oa How native-like do conference interpreters sound in L2?

References

1. AIIC Regulation Governing Admission and Language Classification
   AIIC Regulation Governing Admission and Language Classification 2018 Accessed26 April 2023. https://aiic.org/document/4256/Regulation%20governing%20admissions%20and%20language%20classification%20-%20ENG.pdf (26.04.2023).
2. Abur, Defne, Megan K. MacPherson, and Cara A. Stepp
   2017 “Acoustic Measures of Voice and Physiological Measures of Autonomic Arousal during Speech as a Function of Cognitive Load.” Journal of Voice311: 504–509.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Albl-Mikasa, Michaela
   2010 “Global English and English as a Lingua Franca (ELF): Implications for the Interpreting Profession.” Trans-kom3(2): 126–148.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Anderson-Hsieh, Janet, Ruth Johnson, and Kenneth Koehler
   1992 The Relationship Between Native Speaker Judgements of Non-native Pronunciation and Deviance in Segmentals, Prosody and Syllable Structure.” Language Learning421: 529–555. 10.1111/j.1467‑1770.1992.tb01043.x
   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1992.tb01043.x [Google Scholar]
5. Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena
   2015 “Directionality.” InRoutledge Encyclopedia of Interpreting Studies, edited byFranz Pöchhacker. 108–110. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena
   2017 “The Interpreter’s Visibility in the European Parliament.” Interpreting19(2): 159–185. 10.1075/intp.19.2.01bar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.19.2.01bar [Google Scholar]
7. Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena, and Katarzyna Stachowiak-Szymczak
   2022 “Modes of Conference Interpreting: Simultaneous and Consecutive.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Conference Interpreting, edited byMichaela Albl-Mikasa, and Elisabet Tiselius, 19–33. London: Routledge.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena, Ewa Gumul, and Danijel Koržinek
   2022 “EP-Poland: Building a Bilingual Parallel Corpus for Interpreting Research.” GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies22(1): 110–126. 10.17576/gema‑2022‑2201‑06
   https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2022-2201-06 [Google Scholar]
9. Bartłomiejczyk, Magdalena, and Gumul, Ewa
   2024 “Disfluencies and Directionality in Simultaneous Interpreting: A Corpus Study Comparing Into-B and Into-A Interpretations from the European Parliament”. Translation & Interpreting16(1): 38–54. 10.12807/ti.116201.2024.a03
   https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.116201.2024.a03 [Google Scholar]
10. Baese-Berk, Melissa M., Drew J. McLaughlin, and Kevin B. McGowan
    2020 “Perception of Non-native Speech.” Language and Linguistic Compass14(7): e12375. 10.1111/lnc3.12375
    https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12375 [Google Scholar]
11. Baese-Berk, Melissa M., and Arthur G. Samuel
    2016 “Listeners Beware: Speech Production May Be Bad for Learning Speech Sounds.” Journal of Memory and Language891: 23–36. 10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.008 [Google Scholar]
12. Bergeron, Annie and Pavel Trofimovich
    2017 “Linguistic Dimensions of Accentedness and Comprehensibility: Exploring Task and Listener Effects in Second Language French.” Foreign Language Annals50(3): 547–566. 10.1111/flan.12285
    https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12285 [Google Scholar]
13. Best, Catherine T., and Michael T. Tyler
    2007 “Non-native and Second-language Speech Perception: Commonalities and Complementarities.” InSecond Language Speech Learning: The Role of Language Experience in Speech Perception and Production, edited byMurray J. Munro, and Bohn Ocke-Schwen, 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/lllt.17.07bes
    https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.17.07bes [Google Scholar]
14. Boersma, Paul
    2001 “Praat, a System for Doing Phonetics by Computer.” Glot International101: 341–345.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Boersma, Paul, and David J. M. Weenink
