1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication
  4. Volume 29, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 29, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-9971
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9994
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Terminological conceptual analysis can be applied to purposes beyond terminology work. This article presents a Frame-based Terminology approach adapted to analyse concepts and inform the content of entries in the Humanitarian Encyclopedia. It proposes a method for conceptual analysis by systematising the extraction of knowledge rich contexts (KRCs) around corpus querying tasks through semantic sketch grammars (SSGs) and macros with knowledge patterns (KPs). KRCs are curated manually, modelled into conceptual propositions, and combined with corpus metadata into unified datasets. The method was tested on and and their results are presented. This study provides a preliminary model to operationalise the study of conceptual variation. It also identifies the areas of terminological conceptual analysis with the potential to be informed by other research methods towards creating a standalone methodology.

© 2023 John Benjamins Publishing Company
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/term.00069.cha
2023-10-26
2025-04-30

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/term.00069.cha
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alarcón, Rodrigo, Gerardo Sierra, and Carme Bach
    2008 ‘ECODE: A Pattern Based Approach for Definitional Knowledge Extraction’. InProceedings of the 13th EURALEX International Congress, 923–28. Barcelona, Spain: Institut Universitari de Lingüística Aplicada, Universitat Pompeu Fabra. https://euralex.org/publications/ecode-a-pattern-based-approach-for-definitional-knowledge-extraction/
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen, William
    2017 ‘Making Corpus Data Visible: Visualising Text with Research Intermediaries’. Corpora12 (3): 459–82. 10.3366/cor.2017.0128
     https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2017.0128 [Google Scholar]
  3. American Red Cross
    American Red Cross 2010 ‘2009 Annual Report’.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Barberá Laínez, Yolanda
    2005 ‘The Intersectoral Response to the Malaria Epidemic in Ethiopia in 2003: An Assessment’. Humanitarian Exchange, no.31: 25–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bengtsson, Mariette
    2016 ‘How to Plan and Perform a Qualitative Study Using Content Analysis’. NursingPlus Open21 (January): 8–14. 10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001 [Google Scholar]
  6. Berenskoetter, Felix
    2017 ‘Approaches to Concept Analysis’. Millennium45 (2): 151–73. 10.1177/0305829816651934
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829816651934 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cabezas-García, Melania, and Santiago Chambó
    2021 ‘Multi-Word Term Variation: Prepositional and Adjectival Complex Nominals in Spanish’. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics34 (2): 402–34. 10.1075/resla.19012.cab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.19012.cab [Google Scholar]
  8. Cabezas-García, Melania, and Juan Carlos Gil-Berrozpe
    2018 ‘Semantic-Based Retrieval of Complex Nominals in Terminographic Resources’. InProceedings of the XVIII EURALEX International Congress, 269–81. Ljubljana, Slovenia.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cabezas-García, Melania, and Pilar León-Araúz
    2018 ‘Towards the Inference of Semantic Relations in Complex Nominals: A Pilot Study’. InProceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018). Miyazaki, Japan: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). https://aclanthology.org/L18-1399
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cabrera Moreno, Irvin Yair, Mireya Tovar Vidal, José de Jesús Lavalle Martínez, and Meliza Contreras González
    2019 ‘Algoritmo Basado En Reglas de Asociación Para La Extracción de Relaciones No Taxonómicas En Corpus de Dominio’. Research in Computing Science148 (7): 277–88. 10.13053/rcs‑148‑7‑21
     https://doi.org/10.13053/rcs-148-7-21 [Google Scholar]
  11. Chambó, Santiago, and Pilar León-Araúz
    2021 ‘Visualising Lexical Data for a Corpus-Driven Encyclopaedia’. InProceedings of ELex 2021, 29–55. Brno, Czech Republic: Lexical Computing CZ s.r.o.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chen, Bo, Shouguo Fang, James P. Tam, and Ding Xiang Liu
