Interpreting services in the Western Cape Legislature

References

1. Bamgbose, Ayo
   2003 “The future of multilingualism in South Africa: from policy to practice.” Paper presented atthe Language Conference of the Department of Arts and Culture, Kopanong, Johannesburg, 12–13 June.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bayley, Paul
   (ed.) 2004 Cross-cultural Perspectives on Parliamentary Discourse. Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.10
   https://doi.org/10.1075/dapsac.10 [Google Scholar]
3. Chernov, Ghelly V.
   1985 “Interpretation Research in the Soviet Union: Results and Prospects,” InTranslators and their Position in Society, Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of FIT, ed. by H. Bühler , 169–177. Vienna: Braumüller.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Déjean Le Féal, Karla
   1990 “Some thoughts on the evaluation of simultaneous interpretation.” InInterpreting – yesterday, today and tomorrow, ed. by David Bowen and Magareta Bowen , 154–160. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ata.iv.27lef
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.iv.27lef [Google Scholar]
5. Edwards, Rosalind , Bogusia Temple , and Claire Alexander
   2005 “Users experiences of interpreters: The critical role of trust.” Interpreting7(1): 77–95.10.1075/intp.7.1.05edw
   https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.7.1.05edw [Google Scholar]
6. Garzone, Guilana
   2002 “Quality and norms in interpretation.” InInterpreting in the 21st century. Challenges and Opportunities, ed. by Guilana Garzone and Maurizio Viezzi , 107–120. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.43.11gar
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.43.11gar [Google Scholar]
7. Gile, Daniel
   1991 “A communication-oriented analysis of quality in non-literary translation and interpretation.” InTranslation: Theory and Practice. Tension and Interdependence, ed. by Mildred L. Larson , 188–200. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/ata.v.19gil
   https://doi.org/10.1075/ata.v.19gil [Google Scholar]
8. Gile, Daniel
   1995 Basic Concepts and Models for Interpreter and Translator Training. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.8(1st)
   https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.8(1st) [Google Scholar]
9. Hale, Sandra B.
   2011 “The positive side of community interpreting: An Australian case study.” Interpreting13(2): 234–248.10.1075/intp.13.2.04hal
   https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.13.2.04hal [Google Scholar]
10. Kahane, E.
    2000 “Thoughts on the quality of interpretation.” AIIC. Available at: https://aiic.net/page/197/. Last accessed18 May 2018.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Kotler, Philip and Gary Armstrong
    1994 Principles of Marketing. 6th edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Kurz, Ingrid
    2001 “Conference interpreting: Quality in the ears of the user.” Meta46(2): 394–409.10.7202/003364ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/003364ar [Google Scholar]
13. Lesch, Harold M.
    1999 “Community translation: Right or privilege?” InLiaison Interpreting in the Community, ed. by Mable Erasmus , 90–91. Pretoria: Van Schaik.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Lesch, Harold M.
    2005 “The scope of language services in an emerging multilingual country.” Translating Today3: 16–19.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Lesch, Harold M.
    2010 “A descriptive overview of the interpreting service in Parliament.” Acta Varia42(3): 38–60.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Macías, Macarena Pradas
    2006 “Probing quality criteria in simultaneous interpreting. The role of silent pauses in fluency.” Interpreting8(1): 25–40.10.1075/intp.8.1.03pra
    https://doi.org/10.1075/intp.8.1.03pra [Google Scholar]
17. Nakane, Ikuko
    2007 “Problems in Communicating the Suspect’s Rights in Interpreted Police Interviews.” Applied Linguistics28(1): 87–112. doi: 10.1093/applin/aml050
    https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/aml050 [Google Scholar]
18. Pienaar, M.
    2006 “Kommunikasie tussen staat en burgers: die stand van tolkdienste.” Journal for Language Teaching40(1): 32–46.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2001 “Quality assessment in conference and community interpreting.” Meta46(2): 410–425.10.7202/003847ar
    https://doi.org/10.7202/003847ar [Google Scholar]
20. Pöchhacker, Franz
    2002 “Researching Interpreting Quality: Models and Methods,” InInterpreting in the 21st Century: Challenges and Opportunities, ed. byGiuliana Garzone and Maurizio Viezzi, 95–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.43.10poc
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.43.10poc [Google Scholar]
21. Provinsie Wes-Kaap
    Provinsie Wes-Kaap 1998 Provinsiale Koerant. 24December1998: 1–12.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Reiss, Katharina and Hans J. Vermeer
    1984 Towards a General Theory of Translational Action: Skopos Theory Explained. Trans. byChristiane Nord. London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Seleskovitch, Danica
    1986 “Comment: Who should assess an interpreter’s performance.” Multilingua5(4): 236
    [Google Scholar]
24. Shlesinger, Miriam
    1997 “Quality in Simultaneous Interpreting” InConference Interpreting: Current Trends in Research, ed. by Yves Gambier , Daniel Gile and Christopher Taylor , 123–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/btl.23.08shl
    https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.23.08shl [Google Scholar]
25. Straniero Sergio, Francesco
    2003 “Norms and quality in media interpreting: The Case of Formula one press conferences.” The Interpreter’s Newsletter12: 135–174.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Western Cape Provincial Parliament
    Western Cape Provincial Parliament 2001 Western Cape Language Policy. Available at: www.westerncape.gov.za/Text/2004/3/wcape_lang_policy_nov2001.pdf. Last accessed18 May 2018.
27. Western Cape Provincial Parliament
    Western Cape Provincial Parliament 2004 Western Cape Language Policy. Language Unit. Cape Town: Department of Cultural Affairs and Sport, Provincial Government of the Western Cape.
    [Google Scholar]