    2021 Accessed26 April 2023. “Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. Version 6.1.4.” [Computer programme] www.praat.org/
16. Carlson, Holly K., and Monica A. McHenry
    2006 “Effect of Accent and Dialect on Employability.” Journal of Employment Counselling43(2): 70–83. 10.1002/j.2161‑1920.2006.tb00008.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1920.2006.tb00008.x [Google Scholar]
17. Caruso, Anthony J., Wojtek J. Chodzko-Zajko, Debra A. Bidinger, and Ronald K. Sommers
    1994 “Adults Who Stutter: Responses to Cognitive Stress.” Journal of Speech and Hearing Research371: 746–754. 10.1044/jshr.3704.746
    https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3704.746 [Google Scholar]
18. Chan, Venus
    2021 “Factors Influencing Intelligibility and Comprehensibility: A Critical Review of Research on Second Language English Speakers.” Journal of English Learner Education12(1): Article 6.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Chang, Chia-Chien, and Michelle Min-Chia Wu
    2014 “Non-native English at International Conferences. Perspectives from Chinese-English Interpreters in Taiwan.” Interpreting16(2): 169–190. 10.1075/intp.16.2.02cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.16.2.02cha [Google Scholar]
20. Chen, Sijia
    2017 “The Construct of Cognitive Load in Interpreting and its Measurement.” Perspectives25(4): 640–657. 10.1080/0907676X.2016.1278026
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2016.1278026 [Google Scholar]
21. Cheung, Andrew F. K.
    2013 “Non-native Accents and Simultaneous Interpreting Quality Perceptions.” Interpreting15(1): 25–47. 10.1075/intp.15.1.02che
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.15.1.02che [Google Scholar]
22. Collard, Camille, and Bart Defrancq, Bart
    2020 “Disfluencies in Simultaneous Interpreting: A Corpus-based Study with Special Reference to Sex.” InNew Empirical Perspectives on Translation and Interpreting, edited byLore Vandevoorde, Joke Daems, and Bart Defrancq, 254–299. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Crowther, Dustin, Pavel Trofimovich, Kazuya Saito, and Talia Isaacs
    2015 “Second Language Comprehensibility Revisited: Investigating the Effects of Learner Backgroound.” TESOL Quarterly49(4): 814–837. 10.1002/tesq.203
    https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.203 [Google Scholar]
24. Déjéan le Feal, Karla
    2003 “Impact of the International Status of the Interpreting Student’s Mother Tongues on Training.” Forum1(1): 53–76.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Derwing, Tracey M., and Murray J. Munro
    1997 “Accent, Intelligibility, and Comprehensibility: Evidence from Four L1s.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition19(1): 1–16. 10.1017/S0272263197001010
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263197001010 [Google Scholar]
26. Derwing, Tracey M., Marian J. Rossiter, Murray J. Munro, and Ron I. Thomson
    2004 “Second Language Fluency: Judgments on Different Tasks.” Language Learning54(4): 655–679. 10.1111/j.1467‑9922.2004.00282.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2004.00282.x [Google Scholar]
27. Derwing, Tracey M., and Murray J. Munro
    2009 “Comprehensibility as a Factor in Listener Interaction Preferences: Implications for the Workplace.” Canadian Modern Language Review66(2): 181–202. 10.3138/cmlr.66.2.181
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.66.2.181 [Google Scholar]
28. Derwing, Tracey M., Murray J. Munro, and Ron I. Thomson
    2008 “A Longitudinal Study of ESL Learners’ Fluency and Comprehensibility Development.” Applied Linguistics291: 359–380. 10.1093/applin/amm041
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amm041 [Google Scholar]
29. Flege, James Emil
    1995 “Second Language Speech Learning Theory, Findings and Problems.” InSpeech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-language Research, edited byWinifred Strange, 233–277. Baltimore: York Press.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Flerov, Cyril, and Michael Jacobs
    2016 Improving the Interpreter’s Voice. Lulu Publishing Services.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Frumkin, Lara
