Interpreter-mediated investigative interviews with minors

References

1. Amato, Amalie , and Gabriele Mack
   2015 “Briefing, Debriefing and Support.” InChildren and Justice: Overcoming Language Barriers, ed. by Katalin Balogh , and Heidi Salaets , 247–280. Cambridge: Intersentia.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Angelelli, Claudia V.
   2004 Revisiting the Interpreter’s Role: A Study of Conference, Court, and Medical Interpreters. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.55
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.55 [Google Scholar]
3. Australian Institute of Interpreters and Translators (AUSIT)
   Australian Institute of Interpreters and Translators (AUSIT) 2012 AUSIT Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct. Melbourne. Available at: ausit.org/AUSIT/Documents/Code_Of_Ethics_Full.pdf. Last accessed13 May 2018.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Balogh, Katalin , and Heidi Salaets
   (eds) 2015 Children and Justice: Overcoming Language Barriers. Cambridge: Intersentia.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Baraldi, Claudio , and Laura Gavioli
   (eds) 2012 Co-ordinating Participation in Dialogue Interpreting. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.102
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.102 [Google Scholar]
6. Berk-Seligson, Susan
   2000 “Interpreting for the Police: Issues in Pre-trail Phases of the Judicial Process.” Forensic Linguistics. The Journal of Speech, Language and the Law7(2): 1350–1771.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Berk-Seligson, Susan
   2009 Coerced Confessions: The Discourse of Bilingual Police Interrogations. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110213492
   https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110213492 [Google Scholar]
8. Blakemore, Diane
   2010 “Communication and the Representation of Thought: The Use of Audience-directed Expressions in Free Direct Thought Representations.” Journal of Linguistics46(3): 575–599.10.1017/S0022226709990375
   https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226709990375 [Google Scholar]
9. Blakemore, Diane , and Fabrizio Gallai
   2014 “Discourse Markers in Free Indirect Style and Interpreting.” Journal of Pragmatics60: 106–120.10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.003
   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.003 [Google Scholar]
10. Böser, Ursula
    2013 “‘So Tell me What Happened!’ Interpreting the Free Recall Segment of the Investigative Interview.” Translation and Interpreting Studies8(1): 112–136.10.1075/tis.8.1.06bos
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.8.1.06bos [Google Scholar]
11. Bot, Hanneke
    2005 Dialogue Interpreting in Mental Health. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Carter, Cathleen A. , Bette L. Bottoms , and Murray Levine
    1996 “Linguistic and Socioemotional Influences in the Accuracy of Children’s Reports.” Law and Human Behaviour20(3): 335–358.10.1007/BF01499027
    https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499027 [Google Scholar]
13. Ceci, Stephen J. , and Maggie Bruck
    1995 Jeopardy in the Courtroom: A Scientific Analysis of Children’s Testimony. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.10.1037/10180‑000
    https://doi.org/10.1037/10180-000 [Google Scholar]
14. Colin, Joan , and Ruth Morris
    1996 Interpreters and the Legal Process. Winchester: Waterside Press.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Davitti, Elena
    2013 “Dialogue Interpreting as Intercultural Mediation. Interpreters. Use of Upgrading Moves in Parent–teacher Meetings.” Interpreting15(2): 168–199.10.1075/intp.15.2.02dav
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.15.2.02dav [Google Scholar]
16. Davidson, Brad
    2000 “The Interpreter as Institutional Gatekeeper: The Social-linguistic Role of Interpreters in Spanish-English Medical Discourse.” Journal of Sociolinguistics4(3): 379–405.10.1111/1467‑9481.00121
    https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00121 [Google Scholar]
17. Dimitrova Englund, Birgitta
    1993 “Turntaking in Interpreted Discourse: Interplay of Implicit and Explicit Rules.” InProblemi na sociolinvistikata. Ezikovata situacija v mikro-i makrosocialnite obstnosti, ed. by Kiril Cankov , 15–21. Veliko Tarnovo: Universitetsko izdatelstvo.
