1887
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-9971
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9994
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Novel metaphorical expressions are understudied in traditional approaches to terminology because they behave as sporadic units incapable of structuring whole discourse events. To show that this assumption is wrong, this paper presents a case study of novel bioeconomics metaphors in an academic marine biology research article (Landa 1998). They were analysed following the Career of Metaphor Theory (Bowdle and Gentner 2005), a framework for the description of novel metaphor in usage, and the text-linguistics approach to term description (Collet 2004), which suggests criteria for term definition that challenge the tenets of monolithic terminology models. The analysis of unexpected metaphors identified in the text suggests that these units should be considered proto-terms experienced as deliberate rhetorical conceptual devices. Pragmatically speaking, the metaphors are part and parcel of the writer’s discursive strategy to communicate specialised knowledge to her peers. Conceptually speaking, the metaphors are essential building blocks of the article’s mental model.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/term.22.1.01ure
2016-05-19
2019-11-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Battalio, Raymond , John Kagel , and Don McDonald
    1985 “Animals’ Choices over Uncertain Outcomes: Some Initial Experimental Results.”American Economic Review, American Economic Association75 (4): 597–613.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Baumol, William
    1952Welfare Economics and the Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Boulier, Bryan , and Robert Goldfarb
    1991 “ Pisces Economicus: The Fish as Economic Man.” Economics and Philosophy7 (1): 83–86. doi: 10.1017/S0266267100000924
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267100000924 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bourigault, Didier , and Monque Slodzian
    1999 “Pour une terminologie textuelle.” Terminologies Nouvelles19: 29–32.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bowdle, Brian , and Dedre Gentner
    2005 “The Career of Metaphor.” Psychological Review112 (1): 193–216. doi: 10.1037/0033‑295X.112.1.193
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193 [Google Scholar]
  6. Boyd, Richard
    1993 “Metaphor and Theory Change: What is ‘Metaphor’ a Metaphor for?” InMetaphor and Thought, ed. by Andrew Ortony , 481–533. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.023 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown, Theodore
    2003Making Truth. Metaphor in Science. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Buchanan, James , and Gordon Tullock
    1962The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor (Michigan, USA): Universitv of Michigan Press. doi: 10.3998/mpub.7687
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.7687 [Google Scholar]
  9. Budin, Gerhard
    2007 “Intederminacy in Postmodernist Science.” InIndeterminacy in Terminology and Language for Specific Purposes, ed. by Bassey Antia , 61–72. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tlrp.8.09bud
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.8.09bud [Google Scholar]
  10. Caballero, Rosario
    2006Re-viewing Space: Figurative Language in Architects’ Assessment of Built Space. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyer. doi: 10.1515/9783110893892
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110893892 [Google Scholar]
  11. 2013 “From Design Generator to Rhetorical Device: Metaphor in Architectural Discourse. InMetaphors in/on Architecture and Urbanism, ed. by Andri Gerber and Brent Patterson , 89–104. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Cameron, Lynne
    2007 “Confrontation or Complementarity? Metaphor in Language Use and Cognitive Metaphor Theory.” Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics5: 107–136. doi: 10.1075/arcl.5.06cam
    https://doi.org/10.1075/arcl.5.06cam [Google Scholar]
  13. 2012 “Metaphor in Spoken Discourse.” InThe Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis, ed. by James Gee and Michael Handford , 342–355. London/New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Cameron, Lynne , and Alice Deignan
    2006 “The Emergence of Metaphor in Discourse.” Applied Linguistics27: 671–690. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml032
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml032 [Google Scholar]
  15. Charteris-Black, Jonathan
    2011Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. 2nd ed. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave-MacMillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230319899
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230319899 [Google Scholar]
  16. 2012 “Forensic Deliberations on ‘Purposeful Metaphor’”. Metaphor and the Social World2(1): 1–21. doi: 10.1075/msw.2.1.01cha
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.2.1.01cha [Google Scholar]
  17. Collet, Tanja
    2004 “What’s a Term? An Attempt to Define the Term within the Theoretical Framework of Text Linguistics.” Linguistica Antverpiensia New Series - Themes in Translation Studies3: 99–111.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gibbs, Raymond
    2007 “Why Cognitive Linguists should Care More about Empirical Methods.” InMethods in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Monica Gonzalez-Marquez , Irene Mittelberg , Seana Coulson , and Michael J. Spivey , 2–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.18.06gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.18.06gib [Google Scholar]
