1887
image of Imposing order on a creative chaos

Abstract

Abstract

It is uncontested that terminologists leading multi-professional terminology projects need a thorough knowledge of the principles and standards of terminology work. However, the softer skills involved in the work have gained less attention. In this paper, we apply interaction analysis to a multi-professional expert meeting led by a terminologist and highlight the communicative and interpersonal work he carries out. Our results show how the terminologist allows for a certain “creative chaos” and makes the team “feel good”, while still keeping epistemic quality under permanent scrutiny and never losing focus on the task at hand. He does this through flexible agenda management — sticking to his meeting agenda, but not rigidly, and allowing for and taking note of useful contributions, even if they come in the wrong phase. He also upholds a sufficient degree of conceptual rigour, by holding back premature decisions but not unnecessarily correcting the other’s erroneous use of meta-terminology.

Available under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/term.24016.byr
2024-10-07
2025-06-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/10.1075/term.24016.byr/term.24016.byr.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1075/term.24016.byr&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Baraldi, Claudio
    2013 ‘Forms of Decision Making: Gatekeeping and Dialogic Coordination in CISV Organizational Meetings’. Journal of Business Communication (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnes, Rebecca
    2007 ‘Formulations and the Facilitation of Common Agreement in Meetings Talk’. Text & Talk (): –. 10.1515/TEXT.2007.011
    https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.011 [Google Scholar]
  3. Byrman, Ylva, and Andreas Nord
    2022a ‘“Jag vill att vi väntar med den diskussionen”: En terminologs problemhantering’. InSpråklig mångfald: Rapport Från ASLA-Symposiet i Göteborg, 23–24 april 2020, edited byStina Ericsson, Inga-Lill Grahn, and Susanna Karlsson, –. ASLA:s Skriftserie/ASLA Studies in Applied Linguistics 28. ASLA, Svenska föreningen för tillämpad språkvetenskap.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. 2022b ‘Med terminologen som grindvakt: Beslutsfattande i ett expertgruppsmöte’. InSpråk i skola, på fritid och i arbetsliv: Aktuella arenor för svensk forskning inom tillämpad språkvetenskap, edited byPia Sundqvist, Christian Waldmann, Borglárka Straszer, and Birgitta Ljung Egeland, –. ASLA:s Skriftserie/ASLA Studies in Applied Linguistics 29. ASLA, Svenska föreningen för tillämpad språkvetenskap.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Candlin, Christopher N., and Srikant Sarangi
    eds. 2011Handbook of Communication in Organisations and Professions. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110214222
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214222 [Google Scholar]
  6. Costa, Rute, Raquel Silva, Sérgio Barros, and António Lucas Soares
    2012 ‘Mediation Strategies between Terminologists and Experts’. InProceedings of GLAT — Terminologies: Textes, Discours et Accès Aux Savoirs Spécialisés, –. Genova: GLAT Genova.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Drew, Paul
    1991 ‘Asymmetries of Knowledge in Conversational Interactions’. InAsymmetries in Dialogue, edited byIvana Marková and Klaus Foppa, –. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Drew, Paul, and John Heritage
    1992a ‘Analyzing Talk at Work: An Introduction’. InTalk at work: Interaction in institutional settings, edited byPaul Drew, and John Heritage, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. 1992bTalk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goffman, Erving
    1955 ‘On Face-Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction’. Psychiatry (): –. 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 [Google Scholar]
  11. Halvorsen, Kristin
    2013 ‘Team Decision Making in the Workplace: A Systematic Review of Discourse Analytic Studies’. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, August. 10.1558/japl.v1.i1.17289
    https://doi.org/10.1558/japl.v1.i1.17289 [Google Scholar]
  12. Halvorsen, Kristin, and Srikant Sarangi
    2015 ‘Team Decision-Making in Workplace Meetings: The Interplay of Activity Roles and Discourse Roles’. Journal of Pragmatics (January): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.002
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.11.002 [Google Scholar]
  13. Haug, Christoph
    2015 ‘What Is Consensus and How Is It Achieved in Meetings? Four Types of Consensus Decision Making’. InThe Cambridge Handbook of Meeting Science, edited byJoseph A. Allen, Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock, and Steven G. Rogelberg, –. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781107589735.024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107589735.024 [Google Scholar]
