1887
Volume 31, Issue 2
  • ISSN 0929-9971
  • E-ISSN: 1569-9994
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

Abstract

From a cognitive linguistic perspective, this article delves into the polysemy between the English term and its Chinese counterpart . The research aims to achieve two key objectives: (1) To explore the similarities and differences in the polysemy of in English and in Chinese; (2) To identify the cognitive mechanisms that motivate the semantic expansion of in English and in Chinese. To this end, 《汉语大词典》 (the Great Chinese Dictionary), The Oxford English Dictionary (OED), the British National Corpus (BNC), and the Centre for Chinese Linguistics (CCL) Chinese-English Parallel Corpus were used. The dictionaries are utilized to explore the polysemy of and , while the BNC and CCL Chinese-English Parallel Corpus are employed to investigate the cognitive mechanisms underlying the semantic extensions of the selected terms. Theoretically, this article draws upon the conceptual metaphor and metonymy theory proposed by Lakoff and Johnson. The findings reveal significant semantic overlap between in English and in Chinese, yet notable distinctions remain. This study has implications for vocabulary teaching as well as cross-linguistic and cross-cultural communication.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/term.23033.zha
2025-02-10
2026-03-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Adam, Anokye M.
    2020 “Sample Size Determination in Survey Research.” Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 26(5).90–97. 10.9734/jsrr/2020/v26i530263
    https://doi.org/10.9734/jsrr/2020/v26i530263 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aguglia, Andrea, Gianluca Serafini, Andrea Escelsior, Giovanna Canepa, Mario Amore, and Giuseppe Maina
    2019 “Maximum Temperature and Solar Radiation as Predictors of Bipolar Patient Admission in an Emergency Psychiatric Ward.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health16 (7). 10.3390/ijerph16071140
    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071140 [Google Scholar]
  3. Andryukhina, Tatiana V.
    2018 “Conceptual Metaphor and Emproving Students’ Cognitive Competence.” ФИЛОЛОГИЧЕСКИЕ НАУКИ В МГИМО, 1091.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ashurova, D. U., and M. R. Galieva
    2024 “Cognitive Mechanism of a Metaphor” 1 (1): 221–27. 10.5220/0012483200003792
    https://doi.org/10.5220/0012483200003792 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayata, Değer, Yusuf Yaslan, and Mustafa E. Kamasak
    2020 “Emotion Recognition from Multimodal Physiological Signals for Emotion Aware Healthcare Systems.” Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering40 (2): 149–57. 10.1007/s40846‑019‑00505‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s40846-019-00505-7 [Google Scholar]
  6. Barkin, Jennifer L., Massimiliano Buoli, Carolann Lee Curry, Silke A. von Esenwein, Saswati Upadhyay, Maggie Bridges Kearney, and Katharine Mach
    2021 “Effects of Extreme Weather Events on Child Mood and Behavior.” Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology63 (7): 785–90. 10.1111/dmcn.14856
    https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.14856 [Google Scholar]
  7. Biber, Douglas
    1995 “Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison.” Cambridge University Press google schola21: 171–197. 10.1017/CBO9780511519871
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511519871 [Google Scholar]
  8. (eds) 2007Discourse on the move: Using corpus analysis to describe discourse structure (Vol.281). John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/scl.28
    https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.28 [Google Scholar]
  9. Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad
    (eds) 2019Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/9781108686136
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108686136 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bing, Li
    2023 “Innovation of the Imperial Examination Systems of the Liao, Jin, and Yuan Dynasties and Their Political and Cultural Influences.” Frontiers of History in China, 18(3).
