How useful? How important? How difficult?

References

1. Alves, Fabio & José Luiz Gonçalves
   2003 “A relevance theory approach to the investigation of inferential processes in translation” InTriangulating Translation. Edited byFabio Alves, 3–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. digital.casalini.it/9789027296047. 10.1075/btl.45.04alv
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.45.04alv [Google Scholar]
2. Behr, Dorothée
   2018 “Translating questionnaires for cross-national surveys: A description of a genre and its particularities based on the ISO 17100 categorization of translator competences”. Translation & Interpreting10 (2): 5–20. 10.12807/ti.110202.2018.a02
   https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.110202.2018.a02 [Google Scholar]
3. Behr, Dorothée & Kuniaki Shishido
   2016 “The Translation of Measurement Instruments for CrossCultural Surveys”. InThe SAGE Handbook of Survey Methodology. Edited byChristof Wolf, Dominique Joye, Tom W. Smith & Yang-chih Fu, 268–286. London: SAGE. 10.4135/9781473957893.n19
   https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473957893.n19 [Google Scholar]
4. Chmiel, Agnieszka
   2020 “Translation, psycholinguistics and cognition” InThe Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Edited byFabio Alves and Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, 219–238. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315178127‑15
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178127-15 [Google Scholar]
5. Creswell, John W. & J. David Creswell
   2018 Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 5th ed.Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Dorer, Brita
   2020 Advance Translation as a Means of Improving Source Questionnaire Translatability? Findings from a think-aloud study for French and German. Berlin: Frank & Timme.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dorer, Brita
   2022 “Advance Translation—The remedy to improve translatability of source questionnaires? Results of a think-aloud study”. Field Methodsonline first. 10.1177/1525822X211072343 (retrieved26 June 2022)
   https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X211072343 [Google Scholar]
8. European Social Survey
   European Social Survey 2018 ESS Round 9 Translation Guidelines. https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/round9/methods/ESS9_translation_guidelines.pdf (retrieved26 June 2022)
   [Google Scholar]
9. Fonseca, Norma Barbosa de Lima
   2019 “Analysing the impact of TAPs on temporal, technical and cognitive effort in monolingual post-editing”. Perspectives27 (4): 552–588. 10.1080/0907676X.2019.1597909
   https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2019.1597909 [Google Scholar]
10. García García, José María, Victor M. R. Penichet & María Dolores Lozano Pérez
    2018 “Multimodal affective computing to enhance the user experience of educational software applications”. Mobile Information Systems. 10.1155/2018/8751426
    https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8751426 [Google Scholar]
11. Göpferich, Susanne
    2006 “How Successful is the Mediation of Specialized Knowledge?-The use of thinking-aloud protocols and log files of reverbalization processes as a method in comprehensibility research”. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business (37): 67–93. 10.7146/hjlcb.v19i37.25870
    https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v19i37.25870 [Google Scholar]
12. Göpferich, Susanne
    2015 “Translation competence: Explaining development and stagnation from a dynamic system perspective”. InInterdisciplinarity in translation and interpreting process research. Edited byMaureen Ehrensberger-Dow, Susanne Göpferich & Sharon O’Brien, 63–78. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/bct.72.06goe
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.72.06goe [Google Scholar]
13. Griebel, Cornelia
    2020 “‘Article 1103: oh pff… yes—then concerns… the… um… unilateral contract…’: What do hesitation and repair markers tell us about text reception patterns of translators and lawyers?” Translation, Cognition & Behavior3 (1): 51–75. 10.1075/tcb.00034.gri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tcb.00034.gri [Google Scholar]
14. Hansen-Schirra, Silvia & Jean Nitzke
    2020 “Translation, the process–product interface and cognition”. InThe Routledge Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Edited byFabio Alves & Arnt Lykke Jakobsen, 415–432. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315178127‑27
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178127-27 [Google Scholar]
15. International Test Commission
    International Test Commission 2017 The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests. https://www.intestcom.org/page/14 (retrieved27 June 2022)
    [Google Scholar]
16. Jääskeläinen, Rita
    2017 “Verbal Reports”. InThe Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Edited byJohn W. Schwieter & Aline Ferreira, 213–231. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781119241485.ch12
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241485.ch12 [Google Scholar]
17. Levshina, Natalia
    2015 How to do linguistics with R – Data exploration and statistical analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.195
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.195 [Google Scholar]
18. Mellinger, Christopher & Thomas Hanson
    2017 Quantitative research methods in translation and interpreting studies. Milton Park: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
19. PACTE Research Group
    PACTE Research Group 2014 “First results of PACTE group’s experimental research on translation competence acquisition: the acquisition of declarative knowledge of translation”. MonTI. Special Issue Minding Translation, 85–115. 10.6035/MonTI.2014.ne1.2
    https://doi.org/10.6035/MonTI.2014.ne1.2 [Google Scholar]
20. Reiss, Katharina
    1981 “Type, kind and individuality of text: Decision making in translation”. Poetics Today, 2 (4): 121–131. 10.2307/1772491
    https://doi.org/10.2307/1772491 [Google Scholar]
21. Rey, Jean
    1984 Dictionnaire sélectif et commenté des difficultés de la version anglaise [Selective and commented dictionary of difficulties in English-to-French translation]. Gap: Editions Ophrys.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Saris, Willem E. & Irmtraud N. Gallhofer
    2014 Design, evaluation, and analysis of questionnaires for survey research. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781118634646
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118634646 [Google Scholar]
23. Scribani, Melissa., Jessica Shelton, David Chapel, Nicole Krupa, Lynae Wyckoff & Paul Jenkins
    2014 “Comparison of bias resulting from two methods of self-reporting height and weight: a validation study”. JRSM open, 5 (6): 1–7. 10.1177/2042533313514048
    https://doi.org/10.1177/2042533313514048 [Google Scholar]
24. Smyth, Jolene D. & Kristen Olson
    2019 “The effects of mismatches between survey question stems and response options on data quality and responses”. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, 7 (1): 34–65. 10.1093/jssam/smy005
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smy005 [Google Scholar]
25. Tiselius, Elisabet & Adelina Hild
    2017 “Expertise and competence in translation and interpreting”. InThe Handbook of Translation and Cognition. Edited byJohn W. Schwieter and Aline Ferreira, 1st edition, 425–444. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons. 10.1002/9781119241485.ch23
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119241485.ch23 [Google Scholar]