Experimenting with audio description

References

1. Bardini, Floriane
   2013 Audio Description of Cinematic Language: A Comparative Study of Describers’ Approaches. Paper presented at theAdvanced Research Seminar on Audio Description (ARSAD)on13 – 14 March 2013.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bardini, Floriane
   2017 “Audio Description Style and the Film Experience of Blind Spectators: Design of a Reception Study”. Rivista Internazionale di Tecnica della Traduzione / International Journal of Translation191: 49–73. 10.13137/2421‑6763/17351ISSN1722–5906 (print) ISSN2421–6763 (online).
   https://doi.org/10.13137/2421-6763/17351 [Google Scholar]
3. Bardini, Floriane
   2020 “Film language, film experience and film interpretation in a reception study comparing conventional and interpretative audio description styles”. InInnovation in Audio Description Research, edited bySabine Sabine, and Kim Starr, 76–96). London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barnés-Castaño, Celia, Luisa Bernstorff, and Carmen Vilches
   2021 “Action Research in Motion for Dance Audio Description”. New Voices in Translation Studies21: 1–26.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barrouillet, Pierre, Sophie Bernardin, Sophie Portrat, Evie Vergauwe, and Valèrie Camos
   2007 “Time and cognitive load in working memory”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition33 (3): 570–85. 10.1037/0278‑7393.33.3.570.
   https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.570 [Google Scholar]
6. Barry, Robert J.
   2009 “Habituation of the orienting reflex and the development of preliminary process theory”. Neurobiology of learning and memory92 (2): 235–242.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Barry, Robert J., and Carlie Lawrence
   2009 “ERPs and the evoked cardiac response to auditory stimuli: Intensity and cognitive load effects”. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis691: 552–559.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Benedek, Mathias, and Christian Kaernbach
   2010 “A continuous measure of phasic electrodermal activity”. Journal of Neuroscience Methods190 (1): 80–91.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bläsing, Bettina, and Esther Zimmermann
   2021 “Dance Is More Than Meets the Eye—How Can Dance Performance Be Made Accessible for a Non-sighted Audience?” Frontiers in Psychology121: 643848. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643848
   https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643848 [Google Scholar]
10. Borg, Claudine
    2018 “The phases of the translation process: are they always three?” Proceedings of the Junior College multi-disciplinary conference: research, practice and collaboration. Breaking Barriers: annual conference in Malta: 79–92. University of Malta: Junior College Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Boucsein, Wolfram
    2012 Electrodermal activity. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Bradley, Margaret M., and Peter J. Lang
    1994 “Measuring emotion: the self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential”. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry25 (1): 49–59. 10.1016/0005‑7916(94)90063‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9 [Google Scholar]
13. Braun, Sabine
    2007 “Audio Description from a discourse perspective: a socially relevant framework for research and training”. Linguistica Antverpiensia357–369.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Braun, Sabine
    2011 “Creating coherence in Audio Description”. Meta: Journal des Traducteurs/ Meta: Translator’s Journal56 (3): 645–662.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Brunken, Roland, Jan L. Plass, and Detlev Leutner
    2003 “Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning”. Educational Psychologist38 (1): 53–61.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Buchwald, Mikołaj, Szymon Kupiński, Adam Bykowski Joanna Marcinkowska, Dawid Ratajczyk, and Marcin Jukiewicz
    2019 “Electrodermal activity as a measure of cognitive load: a methodological approach”. Signal Processing: Algorithms, Architectures, Arrangements, and Applications: 175–179.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Cabeza-Cáceres, Cristóbal
    2013 Audiodescripció i recepció: efecte de la velocitat de narració, l’entonació i l’explicitació en la comprensió fílmica [Audio description and reception: effect of narration speed, intonation and explicitness on filmic comprehension] (PhD). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, https://hdl.handle.net/10803/113556
    [Google Scholar]
18. Camos, Valérie, and Sophie Portrat