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Black, Max
    (eds) 2019Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 10.7591/9781501741326
    https://doi.org/10.7591/9781501741326 [Google Scholar]
  12. Burnard, Lou
    2007The British National Corpus, XML Edition, Oxford Text Archive, hdl.handle.net/20.500.14106/2554
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Cheng, Ya Wen, Yuping Wang, Yu Jie Cheng, and Nian Shing Chen
    2022 “The Impact of Learning Support Facilitated by a Robot and IoT-Based Tangible Objects on Children’s Game-Based Language Learning.” Computer Assisted Language Learning0 (0): 1–32. 10.1080/09588221.2022.2152053
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2152053 [Google Scholar]
  14. Chiang, Yueh hui Vanessa, Ya Wen Cheng, and Nian Shing Chen
    2023 “Improving Language Learning Activity Design through Identifying Learning Difficulties in a Platform Using Educational Robots and IoTbased Tangible Objects.” Educational Technology and Society26 (3): 84–100. 10.30191/ETS.202307_26(3).0007
    https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202307_26(3).0007 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chow, Jia Yi, Keith Davids, Chris Button, and Ian Renshaw
    2021Nonlinear pedagogy in skill acquisition: An introduction. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781003247456
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003247456 [Google Scholar]
  16. Clayton, Susan
    2020 “The Insidious Impacts of Climate Change: Mood, Mental Health, and Psychosocial Well-Being.” One Earth2 (6): 530–31. 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.05.019 [Google Scholar]
  17. Cruz, Joana, Piran C. L. White, Andrew Bell, and Peter A. Coventry
    2020 “Effect of Extreme Weather Events on Mental Health: A Narrative Synthesis and Meta-Analysis for the UK.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health17 (22): 1–17. 10.3390/ijerph17228581
    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228581 [Google Scholar]
  18. Deignan, Alice, Jeannette Littlemore, and Elena Semino
    2013 “Figurative Language, Genre and Register,” Cambridge University Press. 327.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Doran, Doran
    2020Transgressive typologies: Constructions of gender and power in early Tang China (Vol.1031). Cambridge and London: Harvard University Asia Center. 10.2307/j.ctt1dnnbg8
    https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1dnnbg8 [Google Scholar]
  20. Duan, Xiaolin
    2020The Rise of West Lake: A Cultural Landmark in the Song Dynasty. University of Washington Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv10qqzq2
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Frank, Hannah E. R., Katie Amato, Michelle Trautwein, Paula Maia, Emily R. Liman, Lauren M. Nichols, Kurt Schwenk, Paul A. S. Breslin, and Robert R. Dunn
    2022 “The Evolution of Sour Taste.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences2891 (1968) 10.1098/rspb.2021.1918
    https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.1918 [Google Scholar]
  22. Grosse, Gerlind, Berit Streubel, Catherine Gunzenhauser, and Henrik Saalbach
    2021 “Let’s Talk About Emotions: The Development of Children’s Emotion Vocabulary from 4 to 11 Years of Age.” Affective Science2 (2): 150–62. 10.1007/s42761‑021‑00040‑2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s42761-021-00040-2 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hartley, Isabella E., Djin Gie Liem, and Russell Keast
    2019 “Umami as an ‘Alimentary’ Taste. A New Perspective on Taste Classification.” Nutrients11 (1). 10.3390/nu11010182
    https://doi.org/10.3390/nu11010182 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jiang, Lifeng, Wang Yong, Huang Zhengjian, Wu Zongguo, Li Zhou, Song Jiayu, and Zhang Fan
    2023 “A Comparison of Chinese and Japanese Political and Social Structures.” InThe History of China–Japan Relations: From Ancient World to Modern International Order (pp.283–361). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. 10.1007/978‑981‑19‑5599‑0_7
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-5599-0_7 [Google Scholar]
  25. Juanjuan, Wu, and Zeng Ya
    2020 “Comparison and Appreciation of the Extended Meanings of Basic Taste Words in Chinese and English,” no. Icatpe: 1–7. 10.25236/icatpe.2020.001
    https://doi.org/10.25236/icatpe.2020.001 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kovecses, Z.
