Volume 25, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-9971
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9994
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes



The advent of the Semantic Web and of the Linked Data initiative have contributed to new perspectives and opportunities regarding terminology work. Among them are the double dimension approach and the theoretical perspective of ontoterminology anchored therein, which explore the synergies resulting from the systematic organisation of both term systems and concept systems. By doing so, they provide a theoretical and methodological foundation underlying the creation of knowledge-based terminological products that can support the conception and development of different types of e‑dictionaries. Within that scope, and based on examples pertaining to two different subject fields, namely endometriosis and Islamic archaeology, this article aims to propose a framework for the creation of a terminological e-dictionary, defined as a reference resource in a specific domain that gathers, structures and describes linguistic data in a systematic way in one, two or more languages, in order to define concepts that are denoted by terms.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


  1. Adamson, G. D., S. Kennedy, and L. Hummelshoj
    2010 “Creating Solutions in Endometriosis: Global Collaboration through the World Endometriosis Research Foundation.” Journal of Endometriosis2(1): 3–6. 10.1177/228402651000200102
    https://doi.org/10.1177/228402651000200102 [Google Scholar]
  2. Almeida, B., C. Roche, and R. Costa
    2016 “Terminology and Ontology Development in the domain of Islamic archaeology.” InTerm Bases and Linguistic Linked Open Data: TKE 2016, ed. byH. E. Thomsen, A. Pareja-Lora, and B. N. Madsen, 147–156. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. 2017 “Archaeological classification and ontoterminology: the case of Islamic archaeology of the al-Andalus”. InTOTh 2017: Terminology & Ontology: Theories and applications, Chambéry, France (June 8-9, 2017), 221–236.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Baader, F., D. Calvanese, D. L. McGuinness, D. Nardi, and P. Patel-Schneider
    eds. 2003The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ballard, K., K. Lowton, and J. Wright
    2006 “What’s the delay? A Qualitative Study of Women’s Experiences of Reaching a Diagnosis of Endometriosis.” Fertility and Sterility86(5): 1296–1301. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.04.054
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.04.054 [Google Scholar]
  6. Borst, W. N.
    1997Construction of Engineering Ontologies for Knowledge Sharing and Reuse. Twente: University of Twente.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bugalhão, J., H. Catarino, S. Cavaco, J. Covaneiro, I. C. F. Fernandes, A. Gomes, S. Gómez-Martínez, M. J. Gonçalves, M. Grangé, I. Inácio, G. Lopes, and C. Santos
    2010 “CIGA: projecto de sistematização para a cerâmica islâmica do Gharb al-Ândalus.” Xelb10: 455–476.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Cañas, A. J., G. Hill, R. Carff, N. Suri, J. Lott, G. Gómez, T. Eskridge, M. Arroyo, R. Carvajal
    2004 “CmapTools: A Knowledge Modeling and Sharing Environment”. InConcept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona, Spain (September14–17 2004), Editorial Universidad Pública de Navarra.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Carvalho, S., R. Costa, and C. Roche
    2016a “LESS Can Indeed Be More: Linguistic and Conceptual Challenges in the Age of Interoperability.” InProceedings of the 12th International conference on Terminology and Knowledge Engineering, ed. byH. E. Thomsen, A. Pareja-Lora, and B. N. Madsen, 157–167. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. 2016b “Ontoterminology meets Lexicography: the Multimodal Online Dictionary of Endometriosis (MODE).” InGlobalex 2016: Lexicographic Resources for Human Language Technology, ed. byI. Kernerman, I. Kosem, S. Krek, and L. Trap-Jensen, 8–15. Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Portorož, Slovenia.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. 2018 “The Role of Conceptual Relations in the Drafting of Natural Language Definitions: an Example from the Biomedical Domain. InProceedings of the LREC 2018 Workshop Globalex 2018: Lexicography & WordNets, ed. byI. Kernerman, and S. Krek, 10–16. Miyazaki, Japan.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Carvalho, S., C. Roche, and R. Costa
    2015 “Ontologies for Terminological Purposes: the EndoTerm Project.” InProceedings of the 11th International Conference on Terminology and Artificial Intelligence, ed. byT. Poibeau, and P. Faber, 17–27. Granada: Universidad de Granada.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Chern, B. S. M., S. Lakhotia, C. K. Khoo, and A. Y. M. Siow
    2012 “Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecology: Evolution, Current Trends, and Future Perspectives.” Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy1(1):9–18. 10.1016/j.gmit.2012.08.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gmit.2012.08.005 [Google Scholar]
  14. Cimiano, P., J. P. McCrae, and P. Buitelaar
    (eds.) 2016Lexicon Model for Ontologies: Community Report. (https://www.w3.org/2016/05/ontolex). Accessed25 September 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Coiera, E.
