1887
image of Term variation and framing in the context of ideological struggle
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

Term variation relates to the representation and communication of specialized knowledge in different contexts. Terminological choices reflect how a speaker understands a concept or wishes to present it in a given context; they can shape understanding within specialized fields and influence public opinion on scientific issues. However, capturing systematic patterns in these choices is challenging due the highly contextual nature of categorization. This study applies frame analysis to study the behavior and motivations behind the use of term variants related to surrogacy, a controversial topic with legal, social and economic dimensions. First, it performs a cognitive-semantic analysis of 30 term variants identified in scientific and activist discourse, revealing different perspectives that range from critical to favorable towards the practice. Second, it examines how these terms are used and framed in a corpus of Spanish press from different ideological orientations. Results show a correlation between the evaluative valences of terms and frames in the case of less frequent variants, whereas the most frequent variants are used across different frames. Furthermore, critical framings and terms are more common in progressive media outlets, emphasizing the illegality and commodification of the practice. In contrast, liberal newspapers adopt more neutral and/or favorable framings, focusing on the need for regulation or the personal experiences of intending parents. The findings provide insights into how cognitive frames and terminological choices reflect broader ideological struggles in scientific and public discourse.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/term.00092.fer
2026-03-31
2026-04-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Benítez, Valeria, and Pilar León-Araúz
    2023 “Denominative Variation in the COVID-19 Open Research Dataset Corpus.” Terminology: International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication (): –. 10.1075/term.00071.ben
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.00071.ben [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertulessi, Chiara
    2024 “Terminology, Popularisation and Ideology in Contemporary China: The ‘Scientific & Technical Term of the Day’ Column.” Terminology: International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication (): –. 10.1075/term.00077.ber
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.00077.ber [Google Scholar]
  3. Bureau, Pauline
    2024 “Climate Knowledge or Climate Debate?: Using Word Embeddings and Critical Discourse Analysis to Compare Expert and Media Representations of Climate Knowledge.” Terminology: International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication (): –. 10.1075/term.00076.bur
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.00076.bur [Google Scholar]
  4. Cabré, María Teresa
    2008 “El principio de poliedricidad: La articulación de lo discursivo, lo cognitivo y lo lingüístico en Terminología (I).” Ibérica: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Carvalho, Anabela
    2007 “Ideological Cultures and Media Discourses on Scientific Knowledge: Re-Reading News on Climate Change.” Public Understanding of Science (): –. 10.1177/0963662506066775
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506066775 [Google Scholar]
  6. Cesare, Francesca de
    2017 “La gestación subrogada en los titulares de la prensa española.” Confluenze (): –. 10.6092/issn.2036‑0967/7757
    https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.2036-0967/7757 [Google Scholar]
  7. Cienki, Alan
    2007 “Frames, Idealized Cognitive Models, and Domains.” InThe Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics, edited byDirk Geeraerts and Hubert Cuykens, –. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman
    2007 “Framing Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science (): –. 10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054 [Google Scholar]
  9. Cristina, Mariana
    2022 “¿Alquiler o sustitución del embarazo? Sobre la importancia de los significantes en la construcción de sentido.” Revista de Bioética y Derecho, : –. 10.1344/rbd2021.54.34891
    https://doi.org/10.1344/rbd2021.54.34891 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2023 “Algunos argumentos feministas para objetar la relación de alquiler del embarazo.” Análisis Filosófico (): –. 10.36446/af.2023.463
    https://doi.org/10.36446/af.2023.463 [Google Scholar]
  11. Curvadic, Dorde
    2002 “Los marcos interpretativos textuales: herramienta metodológica para el análisis del discurso periodístico”. Revista De Ciencias Sociales, : –.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Daille, Béatrice
    2017Term Variation in Specialised Corpora: Characterization, Automatic Discovery and Applications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tlrp.19
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.19 [Google Scholar]
  13. de Vreese, Claes H.
