lme4.” Journal of Statistical Software67 (1): 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
   https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
8. Bausenhart, Karin M. , Oliver Dyjas , and Rolf Ulrich
   2015 “Effects of Stimulus Order on Discrimination Sensitivity for Short and Long Durations.” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics77 (4): 1033–1043. doi:10.3758/s13414‑015‑0875‑8.
   https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0875-8 [Google Scholar]
9. Brown, Stephen J. and Jerold B. Warner
   1985 “Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies.” Journal of Financial Economics14 (1): 3–31. doi:10.1016/0304‑405X(85)90042‑X
   https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(85)90042-X [Google Scholar]
10. Christensen, Tina Paulsen , and Anne Schjoldager
    2015 “Computer-aided Translation Tools: The Uptake and Use by Danish Translation Service Providers.” The Journal of Specialised Translation25: 89–105.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Cohen, Jacob
    1988 Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Denkowski, Michael , and Alan Lavie
    2012 “TransCenter: Web-based Translation Research Suite.” AMTA 2012 Workshop on Post-Editing Technology and Practice Demo Session.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Dragsted, Barbara
    2004 Segmentation in Translation and Translation Memory Systems: An Empirical Investigation of Cognitive Segmentation and Effects of Integrating a TM-System into the Translation Process. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Dragsted, Barbara
    2005 “Segmentation in Translation: Differences Across Levels of Expertise and Difficulty.” Target17 (1): 49–70. doi:10.1075/target.17.1.04dra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.17.1.04dra [Google Scholar]
15. Dragsted, Barbara
    2008 “Computer-aided Translation as a Distributed Cognitive Task.” InCognition Distributed: How Cognitive Technology Extends our Minds. Edited by I. E. Dror and S. Harnad , 237–256. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/bct.16.16dra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.16.16dra [Google Scholar]
16. Dragsted, Barbara , and Inge Gorm Hansen
    2008 “Comprehension and Production in Translation: A Pilot Study on Segmentation and the Coordination of Reading and Writing Processes.” InLooking at Eyes: Eye-Tracking Studies of Reading and Translation Processing. Edited by S. Göpferich , A. L. Jakobsen , and I. Mees , 9–30. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Dunne, Keiran J.
    2012 “The Industrialization of Translation: Causes, Consequences, and Challenges.” Translation Spaces1: 143–168. doi:10.1075/ts.1.07dun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.1.07dun [Google Scholar]
18. Dunne, Keiran J.
    2014 “Localization and the (R)Evolution of Translation.” InA Companion to Translation Studies. Edited by S. Bermann and C. Porter , 147–162. Oxford, UK: Wiley Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9781118613504.ch11
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118613504.ch11 [Google Scholar]
19. Eckes, Thomas
    2008 “Rater Types in Writing Performance Assessments: A Classification Approach to Rater Variability.” Language Testing25 (2): 155–185. doi:10.1177/0265532207086780
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532207086780 [Google Scholar]
20. Ehrensberger-Dow, Maureen
    2017 “An Ergonomic Perspective of Translation.” InThe Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Edited by J. W. Schwieter and A. Ferreira , 332–349. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781119241485.ch18
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241485.ch18 [Google Scholar]
21. Enríquez Raído, Vanessa
    2014 Translation and Web Searching. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gile, Daniel
    2016 “Experimental Research.” InResearching Translation and Interpreting. Edited by C. V. Angelelli and B. J. Baer , 220–228. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Guerberof Arenas, Ana
    2009 “Productivity and Quality in the Post-editing of Outputs from Translation Memories and Machine Translation.” Localisation Focus7 (1): 11–21.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hvelplund, Kristian
    2017 “Eye Tracking in Translation Process Research.” InThe Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Edited by J. W. Schwieter and A. Ferreira , 248–264. Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. doi: 10.1002/9781119241485.ch14
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241485.ch14 [Google Scholar]
25. Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke
    1999 “Logging Target Text Production with Translong.” InProbing the Process in Translation: Methods and Results. Edited by G. e Hansen , 9–20. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke
    2002 “Translation Drafting by Professional Translators and by Translation Students.” InEmpirical Translation Studies: Process and Product. Edited by Gyde Hansen , 191–204. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke
    2011 “Tracking Translators’ Keystrokes and Eye Movements with Translog.” InMethods and Strategies of Process Research: Integrative Approaches to Translation Studies. Edited by C. Alvstad , A. Hild , and E. Tiselius , 37–55. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/btl.94.06jak
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.94.06jak [Google Scholar]
28. Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke , and Kristian T. H. Jensen
    2008 “Eye Movement Behavior Across Four Different Types of Reading Task.” Copenhagen Studies in Language36: 103–124.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Jensen, Kristian T. H.
