Processing of grammatical metaphor

References

1. Alves, Fabio , Adriana Pagano , and Igor da Silva
   2014 “Effortful Text Production in Translation: A Study of Grammatical (De)Metaphorization Drawing On Product and Process Data.” Translation and Interpreting Studies9 (1): 25–51. doi: 10.1075/tis.9.1.02alv
   https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.9.1.02alv [Google Scholar]
2. Alves, Fabio , Adriana Pagano , Stella Neumann , Erich Steiner , and Silvia Hansen-Schirra
   2010 “Translation Units and Grammatical Shifts: Towards an Integration of Product- and Process-Based Translation Research.” InTranslation and Cognition. Edited by G. Shreve and E. Angelone , 109–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ata.xv.07alv
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.07alv [Google Scholar]
3. Bangalore, Srinivas , Bergljot Behrens , Michael Carl , Maheshwar Ghankot , Arndt Heilmann , Jean Nitzke , Moritz Schaeffer , and Annegret Sturm
   2016 “Syntactic Variance and Priming Effects in Translation.” InNew Directions in Empirical Translation Process Research: Exploring the CRITT TPR-DB. Edited by M. Carl , S. Bangalore , and M. Schaeffer , 211–238. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑20358‑4_10
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20358-4_10 [Google Scholar]
4. Bates, Douglas , Martin Maechler , Ben Bolker , and Steven Walker
   2015 “Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using {lme4}.” Journal of Statistical Software67 (1): 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 [Google Scholar]
5. Bernolet, Sarah , Robert J. Hartsuiker , and Martin J. Pickering
   2013 “From Language-Specific to Shared Syntactic Representations: The Influence of Second Language Proficiency on Syntactic Sharing in Bilinguals.” Cognition127 (3): 287–306. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.005 [Google Scholar]
6. Boada Navarro, Roger , Rosa Ma. Sánchez Casas , José M. Gavilán Ibáñez , José E. García Albea , and Natasha Tokowicz
   2013 “Effect of Multiple Translations and Cognate Status on Translation Recognition Performance of Balanced Bilinguals.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition16 (1): 183–197. doi: 10.1017/S1366728912000223
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000223 [Google Scholar]
7. Campbell, Stuart
   2000 “Critical Structures in the Evaluation of Translations from Arabic into English as a Second Language.” The Translator6 (2): 211–229. doi: 10.1080/13556509.2000.10799066
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2000.10799066 [Google Scholar]
8. Carl, Michael
   2012 “Translog-II: A Program for Recording User Activity Data for Empirical Reading and Writing Research.” Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 4108–4112.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Carl, Michael , Barbara Dragsted , and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen
   2011 “A Taxonomy of Human Translation Styles.” Translation Journal16 (2). Available attranslationjournal.net/journal/56taxonomy.htm.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Couto Vale, Daniel
    2017 “What Does a Translator Do when Not Writing?” InEmpirical Modelling of Translation and Interpreting. Edited by S. Hansen-Schirra , O. Czulo , and S. Hofman , 177–208. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Dragsted, Barbara
    2005 “Segmentation in Translation: Differences across Levels of Expertise and Difficulty.” Target17 (1): 49–70. doi: 10.1075/target.17.1.04dra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.17.1.04dra [Google Scholar]
12. Dragsted, Barbara
    2010 “Coordination of Reading and Writing Processes in Translation: An Eye on Uncharted Territory.” InTranslation and Cognition. Edited by G. Shreve and E. Angelone , 41–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/ata.xv.04dra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.xv.04dra [Google Scholar]
13. Dragsted, Barbara
    2012 “Indicators of Difficulty in Translation: Correlating Product and Process.” Across Languages and Cultures13 (1): 81–98. doi: 10.1556/Acr.13.2012.1.5
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.13.2012.1.5 [Google Scholar]
14. Dragsted, Barbara , and Inge Gorm Hansen
    2008 “Comprehension and Production in Translation: A Pilot Study on Segmentation and the Coordination of Reading and Writing Processes.” InLooking at Eyes: Eye-Tracking Studies of Reading and Translation Processing. Edited by S. Göpferich , A. L. Jakobsen , and I. M. Mees , 9–29. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Gibbs, Raymond W.