    (2010) Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford university press. 10.1177/09639470030123008
    https://doi.org/10.1177/09639470030123008 [Google Scholar]
  27. Kumar, Sunil, and Ilyoung Chong
    2018 “Correlation Analysis to Identify the Effective Data in Machine Learning: Prediction of Depressive Disorder and Emotion States.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health15 (12). 10.3390/ijerph15122907
    https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15122907 [Google Scholar]
  28. Lahlou, Hicham
    2021 “Concepts in Physics: A Comparative Cognitive Analysis of Arabic and French Terminologies,” 1–195. Malaysia: Institut Terjemahan & Buku Malaysia.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. 2023 “The Cognitive Mechanisms Underlying the Concept of سرعة (Speed) in Arabic.” Arab World English Journal for Translation and Literary Studies, 7(1). 21–32. 10.24093/awejtls/vol7no1.2
    https://doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol7no1.2 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lahlou, Hicham, and Hajar Abdul Rahim
    2020 “The Influence of Prior Knowledge on Learning Scientific Terminology: A Corpus-Based Cognitive Linguistic Study of Acceleration in Arabic and English.” Arab World English Journal For Translation and Literary Studies4 (1): 148–60. 10.24093/awejtls/vol4no1.12
    https://doi.org/10.24093/awejtls/vol4no1.12 [Google Scholar]
  31. 2023 “The Inclusion of Polysemes in Non-Native English Textbooks: A Corpus-Based Study.” Arab World English Journal14 (2): 19–29. 10.24093/awej/vol14no2.2
    https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol14no2.2 [Google Scholar]
  32. Lakoff, George
    1993 “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” Metaphor & Thought, 101, 374–379. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
  33. 2006 “Conceptual metaphor. InGeeraerts, D. (Ed.), Cognitive Linguistics: Basic Readings.” Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. 341:185. 10.1515/9783110199901.185
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199901.185 [Google Scholar]
  34. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    (eds) 2008Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press. 10.2307/414069
    https://doi.org/10.2307/414069 [Google Scholar]
  35. Lakoff, George, and Marl Turner
    (eds) 2009More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. University of Chicago press. 10.1207/s15327868ms0504_5
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0504_5 [Google Scholar]
  36. Li, Lingli
    2021 “On Chinese and English Metaphors of Taste Based on Conceptual Metaphor Theory: A Case Study of Taste Word Translation in <I>Fortress Besieged</I>” International Journal of Applied Linguistics and Translation7 (2): 69. 10.11648/j.ijalt.20210702.16
    https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijalt.20210702.16 [Google Scholar]
  37. Li, Shitian, Umar Al-Sheikh, Yili Chen, and Lijun Kang
    2023 “Nematode Homologs of the Sour Taste Receptor Otopetrin1 Are Evolutionarily Conserved Acid-Sensitive Proton Channels.” Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology11 (January): 1–8. 10.3389/fcell.2023.1133890
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1133890 [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, Xia, Weihua Li, Hong Wang, Douglas L. Bayley, Jie Cao, Danielle R. Reed, Alexander A. Bachmanov,
    2006 “Cats Lack a Sweet Taste Receptor.” Journal of Nutrition136 (7): 1932–34. 10.1093/jn/136.7.1932S
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/136.7.1932S [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu, Jingwen, Blesson M. Varghese, Alana Hansen, Jianjun Xiang, Ying Zhang, Keith Dear, Michelle Gourley,
    2021 “Is There an Association between Hot Weather and Poor Mental Health Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Environment International1531: 106533. 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106533
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106533 [Google Scholar]
  40. Liu, Michelle
    2023 “Cross-Domain Descriptions: The Sensory and the Psychological.” The Philosophical Quarterly, 1–14. 10.1093/pq/pqad043
    https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqad043 [Google Scholar]
  41. Luo, Zhufeng
    (eds) 1994汉语大词典[The Chinese Dictionary]. Shang Hai: Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ma, Yuhua
    (eds) 2023Regional Culture and Social Change: A Study of Miao-Inhabited Areas of Southwest China. Springer Nature. 10.1007/978‑981‑19‑8983‑4
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-8983-4 [Google Scholar]
