oa Wine words, cultural worlds

References

1. Aitchison, Jean
   2001 Language Change: Progress or Decay?Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Amerine, Maynard A., and Edward B. Roessler
   1976 Wines: Their Sensory Evaluation. San Francisco: Freeman.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Amerine, Maynard A., Rose Marie Pangborn, and Edward B. Roessler
   1965 Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food. New York: Academic Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Baicchi, Annalisa
   2015 “Complex Adaptive Systems: The Case of Language.” InConstruction Learning as a Complex Adaptive System: Psycholinguistic Evidence from L2 Learners of English, ed. byUte Römer, –. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑18269‑8_2
   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18269-8_2 [Google Scholar]
5. Balogh, Jeremiás Máté, and Attila Jámbor
   2018 “The Role of Culture, Language and Trade Agreements in Global Wine Trade.” AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics (): –. 10.7160/aol.2018.100302
   https://doi.org/10.7160/aol.2018.100302 [Google Scholar]
6. Bertulessi, Chiara, Camilla Lupano, Bettina Mottura, Nicoletta Riva, and Yi Zhou
   2021 “The Languages of Wine: Negotiating Intercultural Exchanges through Translation.” InFood Issues 食事: Interdisciplinary Studies on Food in Modern and Contemporary East Asia, ed. byMiriam Castorina and Diego Cucinelli, –. Florence: Firenze University Press. 10.36253/978‑88‑5518‑506‑6.13
   https://doi.org/10.36253/978-88-5518-506-6.13 [Google Scholar]
7. Bianchi, Ivana, Edoardo Branchini, Stefania Torquati, Alessandra Fermani, Elena Capitani, Veronica Barnaba, Ugo Savardi, and Roberto Burro
   2021 “Non Experts’ Understanding of Terms Frequently Used by Experts to Describe the Sensory Properties of Wine: An Investigation Based on Opposites.” Food Quality and Preference: . 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104215
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104215 [Google Scholar]
8. Bosker, Bianca
   2017 “Cork Dork: A Wine-Fueled Adventure Among the Obsessive Sommeliers, Big Bottle Hunters, And Rogue Scientists Who Taught Me to Live for Taste.” Penguin Books, New York.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bratož, Silva
   2013 “The Anthropomorphic Metaphor in Slovene and English Wine Tasting Discourses.” ELOPE: English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries (): –. 10.4312/elope.10.1.23‑35
   https://doi.org/10.4312/elope.10.1.23-35 [Google Scholar]
10. Breit, Blanche W.
    2014 “Appraisal Theory Applied to the Wine Tasting Sheet in English and Spanish.” Ibérica, Revista de la Asociación Europea de Lenguas para Fines Específicos: –.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Brochet, Frédéric, and Denis Dubourdieu
    2001 “Wine Descriptive Language Supports Cognitive Specificity of Chemical Senses.” Brain and Language (): –. 10.1006/brln.2000.2428
    https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2000.2428 [Google Scholar]
12. Caballero, Rosario
    2007 “Manner-of-Motion Verbs in Wine Description.” Journal of Pragmatics (): –. 10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.07.005 [Google Scholar]
13. Caballero, Rosario
    2009 “Cutting across the Senses: Imagery in Winespeak and Audiovisual Promotion.” InMultimodal Metaphor, ed. byCharles J. Forceville and Eduardo Urios-Aparisi, –. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110215366.2.73
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110215366.2.73 [Google Scholar]
14. Caballero, Rosario
    2017 “From the Glass Through the Nose and the Mouth: Motion in the Description of Sensory Data About Wine in English and Spanish.” Terminology(): –.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Caballero, Rosario
    2019 “Sensory Experiences, Meaning and Metaphor: The Case of Wine.” InPerception Metaphors, ed. byLaura J. Speed, Carolyn O’Meara, Lila San Roque, and Asifa Majid, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Caballero, Rosario, and Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano
    2009 “Ways of Perceiving, Moving, and Thinking: Revindicating Culture in Conceptual Metaphor Research.” Cognitive Semiotics (): –. 10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.268