  19. Goatly, Andrew
    2002 “Text-linguistic Comments on Metaphor Identification.” Language and Literature11 (1): 70–90. doi: 10.1177/096394700201100106
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394700201100106 [Google Scholar]
  20. Knudsen, Suzanne
    2003 “Scientific Metaphor Going Public.” Journal of Pragmatics35: 1247–1263. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(02)00187‑X
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00187-X [Google Scholar]
  21. 2005 “Communicating Novel and Conventional Scientific Metaphors: A Study of the Development of the Metaphor of Genetic Code.” Public Understanding of Science14: 373–392. doi: 10.1177/0963662505056613
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662505056613 [Google Scholar]
  22. Krennmayr, Tina , Brian Bowdle , Gerben Mulder , and Gerard Steen
    2014 “Economic Competition is Like Auto Racing.” Metaphor and the Social World4 (1): 65–89. doi: 10.1075/msw.4.1.04kre
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.4.1.04kre [Google Scholar]
  23. Landa, Janet
    1986 “The Political Economy of Swarming in Honey-bees: Voting-with-the-wings, Decision-making Costs and the Unanimity Rule.” Public Choice51 (1): 25–38. doi: 10.1007/BF00141683
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00141683 [Google Scholar]
  24. 1998 “Bioeconomics of Schooling Fishes: Selfish Fish, Quasi-free Riders, and other Fishy Tales.” Environmental Biology of Fishes53: 353–364. doi: 10.1023/A:1007414603324
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007414603324 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lyons, John
    1977Semantics, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Magurran, Anne and Sarah Girling
    1986 “Predator recognition and response habituation in shoaling minnows.” Animal Behaviour34: 510–518. doi: 10.1016/S0003‑3472(86)80119‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80119-1 [Google Scholar]
  27. Pecman, Mojca
    2014 “Variation as a Cognitive Device.” Terminology20 (1): 1–24. doi: 10.1075/term.20.1.01pec
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.20.1.01pec [Google Scholar]
  28. Rogers, Margaret
    2007a “Lexical Chains in Technical Translation: A Case Study in Indeterminacy”. InIndeterminacy in LSP and Terminology: Studies in Honour of Heribert Picht, ed. by Bassey Antia , 13–35. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tlrp.8.05rog
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.8.05rog [Google Scholar]
  29. 2007b “Terminological Equivalence in Technical Translation: A Problematic Concept? St Jerome and technical translation.” Synaps20: 13–25.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sager, Juan Carlos
    1997 “Term Formation.” InHandbook of Terminology Management, Vol. 1, ed. by Sue Ellen Wright and Gerhard Budin , 25–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.htm1.06sag
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.htm1.06sag [Google Scholar]
  31. Steen, Gerard
    2007Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.10
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.10 [Google Scholar]
  32. 2009 “Deliberate Metaphor Affords Conscious Metaphorical Cognition.” Journal of Cognitive Semiotics5: 179–197.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Temmerman, Rita
    2008 “Sociocultural Situatedness of Terminology in the Life Sciences: The History of Splicing.” InBody, Language and Mind, Vol II, ed. by Tom Ziemke , Jordan Zlatev , and Roslyn Frank , 327–360. Berlin: Walter de Grutyer.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Tiebout, Charles
    1956 “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy64: 416–424. doi: 10.1086/257839
    https://doi.org/10.1086/257839 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ureña, José Manuel
    2011Metaphor in Specialised Language: An English-Spanish Comparative Study in Marine Biology . PhD Thesis. Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain.
  36. Ureña, José Manuel , and Pamela Faber
    2010 “Reviewing Imagery in Resemblance and Non-resemblance Metaphors.” Cognitive Linguistics21 (1): 123–149. doi: 10.1515/cogl.2010.004
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2010.004 [Google Scholar]
  37. 2011 “Strategies for the Semi-automatic Retrieval of Metaphorical Terms.” Metaphor and Symbol26 (1): 23–52. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2011.535415
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2011.535415 [Google Scholar]
  38. Ureña, José Manuel , Pamela Faber , and Miriam Buendía
    2013 “Frame Blending in Specialized Language: Harmful Algal Bloom.” Terminology19 (2): 175–201. doi: 10.1075/term.19.2.02gom
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.19.2.02gom [Google Scholar]
  39. Ureña, José Manuel , and Pamela Faber
    2014 “A Cognitive Sociolinguistic Approach to Metaphor and Denominative Variation: A Case Study of Marine Biology Terms.” Review of Cognitive Linguistics12 (1): 193–222. doi: 10.1075/rcl.12.1.07ure
    https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.12.1.07ure [Google Scholar]
  40. Wüster, Eugen
    1979Einführung in die allgemeine Terminologielehre und in die terminologische Lexikographie. UNESCO ALSED LSP Network. Vienna: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Zlatev, Jordan , Timothy Racine , Chris Sinha , and Esa Itkonen
    (eds) 2008The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.12
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/term.22.1.01ure
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error