    2007 “Influences of Accent and Ethnic Background on Perceptions of Eyewitness Testimony.” Psychology, Crime and Law13(3): 317–331. 10.1080/10683160600822246
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160600822246 [Google Scholar]
32. Garzone, Giuliana Elena
    2003 “Reliability of Quality Criteria Evaluation in Survey Research.” InLa Evaluación de la Calidad en Interpretación: Investigación, eduted byÁngela Collados Aís, M. Manuela Fernández Sanchez, and Daniel Gile, 23–30. Granada: Comares.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Gile, Daniel
    2009 Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Revised Edition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/btl.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.8 [Google Scholar]
34. Gebhard, Silke
    2001 Accessed28 April 2023. “Building Europe — or Back to Babel?” https://aiic.org/document/449/AIICWebzine_NovDec2001_2_GEBHARD_Building_Europe_or_back_to_Babel_EN.pdf
35. Graves, Alison
    2013 “Interpreter Training in the European Parliament.” Gramma191: 143–149.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Graves, Alison, Marina Pascual Olaguíbel, and Cathy Pearson
    2022 “Conference Interpreting in the European Union Institutions.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Conference Interpreting, edited byMichaela Albl-Mikasa, and Elisabet Tiselius, 104–114. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Gumul, Ewa
    2021 “Explicitation and Cognitive Load in Simultaneous Interpreting: Product- and Process-oriented Analysis of Trainee Interpreters’ Outputs.” Interpreting23(1): 45–75. 10.1075/intp.00051.gum
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00051.gum [Google Scholar]
38. Hale, Sandra, Nigel Bond, Jeanna Sutton
    2011 “Interpreting Accent in the Courtroom.” Target23(1): 48–61. 10.1075/target.23.1.03hal
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.23.1.03hal [Google Scholar]
39. Huttunen, Kerttu, Heikki Keränen, and E. Vayrynen
    2011 “Effect of Cognitive Load on Speech Prosody in Aviation: Evidence from Military Simulator Flights.” Apple Ergon421: 348–357. 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.005 [Google Scholar]
40. Iglesias Fernándes, Emilia
    2013 “Unpacking Delivery Criteria in Interpreting Quality Assessment.” InAssessment Issues in Language Translation and Interpreting, edited byDina Tsagari, and Roelof van Deemeter, 51–66. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Kang, Okim, Donald Rubin, and Lucy Pickering
    2010 “Suprasegmental Measures of Accentedness and Judgements of Language Learner Proficiency in Oral English.” Modern Language Journal941: 554–566. 10.1111/j.1540‑4781.2010.01091.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01091.x [Google Scholar]
42. Kennedy, Sara, and Pavel Trofimovich
    2008 “Intelligibility, Comprehensibility, and Accentedness of L2 Speech.” The Canadian Modern Language Review64(3): 459–489. 10.3138/cmlr.64.3.459
    https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.3.459 [Google Scholar]
43. Kent, Stephanie Jo
    2014 Interpreting. Doctoral Thesis, University of Massachusetts.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Kormos, Judit, and Mariann Dénes
    2004 “Exploring Measures and Perceptions of Fluency in the Speech of Second Language Learners.” System321: 145–164. 10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001 [Google Scholar]
45. Levi, Susannah V., Stephen J. Winters, and David B. Pisoni
    2007 “Speaker-independent Factors Affecting the Perception of Foreign Accent in a Second Language.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America1211: 2327–2338. 10.1121/1.2537345
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2537345 [Google Scholar]
46. Lindemann, Stephanie
    2002 “Listening with an Attitude: A Model of Native-speaker Comprehension of Non-native Speakers in the United States.” Language in Society31(3): 419–441. 10.1017/S0047404502020286
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404502020286 [Google Scholar]
