1887
Volume 23, Issue 1
  • ISSN 0929-9971
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9994
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Of all the varieties of sensory experience, wine appreciation seems to be one of the most rewarding yet also one of the most challenging to verbalize. This is largely due to a lack of scientific terminology capable of describing sensory impressions (in turn related to how little is known about human perception). Wine language is highly unspecific and figurative, depending on a weakly standardized community practice rather than a solid and comprehensive range of descriptors. In this paper I study figurative language and verbal creativity in a corpus of 12,000 English and Spanish wine reviews by focusing specifically on metaphor and synesthesia as the resources that best exemplify (and often manage to overcome) many of the genre’s shortcomings. In addition to the discussion of quantitative results, a case study in synesthesia is offered as illustration of the genre’s complexities, complemented by a contrastive discussion of how similar difficulties are handled in different ways in English and Spanish.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/term.23.1.04sua
2017-11-10
2019-10-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amoraritei, Loredana
    2002 “La métaphore en œnologie.” Metaphorik3: 4–16.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barsalou, Lawrence
    2008 “Grounded Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology59: 617–645. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 [Google Scholar]
  3. Brochet, Frédéric , and Denis Dubourdieu
    2001 “Wine Descriptive Language Supports Cognitive Specificity of Chemical Senses.” Brain and Language77:187–196. doi: 10.1006/brln.2000.2428
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2428 [Google Scholar]
  4. Caballero, Rosario
    2007 “Manner-of-motion Verbs in Wine Description.” Journal of Pragmatics39 (12): 2095–2114. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.005 [Google Scholar]
  5. Caballero, Rosario , and Ernesto Suárez-Toste
    2008 “Translating the Senses: Teaching the Metaphors in Winespeak.” InCognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, ed. by Frank Boers and Seth Lindstromberg , 241–260. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. 2010 “A Genre Approach to Imagery in Winespeak.” InResearching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World, ed. by Graham Low , Zazie Todd , Alice Deignan , and Lynne Cameron , 265–287. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/hcp.26.15cab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.15cab [Google Scholar]
  7. Caballero, Rosario , and Javier Díaz-Vera
    (eds) 2013Sensuous Cognition. Explorations into Human Sentience: Imagination, (E)motion, and Perception. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110300772
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110300772 [Google Scholar]
  8. Charters, Steve
    2006Wine and Society. The Social and Cultural Context of a Drink. Oxford: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Classen, Constance
    1993Worlds of Sense: Exploring the Senses in History and across Cultures. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Coutier, Martine
    2007Dictionnaire de la langue du vin. CNRS Editions: Paris.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Day, Sean
    1996 “Synaesthesia and Synaesthetic Metaphors.” Psyche2 (32). psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v2/psyche-2-32-day.html. Accessed4 May 2017.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dubois, Danièle
    2007 “From Psychophysics to Semiophysics: Categories as Acts of Meaning. A Case Study from Olfaction and Audition back to Colors.” InSpeaking of Colors and Odors, ed. by Martina Plümacher and Peter Holz , 167–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/celcr.8.10dub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.8.10dub [Google Scholar]
  13. Gawel, Richard , Anita Oberholster , and Leigh Francis
    2000 “A Mouth-feel Wheel: Terminology for Communicating the Mouth-feel Characteristics of Red Wine.” Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research6: 203–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1755‑0238.2000.tb00180.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0238.2000.tb00180.x [Google Scholar]
  14. Gibbs, Raymond
    (ed.) 2016Mixing Metaphor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/milcc.6
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.6 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goatly, Andrew
    1997The Language of Metaphors. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203210000
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203210000 [Google Scholar]