  43. Mathes, Eugene W.
    2005 “Relationship between short-term sexual strategies and sexual jealousy.” Psychological Reports96.11: 29–35. 10.2466/pr0.96.1.29‑35
    https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.96.1.29-35 [Google Scholar]
  44. Mo, Lihong
    2020 “英语味觉词词义演变的认知机制及其对英语词汇教学的启示[The Cognitive Mechanisms in Meaning Extensions of English Taste Words and the Implications for English Vocabulary Teaching].” Hunan: Journal of Shaoyang University: Social Science, (06),101–107. 10.3969/j.issn.1672‑1012.2020.06.015
    https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-1012.2020.06.015 [Google Scholar]
  45. Molina, Tomàs, Alex Sancliment, and Jofre Janué
    2021 “How Weather Influenced the Mood of People during the COVID-19 Lockdown in Catalonia: A Review of Twitter Posts.” Advances in Science and Research181: 1–5. 10.5194/asr‑18‑1‑2021
    https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-18-1-2021 [Google Scholar]
  46. Ni, Meng, and Zhu Min
    2023 “通感隐喻视角下汉语味觉词“苦”的语义变迁[Semantic change of Chinese Taste Word “ku” from perspective of synaesthetic metaphor].” Zhejiang: Journal of Zhejiang University of Science and Technology, (02),153–158. 10.3969/j.issn.1671‑8798.2023.02.007
    https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-8798.2023.02.007 [Google Scholar]
  47. O’Keeffe, Anne, McCarthy Michael, and Carter Ronald
    (eds) 2007From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511497650
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497650 [Google Scholar]
  48. Parrott, W. Gerrod, and Richard H. Smith
    1993 “Distinguishing the Experiences of Envy and Jealousy.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology64 (6): 906–20. 10.1037/0022‑3514.64.6.906
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.906 [Google Scholar]
  49. Pettersson-Traba, Daniela
    2021 “A diachronic perspective on near-synonymy: The concept of sweet-smelling in American English.” Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory171, no.: 319–349. 10.1515/cllt‑2018‑0025
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2018-0025 [Google Scholar]
  50. Qiu, Yitong
    2022 Power and identity in the Qing empire: a study of the political and economic life of the elites through confiscation inventories 1700–1912 (Doctoral dissertation, London School of Economics and Political Science). etheses.lse.ac.uk/id/eprint/4455
  51. Sambuichi, Eri, Rumi Nishimura, Shiho Morishita, and Shigeru Watanabe
    2024 “The Effect of Umami Stimulation on Salivary Secretion Rate and Duration.” Health16 (01): 52–59. 10.4236/health.2024.161005
    https://doi.org/10.4236/health.2024.161005 [Google Scholar]
  52. Smith, Richard H., and Sung Hee Kim
    2007 “Comprehending envy.” Psychological Bulletin, 133(1), 46–64. 10.1037/0033‑2909.133.1.46
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.46 [Google Scholar]
  53. Radden, Günter, and Zoltán Kövecses
    1999 “Towards a Theory of Metonymy.” Metonymy in language and thought/John Benjamins17–59. 10.1075/hcp.4.03rad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.4.03rad [Google Scholar]
  54. Reed, Danielle R., Toshiko Tanaka, and Amanda H. McDaniel
    2006 “Diverse Tastes: Genetics of Sweet and Bitter Perception.” Physiology and Behavior88 (3): 215–26. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.05.033
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2006.05.033 [Google Scholar]
  55. Roessingh, Hetty
    2020 “Culturally Responsive Pedagogy and Academic Vocabulary Teaching and Learning: An Integrated Approach in the Elementary Classroom.” TESL Canada Journal37 (1): 51–62. 10.18806/tesl.v37i1.1334
    https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v37i1.1334 [Google Scholar]
  56. Shu, Lin, Jinyan Xie, Mingyue Yang, Ziyi Li, Zhenqi Li, Dan Liao, Xiangmin Xu, and Xinyi Yang
    2018 “A Review of Emotion Recognition Using Physiological Signals.” Sensors (Switzerland)18 (7). 10.3390/s18072074
    https://doi.org/10.3390/s18072074 [Google Scholar]
  57. Soanes, Catherine, and Angus Stevenson
    (eds) 2010Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    [Google Scholar]
  58. St Clair Gibson, A., J. Swart, and R. Tucker
    2018 “The Interaction of Psychological and Physiological Homeostatic Drives and Role of General Control Principles in the Regulation of Physiological Systems, Exercise and the Fatigue Process–The Integrative Governor Theory.” European Journal of Sport Science18 (1): 25–36. 10.1080/17461391.2017.1321688
    https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2017.1321688 [Google Scholar]
  59. Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr, and Tryntje Pasma
    (eds) 2010 A method for linguistic metaphor identification from MIP to MIPVU preface. Method For Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP To MIPVU, 141, IX-+. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  60. Tang, Qiaomei
