1887
  1. Home
  2. e-Journals
  3. Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication
  4. Volume 23, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 23, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-9971
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9994
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Given the double nature of as individual as well as shared experience and knowledge, the question is how to connect the observed variability of expressing such a sensory experience with a normalized requirement for developing (food) terminology. On the basis of descriptions of food experiences in actual practices involving the way food is consumed, evaluated and expressed by individuals – experts or not – in all their diversity, we propose to contribute cognitive (psychological and linguistic) expertise to terminology research. We analyze terms as cognitive units, defined within a psychological theory of natural categories as acts of meaning. In tracking the processes of terminological meaning construction in discourse we find intersubjective experience within the complex process of terminologization.

© No part of this book may be reproduced in any form, by print, photoprint, microfilm, or any other means, without written permission from the publisher.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/term.23.1.01dub
2017-11-10
2021-11-29

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1075/term.23.1.01dub
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amilien, V. , and A. E Delavigne
    (eds) 2003 Crispy, Crunchy: A Dream of Consistency…. Special issue of Anthropology of Food 1.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Barsalou, L. W.
    1999 “Perceptual Symbol Systems.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences22: 577–660.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. 2008 “Grounded Cognition.” Annual Review Psychology59: 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 [Google Scholar]
  4. Barthes, R.
    1961 “Pour une psycho-sociologie de l’alimentation contemporaine.” Annales, Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations16 (5): 977–986.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bende, M. , and S. Nordin
    1997 “Perceptual Learning in Olfaction: Professional Wine Tasters versus Controls.” Physiology & Behavior62 (5): 1065–1070. doi: 10.1016/S0031‑9384(97)00251‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9384(97)00251-5 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bieler, L. M. , and M. Runte
    2010 “Semantik der Sinne. Die lexikografische Erfassung von Geschmacksadjektiven.” Lexicographica. Series maior26: 109–128.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bieler, L. M. , and D. Dubois
    2011 “Communicating Taste: A Dialogical Perspective on Meaning Constitution in Conversation about Taste.” In Proceedings Les descripteurs du vin, Vino lingua , Dijon.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bruner, J.
    1990 Acts of Meanings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (French translation (1991) Car la culture donne forme à l'esprit : de la révolution cognitive à la psychologie culturelle. Paris: Eshel).
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Cabré, T.
    1999 Terminology: Theory, Methods and Applications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tlrp.1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.1 [Google Scholar]
  10. 2000 “Terminologie et linguistique: la théorie des portes.” Terminologies nouvelles RIFAL21: 10–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 2003 “Theories of Terminology: Their Description, Prescription and Explanation.” Terminology9 (2): 163–200. doi: 10.1075/term.9.2.03cab
     https://doi.org/10.1075/term.9.2.03cab [Google Scholar]
  12. 2005 “La terminologie, une discipline en évolution: le passé, le présent et quelques prospectives.” (In French from A Terminologia, uma disciplina em evolução: passado, presente e alguns elementos de futuro). Debate Terminologico4: 1813–1867.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. 2009 “La Teoría Comunicativa de la Terminología, una aproximación lingüística a los Términos.” Revue Française de linguistique appliquée14 (2): 9–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Cance, C.
    2009 “Stimuli, dispositifs expérimentaux et mondes construits.” InLe Sentir et le Dire, ed. by D. Dubois , 107–136. Paris: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Cance, C. , and D. Dubois
    2015 “Dire notre expérience du sonore: nomination et référenciation.” Langue Française188 (4): 15–32. doi: 10.3917/lf.188.0015
     https://doi.org/10.3917/lf.188.0015 [Google Scholar]
  16. . submitted. “Diversité des ressources linguistiques et des discours dans différentes modalités sensorielles: de l’expression de l’expérience sensible à la construction de l’objectivité.”