47. Lively, Scott E., David B. Pisoni, David, B., W. Van Summers, and Robert Bernacki
    1993 “Effects of Cognitive Workload on Speech Production: Acoustic Analyses and Perceptual Consequences.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America931: 2962–2973. 10.1121/1.405815
    https://doi.org/10.1121/1.405815 [Google Scholar]
48. MacPherson, Megan K., Defne Abur, and Cara E. Stepp
    2017 “Acoustic Measures of Voice and Physiological Measures of Autonomic Arousal during Speech as a Function of Cognitive Load.” Journal of Voice31(4): 504.E1–504.E9. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.10.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.10.021 [Google Scholar]
49. Mendoza, Elvira, and Gloria Caraballo
    1998 “Acoustic Analysis of Induced Vocal Stress by Means of Cognitive Workload Tasks.” Journal of Voice121: 263–273. 10.1016/S0892‑1997(98)80017‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(98)80017-9 [Google Scholar]
50. Munro, Murray J., Tracey M. Derwing, and Clifford S. Burgess
    2010 “Detection of Nonnative Speaker Status from Content-masked Speech.” Speech Communication521: 626–637. 10.1016/j.specom.2010.02.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2010.02.013 [Google Scholar]
51. Munro, Murray J., Tracey M. Derwing, and Susan L. Morton
    2006 “The Mutual Intelligibility of L2 Speech.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition28(1): 111–131. 10.1017/S0272263106060049
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060049 [Google Scholar]
52. Piske, Thorsten, Ian R. A. MacKay, and James Emil Flege
    2001 “Factors Affecting Degree of Foreign Accent in an L2: A Review.” Journal of Phonetics291: 191–215. 10.1006/jpho.2001.0134
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0134 [Google Scholar]
53. Plevoets, Koen, and Bart Defrancq
    2018 “The Cognitive Load of Interpreters in the European Parliament: A Corpus-based Study of Predictors for the Disfluency Uh(m).” Interpreting20(1): 1–32. 10.1075/intp.00001.ple
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.00001.ple [Google Scholar]
54. Porzuczek, Andrzej, Arkadiusz Rojczyk, Janusz Arabski
    2016 Praktyczny Kurs Wymowy Angielskiej dla Polaków [A Practical English Pronunciation Course for Poles]. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Porzuczek, Andrzej, and Arkadiusz Rojczyk
    2017 “English Word Stress in Polish Learners’ Speech Production and Metacompetence.” Research in Language15(4): 312–323. 10.1515/rela‑2017‑0018
    https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2017-0018 [Google Scholar]
56. Pradas Macías, Macarena
    2006 “Probing Quality Criteria in Simultaneous Interpreting.” Interpreting8(1): 25–43. 10.1075/intp.8.1.03pra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.8.1.03pra [Google Scholar]
57. Purnell, Thomas, William Idsardi, and John Baugh
    1999 “Perceptual and Phonetic Experiments on American English Dialect Identification.” Journal of Language and Social Psychology18(1): 10–30. 10.1177/0261927X99018001002
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X99018001002 [Google Scholar]
58. Rojczyk, Arkadiusz, and Andrzej Porzuczek
    2012 “Selected Aspects in the Acquisition of English Phonology by Polish Learners — Segments and Prosody.” InReadings in Second Language Acquisition, edited byDanuta Gabryś-Barker, 93–120. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
    [Google Scholar]
59. Rojczyk, Arkadiusz, and Andrzej Porzuczek
    2019 “EFL Pronunciation Teaching to Polish English Studies Majors.” InChallenges of Foreign Language Instruction in the University Context, edited byDanuta Gabryś-Barker, 9–25. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
    [Google Scholar]
60. Schwartz, Geoffrey, Anna Balas, and Arkadiusz Rojczyk
    2015 “Phonological Factors Affecting L1 Phonetic Realization of Proficient Polish Users of English.” Research in Language13(2): 181–198. 10.1515/rela‑2015‑0014
    https://doi.org/10.1515/rela-2015-0014 [Google Scholar]
61. Seleskovitch, Danica
    1968 English translation 1978. Interpreting for International Conferences: Problems of Language and Communication. Washington, D.C., Pen and Booth.