    https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.268 [Google Scholar]
17. Caballero, Rosario, Carita Paradis, and Ernesto Suárez-Toste
    2019 Representing Wine: Sensory Perceptions, Communication and Cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.21
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.21 [Google Scholar]
18. Caballero, Rosario, and Ernesto Suárez-Toste
    2008 “Translating the Senses: Teaching the Metaphors in Winespeak.” InCognitive Linguistic Approaches to Teaching Vocabulary and Phraseology, ed. byFrank Boers and Seth Lindstromberg, –. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 10.1515/9783110199161.3.241
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199161.3.241 [Google Scholar]
19. Caballero, Rosario, and Ernesto Suárez-Toste
    2010 “A Genre Approach to Imagery in Winespeak.” InResearching and Applying Metaphor in the Real World, ed. byGraham Low, Zazie Todd, Alice Deignan, and Lynne Cameron, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/hcp.26.15cab
    https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.26.15cab [Google Scholar]
20. Charters, Steve, and Simone Pettigrew
    2005 “Is Wine Consumption an Aesthetic Experience?” Journal of Wine Research (): –. 10.1080/09571260500327663
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571260500327663 [Google Scholar]
21. Citron, Francesca M. M., and Adele E. Goldberg
    2014 “Metaphorical Sentences Are More Emotionally Engaging than Their Literal Counterparts.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (): –. 10.1162/jocn_a_00654
    https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00654 [Google Scholar]
22. Corsi, Armando, Justin Cohen, and Larry Lockshin
    2014 “Words Are Powerful: How Are They Used to Describe Wine in China?” Wine & Viticulture Journal (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Coutier, Martine
    1994 “Tropes et termes: Le vocabulaire de la dégustation du vin” [Tropes and terms: The vocabulary of wine tasting]. Langue française: –.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Crane, Tim
    2007 “Wine as an Aesthetic Object.” InQuestions of Taste: The Philosophy of Wine, ed. byBarry C. Smith, –. London: Signal Books.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Creed, Allison
    2013 “Wine and Metaphor: Cross-Cultural [Dis]harmony.” InMetaphors for, in and of Education Research, ed. byWarren Midgley, Karen Trimmer, and Andy Davies, –. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Creed, Allison
    2016 “Metaphor in Wine Appreciation and Acculturation: A Sensory and Affective Conduit.” Paper presented at11th Conference of the Association for Researching and Applying Metaphor (RaAM), Berlin, Germany, July 1–4.
27. Creed, Allison, and Peter McIlveen
    2019 “Uncorking the Potential of Wine Language for Young Wine Tourists.” InManagement and Marketing of Wine Tourism Business: Theory, Practice, and Cases, ed. byMarianna Sigala and Richard N. S. Robinson, –. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑75462‑8_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75462-8_2 [Google Scholar]
28. Crichton-Fock, Anette, Charles Spence, and Niklas Pettersson
    2023 “Using Crossmodal Correspondences as a Tool in Wine Communication.” Frontiers in Psychology: . 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1190364
    https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1190364 [Google Scholar]
29. Croft, William, and D. Alan Cruse
    2004 Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511803864
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803864 [Google Scholar]
30. Croijmans, Ilja, Iris Hendrickx, Els Lefever, Asifa Majid, and Antal Van Den Bosch
    2020 “Uncovering the Language of Wine Experts.” Natural Language Engineering (): –. 10.1017/S1351324919000500
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1351324919000500 [Google Scholar]
31. Croijmans, Ilja, Robert Pellegrino, and Qian Janice Wang
    2024 “Demystifying Wine Expertise through the Lens of Imagination: Descriptions and Imagery Vividness across Sensory Modalities.” Food Research International: . 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114159