    2020 “From Talented Poet to Jealous Wife: Reimagining Su Hui in Late Tang Literary Culture.” Nan Nu22 (1): 1–35. 10.1163/15685268‑00221P01
    https://doi.org/10.1163/15685268-00221P01 [Google Scholar]
  61. Tian, Qingyuan, Hongtao Liu, and Xin Han
    2018 “A Study of the Semantic Shift and Cognitive Mechanism of “Suan” by Analyzing Ancient Chinese from the Perspective of Conceptual Metaphor.” Modern Linguistics, 06(05), 676–684. 10.12677/ML.2018.65078
    https://doi.org/10.12677/ML.2018.65078 [Google Scholar]
  62. Tracy, Jessica L., Conor M. Steckler, and Gordon Heltzel
    2019 “The Physiological Basis of Psychological Disgust and Moral Judgments.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology116 (1): 15–32. 10.1037/pspa0000141
    https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000141 [Google Scholar]
  63. Ungerer, Friedrich, and Hans-Jorg Schmid
    (eds) 2013An introduction to cognitive linguistics. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315835396
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835396 [Google Scholar]
  64. Vogeleer, Svetlana, and Marie-Aude Lefer
    (eds) 2016Genre-and register-related discourse features in contrast (Vol.871). John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/bct.87
    https://doi.org/10.1075/bct.87 [Google Scholar]
  65. Wang, Xusheng, Xing Chen, and Congjun Cao
    2020 “Human Emotion Recognition by Optimally Fusing Facial Expression and Speech Feature.” Signal Processing: Image Communication841 (March): 115831. 10.1016/j.image.2020.115831
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2020.115831 [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang, Xinyu
    2022 “味觉词新义的多维考察——以网络新媒体环境下“酸”的新义为例[A multi-dimensional investigation of the new meanings of taste words — taking the new meaning of “sour” in the Internet new media environment as an example].” Anhui: Journal of Huaibei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), (06),80–86.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Xie, Jin
    2020 “The sustainable development of eco-cultural tourism in Xiangxi Tujia and Miao autonomous prefecture.” https://hdl.handle.net/10292/13420
  68. Xu, Yidan
    2020 “The Concepts Sour / Kislyi / Suan in Russian, English and Chinese Linguocultures: A Comparative Aspect.” Bulletin of the Moscow State Regional University (Linguistics), no.3: 100–106. 10.18384/2310‑712X‑2020‑3‑100‑106
    https://doi.org/10.18384/2310-712X-2020-3-100-106 [Google Scholar]
  69. Yao, Yun
    (eds) 2020酸食志:解构中国人的酸食DNA [Sour food history: Deconstructing the Chinese people’s sour food DNA]. Beijing: Beijing United Publishing Co.,Ltd.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Zawisławska, Magdalena Anna, and Marta Helena Falkowska
    2018 “All My Sour-Sweet Days I Will Lament And Love — A Comparative Analysis of Metaphors with the Basic Taste Adjectives in Polish and English.” Cognitive Studies2018 (18): 1–11. 10.11649/cs.1675
    https://doi.org/10.11649/cs.1675 [Google Scholar]
  71. Zhan, Weidong, Guo Rui, Chang Baobao, Chen Yirong, and Chen Long
    2019 “The building of the CCL corpus: Its design and implementation.” Corpus Linguistics 2019, Vol.6, No.1, pp.71–86
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhang, Ting, Hicham Lahlou, and Yasir Azam
    2023 “A Corpus-Based Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of Taste Words: The Case of English ‘Bitter’ and Chinese Ku.” Kemanusiaan301: 43–72. 10.21315/kajh2023.30.s1.4
    https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2023.30.s1.4 [Google Scholar]
  73. Zhao, Qingqing, Huang, Chu-Ren and Long, Yunfei
    2018 “Synaesthesia in Chinese: A corpus-based study on gustatory adjectives in Mandarin” Linguistics, 56(5),1167–1194. 10.1515/ling‑2018‑0019
    https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2018-0019 [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhou, Qing
    2015 “认知视阙下英汉语“酸”通感隐喻的对比分析[A comparative analysis of English and Chinese “sour” synaesthetic metaphors from a cognitive perspective].” Neimenggu: Course Education Research, (23),118–119.
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhou, Wei., and Lai Ou
    2021 “语境文化下汉英味觉词“酸”的概念隐喻对比[A Comparative Analysis of Conceptual Metaphor of Chinese and English Gustatorial Word “suān” / Sourness in the Perspective of Context Culture].” Hunan: Journal of Xiangnan University, (04),75–79.
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhu, Xiaodong
    2012 “Understanding China’s Growth: Past, Present, and Future” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(4), 103–124. 10.1257/jep.26.4.103
    https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.103 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/term.23033.zha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/term.23033.zha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conceptual metaphor; conceptual metonymy; sour; source domain; target domain
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error