    2002Framing Europe: Television News and European Integration. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. 2005 “News Framing: Theory and Typology.” Information Design Journal + Document Design (): –. 10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre [Google Scholar]
  15. Durán-Muñoz, Isabel
    2016 “Producing Frame-Based Definitions: A Case Study.” Terminology: International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication (): –. 10.1075/term.22.2.04mun
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.22.2.04mun [Google Scholar]
  16. Entman, Robert M.
    1993 “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication (): –. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.1993.tb01304.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x [Google Scholar]
  17. Faber, Pamela
    ed. 2012A Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Language. New York: De Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110277203
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110277203 [Google Scholar]
  18. ed. 2022 “Frame-Based Terminology.” InTheoretical Perspectives on Terminology: Explaining Terms, Concepts and Specialized Knowledge, edited byPamela Faber and Marie-Claude L’Homme, –. Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tlrp.23.16fab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.23.16fab [Google Scholar]
  19. Faber, Pamela, Pilar León-Araúz, and Juan A. Prieto
    2009 “Semantic Relations, Dynamicity, and Terminological Knowledge Bases.” Current Issues in Language Studies (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Fernández-Silva, Sabela
    2022 “Cognitive approaches to the study of term variation.” InTheoretical perspectives on Terminology. Explaining terms, concepts and specialized knowledge, edited byPamela Faber and Marie-Claude L’Homme, –. Amsterdan/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tlrp.23.20fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.23.20fer [Google Scholar]
  21. Fernández-Silva, Sabela, Judit Freixa, and M. Teresa Cabré
    2011 “A Proposed Method for Analysing the Dynamics of Cognition through Term Variation”. Terminology: International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication (): –. 10.1075/term.17.1.04fer
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.17.1.04fer [Google Scholar]
  22. Fillmore, Charles J.
    1977 “Topics in lexical semantics.” InCurrent Issues in Linguistic Theory, edited byRoger W. Cole, –. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. 2006 “Frame Semantics.” InCognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings, edited byDirk Geeraerts, –. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199901.373
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901.373 [Google Scholar]
  24. Freixa, Judit
    2006 “Causes of Denominative Variation in Terminology: A Typology Proposal”. Terminology: International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication (): –. 10.1075/term.12.1.04fre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.12.1.04fre [Google Scholar]
  25. Freixa, Judit, and Sabela Fernandez-Silva
    2017 “Terminological Variation and the Unsaturability of Concepts.” InMultiple Perspectives on Terminological Variation, edited byPatrick Drouin, Aline Francoeur, John Humbley, and Aurélie Picton, –. Amsterdam/Philadephia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tlrp.18.07fre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.18.07fre [Google Scholar]
  26. Goffman, Erving
    1974Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jefatura del Estado
    Jefatura del Estado. Ley 14/2006, de 26 de mayo, sobre técnicas de reproducción humana asistida. BOEno., 27 May 2006. BOE-A-2006-9292. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/l/2006/05/26/14/con
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kuperman, Victor, Zachary Estes, Marc Brysbaert and Amy Beth Warriner
    2014 “Emotion and language: valence and arousal affect word recognition”. Journal of experimental psychology. General(): –. 10.1037/a0035669
    https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035669 [Google Scholar]
  29. Leveau, Nicolas, Sandra Jhean-Larose, Guy Denhière, and Ba-Linh Nguyen
    2012 “Validating an interlingual metanorm for emotional analysis of texts”. Behavior Research Methods: –. 10.3758/s13428‑012‑0208‑y
    https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0208-y [Google Scholar]
  30. Lamm, Eleonora
    2013Gestación por sustitución: Ni maternidad subrogada ni alquiler de vientres. Barcelona: Publicacions de la UB.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. León Aráuz, Pilar, and Anne Reimerink
    2014 “From Term Dynamics to Concept Dynamics: Term Variation and Multidimensionality in the Psychiatric Domain.” InProceedings of the XVI EURALEX International Congress, edited byAndrea Abel, Chiara Vettori, and Natascia Ralli, –. Bolzano: EURALEX.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Markens, Susan
    2012 “The Global Reproductive Health Market: U.S. Media Framings and Public Discourses about Transnational Surrogacy.” Social Science & Medicine (): –. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.013 [Google Scholar]
  33. McDonald, Kelsey, Rose Graves, Siyuan Yin, Tara Weese, and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
    2021 “Valence framing effects on moral judgments: A meta-analysis”. Cognition: . 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104703
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104703 [Google Scholar]
  34. Pei, Jiamin, and Le Cheng
    2020 “Mapping Terminological Variation and Ideology in Data Protection Laws.” Terminology: International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication (): –. 10.1075/term.00049.pei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.00049.pei [Google Scholar]
  35. Peruzzo, Katia, and Paola Catenaccio
    2024 “Introduction: Terminology, Ideology and Discourse.” Terminology: International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication (): –. 10.1075/term.00074.per
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.00074.per [Google Scholar]
  36. Posada Kubissa, Luisa
    2021 “Sobre los ’vientres de alquiler’: Debates y reflexiones desde la crítica feminista.” EUNOMÍA: Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad, : –. 10.20318/eunomia.2021.6070
    https://doi.org/10.20318/eunomia.2021.6070 [Google Scholar]