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114159 [Google Scholar]
32. Danner, Lukas, Trent E. Johnson, Renata Ristic, Herbert L. Meiselman, and Susan E. P. Bastian
    2017 “‘I Like the Sound of That!’ Wine Descriptions Influence Consumers’ Expectations, Liking, Emotions and Willingness to Pay for Australian White Wines.” Food Research International: –. 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.05.019
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.05.019 [Google Scholar]
33. Demaecker, Christine
    2017 “Wine-Tasting Metaphors and Their Translation.” Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication (): –. 10.1075/term.23.1.05dem
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.23.1.05dem [Google Scholar]
34. Do, Vinh-Bao, Bruno Patris, and Dominique Valentin
    2009 “Opinions on Wine in a New Consumer Country: A Comparative Study of Vietnam and France.” Journal of Wine Research (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Douglas, Mary
    1984 “Standard Social Uses of Food: Introduction.” InFood in the Social Order: Studies of Food and Festivities in Three American Communities, ed. byMary Douglas, –. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Dubois, Danièle
    2017 “How Words for Sensory Experiences Become Terms.” Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication (): –. 10.1075/term.23.1.01dub
    https://doi.org/10.1075/term.23.1.01dub [Google Scholar]
37. Evans, Vyvyan, Benjamin K. Bergen, and Jörg Zinken
    2007 “The Cognitive Linguistics Enterprise: An Overview.” InThe Cognitive Linguistics Reader, ed. byVyvyan Evans, Benjamin K. Bergen, and Jörg Zinken, –. London: Equinox.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Fillmore, Charlesthe Linguistic Society of Korea
    1982 “Frame Semantics.” InLinguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. bythe Linguistic Society of Korea, –. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Gibbs, Raymond W., Jr.
    1999 “Taking Metaphor out of Our Heads and Putting It into the Cultural World.” InMetaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. byRaymond W. Gibbs Jr. and Gerard J. Steen, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/cilt.175.09gib
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.09gib [Google Scholar]
40. Heath, Jeffrey G.
    1984 “Language Contact and Language Change.” Annual Review of Anthropology: –. 10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.002055
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.13.100184.002055 [Google Scholar]
41. Heine, Bernd, and Tania Kuteva
    2003 “On Contact-Induced Grammaticalization.” Studies in Language (): –. 10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei
    https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.27.3.04hei [Google Scholar]
42. Herdenstam, Annika P. F., Maria Hammarén, Richard Ahlström, and Per-Åke Wiktorsson
    2009 “The Professional Language of Wine: Perception, Training and Dialogue.” Journal of Wine Research (): –. 10.1080/09571260902978543
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571260902978543 [Google Scholar]
43. Hirokawa, Sachio, Brendan Flanagan, Takahiko Suzuki, and Chengjiu Yin
    2014 “Learning Winespeak from Mind Map of Wine Blogs.” Paper presented atHuman Interface and the Management of Information. Information and Knowledge in Applications and Services, Heraklion, Crete, June 22–27.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Holden, Nigel J., and Snejina Michailova
    2014 “A More Expansive Perspective on Translation in IB Research: Insights from the Russian Handbook of Knowledge Management.” Journal of International Business Studies (): –. 10.1057/jibs.2014.10
    https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.10 [Google Scholar]
45. Honoré-Chedozeau, Célia, Marcelo Otheguy, and Dominique Valentin
    2024 “Tell Us How You Taste Wine, and We Will Tell You What Kind of Expert You Are!” Food Research International: . 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113899
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113899 [Google Scholar]
46. Hristova, Mariya
    2022 “Wine Metaphors in Advertising: A Linguistic Corpus Analysis.” Snapshot (Summer).