    2009 ‘Formation of Stable Homodimer via the C-Terminal Alpha-Helical Domain of Coronavirus Nonstructural Protein 9 Is Critical for Its Function in Viral Replication’. Virology383 (2): 328–37. 10.1016/j.virol.2008.10.032
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2008.10.032 [Google Scholar]
  13. Cofie, Nicholas, Heather Braund, and Nancy Dalgarno
    2022 ‘Eight Ways to Get a Grip on Intercoder Reliability Using Qualitative-Based Measures’. Canadian Medical Education Journal13 (2): 73–76. 10.36834/cmej.72504
     https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.72504 [Google Scholar]
  14. Davies, Heather A., and M. R. Macnaughton
    1979 ‘Comparison of the Morphology of Three Coronaviruses’. Archives of Virology59 (1): 25–33. 10.1007/BF01317891
     https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01317891 [Google Scholar]
  15. De Bolla, Peter
    2021 ‘The Evolution of Aesthetic Concepts 1700–1800’. InBeyond Autonomy in Eighteenth-Century British and German Aesthetics, edited byKarl Axelsson, Camilla Flodin, and Mattias Pirholt, 21–46. New York, NY: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. De Bolla, Peter, Jones Ewan, Paul Nulty, Gabriel Recchia, and John Regan
    2019 ‘Distributional Concept Analysis: A Computational Model for History of Concepts’. Contributions to the History of Concepts14 (1): 66–92. 10.3167/choc.2019.140104
     https://doi.org/10.3167/choc.2019.140104 [Google Scholar]
  17. De Bolla, Peter, Ewan Jones, Paul Nulty, Gabriel Recchia, and John Regan
    2020 ‘The Idea of Liberty, 1600–1800: A Distributional Concept Analysis’. Journal of the History of Ideas81 (3): 381–406. 10.1353/jhi.2020.0023
     https://doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2020.0023 [Google Scholar]
  18. Delcambre, Lois M. L., Stephen W. Liddle, Oscar Pastor, and Veda C. Storey
    2018 ‘A Reference Framework for Conceptual Modeling’. InConceptual Modeling, edited byJuan C. Trujillo, Karen C. Davis, Xiaoyong Du, Zhanhuai Li, Tok Wang Ling, Guoliang Li, and Mong Li Lee, 27–42. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑00847‑5_4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00847-5_4 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dorantes, Miguel Alejandro, Alejandro Pimentel, Gerardo Sierra, Gemma Bel-Enguix, and Claudio Molina
    2017 ‘Extracción automática de definiciones analíticas y relaciones semánticas de hiponimia-hiperonimia con un sistema basado en patrones lingüísticos’. Linguamática9 (2): 33–44. 10.21814/lm.9.2.257
     https://doi.org/10.21814/lm.9.2.257 [Google Scholar]
  20. Durán-Muñoz, Isabel
    2016 ‘Producing Frame-Based Definitions: A Case Study’. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication22 (2): 223–49. 10.1075/term.22.2.04mun
     https://doi.org/10.1075/term.22.2.04mun [Google Scholar]
  21. Eberwein, Wolf-Dieter, and Sabine Saurugger
    2013 ‘The Professionalization of International Non-Governmental Organizations’. InRoutledge Handbook of International Organization, edited byBob Reinalda, 257–69. Abingdon-on-Thames, England: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Egger, Clara, and Doris Schopper
    2018 ‘What Are the Most Salient Concepts for Humanitarian Practice? Report on Concept Selection’. Geneva, Switzerland: Humanitarian Encyclopedia.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Espinosa-Anke, Luis, and Steven Schockaert
    2018 ‘Syntactically Aware Neural Architectures for Definition Extraction’. InProceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers), 378–85. New Orleans, Louisiana: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/N18‑2061
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-2061 [Google Scholar]
  24. Faber, Pamela
    2015 ‘Frames as a Framework for Terminology’. InHandbook of Terminology: Volume 1, edited byHendrik J. Kockaert and Frieda Steurs, 14–33. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/hot.1.02fra1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hot.1.02fra1 [Google Scholar]
  25. 2022 ‘Chapter 16. Frame-Based Terminology’. InTheoretical Perspectives on Terminology: Explaining Terms, Concepts and Specialized Knowledge, edited byPamela Faber and Marie-Claude L’Homme, 231:353–76. Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tlrp.23.16fab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.23.16fab [Google Scholar]
  26. Faber, Pamela, and Melania Cabezas-García
