oa Terminological hybridity in institutional legal translation

References

1. Biber, Douglas
   1993 “Representativeness in Corpus Design.” Literary and Linguistic Computing8 (4): 243–257. 10.1093/llc/8.4.243
   https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/8.4.243 [Google Scholar]
2. Corpas Pastor, Gloria, and Miriam Seghiri Domínguez
   2006 ReCor.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Fontanet, Mathilde
   2018 “Translating Hybrid Legal Texts for Science and Technology Institutions: The Case of CERN.” InInstitutional Translation for International Governance: Enhancing Quality in Multilingual Legal Communication, ed. byFernando Prieto Ramos, 126–138. London: Bloomsbury. 10.5040/9781474292320.0018
   https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474292320.0018 [Google Scholar]
4. Gries, Stefan T.
   2008 “Phraseology and Linguistic Theory: A Brief Survey.” InPhraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, ed. bySylviane Granger, and Fanny Meunier, 3–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/z.139.06gri
   https://doi.org/10.1075/z.139.06gri [Google Scholar]
5. Hewson, Lance
   2013 “Is English as a lingua franca translation’s defining moment?” The Interpreter and Translator Trainer7 (2): 257–277. 10.1080/13556509.2013.10798854
   https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2013.10798854 [Google Scholar]
6. Kjær, Anne-Lise
   2007 “Phrasemes in legal texts.” InPhraseology. An International Handbook of Contemporary Research (Vol.21), ed. byHarald Burger, Dimitrij Dobrovol’skij, Peter Kühn, and Neal R. Norrick, 506–515. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Koester, Almut
   2010 “Building Small Specialised Corpora.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, ed. byMichael McCarthy, and Anne O’Keeffe, 66–79. Abingdon: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203856949.ch6
   https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856949.ch6 [Google Scholar]
8. Mayoral Asensio, Roberto
   2007 “Specialised translation: A concept in need of revision.” Babel53 (1): 48–55. 10.1075/babel.53.1.05may
   https://doi.org/10.1075/babel.53.1.05may [Google Scholar]
9. McAuliffe, Karen
   2011 “Hybrid texts and uniform law? The multilingual case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union.” International Journal for the Semiotics of Law241: 97–115. 10.1007/s11196‑010‑9188‑3
   https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-010-9188-3 [Google Scholar]
10. O’Donnell, Mick
    2019 UAM CorpusTool. Retrieved fromwww.corpustool.com/index.html
    [Google Scholar]
11. Oostdijk, Nelleke
    1991 Corpus Linguistics and the Automatic Analysis of English. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Prieto Ramos, Fernando
    2014a “International and supranational law in translation: From multilingual lawmaking to adjudication.” The Translator20 (3): 313–331. 10.1080/13556509.2014.904080
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2014.904080 [Google Scholar]
13. Prieto Ramos, Fernando
    2014b “Parameters for problem-solving in legal translation: Implications for legal lexicography and institutional terminology management.” InThe Ashgate Handbook of Legal Translation, ed. byAnne Wagner, Kin-Kui Sin, and Le Cheng, 121–134. Farnham: Ashgate.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Prieto Ramos, Fernando
    2019 “Implications of Text Categorisation for Corpus-based Legal Translation Research: The Case of International Institutional Settings.” InResearch Methods in Legal Translation and Interpreting: Crossing Methodological Boundaries, ed. byŁucja Biel, Jan Engberg, Rosario Martín Ruano, and Vilelmini Sosoni, 29–47. London and New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781351031226‑3
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351031226-3 [Google Scholar]
15. Prieto Ramos, Fernando
    2020 “The use of resources for legal terminological decision-making: patterns and profile variations among institutional translators.” Perspectives29 (2): 278–310. 10.1080/0907676X.2020.1803376
    https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2020.1803376 [Google Scholar]
16. Prieto Ramos, Fernando, Giorgina Cerutti, and Diego Guzmán
    2019 “Building representative multi-genre corpora for legal and institutional translation research: The LETRINT approach to text categorization and stratified sampling.” Translation Spaces8 (1): 93–116. 10.1075/ts.00014.pri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ts.00014.pri [Google Scholar]
17. Prieto Ramos, Fernando, and Giorgina Cerutti
    2021 “Terminology as a source of difficulty in translating international legal discourses: an empirical cross-genre study.” International Journal of Legal Discourse6 (2): 155–179. 10.1515/ijld‑2021‑2052
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ijld-2021-2052 [Google Scholar]
18. Prieto Ramos, Fernando, and Diego Guzmán
    2021 “Examining institutional translation through a legal lens: A comparative analysis of multilingual text production at international organizations.” Target33 (2): 254–281. 10.1075/target.21003.pri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.21003.pri [Google Scholar]
19. Ruusila, Anna, and Emilia Lindroos
    2016 “Conditio sine qua non. On phraseology in legal language and its translation.” Language and Law / Linguagem e Direito3 (1): 120–140.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Sandrelli, Annalisa
    2018 “Observing Eurolects: The case of English.” InObserving Eurolects: Corpus analysis of linguistic variation in EU law, ed. byLaura Mori, 64–92. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Tirkkonen-Condit, Sonja
    2001 “EU project proposals as hybrid texts: Observations from a Finnish research project.” Across Languages and Cultures2 (2): 261–265. 10.1556/Acr.2.2001.2.9
    https://doi.org/10.1556/Acr.2.2001.2.9 [Google Scholar]
22. Trklja, Aleksandar
    2018 “A corpus investigation of formulaicity and hybridity in legal language. A case of EU case law texts.” InPhraseology in Legal and Institutional Settings, ed. byAnne Wagner, Vijay Kumar Bhatia, Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski, and Gianluca Pontrandolfo, 157–169. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]