    [Google Scholar]
47. Hsu, I-Ju
    2023 “Winespeak in Wine’s Pics.” Cognitive Linguistic Studies (): –. 10.1075/cogls.21009.hsu
    https://doi.org/10.1075/cogls.21009.hsu [Google Scholar]
48. Inglis, David
    2020 “Mutating and Contested Languages of Wine: Heard on the Grapevine.” InHandbook of the Changing World Language Map, ed. byStanley D. Brunn and Roland Kehrein, –. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978‑3‑030‑02438‑3_205
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_205 [Google Scholar]
49. Inglis, David
    2021 “Towards a Sociology of Wine: The Power of Processes.” Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change (): . 10.20897/jcasc/11447
    https://doi.org/10.20897/jcasc/11447 [Google Scholar]
50. Isani, Shaeda
    2017 “Of Synaesthetic Wine Metaphors, Discourse Communities, Addressers and Addressees: The Specialised Language of Wine Descriptors.” ASp. la revue du GERAS: –.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Ivanova, Natalia, Qian Yang, Susan E. P. Bastian, Kerry L. Wilkinson, and Rebecca Ford
    2022 “Consumer Understanding of Beer and Wine Body: An Exploratory Study of an Ill-Defined Concept.” Food Quality and Preference: . 10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104383
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2021.104383 [Google Scholar]
52. Jackson, Ronald S.
    2022 Wine Tasting: A Professional Handbook. London: Elsevier.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Janodet, Fanny L.
    2023 “Terminological Metaphors in Red Wine Tasting Notes: A Corpus-Based Study Applied to Wine Translation (French-Spanish).” InText and Wine: Approaches from Terminology and Translation, ed. byMaría del Carmen Balbuena Torezano and Miguel Ángel Jurado, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/ivitra.38.07jan
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ivitra.38.07jan [Google Scholar]
54. Jarvis, Wade, Simone Mueller, and Kai Chiong
    2010 “A Latent Analysis of Images and Words in Wine Choice.” Australasian Marketing Journal (): –. 10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.05.001
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ausmj.2010.05.001 [Google Scholar]
55. Joy, Annamma, Steve Charters, Jeff Jianfeng Wang, and Bianca Grohmann
    2020 “A Multi-Sensory and Embodied Understanding of Wine Consumption.” Journal of Wine Research (): –. 10.1080/09571264.2020.1854700
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2020.1854700 [Google Scholar]
56. Kaimann, Daniel, and Cécile L. M. Spiess Bru
    2024 “Sounds Too Feminine? Blind Tastings, Phonetic Gender Scores, and the Impact on Professional Critics.” Journal of Wine Economics (): –. 10.1017/jwe.2024.8
    https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2024.8 [Google Scholar]
57. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2005 Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
58. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2010 “Metaphor, Language, and Culture.” DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Lingüística Teórica e Aplicada: –. 10.1590/S0102‑44502010000300017
    https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-44502010000300017 [Google Scholar]
59. Lakoff, George
    1993 “The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor.” InMetaphor and Thought, ed. byAndrew Ortony, 2nd ed., –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013 [Google Scholar]
60. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980 Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
61. Langlois, Jodi, Catherine Dacremont, Dominique Peyron, Dominique Valentin, and Danièle Dubois
    2011 “Lexicon and Types of Discourse in Wine Expertise: The Case of Vin de Garde.” Food Quality and Preference (): –. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.10.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.10.008 [Google Scholar]