    2019 ‘Specialized Knowledge Representation: From Terms to Frames’. Research in Language17 (2): 197–211. 10.2478/rela‑2019‑0012
     https://doi.org/10.2478/rela-2019-0012 [Google Scholar]
  27. Faber, Pamela, and Pilar León-Araúz
    2019 ‘Frame-Based Terminology Applied to Military Science: Transforming a Glossary into a Knowledge Resource’. Lexicography6 (2): 105–31. 10.1007/s40607‑019‑00060‑y
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-019-00060-y [Google Scholar]
  28. Faber, Pamela, and Ricardo Mairal
    1998 ‘Methodological Criteria for the Elaboration of a Functional Lexicon-Based Grammar of the Semantic Domain of Cognitive Verbs’. In, 3–24. 10.1075/slcs.43.03fab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.43.03fab [Google Scholar]
  29. Faber, Pamela, Juan Antonio Prieto Velasco, and Pilar León-Araúz
    2009 ‘Semantic Relations, Dynamicity, and Terminological Knowledge Bases’. Current Issues in Language Studies1–231: 1.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, and WHO
    FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, and WHO 2017 The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2017: Building Resilience for Peace and Security. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2017. Rome, Italy: FAO.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Fernández-Martínez, Nicolás José, and Pamela Faber
    2020 ‘Who Stole What from Whom?: A Corpus-Based, Cross-Linguistic Study of English and Spanish Verbs of Stealing’. Languages in Contrast20 (1): 107–40. 10.1075/lic.19002.fer
     https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.19002.fer [Google Scholar]
  32. Fillmore, Charles J.
    2008 ‘Chapter 10 Frame Semantics’. InCognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, edited byDirk Geeraerts, 373–400. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110199901.373
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901.373 [Google Scholar]
  33. Food Security Information Network
    Food Security Information Network 2017 ‘Global Report on Food Crises 2017’.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Garbern, Stephanie C., Laura G. Ebbeling, and Susan A. Bartels
    2016 ‘A Systematic Review of Health Outcomes Among Disaster and Humanitarian Responders’. Prehospital and Disaster Medicine31 (6): 635–42. 10.1017/S1049023X16000832
     https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X16000832 [Google Scholar]
  35. Gavin, Michael, Collin Jennings, Lauren Kersey, and Brad Pasanek
    2019 ‘Spaces of Meaning: Conceptual History, Vector Semantics, and Close Reading’. InDebates in the Digital Humanities 2019, edited byMatthew K. Gold and Lauren F. Klein, 243–67. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/j.ctvg251hk.24
     https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctvg251hk.24 [Google Scholar]
  36. Gil-Berrozpe, Juan Carlos
    2020 ‘Attribute-Based Approach to Hyponymic Behavior in Botanical Terminology’. InTOTh 2019 – Terminology & Ontology: Theories and Applications, Terminologica, edited byC. Roche, 93–108. Chambéry, France: Éditions de l’Université de Savoie Mont Blanc.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Gil-Berrozpe, Juan Carlos, Pilar León-Araúz, and Pamela Faber
    2019 ‘Ontological Knowledge Enhancement in EcoLexicon’. InProceedings of the ELex 2019, 177–97. Sintra, Portugal: Lexical Computing. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7302779
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Guarino, Nicola, Giancarlo Guizzardi, and John Mylopoulos
    2020 ‘On the Philosophical Foundations of Conceptual Models’. InInformation Modelling and Knowledge Bases XXXI, edited byAjantha Dahanayake, Janne Huiskonen, Kiyoki, Yasuhi, Thalheim, Bernhard, Jaakkola, Hannu, and Yoshida, Naofumi, 3211:1–15. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Guilhaumou, Jacques
    2000 ‘De l’histoire Des Concepts à l’historire Linguistique Des Usages Conceptual’. Genèses, no.381: 105–18.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Humanitarian Encyclopedia
    Humanitarian Encyclopedia 2021a ‘Corpus’. Humanitarian Encyclopedia 2021 https://humanitarianencyclopedia.org/corpus
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Humanitarian Encyclopedia
    Humanitarian Encyclopedia 2021b ‘Methodology’. Humanitarian Encyclopedia 2021 https://humanitarianencyclopedia.org/methodology
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hupcey, Judith E., Janice M. Morse, Elizabeth R. Lenz, and Maritza Cerdas Tasón
