The ‘hookability’ of multimodal impact captions

References

1. Baumgarten, Nicole
   2008 “Yeah, That’s It! Verbal Reference to Visual Information in Film Texts and Film Translations.” Meta: Translators’ Journal53 (1): 6–25.   10.7202/017971ar
   https://doi.org/10.7202/017971ar [Google Scholar]
2. Bogucki, Łukasz
   2004 “The Constraint of Relevance in Subtitling.” The Journal of Specialised Translation1: 71–88.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Caffrey, Colm
   2008 “Using Pupilometric, Fixation-Based and Subjective Meastures to Measure of the Processing Effect Experienced when Viewing Subtitled TV Anime with Pop-Up Gloss”. InLooking at Eyes: Eye-tracking Studies of Reading and Translation Processing. Edited bySusanne Göpferich, Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, and Inger Mees, 125–144. Copenhagen: Samfundslitteratur.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Caffrey, Colm
   2009 “Relevant Abuse? Investigating the Effects of an Abusive Subtitling Procedure on the Perception of TV Anime using Eye Tracker and Questionnaire.” PhD thesis. Dublin City University.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Chung, Marvin and Nicholas Turk-Browne
   2007 “Interactions between Attention and Memory.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology17 (2): 177–184.   10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.005
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2007.03.005 [Google Scholar]
6. Díaz Cintas, Jorge & Remael, Aline
   2021 Subtitling: Concepts and Practices. London, UK: Routledge.   10.4324/9781315674278
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315674278 [Google Scholar]
7. Doherty, Stephen
   2016 “The Impact of Translation Technologies on the Process and Product of Translation”. International Journal of Communication (10): 947–969.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Doherty, Stephen
   2020 “Multisensory Integration in Audiovisual Translation”. InMultilingual Mediated Communication and Cognition. Edited byRicardo Muñoz Martín and Sandra Halverson, 155–170. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429323867‑7
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429323867-7 [Google Scholar]
9. Ekman, Papul, Wallace V. Friesen, and Joseph C. Hager
   2002 The Facial Action Coding System CD-ROM. Salt Lake City: Research Nexus.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Fritz, Jonathan, Mounya Elhilali, Stephen David, and Shihab Shamma
    2007 “Auditory Attention: Focusing the Searchlight on Sound.” Current Opinion in Neurobiology17 (4): 437–455. 10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.011
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2007.07.011 [Google Scholar]
11. Gambier, Yves
    2018 “Translation Studies, Audiovisual Translation and Reception.” InReception Studies and Audiovisual Trannslation. Edited byElena Di Giovanni and Yves Gambier, 43–68. Ansterdam: John Benjamins.   10.1075/btl.141.04gam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.141.04gam [Google Scholar]
12. Gibbs, Raymond & Markus Tendahl
    2006 “Cognitive Effort and Effects in Metaphor Comprehension: Relevance Theory and Psycholinguistics”. Mind & Language21 (3): 379–403.   10.1111/j.1468‑0017.2006.00283.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2006.00283.x [Google Scholar]
13. Karamitroglou, Fotios
    1998 A Proposed Set of Subtitling Standards in Europe. [Online] Available at: www.translationjournal.net/journal/04stndrd.htm
    [Google Scholar]
14. Karamitroglou, Fotios
    2000 Towards a Methodology for the Investigation of Norms in Audiovisual Translation. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 10.1163/9789004485891
    https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004485891 [Google Scholar]
15. Kennedy, Daniel, Brian D’Onofrio, Patrick Quinn, Sven Bölte, Paul Lichtenstein & Terje Falck-Ytter
    2017 “Genetic Influence on Eye Movements to Complex Scenes at Short Timescales”. Current Biology27 (22): 3554–3560.   10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.007
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.10.007 [Google Scholar]
16. Knoblauch, Kenneth, Aries Arditi, and Janet Szlyk
    1991 “Effects of Chromatic and Luminance Contrast on Reading”. Journal of the Optical Society of America8 (2): 428–439. 10.1364/JOSAA.8.000428
    https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.8.000428 [Google Scholar]
17. Koga, Tadamichi
    2013 “Research Report: An Attempt of Quantitative Analysis on Directing Elements in Information and Variety Programs: From an Analytical Survey on Primetime Television Programs.” The NHK Monthly Report on Broadcast Research63 (5): 68–81.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Kovačič, Irena
    1994 Relevance as a Factor in Subtitling Reductions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.5.35kov
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.5.35kov [Google Scholar]
19. Kovačič, Irena
    1995 “Reception of Subtitles. The Non-existent Ideal Viewer”, Translatio (Nouvelles de la FIT/FIT Newsletter)14 (3–4), 376–383. Audiovisual Communication and Language Transfer, International Forum, Strasbourg. 22–24June 1995 Forum, Strasbourg22–24.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Kress, Gunter, and Theo Van Leeuwen
    2001 Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Edward Arnold.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Kruger, Jan-Louis & Stephen Doherty
    2016 “Measuring Cognitive Load in the Presence of Educational Video: Towards a Multimodal Methodology”. The Australasian Journal of Educational Technology (32): 19–31. 10.14742/ajet.3084
    https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3084 [Google Scholar]
22. Lang, Annie
    1990 “Involuntary Attention and Physiological Arousal Evoked by Structural Features and Emotional Content in TV Commercials”. Communication Research17 (3): 275–299. 10.1177/009365090017003001
    https://doi.org/10.1177/009365090017003001 [Google Scholar]
23. Legge, Gordon
    2006 Psychophysics of Reading. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Mangirón Hevia, Carmen
    2013 “Subtitling in Game Localisation: A Descriptive Study.” Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 21(1): 42–56. 10.1080/0907676X.2012.722653
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2012.722653 [Google Scholar]
25. Orero Clavero, Pilar, Stephen Doherty, Jan-Louis Kruger, Anna Matamala Ripoll, Jan Pedersen, Elisa Perego, Pablo Romero Fresco, Sara Rovira Esteva, Olga Soler Vilageliu & Agnieszka Szarkowska
    2018 “Conducting Experimental Research in Audiovisual Translation (AVT): A Position Paper”. The Journal of Specialised Translation (30): 105–126.