    2015Guide to Health Informatics, 3rd ed.Boca Raton: CRC Press – Taylor and Francis Group.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Coll Conesa, J., J. Martí Oltra, and J. Pascual Pacheco
    1988Cerámica y Cambio Cultural: el Tránsito de la Valencia Islámica a la Cristiana. Madrid: Dirección General de Bellas Artes y Archivos.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Costa, R.
    2006 “Plurality of Theoretical Approaches to Terminology.” InModern Approaches to Terminological Theories and Applications, ed. byH. Picht, 77–89. Bern: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. 2013 “Terminology and Specialised Lexicography: Two Complementary Domains”. Lexicographica29(1):29–42. 10.1515/lexi‑2013‑0004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/lexi-2013-0004 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dunselman, G., N. Vermeulen, C. Becker, C. Calhaz-Jorge, and T. D’Hooghe
    2014 “ESHRE Guideline: Management of Women with Endometriosis.” Human Reproduction29(3):400–412. 10.1093/humrep/det457
    https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det457 [Google Scholar]
  20. Faber, P.
    ed. 2012A Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Language. Berlin: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110277203
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110277203 [Google Scholar]
  21. 2015 “Frames as a Framework for Terminology.” InHandbook of Terminology, vol.1, ed. byH. J. Kockaert, and F. Steurs, 14–33. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hot.1.02fra1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hot.1.02fra1 [Google Scholar]
  22. Gangemi, A.
    2016 “Dolce+D&S Ultralite and its Main Ontology Design Patterns.” InOntology Engineering with Ontology Design Patterns: Foundations and Applications, ed. byP. Hitzler, A. Gangemi, A. Janowicz, A. Krisnadhi, and V. Presutti, 81–103. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Genesereth, M. R., and R. E. Fikes
    1992Knowledge Interchange Format: Version 3.0: Reference Manual. Stanford: Computer Science Department, Stanford University. Current Version June (logic.stanford.edu/publications/genesereth/kif.pdf). Accessed25 September 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Gill, I. S., A. P. Advincula, M. Aron, J. Caddedu, D. Canes, P. G. Curcillo, and J. Teixeira
    2010 “Consensus Statement of the Consortium for Laparoendoscopic Single-site Surgery.” Surgical Endoscopy24(4):762–768. 10.1007/s00464‑009‑0688‑8
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0688-8 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gómez Martínez, S.
    2000 “Contenedores de Fuego en el Garb al-Andalus.” InActas do 3o Congresso de Arqueologia Peninsular, vol.7, ed. byV. O. Jorge, 421–434. Porto: ADECAP.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. 2004La Cerámica Islámica de Mértola: Producción y Comercio. Universidad Complutense, Madrid.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Gruber, T.