    1996 ‘Wilsonian Methods of Concept Analysis: A Critique’. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice10 (3): 185–186,1881,194–200,202–210.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Hupcey, Judith E., and Janice Penrod
    2005 ‘Concept Analysis: Examining the State of the Science’. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice19 (2): 197–208. 10.1891/rtnp.19.2.197.66801
     https://doi.org/10.1891/rtnp.19.2.197.66801 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ifversen, Jan
    2021 ‘Part 2: After the Big Bang: The Fusing of New Approaches’. Contributions to the History of Concepts16 (2): v–xvii. 10.3167/choc.2021.160201
     https://doi.org/10.3167/choc.2021.160201 [Google Scholar]
  45. Jin, Jian-Min, Peng Bai, Wei He, Fei Wu, Xiao-Fang Liu, De-Min Han, Shi Liu, and Jin-Kui Yang
    2020 ‘Gender Differences in Patients With COVID-19: Focus on Severity and Mortality’. Frontiers in Public Health81. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00152. 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00152
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00152 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kantner, Cathleen, and Maximilian Overbeck
    2020 ‘Exploring Soft Concepts with Hard Corpus-Analytic Methods’. InReflektierte Algorithmische Textanalyse, edited byNiels Reiter, Axel Pichler, and Jonas Kuhn, 169–90. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110693973‑008
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110693973-008 [Google Scholar]
  47. Kilgarriff, Adam, Vít Baisa, Jan Bušta, Miloš Jakubíček, Vojtěch Kovář, Jan Michelfeit, Pavel Rychlý, and Vít Suchomel
    2014 ‘The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On’. Lexicography1 (1): 7–36. 10.1007/s40607‑014‑0009‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s40607-014-0009-9 [Google Scholar]
  48. Kovář, Vojtěch, Monika Močiariková, and Pavel Rychlý
    2016 ‘Finding Definitions in Large Corpora with Sketch Engine’. InProceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’16), 391–94. Portorož, Slovenia: European Language Resources Association (ELRA). https://aclanthology.org/L16-1061
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Kumar, Priyanshu, Aadarsh Singh, Pramod Kumar, and Chiranjeev Kumar
    2020 ‘An Explainable Machine Learning Approach for Definition Extraction’. In, edited byArup Bhattacharjee, Samir Kr. Borgohain, Badal Soni, Gyanendra Verma, and Xiao-Zhi Gao, 12411:145–55. Communications in Computer and Information Science. Singapore: Springer Singapore. 10.1007/978‑981‑15‑6318‑8_13
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6318-8_13 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kyngäs, Helvi
    2020 ‘Inductive Content Analysis’. InThe Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research, edited byHelvi Kyngäs, Kristina Mikkonen, and Maria Kääriäinen, 13–21. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑30199‑6_2
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_2 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kyngäs, Helvi, and Pirjo Kaakinen
    2020 ‘Deductive Content Analysis’. InThe Application of Content Analysis in Nursing Science Research, edited byHelvi Kyngäs, Kristina Mikkonen, and Maria Kääriäinen, 23–30. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑30199‑6_3
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30199-6_3 [Google Scholar]
  52. Lan, Jun, Jiwan Ge, Jinfang Yu, Sisi Shan, Huan Zhou, Shilong Fan, Qi Zhang,
    2020 ‘Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-Binding Domain Bound to the ACE2 Receptor’. Nature581 (7807): 215–20. 10.1038/s41586‑020‑2180‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2180-5 [Google Scholar]
  53. Le Naëlou, Anne
    2004 ‘ONG : les pièges de la professionnalisation’. Revue Tiers Monde180 (4): 727–34. 10.3917/rtm.180.0727
     https://doi.org/10.3917/rtm.180.0727 [Google Scholar]
  54. León-Araúz, Pilar
    2017 ‘Term and Concept Variation in Specialized Knowledge Dynamics’. InMultiple Perspectives on Terminological Variation, edited byPatrick Drouin, Aline Francoeur, John Humbley, and Aurélie Picton. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tlrp.18.09leo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.18.09leo [Google Scholar]
  55. 2019 ‘Multi-Word Term Extraction with Word Sketches’. Unpublished work.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. León-Araúz, Pilar, and Pamela Faber
