1887
image of Metaphor in population-based AI
USD
Buy:$35.00 + Taxes

Abstract

English serves as the primary source language for Artificial Intelligence terminology, playing a pivotal role in shaping the metaphorical expressions that underpin specialized lexicons and facilitate knowledge transfer. This study investigates the patterns of metaphorical term formation within English-language AI discourse, focusing specifically on the domain of population-based algorithms. Through a qualitative, corpus-informed analysis of 1,540 terminological units drawn from academic literature and specialized glossaries, we identify and classify 85 metaphorical terms (5.5% of the dataset). The analysis reveals that metaphorical transfer in this field is systematically anchored in four dominant source domains: , and . Employing Conceptual Metaphor Theory (Lakoff & Johnson), Frame Theory (Minsky), and Sociocognitive approach to terminology (Temmerman), the study maps these cross-domain mappings drawn from societal organization and biological systems. The findings demonstrate that these metaphors function as essential cognitive tools that structure technical understanding, foster interdisciplinary dialogue, and enhance the intelligibility of complex systems. Besides, the analysis critically examines potential communicative effects, such as unintended anthropomorphism or the naturalization of competitive framings, which carry implications for ethical discourse and human-centered AI. The given study provides a framework for analyzing term formation, supports transparent naming practices, and highlights the influence of metaphorical choices on both the conceptual architecture and the societal perception of Artificial Intelligence.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1075/term.25040.sha
2026-07-31
2026-08-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bakanach, Mikhail O., Alexander N. Vlaskin, and Andrei Yu. Chesalov
    2023Glossarium po iskusstvennomu intellektu: 2500 terminov [Glossary of Artificial Intelligence: 2500 Terms]. Moscow: Ridero.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bandura, Albert
    1977Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Barsalou, Lawrence W.
    2008 “Grounded Cognition.” Annual Review of Psychology: –. 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bastos-Filho, Claudio, Francisco Lima Neto, Andre Lins,
    2008 “A Novel Search Algorithm Based on Fish School Behavior.” InIEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, –. 10.1109/ICSMC.2008.4811695
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2008.4811695 [Google Scholar]
  5. Beheshti, Zahra, and Siti Shamsuddin
    2013 “A Review of Population-Based Meta-Heuristic Algorithm.” International Journal of Advances in Soft Computing and Its Applications: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Black, Max
    1967Models and Metaphors: Studies in Language and Philosophy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Borodulina, Natalia, and Marina Makeeva
    2024 “Types of Metaphors in Economic Discourse (Based on the Representation of Enterprise Activities in Russian, English, German, and French).” Theory of Language (). 10.30853/phil20240180
    https://doi.org/10.30853/phil20240180 [Google Scholar]
  8. Boyd, Richard
    1993 “Metaphor and Theory Change: What Is ‘Metaphor’ a Metaphor For?” InMetaphor and Thought, ed. byAndrew Ortony, 2nd ed., –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.023
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.023 [Google Scholar]
  9. Brown, Theodore L.
    2003Making Truth: Metaphor in Science. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cazeaux, Clive
    2007Metaphor and Continental Philosophy: From Kant to Derrida. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203326831
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203326831 [Google Scholar]
  11. Cheng, Shaoqun, Li Bin, Qiang Ting,
    2016 “Survey on Data Science with Population-Based Algorithms.” Big Data Analysis: –. 10.1186/s41044‑016‑0003‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1186/s41044-016-0003-3 [Google Scholar]
  12. Colburn, Timothy, and Gary Shute
    2008 “Metaphor in Computer Science.” Journal of Applied Logic (): –. 10.1016/j.jal.2008.09.005
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2008.09.005 [Google Scholar]
  13. Danto, Arthur C.
    1993 “Metaphor and Cognition.” InKnowledge and Language, –. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑011‑1844‑6_2
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1844-6_2 [Google Scholar]
  14. de Man, Paul
    1978 “The Epistemology of Metaphor.” Critical Inquiry (): –. www.jstor.org/stable/1342975
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Derrida, Jacques
    1978Writing and Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dorigo, Marco
    1992 Optimization, Learning and Natural Algorithms. PhD diss., Politecnico di Milano.
  17. Ershov, Nikolay M., and Sergey V. Poluyan
    2018 “Analysis of the Parallel Structure of Population-Based Optimization Algorithms.” InProceedings of the VIII International Conference: Distributed Computing and Grid-Technologies in Science and Education, –.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Faber, Pamela
    2012A Cognitive Linguistics View of Terminology and Specialized Language. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 10.1515/9783110277203
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110277203 [Google Scholar]
  19. Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner
    2002The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Feldman, Jerome
    2006From Molecule to Metaphor: A Neural Theory of Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/3135.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3135.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Fogel, David
    2009 “Artificial Intelligence through Simulated Evolution.” InEvolutionary Computation: The Fossil Record, –. 10.1109/9780470544600.ch7
    https://doi.org/10.1109/9780470544600.ch7 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fontanier, Pierre
    1968Les Figures du Discours. Paris: Flammarion.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Futuyma, Douglas J., and Mark Kirkpatrick
    2017Evolution. 4th ed.Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Geem, Zong Woo, Joong Hoon Kim, and G. V. Loganathan
    2001 “A New Heuristic Optimization Algorithm: Harmony Search.” Simulation (): –. 10.1177/003754970107600201
    https://doi.org/10.1177/003754970107600201 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gibbs, Raymond W.
