oa Imposing order on a creative chaos

References

1. Baraldi, Claudio
   2013 ‘Forms of Decision Making: Gatekeeping and Dialogic Coordination in CISV Organizational Meetings’. Journal of Business Communication50 (4): 339–61.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Barnes, Rebecca
   2007 ‘Formulations and the Facilitation of Common Agreement in Meetings Talk’. Text & Talk27 (3): 273–96. 10.1515/TEXT.2007.011
   https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
3. Byrman, Ylva, and Andreas Nord
   2022a ‘“Jag vill att vi väntar med den diskussionen”: En terminologs problemhantering’. InSpråklig mångfald: Rapport Från ASLA-Symposiet i Göteborg, 23–24 april 2020, edited byStina Ericsson, Inga-Lill Grahn, and Susanna Karlsson, 26–43. ASLA:s Skriftserie/ASLA Studies in Applied Linguistics 28. ASLA, Svenska föreningen för tillämpad språkvetenskap.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Byrman, Ylva, and Andreas Nord
   2022b ‘Med terminologen som grindvakt: Beslutsfattande i ett expertgruppsmöte’. InSpråk i skola, på fritid och i arbetsliv: Aktuella arenor för svensk forskning inom tillämpad språkvetenskap, edited byPia Sundqvist, Christian Waldmann, Borglárka Straszer, and Birgitta Ljung Egeland, 265–86. ASLA:s Skriftserie/ASLA Studies in Applied Linguistics 29. ASLA, Svenska föreningen för tillämpad språkvetenskap.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Candlin, Christopher N., and Srikant Sarangi
   eds. 2011 Handbook of Communication in Organisations and Professions. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214222
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214222 [Google Scholar]
6. Costa, Rute, Raquel Silva, Sérgio Barros, and António Lucas Soares
   2012 ‘Mediation Strategies between Terminologists and Experts’. InProceedings of GLAT — Terminologies: Textes, Discours et Accès Aux Savoirs Spécialisés, 297–308. Genova: GLAT Genova.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Drew, Paul
   1991 ‘Asymmetries of Knowledge in Conversational Interactions’. InAsymmetries in Dialogue, edited byIvana Marková and Klaus Foppa, 29–48. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
   1992a ‘Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction’. InTalk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, edited byPaul Drew, and John Heritage, 3–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
   1992b Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Goffman, Erving
    1955 ‘On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction’. Psychiatry18 (3): 213–31. 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
11. Halvorsen, Kristin
    2013 ‘Team Decision Making in the Workplace: A Systematic Review of Discourse Analytic Studies’. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, August. 10.1558/japl.v1.i1.17289
    https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v1.i1.17289 [Google Scholar]
12. Halvorsen, Kristin, and Srikant Sarangi
    2015 ‘Team Decision-Making in Workplace Meetings: The Interplay of Activity Roles and Discourse Roles’. Journal of Pragmatics761 (January): 1–14. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.002 [Google Scholar]
13. Haug, Christoph
    2015 ‘What Is Consensus and How Is It Achieved in Meetings? Four Types of Consensus Decision Making’. InThe Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science, edited byJoseph A. Allen, Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock, and Steven G. Rogelberg, 556–84. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107589735.024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589735.024 [Google Scholar]
14. Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
    2010 Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444318135
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135 [Google Scholar]
15. Holmes, Janet, Stephanie Schnurr, and Meredith Marra
    2007 ‘Leadership and Communication: Discursive Evidence of a Workplace Culture Change’. Discourse & Communication1 (4): 433–51. 10.1177/1750481307082207
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307082207 [Google Scholar]
16. Holmes, Janet, and Maria Stubbe
    2015 Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315750231
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750231 [Google Scholar]
17. Huisman, Marjan
    2001 ‘Decision-Making in Meetings as Talk-in-Interaction’. International Studies of Management & Organization31 (3): 69–90. 10.1080/00208825.2001.11656821
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2001.11656821 [Google Scholar]
18. ISO 704:2022
    ISO 704:2022. Terminology work — Principles and methods.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Jefferson, Gail
    1987 ‘On Exposed and Embedded Correction in Conversation’. InTalk and Social Organisation, edited byGraham Button and J. R. E. Lee, 86–100. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781800418226‑006
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800418226-006 [Google Scholar]
20. Laker, Dennis R., and Jimmy L. Powell
    2011 ‘The Differences between Hard and Soft Skills and Their Relative Impact on Training Transfer’. Human Resource Development Quarterly22 (1): 111–22. 10.1002/hrdq.20063
    https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20063 [Google Scholar]
21. Lian, Olaug S., Sarah Nettleton, Huw Grange, and Christopher Dowrick
    2023 ‘“It feels like my metabolism has shut down”. Negotiating interactional roles and epistemic positions in a primary care consultation’. Health Expectations, 26(1): 366–375. 10.1111/hex.13666
    https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13666 [Google Scholar]
22. Lindström, Anna, and Ann Weatherall
    2015 ‘Orientations to epistemics and deontics in treatment discussions’. Journal of pragmatics, 781: 39–53. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.005 [Google Scholar]
23. Lundgren, Charlotte
    2009 Samarbete genom samtal: En samtalsanalytisk studie av multiprofessionella teamkonferenser inom smärtrehabilitering. Linköping: Linköpings universitet.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Mitchell, Geana W., Leane B. Skinner, and Bonnie J. White
    2010 ‘Essential Soft Skills for Success in the Twenty-First Century Workforce as Perceived by Business Educators’. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal52 (1): 43–53.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Nilsson, Henrik
    2021 Distansering, elicitering och facilitering — det nya terminologiarbetet?InBegreppsarbete och informationshantering. Rapport från NORDTERM 2021, Helsingfors, Finland, 1–2 juni 2021. Nordterm 22. Terminologicentralen.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 ‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation’. Language50 (4): 696–735. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
27. Sarangi, Srikant, and Celia Roberts
    1999 ‘The Dynamics of Interactional and Institutional Orders in Work-Related Settings’. InTalk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, edited bySrikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts, 1–57. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110208375.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375.1.1 [Google Scholar]
28. Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks
    1973 ‘Opening up Closings’. Semiotica81: 289–327. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
29. Sidnell, Jack
    2010 Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig
    2011 ‘Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction’. InThe Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, edited byTanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, 3–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002 [Google Scholar]
31. Suonuuti, Heidi
    2001 Guide to Terminology. 2nd ed.Nordterm 8. Helsinki: Tekniikan Sanastokeskus.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Svennevig, Jan
    2012 ‘Interaction in Workplace Meetings’. Discourse Studies14 (1): 3–10. 10.1177/1461445611427203
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611427203 [Google Scholar]