    2010 ‘Natural and Contextual Constraints for Domain-Specific Relations’. InProceedings of the Workshop Semantic Relations. Theory and Applications, 12–17. La Valetta, Malta.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. León-Araúz, Pilar, Pamela Faber, and Silvia Montero Martínez
    2012 ‘Specialized Language Semantics’. InA Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Language, edited byPamela Faber, 95–175. Boston, United States: De Gruyter Mouton.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. León-Araúz, Pilar, and Arianne Reimerink
    2019 ‘High-Density Knowledge Rich Contexts’. Argentinian Journal of Applied Linguistics (1): 109–30.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. León-Araúz, Pilar, Arianne Reimerink, and Pamela Faber
    2019 ‘EcoLexicon and By-Products: Integrating and Reusing Terminological Resources’. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication25 (2): 222–58. 10.1075/term.00037.leo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/term.00037.leo [Google Scholar]
  60. León-Araúz, Pilar, and Antonio San Martín
    2018 ‘The EcoLexicon Semantic Sketch Grammar: From Knowledge Patterns to Word Sketches’. InProceedings of the LREC 2018 Workshop, edited byI. Kernenman and S. Krek. Miyazaki, Japan: Globalex.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. León-Araúz, Pilar, Antonio San Martín, and Pamela Faber
    2016 ‘Pattern-Based Word Sketches for the Extraction of Semantic Relations’. InProceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Computational Terminology (Computerm2016), 73–82. Osaka, Japan: The COLING 2016 Organizing Committee. https://aclanthology.org/W16-4709
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Liberian Red Cross
    Liberian Red Cross 2015 ‘2014 Annual Report’.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Lindgren, Simon
    2016 ‘Introducing Connected Concept Analysis: A Network Approach to Big Text Datasets’. Text & Talk36 (3): 341–62. 10.1515/text‑2016‑0016
     https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2016-0016 [Google Scholar]
  64. Marshman, Elizabeth
    2022 ‘Chapter 13. Knowledge Patterns in Corpora’. InTheoretical Perspectives on Terminology: Explaining Terms, Concepts and Specialized Knowledge, edited byPamela Faber and Marie-Claude L’Homme, 231:291–310. Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tlrp.23.13mar
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.23.13mar [Google Scholar]
  65. Meyer, Ingrid
    2001 ‘Extracting Knowledge-Rich Contexts for Terminography’. InRecent Advances in Computational Terminology, edited byDidier Bourigault, Christian Jacquemin, and Marie-Claude L’Homme, 279–302. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/nlp.2.15mey
     https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.2.15mey [Google Scholar]
  66. 2022 ‘Chapter 5. Concept Management for Terminology: A Knowledge Engineering Approach’. InTheoretical Perspectives on Terminology: Explaining Terms, Concepts and Specialized Knowledge, edited byPamela Faber and Marie-Claude L’Homme, 231:111–26. Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tlrp.23.05mey
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.23.05mey [Google Scholar]
  67. Meyer, Ingrid, and Kristen Mackintosh
    1996 ‘Refining the Terminographer’s Concept-Analysis Methods: How Can Phraseology Help?’ Terminology3 (1): 1–26. 10.1075/term.3.1.02mey
     https://doi.org/10.1075/term.3.1.02mey [Google Scholar]
  68. Millet, Jean Kaoru, and Gary R. Whittaker
    2018 ‘Physiological and Molecular Triggers for SARS-CoV Membrane Fusion and Entry into Host Cells’. Virology5171 (April): 3–8. 10.1016/j.virol.2017.12.015
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2017.12.015 [Google Scholar]
  69. Montero-Martínez, Silvia, and Míriam Castro-Buendía
    2017 ‘Clasificación Semántica de Colocaciones Verbales Para La Adquisición y Codificación de Conocimiento Experto: El Caso de Los Riesgos Naturales’. Revista Española de Lingüística Aplicada/Spanish Journal of Applied Linguistics30 (1): 240–72. 10.1075/resla.30.1.10mon
     https://doi.org/10.1075/resla.30.1.10mon [Google Scholar]
  70. Mopkins, Dawn
    2022 ‘Workplace Psychological Distress: A Concept Analysis’. Workplace Health & Safety70 (10): 436–44. 10.1177/21650799221090641
     https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799221090641 [Google Scholar]
  71. Nuopponen, Anita
    2010a ‘Methods of Concept Analysis-a Comparative Study Part 1 of 3’. LSP Journal1 (1).