    2015 “The impact of cognitive load on delayed recall”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review22 (4): 1029–1034. 10.3758/s13423‑014‑0772‑5
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0772-5 [Google Scholar]
19. Cavallo, Amelia
    2015 “Seeing the word, hearing the image: the artistic possibilities of audio description in theatrical performance”. Research in Drama Education: The Journal of Applied Theatre and Performance, 20 (1): 125–134. 10.1080/13569783.2014.983892
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13569783.2014.983892 [Google Scholar]
20. Chafe, Wallace
    (Ed.) 1980 The Pear Stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Di Giovanni, Elena
    2014 “Audio introduction meets audio description: an Italian experiment”. Intralinea161: 1–15.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Dieleman, Gwendolyn C., Anja Huizink, Joke Tulen, Elisabeth Utens, Hanneke Creemers, Jan van der Ende, and Frank Verhulst
    2015 “Alterations in HPA-axis and autonomic nervous system functioning in childhood anxiety disorders point to a chronic stress hypothesis”. Psychoneuroendocrinology511: 135–150.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Directive (EU) 2019/882 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the accessibility requirements for products and services). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/882/oj
24. European Disability Strategy 2010–2020: A Renewed Commitment to a Barrier-Free Europe for Disabled Persons. https://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM%3A​2010%3A​0636%3A​FIN%3A​EN%3A​PDF
25. Ferziger, Naomi, Yossi Freier Dror, Lirit Gruber, Sara Nahari, Nofar Goren, Nurit Neustadt-Noy, Noomi Katz, and Asnat Bar-Haim Erez
    2020 “Audio description in the theater: assessment of satisfaction and quality of the experience among individuals with visual impairment”. British Journal of Visual Impairment381: 299–311. 10.1177/02646196209.12792
    https://doi.org/10.1177/02646196209.12792 [Google Scholar]
26. Fresno Cañada, Nazaret
    2014 “Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? The Role of Memory in Audio Description”. Across Languages and Cultures15 (1): 111–129.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Fryer, Louise
    2013 Putting it into words: The impact of visual impairment on perception, experience and presence. PhD, London University [available atresearch.gold.ac.uk/view/oldsmiths/Fryer=3ALouise=3A=3A.html].
    [Google Scholar]
28. Fryer, Louise, and Freeman, Jonathan
    2012 “Cinematic language and the description of film: Keeping AD users in the frame”. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology211: 412–426.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Fryer, Louise, and Jonathan Freeman
    2013 “Visual impairment and presence”. InProceedings of the 2013 Inputs-Outputs Conference on An Interdisciplinary Conference on Engagement in HCI and Performance, edited byHarry Witchel, 1–5. New York City: ACM Press. 10.1145/2557595.2557599
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2557595.2557599 [Google Scholar]
30. Fryer, Louise, and Jonathan Freeman
    2014 “Can you feel what I’m saying? The impact of verbal information on emotion elicitation and presence in people with a visual impairment”. InProceedings of the International Society for Presence Research, edited byAnna Felnhofer, and Oswald Kothgassner, 99–107. Wien: Facultas.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Fryer, Louise, and Pablo Romero-Fresco
    2014 “Audiointroductions”. InAudio Description: New perspectives illustrated, edited byAgnieszka Maszerowska, Anna Matamala, and Pilar Orero, 11–28. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.112.02fry
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.112.02fry [Google Scholar]
32. Holsanova, Jana
    2019 “Uncovering scientific and multimodal literacy through audio description”. Journal of Visual Literacy39 (3–4): 132–148.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Hughes, Ashley M., Gabriella Hancock, Shannon L. Marlow, Kimberly Stowers, and Eduardo Salas
    2019 “Cardiac measures of cognitive workload: a meta–analysis”. Human factors61 (3): 393–414.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Igareda, Paula, and Anna Matamala
    2012 “Variations on the Pear Tree Experiment: different variables, new results?”. Perspectives. Studies in Translatology20 (1): 103–123.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Iturregui-Gallardo, Gonzalo
    2019 “Audio subtitling: Voicing strategies and their effect on emotional activation”. PhD, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona [available athttps://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/667158].