  16. Goode, Jamie
    2016I Taste Red. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hommerberg, Charlotte
    2011Persuasiveness in the Discourse of Wine: The Rhetoric of Robert Parker. Växjö: Linnaeus University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Howes, David
    2003Sensual Relations: Engaging the Senses in Culture and Social Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. doi: 10.3998/mpub.11852
    https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11852 [Google Scholar]
  19. Jefford, Andrew
    2013 “TN of Amontillado Coliseo VORS.” In Jesús Barquín, Andrew Jefford, and Richard Mayson. “Amontillado: A Draught from Paradise.” The World of Fine Wine42. www.worldoffinewine.com/news/amontillado-a-draught-from-paradise-4742978. Accessed3 September 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. 2016 “Andrew Jefford’s Column.” Decanter14.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson, Hugh , and Jancis Robinson
    2007The World Atlas of Wine, 5th ed. London: Mitchell Beazley.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. 2013The World Atlas of Wine, 7th ed. London: Mitchell Beazley.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson, Mark
    1987The Body in the Mind. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Kleiber, Georges
    2012 “Carte d’identité linguistique des odeurs.” Revue IRIS33: 91–103.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kleiber, Georges , and Marcel Vuillaume
    2016 “Odours and Denominations: Issues in their Identification.” InWords for Odours: Language Skills and Cultural Insights, ed. by Melissa Barkat-Defradas and Elisabeth Motte-Florac , 209–228, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kramer, Matt
    2015True Taste. New York: Simon & Schuster.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Lakoff, George , and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 1999Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lakoff, George , and Mark Turner
    1989More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470986.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  30. Langewiesche, William
    2000 “The Million-Dollar Nose.” The Atlantic Monthly286: 42–70.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Lawless, Harry T.
    1999 “Descriptive Analysis of Complex Odors: Reality, Model or Illusion?” Food Quality and Preference10: 325–332. doi: 10.1016/S0950‑3293(98)00052‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(98)00052-4 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lehrer, Adrienne
    1978 “Structures of the Lexicon and Transfers of Meaning.” Lingua45: 95–123. doi: 10.1016/0024‑3841(78)90001‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3841(78)90001-3 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2009Wine & Conversation. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195307931.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195307931.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  34. Levinson, Stephen , and Asifa Majid
    2014 “Differential Ineffability and the Senses.” Mind & Language29 (4): 407–427. doi: 10.1111/mila.12057
    https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12057 [Google Scholar]
  35. Majid, Asifa , and Niclas Burenhult
    2014 “Odors Are Expressible in Language, as long as You Speak the Right Language.” Cognition130 (2): 266–270. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  36. Noble, Ann , Richard Arnold , Brian Masuda , Suzanne Pecore , Janice Schmidt , and Peter Stern
    1984 “Progress Towards a Standardized System of Wine Aroma Terminology.” American Journal of Enology and Viticulture35:107–109.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Noble, Ann , Richard Arnold , John Buechsenstein , Jane Leach , Janice Schmidt , and Peter Stern
    1987 “Modification of a Standardized System of Wine Aroma Terminology.” American Journal of Enology and Viticulture38 (2):143–146.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Paradis, Carita
    2010 “Touchdowns in Winespeak: Ontologies and Construals in Use and Meaningmaking.” InProceedings for the 1st Congress on Linguistic Approaches to Food and Wine Descriptions, ed. by Margarita Goded Rambaud and Alfredo Poves Luelmo , 57–72. Madrid: UNED.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Paradis, Carita , and Mats Eeg-Olofsson
    2013 “Describing Sensory Experience. The Genre of Wine Reviews.” Metaphor & Symbol28 (1):1–19. doi: 10.1080/10926488.2013.742838
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.742838 [Google Scholar]
  40. Paradis, Carita , and Charlotte Hommerberg
    2016 “We Drink with Our Eyes First. The Web of Sensory Perceptions, Aesthetic Experiences and Mixed Imagery in Wine Reviews.” InMixing Metaphor, ed. by Raymond Gibbs , 177–202. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/milcc.6.09par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.6.09par [Google Scholar]