    [Google Scholar]
18. European Commission
    European Commission 2014 Europa Press-release. Available at: europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-636_en.htm. 6 June 2014. Last accessed13 May 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Fontes, Lisa A. , and Amy C. Tishelman
    2016 “Language Competence in Forensic Interviews for Suspected Child Sexual Abuse.” Child Abuse & Neglect58: 51–62.10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.06.014
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2016.06.014 [Google Scholar]
20. Gallai, Fabrizio
    2013a Discourse Markers in Interpreter-mediated Police Interviews: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Salford.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Gallai, Fabrizzio
    2013b “I’ll Just Intervene When he Finds it a Bit Difficult to Answer.” Exploding the Myth of Literalism in Interpreter-mediated Interviews. ” Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice5(1): 57–78.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gallai, Fabrizio
    2016 “Point of View in Free Indirect Thought and in Community Interpreting.” Lingua175–176: 97–12.10.1016/j.lingua.2015.08.012
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2015.08.012 [Google Scholar]
23. Hale, Sandra
    2004 The Discourse of Court Interpreting. Discourse Practices of the Law, the Witness and the Interpreter. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.52
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.52 [Google Scholar]
24. Hale, Sandra
    2007 Community Interpreting. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230593442
    https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593442 [Google Scholar]
25. Heydon, Georgina , and Miranda Lai
    2013 “Police Interviews Mediated by Interpreters: An Exercise in Dimishment?” Investigative Interview: Research and Practice5(2): 82–98.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Holliday, Robin. E. , Douglas M. Karen , and Brett Hayes
    1999 “Children’s Eye-witness Suggestibility: Memory Trace Strength Revisited.” Cognitive Development14(3): 443–462.10.1016/S0885‑2014(99)00014‑3
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(99)00014-3 [Google Scholar]
27. Inghilleri, Moira
    2003 “Habitus, Field and Corpus: Interpreting as a Socially Situated Activity.” Target15(2): 243–268.10.1075/target.15.2.03ing
    https://doi.org/10.1075/target.15.2.03ing [Google Scholar]
28. Jacobsen, Bente
    2012 “The Significance of Interpreting Modes for Question-answer Dialogues in Court Interpreting.” Interpreting14(2): 217–241.10.1075/intp.14.2.05jac
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.14.2.05jac [Google Scholar]
29. Kassin, Saul M. , Steven A. Drizin , Thomas Grisso , Gisli H. Gudjonsson , Richard A. Leo , and Alison D. Redlich
    2010 “Police-induced Confessions: Risk Factors and Recommendations.” Law and Human Behaviour (34): 3–38.10.1007/s10979‑009‑9188‑6
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9188-6 [Google Scholar]
30. Keselman, Olga , Ann-Christin Cederborg , Michael E. Lamb , and Örjan Dahlström
    2008 “Mediated Communication with Minors in Asylum-Seeking Hearings.” Journal of Refugee Studies21(1): 103–116.10.1093/jrs/fem051
    https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem051 [Google Scholar]
31. Keselman, Olga
    2009 Restricting Participation. Unaccompanied Children in Interpreter-mediated Asylum Hearings in Sweden. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science: Linköping.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Keselman, Olga , Ann-Christin Cederborg , and Per Linell
    2010 “‘That is not Necessary for you to Know!’ Negotiation of Participation Status of Unaccompanied Children in Interpreter-mediated Asylum Hearings.” Interpreting (12)1: 84–104.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Keselman, Olga , Ann-Christin Cederborg , Michael E. Lamb , and Örjam Dahlström
    2010 “Asylum Seeking Minors in Interpreter-mediated Interviews: What Do They Say and What Happens to Their Responses?” Journal of Child and Family Social Work21(1): 103–116.
    [Google Scholar]
34. King, Catherine
    2015 “Highly Vulnerable Child Suspects. Signed Language Interpreter.” InChildren and Justice: Overcoming Language Barriers, ed. by Katalin Balogh and Heidi Salaets . 158–165. Cambridge: Intersentia.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Komter, Martha
    2005 “Understanding Problems in an Interpreter-mediated Police Interrogation.” InEthnographies of Law and Social Control, ed. by Stacy Lee Burns , 203–224. Bingley: Emerald.10.1016/S1521‑6136(04)06011‑7
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S1521-6136(04)06011-7 [Google Scholar]
36. Krouglov, Alex
    1999 “Politeness and Sociocultural Context.” The Translator5(2): 285–302.10.1080/13556509.1999.10799045
    https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1999.10799045 [Google Scholar]
37. Lamb, Michael E. , Kathleen J. Sternberg , Yael Orbach et al.
    2003 “Age Differences in Young Children’s Responses to Open-ended Invitations in the Course of Forensic Interviews.” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology71(5): 926–934.10.1037/0022‑006X.71.5.926
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.5.926 [Google Scholar]
38. Lamb, Michael E. , and Deirdre A. Brown
    2006 “Conversational Apprentices: Helping Children Become Competent Informants about their Own Experiences.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology24(1): 215–234.10.1348/026151005X57657
    https://doi.org/10.1348/026151005X57657 [Google Scholar]
39. Lamb, Michael E. et al.
    2007 “A Structured Forensic Interview Protocol Improves the Quality and Informativeness of Investigative Interviews with Children: A Review of Research Using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol.” Child Abuse & Neglect31(11–12): 1201–1231.10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021 [Google Scholar]
40. Lamb, Michael E. , Irit Hershkowitz , Yael Orbach et al.
    2008 Tell me What Happened: Structured Investigative Interviews of Child Victims and Witnesses. Chichester: Wiley.10.1002/9780470773291
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470773291 [Google Scholar]
41. Lamb, Michael E. , David J. LaRooy , Lindsay C. Malloy et al.
    (eds) 2011 Children’s Testimony: A Handbook of Psychological Research and Forensic Practice. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781119998495
    https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119998495 [Google Scholar]
42. Linell, Per , Linda Jönsson and Cecilia Wadensjö
    1992 “Establishing Communicative Contact through a Dialogue Interpreter.” InLSP Communication/Fachsprachliche Kommunikation, ed. by Anette Grindsted and Johannes Wagner . Tübingen: Narr Verlag: 125–42.