36. Iturregui-Gallardo, Gonzalo, and Jorge Luis Méndez-Ulrich
    2019 “Towards the Creation of a Tactile Version of the Self-Assessment Manikin (T-SAM) for the Emotional Assessment of Visually Impaired People”. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education671: 657–674. 10.1080/1034912X.2019.1626007
    https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2019.1626007 [Google Scholar]
37. Iturregui-Gallardo, Gonzalo, and Anna Matamala
    2021 “Audio subtitling: dubbing and voice-over effects and their impact on user experience”. Perspectives29 (1): 64–83. 10.1080/0907676X.2019.1702065
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2019.1702065 [Google Scholar]
38. Jankowska, Anna
    2013 “Taking a British idea to Poland: Audio introductions for voiced-over films”. Paper presented at the4th Advanced Research Seminar on Audio Description (ARSAD), Barcelona, Spain, 13th of March.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Jankowska, Anna
    2021 “Audio describing films: A first look into the description process”. JosTrans: The Journal of Specialized Translation36a1: 26–52.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Jankowska, Anna, Joanna Pilarczyk, Kinga Wołoszyn, and Michał Kunieckib
    2022 “Enough is enough: how much intonation is needed in the vocal delivery of audio description?” Perspectives. 10.1080/0907676X.2022.2026423
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2022.2026423 [Google Scholar]
41. Jiménez-Hurtado, Catalina, and Silvia Soler Gallego
    2015 “Museum accessibility through translation: A corpus study of pictorial audio description”. InAudiovisual Translation: Taking Stock, edited byJorge Díaz Cintas, and Josélia Neves (Eds.), 277–299. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Kruger, Jan-Louis
    2012 “Making meaning in AVT: Eye tracking and viewer construction of narrative”. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology20 (1): 67–86.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Larmuseau, Charlotte, Pieter Vanneste, Jan Cornelis, Piet Desmet, and Fien Depaepe
    2019 “Combining physiological data and subjective measurements to investigate cognitive load during complex learning”. Frontline Learning Research7 (2): 57–74.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Lindquist, Kristen A., and Lisa Barrett
    2008a “Constructing emotion: The experience of fear as a conceptual act”. Psychological Science191: 898–903. 10.1111/j.1467‑9280.2008.02174
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02174 [Google Scholar]
45. Lindquist, Kristen A., and Lisa Barrett
    2008b “Emotional complexity”. InHandbook of emotions, edited byLisa Feldman Barrett, Michael Lewis, and Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones, 513–530. The Guilford Press.
    [Google Scholar]
46. Loaiza, Vanessa, David McCabe, Jessie Youngblood, Nathan Rose, and Joel Myerson
    2011 “The influence of levels of processing on recall from working memory and delayed recall tasks”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition37 (5): 1258.
    [Google Scholar]
47. López, Mariana Julieta, Gavin Cyril Kearney, and Krisztian Hofstadter
    2018 “Audio Description in the UK: what works, what doesn’t and understanding the need for personalising access”. British Journal of Visual Impairment36 (3): 1–18. ISSN0264–6196.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Maczynska, Magdalena, and Agnieszka Szarkowska
    2011 “Text-to-speech audio description with audio subtitling to a non-fiction film La Soufriere by Werner Herzog”. Paper presented at theconference Media4ALL 4 in London, organized by the Imperial College Londonon28 June – 1 July 2011.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Margolies, Eleanor
    2015 “Going to hear a dance: On audio describing”. Performance Research20 (6): 17–23. 10.1080/13528165.2015.1111044
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13528165.2015.1111044 [Google Scholar]
50. Matamala, Anna, Anna Fernández, and Carla Ortiz-Boix
    2013 “Enhancing sensorial and linguistic accessibility: further developments in the TECNACC and ALST projects”. Paper presented at theconference M4ALL5, 25–27th September 2013, Dubrovnik, Croatia.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Mazur, Iwona
    2017 “Audio description crisis points: The idea of common European audio description guidelines revisited.” InFast-Forwarding with Audiovisual Translation, edited byJorge Díaz Cintas, and Kristijan Nikoliĉ, 127–140. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Mazur, Iwona
    2014 “Gestures and facial expressions in audio description”. InAudio Description. New perspectives illustrated, edited byAnna Maszerowska, Anna Matamala, and Pilar Orero, 179–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.112.11maz
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.112.11maz [Google Scholar]
53. Mazur, Iwona, and Agnieszka Chmiel
    2016 “Should Audio Description Reflect the Way Sighted Viewers Look at Films? Combining Eye-Tracking and Reception Study Data”. InResearching Audio Description New Approaches, edited byAnna Matamala, and Pilar Orero Clavero, 97–121. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
54. Mazur, Iwona, and Jan-Louis Kruger
    2012 “Pear stories and audio description: Language, perception and cognition across cultures”. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology20 (1): 1–3. 10.1080/0907676X.2012.633769
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2012.633769 [Google Scholar]