    1993 “A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specifications”. Knowledge Acquisition5(2):199–220. 10.1006/knac.1993.1008
    https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008 [Google Scholar]
  28. ISO 1087–1
    ISO 1087–1 2000Terminology Work – Vocabulary – Part 1: Theory and Application. Geneva: International Standardization Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. ISO/FDIS 1087 (E)
    ISO/FDIS 1087 (E) 2019Terminology Work and Terminology Science – Vocabulary. Geneva: International Standardization Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. ISO 17115
    ISO 17115 2007Health Informatics – Vocabulary for Terminological Systems. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. ISO 704
    ISO 704 2009Terminology Work – Principles and Methods. Geneva: International Standards Organisation.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. ISO 1828
    ISO 1828 2012Health Informatics – Categorial Structure for Terminological Systems of Surgical Procedures. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. ISO 24156-1
    ISO 24156-1 2014Notations Graphiques pour la Modélisation des Concepts en Terminologie et ses Relations avec UML – Partie 1: Lignes Directrices pour l’Application de la Notation UML dans le Travail Terminologique. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Johnson, N. P., and L. Hummelshoj
    2013 “Consensus on Current Management of Endometriosis.” Human Reproduction28(25):1552–1568. 10.1093/humrep/det050
    https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det050 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kim, J. Y.
    2014Opening address to the inaugural “The Lancet Commission on Global Surgery” meeting. The World Bank. Jan17 2014 Boston, MA, USA. (www.globalsurgery.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Jim-Kim-Global-Surgery-Transcribed.pdf). Accessed4 October 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Maks, I.
    2006 “Frame-based Definitions in a Learners’ Dictionary for Dutch Business Language.” InTerminology, Computing and Translation, ed. byP. Ten Hacken, 191–206. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Meyer, I., D. Skuce, L. Bowker, and K. Eck
    1992 “Towards a New Generation of Terminological Resources: an Experiment in Building a Terminological Knowledge Base”. InCOLING ’92 Proceedings of the 14th conference on Computational linguistics, vol.3, 956–960. Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.3115/992383.992410
    https://doi.org/10.3115/992383.992410 [Google Scholar]
  38. Meyer, I., K. Eck, and D. Skuce
    1997 “Systematic Concept Analysis within a Knowledge-Based Approach to Terminology”. InHandbook of Terminology Management, vol.1, ed. byS. E. Wright, and G. Budin, 98–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.htm1.14mey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.htm1.14mey [Google Scholar]
  39. Minsky, M.
    1974 A Framework for Representing Knowledge. MIT-AI Laboratory Memo 306, June 1974 Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  40. Musen, M. A.
    2015 “The Protégé Project: a Look Back and a Look Forward.” AI Matters1(4):4–12. 10.1145/2757001.2757003
    https://doi.org/10.1145/2757001.2757003 [Google Scholar]
  41. NIH, and US National Library of Medicine
    NIH, and US National Library of Medicine 2018Unified Medical Language System. UMLS Terminology Services.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Nnoaham, K. E., J. Hummelshoj, P. Webster, T. d’Hooghe, F. de Cicco Nardone, and C. de Cicco Nardone
    2011 “Impact of Endometriosis on Quality of Life and Work Productivity: a Multicenter Study across Ten Countries.” Fertility and Sterility96(2):366–373.e8. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.090
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.05.090 [Google Scholar]
  43. Roberts, R. B., and I. P. Goldstein
    1977The FRL Manual. Memo 409, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, AI Laboratory, September 1977.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Roche, C.
    2007a “Terme et Concept : Fondements pour une Ontoterminologie.” InTOTh 2007, 1–22. Annecy: Institut Porphyre.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. 2007b “Saying is not Modelling”. InNLPCS 2007, Natural Language Processing and Cognitive Science, 47–56. Funchal: Portugal.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. 2012 “Ontoterminology: How to Unify Terminology and Ontology into a Single Paradigm.” InProceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC-2012), ed. byN. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, M. U. Dogan, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, and S. Piperidis, 2626–2630. Istanbul: Turkey.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. 2015 “Ontological Definition.” InHandbook of Terminology, vol.1, ed. byH. J. Kockaert, and F. Steurs, 128–152. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hot.1.08ont1
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hot.1.08ont1 [Google Scholar]
  48. Rogers, P. A. W., G. D. Adamson, M. Al-Jefout, C. M. Becker, T. M. D’Hooghe, G. A. J. Dunselman, and K. T. Zondervan
    2017 “Research Priorities for Endometriosis.” Reproductive Sciences24(2):202–226. 10.1177/1933719116654991
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719116654991 [Google Scholar]
  49. Rogers, P. A. W., T. M. D’Hooghe, A. Fazleabas, C. E. Gargett, L. C. Giudice, G. W. Montgomery, K. T. Zondervan
    2009 “Priorities for Endometriosis Research: Recommendations From an International Consensus Workshop.” Reproductive Sciences16(4):335–346. 10.1177/1933719108330568
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719108330568 [Google Scholar]
  50. Rose, J., T. G. Weiser, P. Hider, L. Wilson, R. L. Gruen, and S. W. Bickler
    2015 “Estimated Need for Surgery Worldwide based on Prevalence of Diseases: a Modelling Strategy for the WHO Global Health Estimate.” The Lancet Global Health3:S13–S20. 10.1016/S2214‑109X(15)70087‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(15)70087-2 [Google Scholar]