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 2010b ‘Methods of Concept Analysis – towards Systematic Concept Analysis (Part 2 of 3)’. LSP Journal1 (2).
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 2011 ‘Methods of Concept Analysis-Tools for Systematic Concept Analysis Part 3 of 3’. LSP Journal2 (1).
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 2018 ‘23. Terminological Concept Systems’. In23. Terminological Concept Systems, 453–68. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110228014‑023
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110228014-023 [Google Scholar]
  75. 2022 ‘Chapter 3. Conceptual Relations: From the General Theory of Terminology to Knowledge Bases’. InTheoretical Perspectives on Terminology: Explaining Terms, Concepts and Specialized Knowledge, edited byPamela Faber and Marie-Claude L’Homme, 231:63–86. Terminology and Lexicography Research and Practice. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tlrp.23.03nuo
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.23.03nuo [Google Scholar]
  76. Oxford, John S., and Bo Öberg
    eds. 1985 ‘Chapter 9 Infections Caused by Rubella, Reoviridae, Retro, Norwalk and Ronaviruses’. InPerspectives in Medical Virology, 11:405–44. Conquest of Viral Diseases. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. 10.1016/S0168‑7069(08)70017‑X
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-7069(08)70017-X [Google Scholar]
  77. Peng, Xian, Xin Xu, Yuqing Li, Lei Cheng, Xuedong Zhou, and Biao Ren
    2020 ‘Transmission Routes of 2019-NCoV and Controls in Dental Practice’. International Journal of Oral Science12 (1): 1–6. 10.1038/s41368‑020‑0075‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-020-0075-9 [Google Scholar]
  78. Penrod, Janice, and Judith E. Hupcey
    2005 ‘Enhancing Methodological Clarity: Principle-Based Concept Analysis’. Journal of Advanced Nursing50 (4): 403–9. 10.1111/j.1365‑2648.2005.03405.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03405.x [Google Scholar]
  79. Pillaiyar, Thanigaimalai, Manoj Manickam, Vigneshwaran Namasivayam, Yoshio Hayashi, and Sang-Hun Jung
    2016 ‘An Overview of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome–Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) 3CL Protease Inhibitors: Peptidomimetics and Small Molecule Chemotherapy’. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry59 (14): 6595–6628. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01461
     https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01461 [Google Scholar]
  80. Pollak, Senja, Anze Vavpetic, Janez Kranjc, N. Lavrač, and Špela Vintar
    2012 ‘NLP Workflow for On-Line Definition Extraction from English and Slovene Text Corpora’. InProceedings of KONVENS 2012. Vienna, Austria.