    (ed.) 2008The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802 [Google Scholar]
  26. 2006Embodiment and Cognitive Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511805844
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805844 [Google Scholar]
  27. Grady, Joseph
    1997 Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3g9427m2
  28. Groupe µ
    Groupe µ 1970Rhétorique Générale. Paris: Larousse.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Guo, Zhi
    2023 “Conceptual Metaphor and Cognition: From the Perspective of the Philosophy of Language.” Journal of Innovation and Development (): –. 10.54097/jid.v3i1.8424
    https://doi.org/10.54097/jid.v3i1.8424 [Google Scholar]
  30. Henderson, Willie
    2000 “Metaphor, Economics and ESP: Some Comments.” English for Specific Purposes (): –. 10.1016/S0889‑4906(99)00035‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(99)00035-6 [Google Scholar]
  31. Holland, John H.
    1975Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hu, Zhongyu
    2023Metaphor and Cognition. Singapore: Springer. 10.1007/978‑981‑99‑3852‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3852-0 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hussain, Kashif, Mohd Najib Mohd Salleh, Shi Cheng, and Yuhui Shi
    2019 “Metaheuristic Research: A Comprehensive Survey.” Artificial Intelligence Review (): –. 10.1007/s10462‑017‑9605‑z
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-017-9605-z [Google Scholar]
  34. Indurkhya, Bipin
    1992Metaphor and Cognition: An Interactionist Approach. Dordrecht: Springer. 10.1007/978‑94‑017‑2252‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2252-0 [Google Scholar]
  35. Kennedy, James, and Russell C. Eberhart
    1995 “Particle Swarm Optimization.” InProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (ICNN’95), :–. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE. 10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968
    https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kirkpatrick, Scott, C. D. Gelatt Jr., and Mario P. Vecchi
    1983 “Optimization by Simulated Annealing.” Science, no. (): –. 10.1126/science.220.4598.671
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.671 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kolmakova, Valentina, Oksana Marunevich, and Yulia Karagodskaya
    2023 “Critical Analysis of Language Deviations in Modern Mass Media Metaphorology.” InXV International Scientific Conference INTERAGROMASH 2022, –. Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑21432‑5_103
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-21432-5_103 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kövecses, Zoltán
    2005Metaphor in Culture: Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511614408
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614408 [Google Scholar]
  39. Koza, John R.
    1992Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Krishnanand, K. N., and Debasish Ghose
    2011 “Glowworm Swarm Optimization for Multimodal Search Spaces.” InHandbook of Swarm Intelligence, edited byBijaya Ketan Panigrahi, Yuhui Shi, and Meng-Hiot Lim, –. Adaptation, Learning, and Optimization 8. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑17390‑5_19
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17390-5_19 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kuhn, Thomas S.
    1993 “Metaphor in Science.” InMetaphor and Thought, edited byAndrew Ortony, 2nd ed., –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173865.024
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.024 [Google Scholar]
  42. Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson
    1980Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Minsky, Marvin
    1974 “A Framework for Representing Knowledge.” Cambridge, MA: MIT.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Müller, Vincent C.
    ed. 2016Fundamental Issues of Artificial Intelligence. Synthese Library 377. Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑319‑26485‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26485-1 [Google Scholar]
  45. Nersessian, Nancy J.
    2010Creating Scientific Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Rashedi, Esmat, Hossein Nezamabadi-pour, and Saeid Saryazdi
    2009 “GSA: A Gravitational Search Algorithm.” Information Sciences (): –. 10.1016/j.ins.2009.03.004
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2009.03.004 [Google Scholar]
  47. Raynor, William J.
    1999The International Dictionary of Artificial Intelligence. Chicago: Glenlake Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Rechenberg, Ingo
    1965 “Cybernetic Solution Path of an Experimental Problem.” Translated byRoyal Aircraft Establishment. Library Translation 1122. Farnborough, UK: Royal Aircraft Establishment.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 1998 “Cybernetic Solution Path of an Experimental Problem.” InEvolutionary Computation: The Fossil Record, –. New York: IEEE Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Reynolds, Robert G.
    1994 “An Introduction to Cultural Algorithms.” InProceedings of the Third Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming, edited byAnthony V. Sebald and Lawrence J. Fogel, –. River Edge, NJ: World Scientific.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Richards, Ivor A.