  17. Chollet, S. , and D. Valentin
    2000 “Le degré d'expertise a-t-il une influence sur la perception olfactive? Quelques éléments de réponse dans le domaine du vin.” L'Année psychologique100 (1): 11–36. doi: 10.3406/psy.2000.28625
     https://doi.org/10.3406/psy.2000.28625 [Google Scholar]
  18. 2001 “Impact of Training on Beer Flavor Perception and Description: are Trained and Untrained Subjects really Different?” Journal of Sensory Studies16 (6): 601–618. doi: 10.1111/j.1745‑459X.2001.tb00323.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.2001.tb00323.x [Google Scholar]
  19. Civille, G. V. , and H. T. Lawless
    1986 “The Importance of Language in Describing Perceptions.” Journal of Sensory Studies1: 203–215. doi: 10.1111/j.1745‑459X.1986.tb00174.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1986.tb00174.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Clark, H. H.
    1996 Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620539
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620539 [Google Scholar]
  21. David, S.
    1997 “Représentations sensorielles et marques de la personne: contrastes entre olfaction et audition.” InCatégorisation et Cognition: De la perception au discours, ed. by D. Dubois , 211–242. Paris: Kimé.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. 2000 “Certitudes et incertitudes dans les domaines olfactif, gustatif et auditif.” InEspaces sensoriels et formes lexicales, ed. by D. Dubois , 77–108. Paris: LCPE (INaLF-CNRS).
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Deppermann, A.
    2012 “How does ‘Cognition’ Matter to the Analysis of Talk-in-Interaction?” Language Sciences34 (6): 746–767. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.013
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.013 [Google Scholar]
  24. Diederich, C.
    2015 Sensory Adjectives in the Discourse of Food: A Frame-semantics approach to language and perception. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.16
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.16 [Google Scholar]
  25. Diki-Kidiri, M.
    2007 Eléments de terminologie culturelle. Special issue of Cahiers du RIFAL 26.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Diki-Kidiri, M. , S. David , D. Dubois , and J. Poitou
    2000 “Terminologies nouvelles.” Cahiers du RIFAL21: 7–9.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Dubois, D.
    (ed) 1991 Sémantique et cognition – Catégories, prototypes, typicalité. Paris: CNRS éditions.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. (ed) 1997 Catégories et cognition. Paris: Kimé.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 2000 “Categories as Acts of Meaning: The Case of Categories in Olfaction and Audition”. Cognitive Science Quarterly1: 35–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. 2002 “Informations, représentations, connaissances, et significations: des objets en question dans les sciences cognitives.” InDu sujet : théorie et praxis, ed. by J. B. Berthelin , 97–106. Paris: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. 2006 “Les 'mots' et les catégories cognitives du sensible: des rapports problématiques”. Cahiers du LCPE7: 23–48.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 2007 “From Psychophysics to Semiophysics: Categories as Acts of Meaning.” InSpeaking of Colors and Odors, ed. by M. Plümacher and P. Holz , 167–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.8.10dub
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.8.10dub [Google Scholar]
  33. 2008 “Sens communs et sens commun: Expériences sensibles, connaissance(s) ou doxa?” Langages170: 41–53. doi: 10.3917/lang.170.0041
     https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.170.0041 [Google Scholar]
  34. (ed) 2009 Le sentir et le dire : concepts et méthodologies en linguistique et psychologie cognitive. Paris: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Dubois, D. , and A. Giboreau
    2006 “Descriptors: Attributes? Labels? Terms? Names? A Contribution of Psycholinguistics to Sensory Evaluation.” Food Quality and Preference17 (7/8): 669–667. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.07.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.07.001 [Google Scholar]
  36. Dubois, D. , and C. Cance
    2012 “Vers une sémiologie du sensible: des couleurs en discours et en pratiques”. Histoire, Epistémologie, LangageXXXIV (1): 63–95. doi: 10.3406/hel.2012.3237
     https://doi.org/10.3406/hel.2012.3237 [Google Scholar]
  37. Dubois, D. , and C. Rouby
    2002 “Names and Categories for Odors: The Veridical Label Revisited.” InOlfaction, Taste, and Cognition, ed. by C. Rouby , B. Schaal , D. Dubois , R. Gervais , and A. Holley , 47–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511546389.009
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511546389.009 [Google Scholar]
  38. Edwards, D.
    1997 Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 2005. “Discursive Psychology.”InHandbook of Language and Social Interaction, ed. by K. L. Fitch and R. E Sanders , 257–273. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Epstein, R.