62. Lawless, Harry T.
    1984 “Flavor Description of White Wine by ‘Expert’ and Nonexpert Wine Consumers.” Journal of Food Science (): –. 10.1111/j.1365‑2621.1984.tb13686.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1984.tb13686.x [Google Scholar]
63. Lawless, Harry T., and Hildegarde Heymann
    2010 Sensory Evaluation of Food: Principles and Practices. New York: Springer. 10.1007/978‑1‑4419‑6488‑5
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6488-5 [Google Scholar]
64. Lefever, Els, Iris Hendrickx, Ilja Croijmans, Antal Van den Bosch, and Asifa Majid
    2018 “Discovering the Language of Wine Reviews: A Text Mining Account.” InProceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), ed. byNicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Christopher Cieri, , –. Miyazaki: European Language Resources Association.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Lehrer, Adrienne
    1975 “Talking about Wine.” Language (): –. 10.2307/412700
    https://doi.org/10.2307/412700 [Google Scholar]
66. Lehrer, Adrienne
    2009 Wine and Conversation. New York: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195307931.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195307931.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
67. Lehrer, Keith, and Adrienne Lehrer
    2016 ”The Language of Taste.” Inquiry (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Lévi-Strauss, Claude
    1966 The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
69. Li, Hua, Hua Wang, and Huanmei Li
    2018 “The Worlds of Wine: Old, New and Ancient.” Wine Economics and Policy (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
70. López Arroyo, Belén, and Roda Roberts
    2017 “Metaphors in Wine-Tasting Notes in English and Spanish.” Hermēneus. Revista de Traducción e Interpretación: –. 10.24197/her.19.2017.139‑163
    https://doi.org/10.24197/her.19.2017.139-163 [Google Scholar]
71. López Arroyo, Belén, and Roda P. Roberts
    2020 “What Wine Descriptors Really Mean: A Comparison between Dictionary Definitions and Real Use.” Journal of Wine Research (): –. 10.1080/09571264.2020.1854701
    https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2020.1854701 [Google Scholar]
72. MacInnis, Deborah J., and Valerie S. Folkes
    2017 “Humanizing Brands: When Brands Seem to Be Like Me, Part of Me, and in a Relationship with Me.” Journal of Consumer Psychology (): –. 10.1016/j.jcps.2016.12.003
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.12.003 [Google Scholar]
73. Manca, Elena
    2020 “Investigating the Language of Red Wine Tasting Notes across the US, the Australian and the Italian Cultures.” Lingue e Linguaggi: –.
    [Google Scholar]
74. Masset, Philippe, Laurence Terrier, and Florine Livat
    2023 “Can a Wine Be Feminine? Gendered Wine Descriptors and Quality, Price, and Aging Potential.” Journal of Wine Economics (): –. 10.1017/jwe.2023.30
    https://doi.org/10.1017/jwe.2023.30 [Google Scholar]
75. McCannon, Bryan C.
    2020 “Wine Descriptions Provide Information: A Text Analysis.” Journal of Wine Economics (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
76. Molina-Plaza, Silvia
    2016 “Multimodal Metaphors on the Spanish Technical Discourse of Wine: An Overview.” InBeyond the Universe of Languages for Specific Purposes: The 21st Century Perspective, ed. byElena Martín-Monje, Izaskun Elorza, and Blanca García Riaza, –. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
77. Moreno-Pérez, Leticia, and Belén López-Arroyo
    2023 “Wine and Translation: An Analysis of Phraseological Units in English and Spanish Wine Technical Sheets.” Perspectives (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
78. Mouret, Marine, Guillaume Lo Monaco, Isabelle Urdapilleta, and Wendy V. Parr
    2013 “Social Representations of Wine and Culture: A Comparison between France and New Zealand.” Food Quality and Preference (): –. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.04.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.04.014 [Google Scholar]
79. Mouret, Marion, Grégory Lo Monaco, Isabel Urdapilleta, and Wendy V. Parr
    2013 “Social Representations of Wine and Culture: A Comparison between France and New Zealand.” Food Quality and Preference (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
80. Mueller, Simone, Larry Lockshin, Yaelle Saltman, and Jason Blanford
    2010 “Message on a Bottle: The Relative Influence of Wine Back Label Information on Wine Choice.” Food Quality and Preference (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
81. Musolff, Andreas
    2006 “Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse.” Metaphor and Symbol (): –. 10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2
    https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2 [Google Scholar]
82. Musolff, Andreas
    2024 “Cultural Metaphor and Intercultural Identities.” InThe Handbook of Cultural Linguistics, ed. byAzin Korangy, –. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. 10.1007/978‑981‑99‑3800‑1_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3800-1_2 [Google Scholar]
83. Nacchia, Flaminia
    2024 “Verbalised Sensoriality or Amusing Embellishment? A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Personification in Promotional Wine Discourse.” In(Critical) Discourse Studies and the (New?) Normal. Analysing Discourse in Times of Crisis, ed. byStefania M. Maci and Martin N. Mcglashan, –. Lausanne: Peter Lang.