    1936The Philosophy of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Schwefel, Hans-Paul
    1965Kybernetische Evolution als Strategie der Experimentellen Forschung in der Strömungstechnik. Berlin: Technical University of Berlin.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Semino, Elena, Zsófia Demjén, Andrew Hardie, Sheila Payne, and Paul Rayson
    2017Metaphor, Cancer, and the End of Life: A Corpus-Based Study. New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9781315629834
    https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315629834 [Google Scholar]
  54. Shi, Yuhui
    2011 “Brain Storm Optimization Algorithm.” InAdvances in Swarm Intelligence: Second International Conference, ICSI 2011, Chongqing, China, June 12–15, 2011, –. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6728. Berlin: Springer. 10.1007/978‑3‑642‑21515‑5_36
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21515-5_36 [Google Scholar]
  55. Shneiderman, Ben
    2022Human-Centered AI. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/oso/9780192845290.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845290.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
  56. Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson
    2008 “A Deflationary Account of Metaphors.” InThe Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought, edited byRaymond W. Gibbs, –. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511816802.007
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816802.007 [Google Scholar]
  57. Stanley, Kenneth O., and Risto Miikkulainen
    2002 “Evolving Neural Networks through Augmenting Topologies.” Evolutionary Computation (): –. 10.1162/106365602320169811
    https://doi.org/10.1162/106365602320169811 [Google Scholar]
  58. Steen, Gerard J., Aletta G. Dorst, J. Berenike Herrmann, Anna A. Kaal, Tina Krennmayr, and Tryntje Pasma
    2010A Method for Linguistic Metaphor Identification: From MIP to MIPVU. Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research 14. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/celcr.14
    https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14 [Google Scholar]
  59. Storn, Rainer, and Kenneth Price
    1997 “Differential Evolution — A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for Global Optimization over Continuous Spaces.” Journal of Global Optimization (): –. 10.1023/A:1008202821328
    https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008202821328 [Google Scholar]
  60. Tarsi, Kate, and Tristan Tuff
    2012 “Introduction to Population Demographics.” Nature Education Knowledge (): .
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Temmerman, Rita
    2000Towards New Ways of Terminology Description: The Sociocognitive Approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 10.1075/tlrp.3
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tlrp.3 [Google Scholar]
  62. Todorov, Tzvetan
    1970Introduction à la littérature fantastique. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Vitanova-Ringaceva, Aleksandra, Dobrinka Marolova, and Daniela Kuzmanovska,
    2024 “Zoonym Phraseological Units as Hate Speech in Youth Vocabulary.” InEducation and New Developments: –.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Weinrich, Harald
    1967Linguistik der Lüge. Heidelberg: Lambert Schneider.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Whitcomb, Sean
    2025Environmental Science. Maricopa Open Digital Press. AccessedNovember 30, 2025. https://open.maricopa.edu/environmentalscience
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Winkle, Katie, Praminda Caleb-Solly, Ute Leonards, Ailie Turton, and Paul Bremner
    2021 “Assessing and Addressing Ethical Risk from Anthropomorphism and Deception in Socially Assistive Robots.” InProceedings of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, –. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. 10.1145/3434073.3444666
    https://doi.org/10.1145/3434073.3444666 [Google Scholar]
  67. Woolley, Anita Williams, Chen Christopher F. Chabris, Alex Pentland, Nada Hashmi, and Thomas W. Malone
    2010 “Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups.” Science, no. (): –. 10.1126/science.1193147
    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1193147 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wu, Jingfang, and Rong
    2013 “Metaphors Ubiquitous in Computer and Internet Terminologies.” Journal of Arts and Humanities (): –.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Yang, Xin-She, and Suash Deb
    2009 “Cuckoo Search via Lévy Flights.” InWorld Congress on Nature & Biologically Inspired Computing (NaBIC 2009), –. IEEE Publications. 10.1109/NABIC.2009.5393690
    https://doi.org/10.1109/NABIC.2009.5393690 [Google Scholar]
  70. Yang, Xin-She
    2013 “Bat Algorithm: Literature Review and Applications.” International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation (): –. 10.1504/IJBIC.2013.055093
    https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIC.2013.055093 [Google Scholar]
  71. Yao, Xin
    1999 “Evolving Artificial Neural Networks.” Proceedings of the IEEE, no. (): –. 10.1109/5.784219
    https://doi.org/10.1109/5.784219 [Google Scholar]
  72. Zaffalon, Marco, and Marcus Hutter
    2005 “Robust Inference of Trees.” Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence (): –. 10.1007/s10472‑005‑9007‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-005-9007-9 [Google Scholar]
  73. Zeng, Huiheng, Dennis Tay, and Kathleen Ahrens
    2020 “A Multifactorial Analysis of Metaphors in Political Discourse.” Metaphor and the Social World (): –. 10.1075/msw.19016.zen
    https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.19016.zen [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1075/term.25040.sha
Loading
/content/journals/10.1075/term.25040.sha
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was successful
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error