    1994 The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Göpferich, Susanne
    2008 Translationsprozessforschung: Stand—Methoden—Perspektiven. Tübingen: Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Halliday, Michael. A. K.
    1985 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Halliday, Michael. A. K. , and James R. Martin
    eds. 1993 Writing Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Halliday, Michael A. K. , and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    1999 Construing Experience Through Meaning: A Language-Based Approach to Cognition. London: Continuum.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Halliday, Michael A. K. , and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen
    2013 An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203431269
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269 [Google Scholar]
21. Hansen, Silvia
    2003 The Nature of Translated Text: An Interdisciplinary Methodology for the Investigation of the Specific Properties of Translations. PhD dissertation, Universität des Saarlandes.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Hansen-Schirra, Silvia , Stella Neumann , and Erich Steiner
    eds. 2012 Cross-Linguistic Corpora for the Study of Translations: Insights from the Language Pair English-German. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110260328
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110260328 [Google Scholar]
23. Hansen-Schirra, Silvia , and Erich Steiner
    2012 “Towards a Typology of Translation Properties.” InCross-Linguistic Corpora for the Study of Translations: Insights from the Language Pair English-German. Edited by S. Hansen-Schirra , S. Neumann , and E. Steiner , 255–279. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110260328.255
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110260328.255 [Google Scholar]
24. Hartsuiker, Robert J. , Martin J. Pickering , and Eline Veltkamp
    2004 “Is Syntax Separate or Shared between Languages? Cross-Linguistic Syntactic Priming in Spanish-English Bilinguals.” Psychological Science15 (6): 409–414. doi: 10.1111/j.0956‑7976.2004.00693.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00693.x [Google Scholar]
25. Hill-Madsen, Aage
    2015 “The ‘Unpacking’ of Grammatical Metaphor as an Intralingual Translation Strategy: From De-Metaphorization to Clausal Paraphrase.” InTranslation and Comprehensibility. Edited by K. Maksymski , S. Gutermuth , and S. Hansen-Schirra , 195–226. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hinrichs, Lars , and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
    2007 “Recent Changes in the Function and Frequency of Standard English Genitive Constructions: A Multivariate Analysis of Tagged Corpora.” English Language and Linguistics11 (3): 437–474. doi: 10.1017/S1360674307002341
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674307002341 [Google Scholar]
27. Jakobsen, Arnt Lykke , and Kristian T. H. Jensen
    2008 “Eye Movement Behaviour across Four Different Types of Reading Task.” InLooking at Eyes: Eye-Tracking Studies of Reading and Translation Processing. Edited by S. Göpferich , A. L. Jakobsen , and I. M. Mees , 103–124. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Kuznetsova, Alexandra , Rune Haubo Bojesen Christensen , and Per Bruun Brockhoff
    2016 lmertest: Tests for Random and Fixed Effects for Linear Mixed Effect Models (lmer Objects of lme4 Package). R Package Version 2.0-32. www.cran.rproject.org/package=lmerTest/.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Lakoff, George , and Mark Johnson
    1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Langacker, Ronald W.
    2008 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
31. Loebell, Helga , and Kathryn Bock
    2003 “Structural Priming Across Languages.” Linguistics41 (5): 791–824. doi: 10.1515/ling.2003.026
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2003.026 [Google Scholar]
32. Lörscher, Wolfgang
    1996 “A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Translation Processes.” Meta41 (1): 26–32. doi: 10.7202/003518ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/003518ar [Google Scholar]
33. Lothmann, Timo , and Tatiana Serbina
    2017 “On the Overlap of Grammatical Metaphor and Conceptual Metaphor in Political Discourse: A Reconciliatory Approach”. InChallenging Boundaries in Linguistics: Systemic Functional Perspectives. Edited by S. Neumann , R. Wegener , J. Fest , P. Niemietz , and N. Hützen , 223–238. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Martin, Jim R.