    [Google Scholar]
84. Negro, Isabel Alousque
    2012 “Wine Discourse in the French Language.” RAEL: Revista electrónica de lingüística aplicada: –.
    [Google Scholar]
85. Negro Alousque, Isabel
    2015 “Visual Wine Metaphor and Metonymy in Ads.” Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences: –. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.041
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.041 [Google Scholar]
86. Noble, Ann C., R. A. Arnold, B. M. Masuda, S. D. Pecore, J. O. Schmidt, and P. M. Stern
    1984 “Progress towards a Standardized System of Wine Aroma Terminology.” American Journal of Enology and Viticulture (): –. 10.5344/ajev.1984.35.2.107
    https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.1984.35.2.107 [Google Scholar]
87. Normand-Marconnet, Nadine, and Jean C. Jones
    2020 “Anthropomorphic Metaphors in Wine Discourse, with Special Reference to Japanese Wine Manga.” International Journal of Language and Culture (): –. 10.1075/ijolc.17009.nor
    https://doi.org/10.1075/ijolc.17009.nor [Google Scholar]
88. Onuma, Tomomi
    2024 “Verbal Descriptions Modulate Flavour Perception and Evaluation of Wine: An Exploratory Study Using Riesling and Muscat Bailey A Wines.” OENO One (): –. 10.20870/oeno‑one.2024.58.2.8002
    https://doi.org/10.20870/oeno-one.2024.58.2.8002 [Google Scholar]
89. Ortony, Andrew
    1975 “Why Metaphors Are Necessary and Not Just Nice.” Educational Theory (): –. 10.1111/j.1741‑5446.1975.tb00666.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.1975.tb00666.x [Google Scholar]
90. Paradis, Carita, and Maria Eeg-Olofsson
    2013 “Describing Sensory Experience: The Genre of Wine Reviews.” Metaphor and Symbol (): –. 10.1080/10926488.2013.742838
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2013.742838 [Google Scholar]
91. Paradis, Carita, and Charlotte Hommerberg
    2016 “We Drink with Our Eyes First: The Web of Sensory Perceptions, Aesthetic Experiences and Mixed Imagery in Wine Reviews.” InMixing Metaphor, ed. byRaymond W. Gibbs Jr., –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/milcc.6.09par
    https://doi.org/10.1075/milcc.6.09par [Google Scholar]
92. Parr, Wendy V.
    2019 “Demystifying Wine Tasting: Cognitive Psychology’s Contribution.” Food Research International: –. 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.03.050
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.03.050 [Google Scholar]
93. Parr, Wendy V., and Heber Rodrigues
    eds. 2020 Cross-Cultural Studies in Wine Appreciation. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
94. Penfolds_Wines
    Penfolds_Wines 2024 “Bin 389 Cabernet Shiraz 2020.” AccessedOctober 21, 2024. https://www.penfolds.com/en-au/bin-389-cabernet-shiraz-2020-8054394.html
95. Pirtskhalaishvili, Tamar
    2018 “Multimodal Metaphors in Wine Advertisements.” Journal of Innovative Technologies in Social Science: –.
    [Google Scholar]