    [Google Scholar]
43. LaRooy, David J. , Elizabeth C. Ahern , Samantha J. Andrews
    2015 “Developmentally Appropriate Interviewing of Highly Vulnerable Children: A Developmental Psychology Perspective.” InChildren and Justice: Overcoming Language Barriers, ed. by Katalin Balogh , and Heidi Salaets , 113–131. Cambridge: Intersentia.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Lai, Miranda , and Sedat Mulayim
    2014 “Interpreter Linguistic Intervention in the Strategies Employed by Police in Investigative Interviews.” Police Practice and Research14(4):307–321.10.1080/15614263.2013.809929
    https://doi.org/10.1080/15614263.2013.809929 [Google Scholar]
45. Marschark, Marc , Patricia Sapere , Carol Convertino et al.
    2005 “Educational Interpreting: Access and Outcomes.” InSign Language Interpreting and Interpreter Education: Directions for Research and Practice, ed. by Marc Marschark , Rico Peterson , Elizabeth A. Winston , 57–83. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof/9780195176940.003.0003
    https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof/9780195176940.003.0003 [Google Scholar]
46. Maryns, Katrijn
    2006 The Asylum Speaker: Language in the Belgian Asylum Procedure. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Mason, Ian
    2000 “Models and Methods in Dialogue Interpreting Research.” InIntercultural Faultlines. Research Models in Translation Studies I. Textual and Cognitive Aspects, ed. by Maeve Olohan , 215–232. Manchester: St. Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Mason, Ian
    2012 “Gaze, Positioning and Identity in Interpreter-mediated Dialogues.” InCo-ordinating Participation in Dialogue Interpreting, ed. by Claudio Baraldi and Laura Gavioli . 177–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.102.08mas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.102.08mas [Google Scholar]
49. Mason, Ian , Wen Ren
    2012 “Power in Face-to-face Interpreting Events.” The Sociological Turn in Translation and Interpreting Studies7(2): 234–253.10.1075/tis.7.2.08mas
    https://doi.org/10.1075/tis.7.2.08mas [Google Scholar]
50. Metzger, Melanie
    2002 Sign Language Interpreting. Deconstructing the Myth of Neutrality. Washington: Gallaudet University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Mikkelson, Holly
    2010 “Consecutive or Simultaneous? An Analysis of their Use in the Judicial Setting.” Accross the Board5(1): 4–7.
    [Google Scholar]
52. Ministry of Justice
    Ministry of Justice 2011 Achieving Best Evidence in Criminal Proceedings. Guidance on Interviewing Victims and Witnesses, and Guidance on Using Special Measures. Available at: https://www.cps.gov.uk/publications/docs/best_evidence_in_criminal_proceedings.pdf. Last accessed13 May 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Nakane, Ikuko
    2007 “Problems in Communicating the Suspect’s Rights in Interpreted Police Interviews.” Applied Linguistics28(1) 87–112.10.1093/applin/aml050
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml050 [Google Scholar]
54. Nakane, Ikuko
    2009 ’The Myth of an Invisible Mediator: An Australian Case Study of English Japanese Police Interpreting.” Portal6(1) 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
55. Nakane, Ikuko
    2011 “The Role of Silence in Interpreted Police Interviews.” Journal of Pragmatics43(9) 2317–2330.10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.013
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.11.013 [Google Scholar]
56. Nakane, Ikuko
    2014 Interpreter Mediated Police Interviews. A Discourse-Pragmatic Approach. London, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
    [Google Scholar]
57. National Institute for Child Health and Development
    National Institute for Child Health and Development 2014 NICHD Protocol. Available at: nichdprotocol.com/the-nichd-protocol/Last accessed13 May 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
58. Nilsen, Anne-Birgitta
    2013 “Exploring Interpreting for Young Children.” The International Journal of Translation and Interpreting Research5(2): 14–29.10.12807/ti.105202.2013.a02
    https://doi.org/10.12807/ti.105202.2013.a02 [Google Scholar]
59. Pavlenko, Aneta
    2008 “‘I’m Very not about the Law Part.’ Non-native Speakers of English and the Miranda Warnings.” TESOL Quarterly42(1): 1–30.10.1002/j.1545‑7249.2008.tb00205.x
    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00205.x [Google Scholar]
60. Pöllabauer, Sonja
    2004 “Interpreting in Asylum Hearings: Issues of Role, Responsibility and Power.” Interpreting6(2): 143–180.10.1075/intp.6.2.03pol
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.6.2.03pol [Google Scholar]
61. Poole, Debra A. , Bruck, Maggie , Pipe, Margaret Ellen
    2011 “Forensic Interviewing Aids: Do Props Help Children Answer Questions About Touching?” Current Directions in Psychological Science20: 11–15.10.1177/0963721410388804
    https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410388804 [Google Scholar]