  41. Popova, Yanna
    2005 “Image Schemas and Verbal Synaesthesia.” InFrom Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Beate Hampe , 395–419. Berlin & New York: de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110197532.5.395
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197532.5.395 [Google Scholar]
  42. Rakova, Marina
    2003The Extent of the Literal: Metaphor, Polysemy and Theories of Concepts. London: Palgrave-Macmillan. doi: 10.1057/9780230512801
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230512801 [Google Scholar]
  43. Shen, Yeshayahu
    1997 “Cognitive Constraints on Poetic Figures.” Cognitive Linguistics8 (1): 33–71. doi: 10.1515/cogl.1997.8.1.33
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1997.8.1.33 [Google Scholar]
  44. Shen, Yeshayahu , and Michal Cohen
    1998 “How Come Silence Is Sweet but Sweetness Is Not Silent: A Cognitive Account of Directionality in Poetic Synaesthesia.” Language and Literature7 (2): 123–140. doi: 10.1177/096394709800700202
    https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709800700202 [Google Scholar]
  45. Shen, Yeshayahu , and Ravid Eisenman
    2008 “‘Heard Melodies are Sweet, but Those Unheard Are Sweeter’: Synaesthesia and Cognition.” Language and Literature17 (2): 101–121. doi: 10.1177/09639470080170010603
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09639470080170010603 [Google Scholar]
  46. Silverstein, Michael
    2003 “Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistics Life.” Language and Communication23: 193–229. doi: 10.1016/S0271‑5309(03)00013‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2 [Google Scholar]
  47. 2004 “‘Cultural’ Concepts and the Language Culture Nexus.” Current Anthropology45 (5): 621–652. doi: 10.1086/423971
    https://doi.org/10.1086/423971 [Google Scholar]
  48. 2006 “Old Wine, New Ethnographic Lexicography.” Annual Review of Anthropology35:481–496. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123327
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123327 [Google Scholar]
  49. Strik Lievers, Francesca
    2015 “Synaesthesia: A Corpus-based Study of Cross-modal Directionality.” Functions of Language27: 69–95.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Suárez-Toste, Ernesto
    2007 “Metaphor inside the Wine Cellar: On the Ubiquity of Personification Schemas in Winespeak.” Metaphorik.de12: 53–64.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 2013 “One Man’s Cheese is another Man’s Music: Synaesthesia and the Bridging of Cultural Differences in the Language of Sensory Perception.” InSensuous Cognition, ed. by Rosario Caballero and Javier Díaz-Vera , 169–191. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. doi: 10.1515/9783110300772.169
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110300772.169 [Google Scholar]
  52. Sweetser, Eve
    1990From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
  53. Temmerman, Rita
    2000Towards New Ways of Terminology Description. The Sociocognitive Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/tlrp.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.3 [Google Scholar]
  54. Thorngate, John H.
    1997 “The Physiology of Human Sensory Response to Wine: A Review.” American Journal of Enology and Viticulture48: 271–279.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Tsur, Reuven
    1992Toward a Theory of Cognitive Poetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Ullman, Stephen
    1945 “Romanticism and Synaesthesia: A Comparative Study of Sense Transfer in Keats and Byron.” PMLA60 (3): 811–827. doi: 10.2307/459180
    https://doi.org/10.2307/459180 [Google Scholar]
  57. 1957The Principles of Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Viberg, Åke
    1984 “The Verbs of Perception: A Typological Study.” Linguistics21 (1): 123–162.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Williams, Joseph
    1976 “Synaesthetic Adjectives: A Possible Law of Semantic Change.” Language52: 461–478. doi: 10.2307/412571
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412571 [Google Scholar]
  60. Yu, Ning
    2003 “Synesthetic Metaphor: A Cognitive Perspective.” Journal of Literary Semantics32: 19–34. doi: 10.1515/jlse.2003.001
    https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.2003.001 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1075/term.23.1.04sua
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/term.23.1.04sua
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): descriptors , metaphor , sensory perception , specialized genre , synesthesia , wine reviews and wine tasting notes
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error