The PCT Termbase of the World Intellectual Property Organization

References

1. Al-Thubaity, Abdulmohsen , Mahrukh Khan , Manal Al-Mazrua , and Maram Al-Mousa
   (eds) 2013 “New Language Resources for Arabic: Corpus Containing More Than Two Million Words and a Corpus Processing Tool.” InAsian Language Processing (IALP 2013), 67–70. (ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6646005). Accessed13 July 2015. doi: 10.1109/ialp.2013.21
   https://doi.org/10.1109/ialp.2013.21 [Google Scholar]
2. Baroni, Marco , and Alessandro Lenci
   2008 “Concepts and Properties in Word Spaces.” Rivista di Linguistica20(1): 55–88.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Budin, Gerhard
   2001 “Multilingual Terminologies and Ontologies for the Semantic Web.” OEGAI-Journal20(1): 22–28.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Buendía Castro, Miriam , and Pamela Faber
   2016 “EcoLexicon, une nouvelle version plus proche des besoins des traducteurs.” InAspects of Specialised Translation, ed. by Ángeles Balbuena Torezano and Maria del Carmen García Calderón , 144–152. Tübingen: Narr.
   [Google Scholar]
5. British Standards Institution
   2015 BSI Shop. “Browse by Subjects”. (shop.bsigroup.com/). Accessed13 July 2015.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Chambers, David
   2000 “Automatic Bilingual Terminology Extraction: A Practical Approach.” Translating and the Computer 22: Proceedings of the Twenty-second International Conference, 16–17. London: Aslib. (mt-archive.info/Aslib-2000-Chambers.pdf). Accessed13 July 2015.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Commission of the European Communities
   1977 System of Classification: Key to Subject Fields, Country Codes, Language Symbols. Luxembourg: Office of Official Publications of the European Communities.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Dag Hammarskjöld Library of the United Nations
   2015 UNBIS Thesaurus. United Nations Bibliographic Information System Thesaurus. (lib-thesaurus.un.org/LIB/DHLUNBISThesaurus.nsf). Accessed13 July 2015.
   [Google Scholar]
9. D’hondt, Eva
   2009 “Lexical Issues of a Syntactic Approach to Interactive Patent Retrieval.” In 3rd BCS-IRSG Symposium on Future Directions in Information Access (FDIA2009), 102–109. Padua, Italy. (www.bcs.org/upload/pdf/ewic_fdia09_s1paper16.pdf). Accessed13 July 2015.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Faber, Pamela
    2014 “Ecolexicon.” InProceedings of the XVI EURALEX International Congress: The User in Focus, ed. by Andrea Abel , Chiara Vettori , and Natascia Ralli , 601–607. Bolzano/Bozen: Institute for Specialized Communication and Multilingualism.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Fontenelle, Thierry
    2014 “From Lexicography to Terminology: A Cline, not a Dichotomy.” InProceedings of the XVI EURALEX International Congress: the User in Focus, ed. by Andrea Abel , Chiara Vettori , and Natascia Ralli , 25–46. Bolzano/Bozen: Institute for Specialized Communication and Multilingualism.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Foo, Jody
    2012 Computational Terminology: Exploring Bilingual and Monolingual Term Extraction. PhD diss., Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. (liu.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:508245/FULLTEXT01.pdf). Accessed13 July 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Gangla, Lilian Atieno
    2001 “Pictorial Illustrations in Dictionaries.” PhD diss., University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa. (repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/22862/Complete.pdf). Accessed13 July 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
14. International and American Association for Dental Research
    2007 “Traditional Chinese Medical Beliefs Still Relevant in Beijing.” ScienceDaily. (www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2007/03/070322161040.htm). Accessed20 August 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
15. ISO (International Organization for Standardization)
    1999 ISO 704:1999. Terminology Work – Principles and Methods. Geneva, CH: ISO.
    [Google Scholar]
16. ISO (International Organization for Standardization)
    1999 ISO 12620:1999. Computer Applications in Terminology – Data Categories. Geneva, CH: ISO.
    [Google Scholar]
17. ISO (International Organization for Standardization)
    2000 ISO 704:2000. Terminology Work – Principles and Methods. Geneva, CH: ISO.
    [Google Scholar]
18. ISO (International Organization for Standardization)
    2008 ISO 30042:2008. Systems to Manage Terminology, Knowledge and Content – TermBase eXchange (TBX). Geneva, CH: ISO.
    [Google Scholar]
19. ISO (International Organization for Standardization)
    2009 ISO 639-6:2009. Codes for the Representation of Names of Languages – Part 6 Alpha-4 Code for Comprehensive Coverage of Language Variants. Geneva, CH: ISO.