96. Ramirez, Carlos D.
    2010 “Do Tasting Notes Add Value? Evidence from Napa Wines.” Journal of Wine Economics (): –. 10.1017/S1931436100001425
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S1931436100001425 [Google Scholar]
97. Rodrigues, Heber, and Wendy V. Parr
    2019 “Contribution of Cross-Cultural Studies to Understanding Wine Appreciation: A Review.” Food Research International: –. 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.008
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.09.008 [Google Scholar]
98. Rodrigues, Heber, Yvonne Seier Christensen, and Allison Creed
    2025 “Wine and Conversation: Tracing Innovation in Wine Metaphors.” Current Opinion in Food Science: . 10.1016/j.cofs.2025.101362
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2025.101362 [Google Scholar]
99. Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén, Jane Demmen, Veronika Koller, Susan Payne, Andrew Hardie, and Paul Rayson
    2017 “The Online Use of Violence and Journey Metaphors by Patients with Cancer, as Compared with Health Professionals: A Mixed Methods Study.” BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care (): –. 10.1136/bmjspcare‑2014‑000785
    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000785 [Google Scholar]
100. Shapin, Steven
     2022 “Hard Science, Soft Science: A Political History of a Disciplinary Array.” History of Science (): –. 10.1177/00732753221094739
     https://doi.org/10.1177/00732753221094739 [Google Scholar]
101. Sharifian, Farzad
     2017 Cultural Linguistics: Cultural Conceptualisations and Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/clscc.8
     https://doi.org/10.1075/clscc.8 [Google Scholar]
102. Shepherd, Gordon M.
     2015 “Neuroenology: How the Brain Creates the Taste of Wine.” Flavour (): . 10.1186/s13411‑014‑0030‑9
     https://doi.org/10.1186/s13411-014-0030-9 [Google Scholar]
103. Shepherd, Holly, Wendy V. Parr, Guillaume Lo Monaco, and Heber Rodrigues
     2023 “The Meaning of the Word Elegance as a Wine Descriptor: Effect of Expertise and Wine Type.” Food Research International: . 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112399
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112399 [Google Scholar]
104. Sillani, Simona, Antonella Miccoli, and Fabio Nassivera
     2017 “Different Preferences for Wine Communication.” Wine Economics and Policy (): –. 10.1016/j.wep.2017.03.002
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wep.2017.03.002 [Google Scholar]
105. Silverstein, Michael
     2006 “Old Wine, New Ethnographic Lexicography.” Annual Review of Anthropology: –. 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123327
     https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123327 [Google Scholar]
106. Spence, Charles
     2011 “Crossmodal Correspondences: A Tutorial Review.” Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics (): –. 10.3758/s13414‑010‑0073‑7
     https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-010-0073-7 [Google Scholar]
107. Spence, Charles
     2024 “Cognitive Influence on the Evaluation of Wine: The Impact and Assessment of Price.” Food Research International: 114411.
     [Google Scholar]
108. Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anne A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr, and Tine Pasma
     2010 A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/celcr.14
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
109. Stengel, Kilien, and Angelica-Helena Marinescu
     2016 “Wine Tasting Discourse: Traditional Knowledge, and Practice.” Journal of Social Sciences (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
110. Suárez-Toste, Ernesto
     2007 “Metaphor Inside the Wine Cellar: On the Ubiquity of Personification Schemas in Winespeak.” Metaphorik. de (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
111. Suárez-Toste, Ernesto
     2017 “Babel of the Senses.” Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication (): –. 10.1075/term.23.1.04sua
     https://doi.org/10.1075/term.23.1.04sua [Google Scholar]
112. Sweetser, Eve E.
     1990 From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511620904
     https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620904 [Google Scholar]
113. Temmerman, Rita
     2017 “Verbalizing Sensory Experience for Marketing Success.” Terminology. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Issues in Specialized Communication (): –. 10.1075/term.23.1.06tem
     https://doi.org/10.1075/term.23.1.06tem [Google Scholar]
114. Templier, Marc, and Guy Paré
     2015 “A Framework for Guiding and Evaluating Literature Reviews.” Communications of the Association for Information Systems: –. 10.17705/1CAIS.03706
     https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03706 [Google Scholar]
115. Ţenescu, Ana
     2014 “A Subtle Grasp of the Five Senses: Cognitive Metaphors in Wine Media Discourse.” InIdentities in Metamorphosis: Literature, Discourse, and Multicultural Dialogue, –. Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană.
     [Google Scholar]
116. Ţenescu, Ana
     2014 “The Organicist-Animist Metaphor in Italian Wine Media Discourse.” Social Sciences and Education Research Review (): –.