  14. Heritage, John, and Steven Clayman
    2010Talk in Action: Interactions, Identities, and Institutions. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 10.1002/9781444318135
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318135 [Google Scholar]
  15. Holmes, Janet, Stephanie Schnurr, and Meredith Marra
    2007 ‘Leadership and Communication: Discursive Evidence of a Workplace Culture Change’. Discourse & Communication (): –. 10.1177/1750481307082207
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481307082207 [Google Scholar]
  16. Holmes, Janet, and Maria Stubbe
    2015Power and Politeness in the Workplace: A Sociolinguistic Analysis of Talk at Work. London: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315750231
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315750231 [Google Scholar]
  17. Huisman, Marjan
    2001 ‘Decision-Making in Meetings as Talk-in-Interaction’. International Studies of Management & Organization (): –. 10.1080/00208825.2001.11656821
    https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2001.11656821 [Google Scholar]
  18. ISO 704:2022
    ISO 704:2022. Terminology work — Principles and methods.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Jefferson, Gail
    1987 ‘On Exposed and Embedded Correction in Conversation’. InTalk and Social Organisation, edited byGraham Button and J. R. E. Lee, –. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. 10.21832/9781800418226‑006
    https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800418226-006 [Google Scholar]
  20. Laker, Dennis R., and Jimmy L. Powell
    2011 ‘The Differences between Hard and Soft Skills and Their Relative Impact on Training Transfer’. Human Resource Development Quarterly (): –. 10.1002/hrdq.20063
    https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20063 [Google Scholar]
  21. Lian, Olaug S., Sarah Nettleton, Huw Grange, and Christopher Dowrick
    2023 ‘“It feels like my metabolism has shut down”. Negotiating interactional roles and epistemic positions in a primary care consultation’. Health Expectations, (): –. 10.1111/hex.13666
    https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13666 [Google Scholar]
  22. Lindström, Anna, and Ann Weatherall
    2015 ‘Orientations to epistemics and deontics in treatment discussions’. Journal of pragmatics, : –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.005 [Google Scholar]
  23. Lundgren, Charlotte
    2009Samarbete genom samtal: En samtalsanalytisk studie av multiprofessionella teamkonferenser inom smärtrehabilitering. Linköping: Linköpings universitet.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mitchell, Geana W., Leane B. Skinner, and Bonnie J. White
    2010 ‘Essential Soft Skills for Success in the Twenty-First Century Workforce as Perceived by Business Educators’. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Nilsson, Henrik
    2021 Distansering, elicitering och facilitering — det nya terminologiarbetet?InBegreppsarbete och informationshantering. Rapport från NORDTERM 2021, Helsingfors, Finland, 1–2 juni 2021. Nordterm 22. Terminologicentralen.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson
    1974 ‘A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation’. Language (): –. 10.1353/lan.1974.0010
    https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.1974.0010 [Google Scholar]
  27. Sarangi, Srikant, and Celia Roberts
    1999 ‘The Dynamics of Interactional and Institutional Orders in Work-Related Settings’. InTalk, Work and Institutional Order: Discourse in Medical, Mediation and Management Settings, edited bySrikant Sarangi and Celia Roberts, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110208375.1.1
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110208375.1.1 [Google Scholar]
  28. Schegloff, Emanuel A., and Harvey Sacks
    1973 ‘Opening up Closings’. Semiotica: –. 10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289
    https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1973.8.4.289 [Google Scholar]
  29. Sidnell, Jack
    2010Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Stivers, Tanya, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig
    2011 ‘Knowledge, Morality and Affiliation in Social Interaction’. InThe Morality of Knowledge in Conversation, edited byTanya Stivers, Lorenza Mondada, and Jakob Steensig, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511921674.002 [Google Scholar]
  31. Suonuuti, Heidi
    2001Guide to Terminology. 2nd ed.Nordterm 8. Helsinki: Tekniikan Sanastokeskus.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Svennevig, Jan
    2012 ‘Interaction in Workplace Meetings’. Discourse Studies (): –. 10.1177/1461445611427203
    https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445611427203 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/term.24016.byr
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/term.24016.byr
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error