    [Google Scholar]
20. ISO (International Organization for Standardization)
    2009 ISO 12620:2009. Terminology and Other Language and Content Resources – Specification of Data Categories and Management of a Data Category Registry for Language Resources. Geneva, CH: ISO.
    [Google Scholar]
21. ISO (International Organization for Standardization)
    2009 ISO 23185:2009. Assessment and Benchmarking of Terminological Resources — General Concepts, Principles and Requirements. Geneva, CH: ISO
    [Google Scholar]
22. ISO (International Organization for Standardization)
    2012 ISO 22274:2012. Systems to Manage Terminology, Knowledge and Content — Concept-Related Aspects for Developing and Internationalizing Classification Systems. Geneva, CH: ISO.
    [Google Scholar]
23. ISOcat
    2014 “ISOcat: a Data Category Registry”. (www.isocat.org/). Accessed13 July 2015.
24. Kang, Hyo Yoon
    2011 “Patent Classification and Scientific Taxonomies: Law as a Space of History and Science?” Max Planck Institute for the History of Science. (www.mpiwg-berlin.mpg.de/en/research/projects/DeptIII_Kang_PatentClassification). Accessed20 August 2015.
25. Klinov, Pavel , and Dmitry Mouromtsev
    2014 “Knowledge Engineering and the Semantic Web.” In 4th International Conference (KESW 2013), St. Petersburg, Russia. (link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-3-642-41360-5). Accessed13 July 2015. doi: 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑41360‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41360-5 [Google Scholar]
26. Lawson, Veronica
    2001 “The Terms and Arts of Patentese: Wolves in Sheep’s Clothing.” InHandbook of Terminology Management, Vol. 2, ed. by Gerhard Budin and Sue Ellen Wright , 171–183. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.htm1.21law
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.htm1.21law [Google Scholar]
27. Library of Congress
    . Library of Congress Classification. (www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/lcc.html). Accessed13 July 13 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Maslias, Rodolfo
    . “Combine EU Terminology with Communication and Ontology Research.” In 11th International Conference onTerminology and Knowledge Engineering (TKE 2014). Berlin, Germany. (https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01005876/document). Accessed13 July 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Meyer, Ingrid
    2001 “Extracting Knowledge-Rich Contexts for Terminography: A Conceptual and Methodological Framework.” InRecent Advances in Computational Terminology, ed. by Didier Bourigault , Christian Jacquemin , and Marie Claude L’Homme , 279–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/nlp.2.15mey
    https://doi.org/10.1075/nlp.2.15mey [Google Scholar]
30. National Library of Medicine
    . NLM Classification 2015. (www.nlm.nih.gov/class/). Accessed13 July 2015.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Nuopponen, Anita
    2011 “Methods of Concept Analysis – Tools for Systematic Concept Analysis (part 3 of 3).” LSP Journal – Language for Special Purposes, Professional Communication, Knowledge Management and Cognition2(1): 4–15.
    [Google Scholar]
32. OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc
    . Dewey Decimal Classification System. (https://www.oclc.org/dewey/features/summaries.en.html). Accessed21 May 2014.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Rirdance, Signe , and Andrejs Vasiļjevs
    2006 Towards Consolidation of European Terminology Resources. Riga: Tilde.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sager, Juan C
    1990 A Practical Course in Terminology Processing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.44
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.44 [Google Scholar]
35. Streiter, Oliver , Ralli Natascia , Ties Isabella , and Leonhard Voltmer
    2004 “Bistro, the Online Platform for Terminology Management.” InLinguistica Antverpiensa, ed. by Rita Temmerman and Dr. Uus Knops , 203–215. Antwerpen: Hogeschool Antwerpen.
    [Google Scholar]
36. USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office)
    2014 “Glossary Initiative.” Department of Commerce. (www.uspto.gov/patents/init_events/glossary_initiative.jsp). Accessed13 July 2015.
37. WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization)
    2010a Medium Term Strategic Plan for WIPO, 2010-15. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
38. WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization)
    2010b WIPO Patent Drafting Manual. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
39. WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization)
    2013 Guide to the International Patent Classification. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
40. WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization)
    2015 PCT Yearly Review 2015. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Wright, Sue Ellen
    2001 “Data Categories for Terminology Management.” InHandbook of Terminology Management, Vol. 2, ed. by Gerhard Budin and Sue Ellen Wright , 552–571. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/z.htm2.18wri
    https://doi.org/10.1075/z.htm2.18wri [Google Scholar]