    2016 “The Empty Brain.” Aeon. https://aeon.co/essays/your-brain-does-not-process-information-and-it-is-not-a-computer. Accessed18 May 2016.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Faber, P.
    (ed.) 2012 A Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Language. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110277203
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110277203 [Google Scholar]
  42. 2015 “Frames as a framework for Terminology”. InHandbook of terminology, Vol 1, ed. by H. Kockaert and F. Steurs , 14–33. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hot.1.fra1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hot.1.fra1 [Google Scholar]
  43. Fischler, C.
    1990 L’homnivore : le goût, la cuisine et le corps. Paris: Odile Jacob.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Gaudin, F.
    1993 “Sémioterminologie: du signe au sens, construction d’un champ.” Meta38 (2): 293–301. doi: 10.7202/002812ar
     https://doi.org/10.7202/002812ar [Google Scholar]
  45. 2003 Socioterminologie: une approche sociolinguistique de la terminologie. Bruxelles: Duculot.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Gautier, L. , and E. Lavric
    (eds) 2015 Unité et diversité dans les discours sur le vin en Europe. Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang. doi: 10.3726/978‑3‑653‑03202‑4
     https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-03202-4 [Google Scholar]
  47. Gawel, R.
    1997 “The Use of Language by Trained and Untrained Experienced Wine Tasters.” Journal of Sensory Studies12(4): 267–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1745‑459X.1997.tb00067.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-459X.1997.tb00067.x [Google Scholar]
  48. Giboreau, A. , and L. Body
    2007 Le marketing sensoriel – De la stratégie à la mise en oeuvre. Paris: Vuibert.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Giboreau, A. , C. Dacremont , C. Egoroff , S. Guerrand , I. Urdapilleta , and D. Candel
    2007 “Defining Sensory Descriptors: Towards Writing Guidelines based on Terminology.” Food Quality and Preference18: 265–274. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.12.003
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.12.003 [Google Scholar]
  50. Hacking, I.
    1999 Rewriting the Soul. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Heritage, J.
    1984 Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Howes, D.
    1991 “Sensorial Anthropology.” InThe Varieties of Sensory experience: A Source Book in the Anthropology of the Senses, ed. by D. Howes , 167–191. Toronto: Toronto University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Hughson, A. L. , and R. A. Boakes
    2002 “The Knowing Nose: the Role of Knowledge in Wine Expertise.” Food Quality and Preference13 (7–8): 463–472. doi: 10.1016/S0950‑3293(02)00051‑4
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00051-4 [Google Scholar]
  54. Humbley, J.
    2009 “Terminologie : orientations actuelles.” Revue française de linguistique appliquéeXIV (2): 5–8.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Hutchins, E.
    1995 Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. ISO AFNOR 13299
    2003 Sensory Analysis – Methodology – General Guidance for Establishing a Sensory Profile. La Plaine St Denis: AFNOR Editions.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Jaffré, J. , D. Valentin , C. Dacremont , and D. Peyron
    2009 “Burgundy Red Wines: Representation of Potential for Aging.” Food Quality and Preference20 (7): 505–513. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.05.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2009.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  58. Kerremans, K.
    2014 Terminologial Variation in Multilingual Europe. PhD. Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Kerremans, K. , R. Temmerman , and P. De Baer
    2008 “Construing Domain Knowledge via Terminological Understanding.” Linguistica Antwerpiensa – New Series – Themes in Translation Studies7: 177–191.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Lakoff, G.
    1987 Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. Chicago: Chicago University Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
     https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  61. Langacker, R.
