Construal of content

References

1. Belletti, Adriana and Luigi Rizzi
   1988 “Psych-verbs and Theta Theory.” Natural Language and Linguistic Theory6 (3): 291–352. doi: 10.1007/BF00133902
   https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00133902 [Google Scholar]
2. Boroditsky, Lera
   2011 “How language shapes thought.” Scientific American304 (2): 62–65. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0211‑62
   https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0211-62 [Google Scholar]
3. Bouchard, Denis
   1995 The Semantics of Syntax: A Minimalist Approach to Grammar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Clark, Herbert and Richard Gerrig
   1990 “Quotations as demonstrations.” Language66 (4): 764–805. doi: 10.2307/414729
   https://doi.org/10.2307/414729 [Google Scholar]
5. Cokely, Dennis
   1992 Interpretation: A Sociolinguistic Model. Burtonsville, MD: Linstok Press.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Colonomos, Betty
   1989 “Integrated Model of Interpreting Handout.” Bilingual Mediation Center. www.visitbmc.com/index.php/publications/integrated-model-of-interpreting-imi. Last accessed on19 September 2017.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Croft, William
   2012 Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248582.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
8. Dudis, Paul
   2007 “ Types of Depiction in ASL .” Unpublished manuscript. Washington, DC, Gallaudet University.
9. Dudis, Paul
   2010 “Some observations on form-meaning correspondences in two types of verbs in ASL.” Deaf Around the World: The Impact of Language, 83. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732548.003.0004
   https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199732548.003.0004 [Google Scholar]
10. Fillmore, Charles
    1975 “An alternative to checklist theories of meaning.” Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society1: 123–131.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Gile, Daniel
    2009 Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.8
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.8 [Google Scholar]
12. Goldberg, Adele
    2003 “Constructions: A new theoretical approach to language.” Trends in Cognitive Science7 (5): 219–224. doi: 10.1016/S1364‑6613(03)00080‑9
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00080-9 [Google Scholar]
13. Healy, Christina
    2015 Construing Affective Events in American Sign Language. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Washington, DC, Gallaudet University.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ingram, Robert
    1978 “Sign Language Interpretation and General Theories of Language, Interpretation and Communication.” InLanguage Interpretation and Communication. NATO Conference Series 6, ed. by David Gerver and Wallace Sinaiko , 109–118. Boston: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978‑1‑4615‑9077‑4_11
    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9077-4_11 [Google Scholar]
15. Katada, Fusa
    2013 “Weak transitivity: Another view of psych-predicates.” Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo”38: 81–91.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Kegl, Judy
    1990 “Predicate argument structure and verb-class organization in the ASL lexicon.” InSign Language Research: Theoretical Issues, ed. by Ceil Lucas , 149–175. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. King, Martin Luther
    1963 “I have a dream…” archives.gov/press/exhibits/dream-speech.pdf. Last accessed8 October 2016.
18. Lakoff, George
    1970 Irregularity in Syntax. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lakoff, George
    1987 Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226471013.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
20. Langacker, Ronald
    1987 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Langacker, Ronald
    1991 Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2, Descriptive Application. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Langacker, Ronald
    2008 Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195331967.001.0001 [Google Scholar]
23. Leeson, Lorraine
    2005 “Making the effort in simultaneous interpreting.” InTopics in Signed Language Interpreting: Theory and Practice, ed. by Terry Janzen , 51–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.63.07lee
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.63.07lee [Google Scholar]
24. Levin, Beth
    1993 English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Liddell, Scott
    2003 Grammar, Gesture, and Meaning in American Sign Language. New YorkCambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511615054
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511615054 [Google Scholar]
26. Napier, Jemina
    2003 “A sociolinguistic analysis of the occurrence and types of omissions produced by Australian Sign Language/English interpreters.” InFrom topic boundaries to omission: New Research on Interpretation, ed. by Melanie Metzger , Steven Collins , Valerie Dively , and Risa Shaw , 99–153. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Oomen, Marloes
    2015 Psych-Verbs in Sign Language of the Netherlands: How humans’ emotional experiences leave their traces in the grammar of languages in the manual modality. Unpublished M.A. thesis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, University of Amsterdam.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Oyharçabal, Beñat
    2013 “Lexical causatives and causative alternation in Basque.” Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo,”223–253.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Quer, Josep
    2009 “Agreement and argument structure in SLs: A case study in LSC psychological predications.” Paper presented at The 21st European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information . Bordeaux, France.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ramchand, Gillian
    2008 Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First-Phase Syntax. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511486319
    https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486319 [Google Scholar]
31. Rankin, Miako
    2013 Form, Meaning, and Focus in American Sign Language. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Sapountzaki, Galini
    2012 “Agreement auxiliaries.” InSign Language. An International Handbook, ed. by Roland Pfau , Markus Steinbach , and Bencie Woll , 204–227. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi: 10.1515/9783110261325.204
    https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110261325.204 [Google Scholar]
33. Talmy, Leonard
    2000 Toward a Cognitive Semantics: Concept Structuring System, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Talmy, Leonard
    2003 Toward a cognitive semantics: Typology jyoti and process in concept structuring (Language, speech, and communication) Volume 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Thumann, Mary
    2010 Identifying Depiction in American Sign Language Presentations. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Washington, DC, Gallaudet University.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Turner, Mark
    1991 Reading Minds. Lawrenceville, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Valli, Clayton , Ceil Lucas , Kristin Mulrooney and Miako Villanueva
    2011 Linguistics of American Sign Language: An Introduction. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Wilcox, Sherman and Barbara Shaffer
    2005 “Towards a cognitive model of interpreting.” InTopics in Signed Language Interpreting: Theory and Practice, ed. by Terry Janzen , 27–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi: 10.1075/btl.63.06wil
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.63.06wil [Google Scholar]
39. Winston, Charlotte
    2013 Psychological Verb Constructions in American Sign Language. Unpublished M.A. thesis. West Lafayette, IN, Purdue University.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Witter-Merithew, Anna
    2001 Understanding the meaning of texts and reinforcing foundation skills through discourse analysis. InTapestry of Our Worlds: Proceedings of the 17th National Conference of Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf, ed. by Clay Nettles , 177–192. Silver Spring, MD: RID Publications.
    [Google Scholar]