     [Google Scholar]
117. Tiefenbacher, John P., and Christi Townsend
     eds. 2020 The Semiofoodscape of Wine: The Changing Global Landscape of Wine Culture and the Language of Making, Selling, and Drinking Wine. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
118. Wang, Qian Janice, Lotte A. Mielby, J. Y. Junge, A. S. Bertelsen, U. Kidmose, Charles Spence, and Derek V. Byrne
     2019 “The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review.” Foods (): . 10.3390/foods8060211
     https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8060211 [Google Scholar]
119. Wang, Qian Janice, Judith K. Thomadsen, and Arash Amidi
     2024 “Can Metaphors Help Us Better Remember Wines? The Effect of Wine Evaluation Style on Short-Term Recognition of Red Wines.” Food Research International: . 10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114009
     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2024.114009 [Google Scholar]
120. Wang, Victor X., X. Chen, S. Quan, and Chu-Ren Huang
     2020 “A Parallel Corpus-Driven Approach to Bilingual Oenology Term Banks: How Culture Differences Influence Wine Tasting Terms.” InProceedings of the 34th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, ed. byMinh Le Nguyen, M. C. Luong, and S. Song, –. Hanoi: Association for Computational Linguistics.
     [Google Scholar]
121. Weatherbee, Tim G., and Daniel Sears
     2023 “Circuits of Organizational Stories: Wineries, History, and the Performance of Place.” InA World Scientific Encyclopedia of Business Storytelling, ed. byDavid M. Boje, Albert J. Mills, and Nancy Deal, –. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. 10.1142/9789811273476_0001
     https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811273476_0001 [Google Scholar]
122. Windsor, Luke C., Joseph H. Tatara, Cameron B. Peters, Chase Kronsted, and Aaron Windsor
     2023 “The Language of Wine Reviews.” Journal of Wine Research (): –. 10.1080/09571264.2023.2205116
     https://doi.org/10.1080/09571264.2023.2205116 [Google Scholar]
123. Winter, Bodo
     2019 “Synaesthetic Metaphors Are Neither Synaesthetic nor Metaphorical.” InPerception Metaphors, ed. byLila J. Speed, Cassandra O’Meara, Leonardo S. Roque, and Asifa Majid, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/celcr.19.06win
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.19.06win [Google Scholar]
124. Yao, Binyuan, M. Jiang, T. Bobinac, D. Yang, and J. Hu
     2024 “Benchmarking Machine Translation with Cultural Awareness.” InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024, –. Miami: Association for Computational Linguistics. 10.18653/v1/2024.findings‑emnlp.765
     https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.765 [Google Scholar]
125. Yoshinari, Yuta
     2022 “Motion Expressions in Japanese Wine-Tasting Descriptions.” InThe Language of Food in Japanese, ed. byKiyoko Toratani, –. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 10.1075/celcr.25.10yos
     https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.25.10yos [Google Scholar]
126. Yu, Ning
     1998 The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: A Perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. 10.1075/hcp.1
     https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.1 [Google Scholar]
127. Zawisławska, Małgorzata, and Magdalena Falkowska
     2017 “Typology of Metaphors with the Gustatory Target Domain in Polish Wine Discourse.” Crossroads. A Journal of English Studies (): –. 10.15290/cr.2017.17.2.05
     https://doi.org/10.15290/cr.2017.17.2.05 [Google Scholar]
128. Zawisławska, Małgorzata, and Magdalena Falkowska
     2019 “Metaphors in Polish Wine Discourse: A Corpus Approach.” Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics (): –. 10.1515/psicl‑2019‑0022
     https://doi.org/10.1515/psicl-2019-0022 [Google Scholar]
129. Zhong, Yue, and Wilson S. Tse
     2022 “Taste of Wine or ‘Taste’ of a Person: (Synesthetic) Metaphors in Wine Reviews.” InProceedings of the 36th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, –. Manila.
     [Google Scholar]