55. Muñoz Martín, Ricardo, and Celia Martín de León
    2018 Fascinatin' Rhythm-and Pauses in Translators' Cognitive Processes. Hermes571: 29–47. 10.7146/hjlcb.v0i57.106192.
    https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v0i57.106192 [Google Scholar]
56. Mutlu-Bayraktar, Duygu, Veysel Cosgun, and Tugba Altan
    2019 “Cognitive load in multimedia learning environments: A systematic review”. Computers & Education1411, 103618.
    [Google Scholar]
57. Orero, Pilar
    2021 “Leitura de Filmes para a Produçao de audiodescriçoes: uma palavra vale mais que mil imagens? [Reading Films to Produce Audio Descriptions: is a word worth a thousand pictures?]”. InDiversas faces da tradução na contemporaneidade, edited byErica Lima, and Viviane Veras, 183–207. Campinas SP: Pontes Editores.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Orero, Pilar, and Anna Vilaró
    2012 “Eye tracking Analysis of Minor Details in Films for Audio Description”. Multidisciplinarity in Audiovisual Translation41, 295–319. 10.6035/MonTI
    https://doi.org/10.6035/MonTI [Google Scholar]
59. Paas, Fred
    1992 “Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skills in statistics: A cognitive load approach”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 841, 429–434. 10.1037/0022‑0663.84.4.429
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.4.429 [Google Scholar]
60. Perego, Elena
    2014 L’audiodescrizione filmica per i ciechi e gli ipovedenti [Film audio description for the blind and visually impaired]. Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Posadas Rodríguez, Gala
    2010 “Audio description as a complex translation process: A protocol”. InNew Insights into Audiovisual Translation and Media Accessibility: Media for All21, edited byJorge Díaz Cintas, Anna Matamala, and Joselia Neves, 195–211. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Potter, Robert, and Paul Bolls
    2012 Psychophysiological measurement and meaning: Cognitive and emotional processing of media. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Ramos Caro, Marina
    2015 “The emotional experience of films: does audio description make a difference?”. The Translator211: 68–94. 10.1080/13556509.2014.994853
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2014.994853 [Google Scholar]
64. Ramos Caro, Marina
    2016 “Testing audio-narration: the emotional impact of language in AD”. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology241: 606–634. 10.1080/0907676X.2015.1120760
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2015.1120760 [Google Scholar]
65. Ramos Caro, Marina, and Ana María Rojo López
    2014 “Feeling Audio Description: Exploring the Impact of AD on Emotional Response”. Translation Spaces31: 133–150. 10.1075/ts.3.06ram
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.3.06ram [Google Scholar]
66. Ramos Caro, Marina, and Ana María Rojo López
    2020 “Analysing the AD process: Creativity, expertise and quality”. The Journal of Specialized Translation331, Special issue on experimental research and cognition in Audiovisual Translation: 212–232.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Ramos Caro, Marina, Laura Espín López, and Ana María Rojo López
    2021 “The psychophysiological impact of audio described porn”. Onomázein, Special Issue VIII – Emotions in Translation and Interpreting, 104–127.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Richardson, Daniel, Nicole Griffin, Lara Zaki, Auburn Stephenson, Jiachen Yan, Thomas Curry, Richard Noble, John Hogan, Jeremy I. Skipper, and Joseph T. Devlin
    2020 “Engagement in video and audio narratives: contrasting self-report and physiological measures”. Scientific Reports101, 11298. 10.1038/s41598‑020‑68253‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68253-2 [Google Scholar]
69. Rojo López, Ana María, Marina Ramos Caro, and Laura Espín López
    2021 “Audio Described vs. Audiovisual Porn: Cortisol, Heart Rate and Engagement in Visually Impaired vs. Sighted Participants”. Frontiers in Psychology121: 661452. 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661452
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661452 [Google Scholar]
70. Romero-Fresco, Pablo
    2019 Accessible Filmmaking. Integrating translation and accessibility into the filmmaking process. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Romero-Fresco, Pablo, and Louise Fryer
    2013 “Could Audio Described Films benefit from Audio Introductions? An Audience Response Study”. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness107 (4): 287–285.