    [Google Scholar]
26. O’Hagan, Minako
    2010 “Japanese TV Entertainment: Framing Humour with Open Caption Telop”. InTranslation, Humour and the Media. Edited byDalia Chiaro, 70–88. London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
27. O’Hagan, Minako & Ryoko Sasamoto
    2016 “Crazy Japanese Subtitles? Shedding Light on the Impact of Impact Captions with a Focus on Research Methodology”. InEyetracking and Applied Linguistics. Edited bySilvia Hansen-Schirra and Sambor Grucza, 31–58. Berlin: Language Science Press.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Paas, Fred, Juhani Tuovinen, Huib Tabbers and Pascal Van Gerven
    2003 Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory. Educational Psychologist – EDUC PSYCHOL. 38. 63–71. 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8
    https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8 [Google Scholar]
29. Park, Joseph
    2008 “Ideological Functions of Subtitles in Multimodal Media Texts: Impact Captioning on Korean Television.” Paper presented at the4th International Conference on Multimodality: From Print to Interactive Digital Media: Technology, Multimodal Representation and Knowledge, Singapore Management University, Singapore, July 30–August 1.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pashler, Harold
    1994 “Dual-task Interference in Simple Tasks: Data and Theory.” Psychological Bulletin116 (2): 220–244.   10.1037/0033‑2909.116.2.220
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220 [Google Scholar]
31. Pérez González, Luis
    2007 “Intervention in New Amateur Subtitling Cultures: A Multimodal Account.” Linguistica Antverpiensia (6): 67–80.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Quittner, Alexandra, Linda Smith, Mary Osberger, Teresa Mitchell, and Donald Katz
    1994 “The Impact of Audition on the Development of Visual Attention.” Psychological Science5 (6): 347–353. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.1994.tb00284.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00284.x [Google Scholar]
33. Sasamoto, Ryoko
    2014 “Impact Caption as a Highlighting Device: Attempts at Viewer Manipulation on TV”. Discourse, Context, and Media6: 1–10.   10.1016/j.dcm.2014.03.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.03.003 [Google Scholar]
34. Sasamoto, Ryoko & Stephen Doherty
    2016 “Towards the Optimal Use of Impact Captions on TV Programmes”. InConflict and Communication: A Changing Asia in a Globalising World. Edited byMinako O’Hagan and Qi Zhang, 210–247. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Sasamoto, Ryoko & Minako O’Hagan
    2020 “Relevance, Style and Multimodality: Typographical Features as Stylistic Devices”. InRelevance Theory, Figuration, and Continuity in Pragmatics. Edited byA. Piskorska, 194–228. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ftl.8.07sas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ftl.8.07sas [Google Scholar]
36. Sasamoto, Ryoko, Minako O’Hagan & Stephen Doherty
    2017 “Telop, Affect, and Media Design: A Multimodal Analysis of Japanese TV Programs”. Television & New Media, 18 (5): 427–440. 10.1177/1527476416677099
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416677099 [Google Scholar]
37. Schultheis, Hoger. and Jameson, Anthony
    2004 “Assessing Cognitive Load in Adaptive Hypermedia Systems: Physiological and Behavioural Methods.” InAdaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-based Systems. Edited byPaul de Bra and Wolfgang Nejdl, 18–24. Eindhoven, Netherlands: Springer Verlag. 10.1007/978‑3‑540‑27780‑4_26
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-27780-4_26 [Google Scholar]
38. Shiota, Eiko
    2003 “関連性理論とテロップ の理解 [Relevance Theory and Understanding of Telop].” The Graduate School Review of the English Language and Literature31: 63–91.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Shitara, Kaoru
    2011 “The Change of Telops on NHK Variety Shows.” Bulletin of Mukogawa Women’s University, Humanities and Social Science59: 1–9.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson
    1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwells.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson
    1986/1995 Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd ed.Oxford: Blackwells.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Taylor, Christopher
    2003 “Multimodal Transcription in the Analysis, Translation and Subtitling of Italian Films.” The Translator9 (2): 191–205. 10.1080/13556509.2003.10799153
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2003.10799153 [Google Scholar]
43. Taylor, Christopher
    2004 “Multimodal Text Analysis and Subtitling”. InPerspectives on Multimodality. Edited byEija Ventola, Cassily Charles and Martin Kaltenbacher, 153–172. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ddcs.6.11tay
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ddcs.6.11tay [Google Scholar]
44. Telebi Kiroku
    Telebi Kiroku 2013 Honmadekka TV Shichoritsu 2013. Telebi kirokuAvailable at: asobigokoro.info/honmadekka2013/
    [Google Scholar]
45. Wickens, Christopher
    1991 “Processing Resources and Attention.” InMultiple-task Performance. Edited byD. Damos, 3–34. London: Taylor & Francis.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Wilson, Deirdre & Dan Sperber
    2002 “Truthfulness and Relevance.” Mind111 (443): 583–632. 10.1093/mind/111.443.583
    https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/111.443.583 [Google Scholar]