    1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Langlois, J. , J. Ballester , D. Peyron , and C. Dacremont
    2010 “Combining Olfactory and Gustatory Clues in Wine Professionals’ Judgment of Aging Potential of Red Wine.” American Journal of Oenology and Viticulture61 (1): 15–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Langlois, J. , C. Dacremont , D. Peyron , D. Valentin , and D. Dubois
    2011 “Lexicon and types of Discourses in Wine Expertise: the Case of Vin de Garde.” Food quality and preference22: 491–498. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.10.008
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.10.008 [Google Scholar]
  64. Larsson, B.
    2008 “Le sens commun ou la sémantique comme science de l’intersubjectivité humaine.” Langages170: 28–40. doi: 10.3917/lang.170.0028
     https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.170.0028 [Google Scholar]
  65. Lawless, H. T.
    1984 “Flavor Description of White Wine by ‘Expert’ and non-Expert Wine Consumers.” Journal of Food Science49: 120–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1365‑2621.1984.tb13686.x
     https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb13686.x [Google Scholar]
  66. Lawless, H. , and H. Heymann
    1998 Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and practices. New York: Chapman & Hall.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Lehrer, A.
    1975 “Talking about Wine.” Language51(4): 901–923. doi: 10.2307/412700
     https://doi.org/10.2307/412700 [Google Scholar]
  68. Lelièvre, M. , S. Chollet , H. Abdi , and D. Valentin
    2008 “What is the Validity of the Sorting Task for Describing Beers? A Study using Trained and Untrained Assessors.” Food Quality and Preference19 (8): 697–703. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.05.001
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.05.001 [Google Scholar]
  69. Lévi-Strauss, C.
    1964 Mythologiques, Tome I : Le Cru et le cuit. Paris: Plon.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Licoppe, C.
    1996 La formation de la pratique scientifique. Paris: La Découverte.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Linell, P.
    2009 Rethinking Language, Mind and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Majid, A. , and S. Levinson
    2011 “The Senses in Language and Culture.” Senses & Society6 (1): 5–18. doi: 10.2752/174589311X12893982233551
     https://doi.org/10.2752/174589311X12893982233551 [Google Scholar]
  73. Meilgaard, M. , G. Civille , and T. Carr
    2007 Sensory Evaluation Techniques, 4th ed. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Melcher, J. M. , and J. W. Schooler
    1996 “The Misremembrance of Wines Past: Verbal and Perceptual Expertise Differentially Mediate Verbal Overshadowing of Taste Memory.” Journal of Memory and Language35 (2): 231–245. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.0013
     https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0013 [Google Scholar]
  75. Merleau-Ponty, M.
    1955 Les aventures de la dialectique. Paris: Gallimard.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Mushin, I.
    2000 “Evidentiality and Deixis in Narrative Retelling.” Journal of Pragmatics32: 927–957. doi: 10.1016/S0378‑2166(99)00085‑5
     https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00085-5 [Google Scholar]
  77. Normand, S.
    2002 Les mots de la dégustation du champagne: Analyse sémantique d'un discours professionnel. Paris: CNRS Editions.
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Parr, W. V. , D. Heatherbell , and K. G. White
    2002 “Demystifying Wine Expertise: Olfactory Threshold, Perceptual Skill and Semantic Memory in Expert and Novice Wine Judges.” Chemical Senses27 (8): 747–755. doi: 10.1093/chemse/27.8.747
     https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/27.8.747 [Google Scholar]
  79. Parr, W. V. , K. G. White , and D. A. Heatherbell
    2004 “Exploring the Nature of Wine Expertise: what Underlies Wine Experts' Olfactory Recognition Memory Advantage?” Food Quality and Preference15 (5): 411–420. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2003.07.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2003.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  80. Plumacher, M. , and P. Holz
    (eds.) 2007 Speaking of Colors and Odors. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Cognitive and Linguistic Categorization of Color Vision and Olfaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.8 [Google Scholar]
  81. Rastier, F.
    1993 “La sémantique cognitive.” Histoire, Epistémologie, Langage15 (1): 153–187. doi: 10.3406/hel.1993.2372
     https://doi.org/10.3406/hel.1993.2372 [Google Scholar]
  82. 2005 “Sémiotique du cognitivisme et sémantique cognitive: Questions d’histoire et d’épistémologie.” Texto!www.revue-texto.net/Inedits/Rastier/Rastier_Semantique-cognitive.html. Accessed2 May 2017.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Rosch, E. R.