    [Google Scholar]
62. Smith, Larry E., and Cecil L. Nelson
    1985 “International Intelligibility of English: Directions and Resources.” World Englishes4(3): 333–342. 10.1111/j.1467‑971X.1985.tb00423.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-971X.1985.tb00423.x [Google Scholar]
63. Sobkowiak, Włodzimierz
    2001 English Phonetics for Poles. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Poznańskie.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Stachowiak-Szymczak, Katarzyna
    2019 Phonology Matters in Interpreting. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Stachowiak-Szymczak, Katarzyna
    2020 “Voice Onset Time and Rhythm Transfer in Simultaneous Interpreting.” InMultilingual Mediated Communication and Cognition, edited byRicardo Muñoz Marin, and Sandra L. Halverson, 69–89. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9780429323867‑4
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429323867-4 [Google Scholar]
66. Stévaux, Elisabeth
    2011 “Akzent [Accent].” InQualitätsparameter beim Simultandolmetschen: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven [Quality parameters in simultaneous interpreting: interdisciplinary perspectives], edited byÁngela Collados Aís, Emilia Iglesias Fernándes, E. Macarena Pradas Macías, and Elisabeth Stévaux, 141–172. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Tergujeff, Elina
    2021 “Second Language Comprehensibility and Accentedness across Oral Proficiency Levels: A Comparison of Two L1s.” System1001: 102567. 10.1016/j.system.2021.102567
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102567 [Google Scholar]
68. Thomson, Ron I.
    2015 “Fluency.” InThe Handbook of English Pronunciation, edited byMarnie Reed and John M. Levis, 209–226. Malden MA: John Wiley and Sons. 10.1002/9781118346952.ch12
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118346952.ch12 [Google Scholar]
69. Trofimovich, Pavel, and Wendy Baker
    2006 “Learning Second-language Suprasegmentals. Effect of L2 Experience on Prosody and Fluency Characteristics of L2 Speech.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition281: 1–30. 10.1017/S0272263106060013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263106060013 [Google Scholar]
70. Trofimovich, Pavel, and Talia Isaacs
    2012 “Disentangling Accent from Comprehensibility.” Bilingualism: Language and Cognition15(4): 905–916. 10.1017/S1366728912000168
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000168 [Google Scholar]
71. Van Engen, Kristin J., and Jonathan E. Peelle
    2014 “Listening Effort and Accented Speech.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience8(577): 1–4. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00577
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00577 [Google Scholar]
72. Van Lierde, Kristiane, S. Van Heule, Sophia De Ley, Erik Mertens, and Sofie Claeys
    2008 “Effect of Psychological Stress on Female Voice Quality: A Multiparameter Approach.” Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica421: 348–357.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Vaughn, Charlotte, Melissa Baese-Berk, and Kaori Idemaru
    2019 “Re-examining Phonetic Variability in Native and Non-native Speech.” Phonetica761: 327–358. 10.1159/000487269
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000487269 [Google Scholar]
74. Wade, Travis, Allard Jongman, and Joan A. Sereno
    2007 “Effects of Acoustic Variability in the Perceptual Learning of Non-native-accented Speech Sounds.” Phonetica641: 122–144. 10.1159/000107913
    https://doi.org/10.1159/000107913 [Google Scholar]
75. Waniek-Klimczak, Ewa
    2005 Temporal Parameters in Second Language Speech. Łódź: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego.
    [Google Scholar]
76. White, Laurence, and Sven L. Mattys
    2007 “Calibrating Rhythm: First Language and Second Language Studies.” Journal of Phonetics351: 501–522. 10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2007.02.003 [Google Scholar]
77. Yenkimaleki, Mahmood, and Vincent J. van Heuven
    2017 “The Effect of Teaching Prosody Awareness on Interpreting Performance: An Experimental Study of Consecutive Interpreting from English into Farsi.” Perspectives26(1): 84–99. 10.1080/0907676X.2017.1315824
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2017.1315824 [Google Scholar]