    1993 “Technicality and Abstraction: Language for the Creation of Specialized Texts.” InWriting Science: Literacy and Discursive Power. Edited by M. A. K. Halliday and J. R. Martin , 203–220. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Neumann, Stella , Adriana Pagano , Fabio Alves , Pirita Pyykkönen , and Igor da Silva
    2010 “Targeting (De-) Metaphorization: Process-Based Insights.” Paper presented at the22nd ESFCW, Koper, Slovenija, July 2010.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Pavlović, Nataša , and Kristian T. H. Jensen
    2009 “Eye Tracking Translation Directionality.” InTranslation Research Projects 2. Edited by A. Pym and A. Perekrestenko , 93–109. Tarragona: Intercultural Studies Group.
    [Google Scholar]
37. R Core Team
    R Core Team 2017 R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Avaliable atwww.R-project.org/.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Rautenberg, Rosa
    2011 (De-)Metaphorization in English-German Translation: A Quantitative Analysis of a Keystroke-Logging Experiment. State Examination Thesis, RWTH Aachen University.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Schaeffer, Moritz , Barbara Dragsted , Kristian T. Hvelplund , Laura Winther Balling , and Michael Carl
    2016 “Word Translation Entropy: Evidence of Early Target Language Activation during Reading for Translation.” InNew Directions in Empirical Translation Process Research: Exploring the CRITT TPR-DB. Edited by M. Carl , S. Bangalore , and M. Schaeffer , 183–210. Cham: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑20358‑4_9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20358-4_9 [Google Scholar]
40. Sáenz, Francisco Santibáñez
    2000 “Halliday’s Grammatical Metaphor, Conceptualization and Linguistic Construal.” Epos: Revista de filología16: 497–511.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Steiner, Erich
    2001 “Translations English-German: Investigating the Relative Importance of Systemic Contrasts and the Text-Type “Translation”.” SPRIKreports: Reports of the Project Languages in Contrast7: 1–49.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Sušinskienė, Solveiga
    2008 “Grammatical Metaphors as Ideological Micro-Components of Political Discourse.” Filologija13: 129–138.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Taverniers, Miriam
    2003 “Grammatical Metaphor in SFL: A Historiography of the Introduction and Initial Study of the Concept.” InGrammatical Metaphor: Views from Systemic Functional Linguistics. Edited by A. -M. Simon-Vandenbergen , M. Taverniers , and L. Ravelli , 5–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/cilt.236.02tav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.236.02tav [Google Scholar]
44. Teich, Elke
    2003 Cross-linguistic Variation in System and Text: A Methodology for the Investigation of Translations and Comparable Texts. Berlin: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110896541
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110896541 [Google Scholar]
45. Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja
    2005 “The Monitor Model Revisited: Evidence from Process Research.” Meta50 (2): 405–414. doi: 10.7202/010990ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/010990ar [Google Scholar]
46. Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja , Jukka Mäkisalo , and Sini Immonen
    2008 “The Translation Process: Interplay between Literal Rendering and a Search for Sense.” Across Languages and Cultures9 (1): 1–15. doi: 10.1556/Acr.9.2008.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.9.2008.1.1 [Google Scholar]
47. Tokowicz, Natasha
    2014 “Translation Ambiguity Affects Language Processing, Learning, and Representation.” InSelected Proceedings of the 2012 Second Language Research Forum. Edited by R. Miller , K. Martin , Ch. Eddington , A. Henery , N. Marcos Miguel , A. Tseng , A. Tuninetti , and D. Walter , 170–180. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
    [Google Scholar]