62. Russell, S.
    2004 “Three’s a Crowd: Shifting Dynamics in the Interpreted Interview.” InLanguage in the Legal Process, ed. by Janet Cotterill , 111–126, Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
63. Russell, Sonia
    2000 “‘Let Me Put it Simply…’: the Case for a Standard Translation of the Police Caution and its Explanation.” International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law7(1): 26–48.10.1558/sll.2000.7.1.26
    https://doi.org/10.1558/sll.2000.7.1.26 [Google Scholar]
64. Scottish Government
    Scottish Government 2011 Guidance on Joint Investigative Interviewing of Child Witnesses in Scotland. Available at : www.gov.scot/Publications/2011/12/16102728/0Last accessed13 May 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
65. Sternberg, Kathleen. J. , Michael E. Lamb , Yael Orbach , et al.
    2001 “Use of a Structured Investigative Protocol Enhances Young Children’s Free-recall Prompts in the Course of Forensic Interviews.” Journal of Applied Psychology86(5): 997–1005.10.1037/0021‑9010.86.5.997
    https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.997 [Google Scholar]
66. Sternberg, Kathleen J. , Philip W. Esplin , Yael Orbach , and Irit Herschkowitz
    2002 “Using a Structured Protocol to Improve the Quality of Investigative Interviews.” InMemory and Suggestibility in the Forensic Interview, ed. by Mitchell L. Eisen , Jodie A. Quas , Gail. S. Goodman , 409–436. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
    [Google Scholar]
67. Solm, Lucy
    2015 “Interpreting Techniques.” In: Children and Justice: Overcoming Language Barriers, ed. by Katalin Balogh , and Heidi Salaets . Cambridge: Intersentia.
    [Google Scholar]
68. Tebble, Helen
    2012 “Interpreting or Interfering?” InCo-ordinating Participation in Dialogue Interpreting, ed. by Claudio Baraldi , and Laura Gavioli . 177–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.102.02teb
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.102.02teb [Google Scholar]
69. Teoh, Yee-San , Michael E. Lamb
    2010 “Preparing Children for Investigative Interviews: Rapport Building. Instruction and Evaluation.” Applied Developmental Science14(3): 154–163.10.1080/10888691.2010.494463
    https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2010.494463 [Google Scholar]
70. Tipton, Rebecca
    2010 “On Trust: Relationships of Trust in Interpreter-mediated Social Work Encounters.” InText and Context: Essays on Translation and Interpreting in Honour of Ian Mason, ed. by Mona Baker , Maeve Olohan , and María Calzada Perez . 188–208. Manchester: St Jerome.
    [Google Scholar]
71. Tribe, Rachel , and Marsha Sanders
    2003 “Training Issues for Interpreters Working in Mental Health.” InUndertaking Mental Health Work Using Interpreters, ed. by Rachel Tribe , Marsha Sanders , and Hitesh Raval , 54–68. New York: Brunner-Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
72. The Ministry of Justice
    The Ministry of Justice 2011 The Ministry of Justice’s Guidelines on Achieving Best Evidence (ABE). Available atwww.cps.gov.uk/publications/docs/best_evidence_in_​criminal_proceedings.pdf. Last accessed13 May 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
73. Virág, György
    2015 “Interpreted Interviews with Highly Vulnerable Children.” InChildren and Justice: Overcoming Language Barriers, ed. by Katalin Balogh and Heidi Salaets , 77–112. Cambridge: Intersentia.10.1017/9781780685144.004
    https://doi.org/10.1017/9781780685144.004 [Google Scholar]
74. United Nations
    United Nations 2000 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. Available atwww.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx. Last accessed13 May 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
75. Wadensjö, Cecilia
    1997 “English Recycled Information as Questioning Strategy: Pitfalls in Interpreter-mediated Talk.” InThe Critical Link: Interpreters in the Community, ed. by Silvana. A. Carr , Roda P. Roberts , and Aideen Dufour , 35–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.19.06wad
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.19.06wad [Google Scholar]
76. Wadensjö, Cecilia
    1998 Interpreting as Interaction: On Dialogue Interpreting in Immigration Hearings and Medical Encounters. Linköping: University of Linköping.
    [Google Scholar]