  51. Rosselló-Bordoy, G.
    1978Ensayo de Sistematización de la Cerámica Árabe en Mallorca. Palma: de Mallorca: Institut d’Estudis Baleàrics.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. 1991El Nombre de las Cosas en al-Andalus: una Propuesta de Terminología Cerámica. Palma de Mallorca: Museo de Mallorca.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Smith, R.
    2018 “Aristotle’s Logic.” InThe Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. byE. N. Zalta. Spring 2018 Edition. (https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/aristotle-logic). Accessed14 September 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Studer, R., R. Benjamins, and D. Fensel
    1998 “Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods.” Data and Knowledge Engineering25(1–2):161–197. 10.1016/S0169‑023X(97)00056‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-023X(97)00056-6 [Google Scholar]
  55. Swanepoel, P.
    2011 “Improving the Functionality of Dictionary Definitions for Lexical Sets: The Role of Definitional Templates, Definitional Consistency, Definitional Coherence and the Incorporation of Lexical Conceptual Models.” Lexikos20:425–449. 10.5788/20‑0‑151
    https://doi.org/10.5788/20-0-151 [Google Scholar]
  56. Torres, C., S. Gómez-Martínez, and M. B. Ferreira
    2003 “Os Nomes da Cerâmica Medieval: Inventário de Termos.” InActas das 3as Jornadas de Cerâmica Medieval e Pós-Medieval, 125–134. Tondela: Câmara Municipal de Tondela.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Vallejo Triano, A., and A. J. Escudero
    1999 “Aportaciones para una Tipología de la Cerámica Común Califal de Madinat al-Zahra.” Arqueología y Territorio Medieval6:133–176.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Wright, J. M., M. S. Fox, and D. Adam
    1984SRL/1.5 User Manual: Technical Report. Robotics Institute, Carnegie-Mellon University.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. ATIH
    ATIH 2017 “Classification Commune des Actes Médicaux – Descriptive à Usage PMSI. Agence Technique de l’Information sur l’Hospitalisation – Ministère des Affaires Sociales et de la Santé.” (https://www.atih.sante.fr/nomenclatures-de-recueil-de-linformation/ccam). Accessed23 September 2018.
  60. CHCI
    CHCI 2018 “Canadian Classification of Health Interventions.” (https://www.cihi.ca/en/version-2018-icd-10-ca-and-cci-classifications). Accessed23 September 2018.
  61. CMS
    CMS 2018 International Classification of Disease – Procedure Coding Systems. 10th ed.https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/ICD10/2019-ICD-10-PCS.html. Accessed25 September 2018.
  62. IHTSDO
    IHTSDO 2018aSNOMED CT Editorial Guide (snomed.org/eg). Accessed3 September 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. IHTSDO
    IHTSDO 2018bSNOMED CT Starter Guide. snomed.org/sg. Accessed3 September 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. WHO
    WHO 2018The International Classification of Health Interventions. Beta 2018 (https://www.who.int/classifications/ichi/en). Accessed18 September 2018.
    [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): definition; ontoterminology; terminological e-dictionary
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error