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Prior, Lindsay, Meirion R. Evans, and Hayley Prout
    2011 ‘Talking about Colds and Flu: The Lay Diagnosis of Two Common Illnesses among Older British People’. Social Science & Medicine (1982)73 (6): 922–28. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.054
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.054 [Google Scholar]
  82. Punuru, Janardhana, and Jianhua Chen
    2012a ‘Discovering Semantic Relations Using Prepositional Phrases’. InFoundations of Intelligent Systems, edited byLi Chen, Alexander Felfernig, Jiming Liu, and Zbigniew W. Raś, 149–54. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑34624‑8_18
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34624-8_18 [Google Scholar]
  83. 2012b ‘Learning Non-Taxonomical Semantic Relations from Domain Texts’. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems38 (1): 191–207. 10.1007/s10844‑011‑0149‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10844-011-0149-4 [Google Scholar]
  84. Qi, Furong, Shen Qian, Shuye Zhang, and Zheng Zhang
    2020 ‘Single Cell RNA Sequencing of 13 Human Tissues Identify Cell Types and Receptors of Human Coronaviruses’. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications526 (1): 135–40. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.03.044
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.03.044 [Google Scholar]
  85. Risjord, Mark
    2009 ‘Rethinking Concept Analysis’. Journal of Advanced Nursing65 (3): 684–91. 10.1111/j.1365‑2648.2008.04903.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04903.x [Google Scholar]
  86. Rodgers, Beth L., Cynthia S. Jacelon, and Kathleen A. Knafl
    2018 ‘Concept Analysis and the Advance of Nursing Knowledge: State of the Science’. Journal of Nursing Scholarship50 (4): 451–59. 10.1111/jnu.12386
     https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12386 [Google Scholar]
  87. Rojas-Garcia, Juan
    2022 ‘Semantic Representation of Context for Description of Named Rivers in a Terminological Knowledge Base’. Frontiers in Psychology131. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.847024. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.847024
     https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.847024 [Google Scholar]
  88. Sabharwal, Meghna, Helisse Levine, and Maria D’Agostino
    2018 ‘A Conceptual Content Analysis of 75 Years of Diversity Research in Public Administration’. Review of Public Personnel Administration38 (2): 248–67. 10.1177/0734371X16671368
     https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X16671368 [Google Scholar]
  89. San Martín, Antonio, and Catherine Trekker
    2021 ‘Adapting Word Sketches for Specialized Knowledge Extraction’. InProceedings of ASIALEX 2021, 64–87. Jarkarta, Indonesia: ASIALEX.
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Sánchez, David, and Antonio Moreno
    2006 ‘Discovering Non-Taxonomic Relations from the Web’. InIntelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2006, edited byEmilio Corchado, Hujun Yin, Vicente Botti, and Colin Fyfe, 629–36. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin. 10.1007/11875581_76
     https://doi.org/10.1007/11875581_76 [Google Scholar]
  91. Serra, Ivo, and Rosario Girardi
    2011 ‘A Process for Extracting Non-Taxonomic Relationships of Ontologies from Text’ 2011 (July). 10.4236/iim.2011.34014
     https://doi.org/10.4236/iim.2011.34014 [Google Scholar]
  92. Sezgin, Zeynep, and Dennis Dijkzeul
    eds. 2015 The New Humanitarians in International Practice: Emerging Actors and Contested Principles. London, UK: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315737621
     https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315737621 [Google Scholar]
  93. Shan, Yu-Fei, Shou-Feng Li, and Gen-Jun Xu
    2004 ‘A Novel Auto-Cleavage Assay for Studying Mutational Effects on the Active Site of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 3C-like Protease’. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications324 (2): 579–83. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.088
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.09.088 [Google Scholar]
  94. Shipley, Rebecca, Edward Wright, David Selden, Guanghui Wu, James Aegerter, Anthony R. Fooks, and Ashley C. Banyard
    2019 ‘Bats and Viruses: Emergence of Novel Lyssaviruses and Association of Bats with Viral Zoonoses in the EU’. Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease4 (1): 31. 10.3390/tropicalmed4010031
     https://doi.org/10.3390/tropicalmed4010031 [Google Scholar]
  95. Sierra, Gerardo, Rodrigo Alarcón, César Aguilar, and Carme Bach
    2008 ‘Definitional Verbal Patterns for Semantic Relation Extraction’. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication14 (1): 74–98. 10.1075/term.14.1.05sie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/term.14.1.05sie [Google Scholar]
  96. 2010 ‘Definitional Verb Patterns for Semantic Relation Extraction’. InProbing Semantic Relations: Exploration and Identification in Specialized Texts, edited byAlain Auger and Caroline Barrière, 74–96. Benjamins Current Topics. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/bct.23.04sie
     https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.23.04sie [Google Scholar]
  97. Siirtola, H., Kari-Jouko Räihä, Tanja Säily, and T. Nevalainen
    2010 ‘Information Visualization for Corpus Linguistics: Towards Interactive Tools’. 10.1145/2002353.2002365
     https://doi.org/10.1145/2002353.2002365 [Google Scholar]
  98. Smith, Stephanie, and Evalotte Mörelius
    2021 ‘Principle-Based Concept Analysis Methodology Using a Phased Approach With Quality Criteria’. International Journal of Qualitative Methods201 (January): 16094069211057996. 10.1177/16094069211057995
     https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211057995 [Google Scholar]