    1978 “Principles of Categorization.” InCognition and Categorization, ed. by E. Rosch and B. Lloyd , 27–48. Hillsdale: L. Erlbaum.
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Rossi, M.
    2009 “L’emploi de la métaphore comme ressource pour la néologie terminologique: le cas du langage de la dégustation du vin.” InAtti del Convegno Internazionale La métaphore en langues de spécialité, 199–227. Lyon: Presses Universitaires de Lyon.
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Sauvageot, F.
    1996 “Sait-on en 1996 décrire le goût d’un aliment ou d’une boisson.” Psychologie Française41: 289–300.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Sauvageot, F. , and C. Dacremont
    2001 L’évaluation sensorielle à la portée de tous – Les premiers pas en évaluation sensorielle, 4th ed. Dijon: Ensbana – Université de Bourgogne.
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Sauvageot, F. , I. Urdapilleta , and D. Peyron
    2006 “Within and between Variations of Texts elicited from nine Wine Experts.” Food Quality and Preference17 (6): 429–444. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.05.007
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.05.007 [Google Scholar]
  88. Savatovsky, D. , and D. Candel
    2007 “Présentation.” Langages168: 3–10. doi: 10.3917/lang.168.0003
     https://doi.org/10.3917/lang.168.0003 [Google Scholar]
  89. Schegloff, E. A.
    1991 “Conversation Analysis and Socially Shared Cognition.” InPerspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, ed. by L. Resnick , J. Levine , and S. Teasley , 150–171. Washington: American Psychology Association. doi: 10.1037/10096‑007
     https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-007 [Google Scholar]
  90. Schifferstein, R. , and P. Hekkert
    2008 Product Experience. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Solomon, G.
    1990 “Psychology of Novice and Expert Wine Talk.” American Journal of Psychology103 (4): 495–517. doi: 10.2307/1423321
     https://doi.org/10.2307/1423321 [Google Scholar]
  92. 1997 “Conceptual Change and Wine Expertise.” The Journal of the learning sciences6 (1): 41–60. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0601_3
     https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0601_3 [Google Scholar]
  93. SSHA
    2009 Évaluation sensorielle: manuel méthodologique, 3rd ed. Paris: Lavoisier, Coll. Tec & Doc.
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Talmy, L.
    2000 Towards a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Temmerman, R.
    2000 Towards New Ways of Terminology Description. The Sociocognitive Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tlrp.3
     https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.3 [Google Scholar]
  96. Traugott, E. C.
    2010 “Revisiting Subjectiviction and Intersubjectivication.” InSubjectification, Intersubjectification and Grammaticalization, ed. by K. Davidse , L. Vandelanotte , and H. Cuyckens , 29–70. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110226102.1.29
     https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110226102.1.29 [Google Scholar]
  97. Valentin, D. , S. Chollet , and H. Abdi
    2003 “Les mots du vin: experts et novices diffèrent-ils quand ils décrivent des vins ?” Corpus2: 183–200.
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Vion, R.
    2009 “De la subjectivité en discours aux discours sur la subjectivité.” InLe sentir et le dire, ed. by D. Dubois , 367–391. Paris: L’Harmattan.
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Webster, J.
    (dir.) 2004 The Language of Science. The Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday. London, New York: Continuum.
     [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/term.23.1.01dub
Loading
How words for sensory experiences become terms
Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication 23, 9 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1075/term.23.1.01dub
/content/journals/10.1075/term.23.1.01dub
/content/journals/10.1075/term.23.1.01dub
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): cognitive categories; lexical resources; sensory experience; situated cognition; word meaning constitution

Most Cited

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error