    2011 “Distribution of Attention Between Source Text and Target Text during Translation.” InCognitive Explorations of Translation. Edited by S. O’Brien , 215–237. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Killman, Jeffrey
    2015 “Context as Achilles’ Heel of Translation Technologies: Major Implications for End-users.” Translation and Interpreting Studies10 (2): 203–222. doi:10.1075/tis.10.2.03kil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.10.2.03kil [Google Scholar]
31. Krings, Hans P.
    2001 Repairing Texts: Empirical Investigations of Machine Translation Post-editing Processes. Edited by G. S. Koby . Kent, OH: Kent State University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Kumpulainen, Minna
    2015 “On the Operationalization of ‘Pauses’ in Translation Process Research.” Translation & Interpreting7 (1): 47–58.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Lacruz, Isabel , Gregory M. Shreve , and Erik Angelone
    2012 “Average Pause Ratio as an Indicator of Cognitive Effort in Post-editing: A Case Study.” Proceedings of the AMTA 2012 Workshop on Post-editing Technology and Practice. San Diego, CA.
    [Google Scholar]
34. LeBlanc, Matthieu
    2013 “Translators on Translation Memory (TM): Results of an Ethnographic Study in Three Translation Services and Agencies.” Translation & Interpreting5 (2): 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Lindgaard, Gitte , Gary Fernandes , Cathy Dudek , and Judith M. Brown
    2006 “Attention Web Designers: You Have 50 Milliseconds to Make a Good First Impression!” Behaviour & Information Technology25 (2): 115–126. doi:10.1080/01449290500330448
    https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290500330448 [Google Scholar]
36. Mellinger, Christopher D.
    2014 Computer-Assisted Translation: An Empirical Investigation of Cognitive Effort. Ph.D. dissertation, Kent State University, OH. Available atbit.ly/1ybBY7W
    [Google Scholar]
37. Mellinger, Christopher D.
    2015 “On the Applicability of Internet-Mediated Research Methods to Investigate Translators’ Cognitive Behavior.” Translation & Interpreting7 (1): 59–71.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Mellinger, Christopher D. , and Gregory M. Shreve
    2016 “Match Evaluation and Over-editing in a Translation Memory Environment.” InReembedding Translation Process Research. Edited by R. Muñoz , 131–148. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.128.07mel
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.128.07mel [Google Scholar]
39. Mellinger, Christopher D. , and Thomas A. Hanson
    2017 Quantitative Research Methods in Translation and Interpreting Studies. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Michels, Walter C. , and Harry Helson
    1954 “A Quantitative Theory of Time-order Effects.” The American Journal of Psychology67 (2): 327–334. doi:10.2307/1418635
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1418635 [Google Scholar]
41. O’Brien, Sharon
    2006 “Pauses as Indicators of Cognitive Effort in Post-editing Machine Translation Output.” Across Language and Cultures7 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1556/Acr.7.2006.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.7.2006.1.1 [Google Scholar]
42. O’Brien, Sharon
    2007 “Eye-tracking and Translation Memory Matches.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology14 (3): 185–205.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Pym, Anthony
    2011 “What Technology Does to Translating.” Translation & Interpreting3 (1): 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
44. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2016 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Ruokonen, Minna , and Kaisa Koskinen
    2017 “Dancing with Technology: Translators’ Narratives on the Dance of Human and Machinic Agency in Translation Work.” The Translator1–14. doi:10.1080/13556509.2017.1301846
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2017.1301846 [Google Scholar]
46. Saldanha, Gabriela , and Sharon O’Brien
    2013 Research Methodologies in Translation Studies. New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Schilperoord, Joost
    1996 It’s about Time: Temporal Aspects of Cognitive Processes in Text Production. Utrecht: USI &C.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Shreve, Gregory M. , Christina Schäffner , Joseph H. Danks , and Jennifer Griffin
    1993 “Is There a Special Kind of ‘Reading’ for Translation? An Empirical Investigation of Reading in the Translation Process.” Target5 (1): 21–41. doi:10.1075/target.5.1.03shr
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.5.1.03shr [Google Scholar]
49. Weigle, Sara Cushing
    1994 “Effects of Training on Raters of ESL Compositions.” Language Testing11 (2): 171–195. doi:10.1177/026553229401100206
    https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229401100206 [Google Scholar]
50. Whyatt, Bogusława , Katarzyna Stachowiak , and Marta Kajzer-Wietrzny
    2016 “Similar and Different: Cognitive Rhythm and Effort in Translation and Paraphasing.” Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics52 (2): 175–208. doi:10.1515/psicl‑2016‑0007
    https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2016-0007 [Google Scholar]