    [Google Scholar]
72. Snyder, Joel
    2005 The Visual Made Verbal: A Comprehensive Training Manual and Guide to the History and Applications of Audio Description. Ward Cove: Dog Ear Publishing. ISBN 1457527227.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Szarkowska, Agnieszka
    2011 “Text-to-speech audio description: towards wider availability of AD”. The Journal of Specialized Translation151: 142–162.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Szarkowska, Agnieszka, and Anna Jankowska
    2012 “Text-to-speech audio description of voiced-over films. A case study of audio described Volver in Polish”. InEmerging topics in translation: Audio description, edited byElena Perego, 81–94. Trieste: EUT Edizioni Università di Trieste.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Szarkowska, Agnieszka, and Pilar Orero
    2014 The importance of sound for audio description. InMaszerowska, Anna, Anna Matamala and Pilar Orero (Eds.), Audio description: New perspectives illustrated, 121–140. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.112.08sza
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.112.08sza [Google Scholar]
76. Udo, John Patrick, and Deborah. I. Fels
    2009 “Suit the Action to the Word, the Word to the Action: An Unconventional Approach to Describing Shakespeare’s Hamlet”. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness103 (3): 178–183.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Udo, John Patrick, and Deborah I. Fels
    2010a “Universal design on stage: live audidescription for theatrical performances”. Perspectives, Studies in Translatology181: 189–203. 10.1080/0907676X.2010.485683
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2010.485683 [Google Scholar]
78. Udo, John Patrick, and Deborah I. Fels
    2010b “Enhancing the entertainment experience of blind and low-vision theatregoers through touch tours”. Disability & Society251: 231–240. 10.1080/09687590903537497
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09687590903537497 [Google Scholar]
79. Van der Wel, Pauline, and Henk van Steenbergen
    2018 “Pupil dilation as an index of effort in cognitive control tasks: A review”. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review25 (6): 2005–2015.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Vandaele, Jeroen
    2012 “What Meets the Eye. Cognitive Narratology for Audio Description”. Perspectives20 (1): 87–102. 10.1080/0907676X.2011.632683
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2011.632683 [Google Scholar]
81. Vilaró, Anna, Andrew Duchowski, Pilar Orero, Tom Grindinger, Stephen Tetreault, and Elena di Giovanni
    2012 “How sound is the Pear Tree Story? Testing the effect of varying audio stimuli on visual attention distribution”. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology20 (1): 55–65.
    [Google Scholar]
82. Vilaró, Anna, and Pilar Orero
    2013 “User-centric cognitive assessment. Evaluation of attention in special working centres: from paper to Kinect”. Advances in Distributed Computing and Artificial intelligence Journal2 (7): 19–22.
    [Google Scholar]
83. Walczak, Agnieszka
    2017 Immersion in Audio Description: The Impact of Style and Vocal Delivery on Users’ Experience. Unpublished PhD Thesis. https://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/402401].
    [Google Scholar]
84. Walczak, Agnieszka, and Agnieszka Szarkowska
    2012 “Text-to-speech audio description to educational materials for visually-impaired children”. InAudiovisual Translation across Europe, edited bySilvia Bruti, and Elena di Giovanni, 209–233. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Walczak, Agnieszka, and Louise Fryer
    2017 “Creative description: The impact of audio description style on presence in visually impaired audiences”. British Journal of Visual Impairment351: 6–17. 10.1177/0264619616661603
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619616661603 [Google Scholar]
86. Walczak, Agnieszka, and Louise Fryer
    2018 “Vocal delivery of audio description by genre: measuring users’ presence”. Perspectives26 (1): 69–83. 10.1080/0907676X.2017.1298634
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2017.1298634 [Google Scholar]
87. Westgate, Erin C., and Timothy D. Wilson
    2018 “Boring thoughts and bored minds: The MAC model of boredom and cognitive engagement”. Psychological Review, 125 (5): 1–25.
    [Google Scholar]
88. Wilken, Nicole, and Jan-Louis Kruger
    2016 “Putting the audience in the picture: Mise-en-shot and psychological immersion in audio described film”. Across Languages and Cultures17 (2): 251–270. 10.1556/084.2016.17.2.6
    https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2016.17.2.6 [Google Scholar]