  37. Puleo, Alicia H.
    2017 “Nuevas formas de desigualdad en un mundo globalizado: El alquiler de úteros como extractivismo.” Revista Europea de Derechos Fundamentales, : –.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Reese, Stephen
    2001 “Framing Public Life: A Bridging Model for Media Research.” InFraming Public Life, edited byStephen Reese, Oscar H. Gandy Jr., and August E. Grant, –. Mahwah, NJ, London: Erlbaum. 10.4324/9781410605689‑7
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605689-7 [Google Scholar]
  39. Rodríguez-Jaume, M. José, M. José González-Río, and Diana Jareño-Ruiz
    2019 “Preguntas y respuestas sobre la gestación por sustitución: Los estudios de opinión pública a revisión.” Política y Sociedad (): –. 10.5209/poso.59736
    https://doi.org/10.5209/poso.59736 [Google Scholar]
  40. Rodríguez-Otero, Luis M., and Alma A. Villa-Rueda
    2023 “Representaciones virtuales de la gestación subrogada en clínicas y agencias privadas mexicanas.” OBETS: Revista de Ciencias Sociales (): –. 10.14198/obets.23799
    https://doi.org/10.14198/obets.23799 [Google Scholar]
  41. Rodríguez-Pedreira, Nuria
    2018 “De la ’mère porteuse’ à la ’GPA’: Vers un contournement du tabou.” Acta Universitatis Lodziensis. Folia Litteraria Romanica, : –. 10.18778/1505‑9065.12.04
    https://doi.org/10.18778/1505-9065.12.04 [Google Scholar]
  42. Sanmartín, Julia
    2023 “Análisis discursivo de la constelación léxica sobre gestación subrogada en medios de comunicación de España: Posicionamientos ideológicos enfrentados.” Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, : –. 10.5209/clac.81667
    https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.81667 [Google Scholar]
  43. Sarasol, Clara, and Francisca Ramón
    2021 “La Gestación Subrogada: Aspectos Éticos y Jurídicos en el Derecho Español.” JURÍDICAS CUC (): –. 10.17981/juridcuc.17.1.2021.12
    https://doi.org/10.17981/juridcuc.17.1.2021.12 [Google Scholar]
  44. Semetko, Holli A., and Patti M. Valkenburg
    2000 “Framing European Politics: A Content Analysis of Press and Television News.” Journal of Communication (): –. 10.1111/j.1460‑2466.2000.tb02843.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x [Google Scholar]
  45. Temmerman, Rita
    2000Towards New Ways of Terminology Description: The Sociocognitive Approach. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/tlrp.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.3 [Google Scholar]
  46. Tercedor, Maribel
    2011 “The Cognitive Dynamics of Terminological Variation.” Terminology (): –. 10.1075/term.17.2.01ter
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.17.2.01ter [Google Scholar]
  47. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman
    1981 “The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice”. Science(): –. 10.1126/science.7455683
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683 [Google Scholar]
  48. Ureña Gómez-Moreno, José M., Pamela Faber, and Miriam Buendía
    2013 “Frame Blending in Specialized Language: Harmful Algal Bloom.” Terminology: International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication (): –. 10.1075/term.19.2.02gom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.19.2.02gom [Google Scholar]
  49. van den Akker, O., P. Fronek, E. Blyth, and L. Frith
    2016 “‘This Neo-Natal Ménage à Trois’: British Media Framing of Transnational Surrogacy.” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology (): –. 10.1080/02646838.2015.1106454
    https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2015.1106454 [Google Scholar]
  50. Wu, Hua, and Ming Zhou
    2003 “Optimizing Synonym Extraction Using Monolingual and Bilingual Resources.” InProceedings of the Second International Workshop on Paraphrasing, , –. 10.3115/1118984.1118994
    https://doi.org/10.3115/1118984.1118994 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/term.00092.fer
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/term.00092.fer
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keywords: press discourse ; term variation ; surrogacy ; frames ; cognitive context
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error