  99. Stroup, Sarah S.
    2012 Borders among Activists: International NGOs in the United States, Britain, and France. Borders among Activists. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 10.7591/9780801464256
     https://doi.org/10.7591/9780801464256 [Google Scholar]
  100. Sphere Association
    Sphere Association 2018 The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response. Geneva, Switzerland. 10.3362/9781908176738
     https://doi.org/10.3362/9781908176738 [Google Scholar]
  101. UNICEF
    UNICEF 2009 ‘UNICEF Humanitarian Action Report 2009’. Geneva, Switzerland: UNICEF.
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Veyseh, Amir, Franck Dernoncourt, Dejing Dou, and Thien Nguyen
    2020 ‘A Joint Model for Definition Extraction with Syntactic Connection and Semantic Consistency’. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence34 (05): 9098–9105. 10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6444
     https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6444 [Google Scholar]
  103. Vintar, Špela, and Matej Martinc
    2022 ‘Framing Karstology: From Definitions to Knowledge Structures and Automatic Frame Population’. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication28 (1): 129–56. 10.1075/term.21005.vin
     https://doi.org/10.1075/term.21005.vin [Google Scholar]
  104. Vintar, Špela, Amanda Saksida, Katarina Vrtovec, and U. Stepišnik
    2019 ‘Modelling Specialized Knowledge With Conceptual Frames: The TermFrame Approach to a Structured Visual Domain Representation’. InProceedings of ELex 2019, 305–18. Brno, Czech Republic: Lexical Computing CZ s.r.o.
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Walker, Lorraine Olszewski, and Kay Coalson Avant
    1995 Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
     [Google Scholar]
  106. 2013 Strategies for Theory Construction in Nursing. 5. ed.Pearson Custom Library. London, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Wang, Lucy Lu, Kyle Lo, Yoganand Chandrasekhar, Russell Reas, Jiangjiang Yang, Doug Burdick, Darrin Eide,
    2020 ‘CORD-19: The COVID-19 Open Research Dataset’.
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Weichselbraun, Albert, Gerhard Wohlgenannt, Arno Scharl, Michael Granitzer, Thomas Neidhart, and Andreas Juffinger
    2009 ‘Discovery and Evaluation of Non-Taxonomic Relations in Domain Ontologies’. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies4 (3): 212–22. 10.1504/IJMSO.2009.027755
     https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2009.027755 [Google Scholar]
  109. Wilmont, Ilona, Sytse Hengeveld, Erik Barendsen, and Stijn Hoppenbrouwers
    2013 ‘Cognitive Mechanisms of Conceptual Modelling’. InConceptual Modeling, edited byWilfred Ng, Veda C. Storey, and Juan C. Trujillo, 74–87. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Berlin. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑41924‑9_7
     https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41924-9_7 [Google Scholar]
  110. Zhang, Chengxin, Wei Zheng, Xiaoqiang Huang, Eric W. Bell, Xiaogen Zhou, and Yang Zhang
    2020 ‘Protein Structure and Sequence Reanalysis of 2019-NCoV Genome Refutes Snakes as Its Intermediate Host and the Unique Similarity between Its Spike Protein Insertions and HIV-1’. Journal of Proteome Research19 (4): 1351–60. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00129
     https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00129 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/term.00069.cha
Loading
Corpus-driven conceptual analysis of epidemic and coronavirus for the Humanitarian Encyclopedia
Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 29, 180 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1075/term.00069.cha
/content/journals/10.1075/term.00069.cha
/content/journals/10.1075/term.00069.cha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conceptual analysis; conceptual variation; Frame-based Terminology; lexical data; multidimensionality

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error